ArticlePDF Available

Abstract and Figures

To report a case of symptomatic bradycardia and hypotension that resulted from the therapeutic use of citalopram and to review any previous reports in the literature, from the manufacturer, and the Australian Drug Reaction Advisory Committee (ADRAC). A 60-year-old white woman who had been taking citalopram 20 mg/d for two weeks presented to the hospital with a heart rate of 39 beats/min, mild hypotension (systolic BP 105 mm Hg), and a normal electrocardiogram (QTc < 440 msec), following a presyncopal episode. The patient was admitted for cardiac monitoring, and citalopram was discontinued. The bradycardia and hypotension resolved in the 48-hour period following cessation of citalopram. No other medical or pharmacologic cause was found for the adverse drug reaction. Bradycardia has been reported rarely with citalopram in therapeutic doses, but this is the first detailed case with a dose of only 20 mg. The manufacturer reports bradycardia as an infrequent adverse effect (0.1-1%) of citalopram. There have been no reports to ADRAC or to the manufacturer in postmarketing surveillance. There is a case report of asymptomatic bradycardia in a patient whose dose was increased to 40 mg. In the case reported here, there was no QTc prolongation consistent with previous reports. The sinus bradycardia reported more often with therapeutic doses would appear to be distinct to QT abnormalities seen with citalopram overdose. Citalopram should be used with care in the elderly and in persons with a history of heart disease. Heart rate and blood pressure should be monitored in the first week of therapy and when doses are modified.
Content may be subject to copyright.
1552
The Annals of Pharmacotherapy
2001 December, Volume 35
C ASE REPORTS
www.theannals.com
C
italopram is a substituted bicyclic phthalane derivative
that is the most selective of the available selective sero-
tonin-reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs).
1
It was first released in
Europe in 1989 and in Australia in 1998. Large, random-
ized controlled trials of its use in depression compared
with tricyclic antidepressants and other SSRIs suggest that
citalopram has fewer adverse effects and is well tolerat-
ed.
2,3
There has been concern regarding the toxicity of citalo-
pram, mainly in overdose.
4,5
Large overdoses of citalopram
(>600 mg) can result in seizures, QT lengthening, and oth-
er electrocardiographic (ECG) abnormalities.
6-8
There is
presently little evidence to indicate that citalopram causes
ECG abnormalities at therapeutic doses, with two stud-
ies
9,10
demonstrating no significant effects on QRS and
QTc intervals. However, like other SSRIs, citalopram can
cause a small but significant decrease in heart rate com-
pared with placebo.
9
Bradycardia (HR <60 beats/min) appears to be an un-
common but potentially important adverse drug reaction to
citalopram. Premarketing information is difficult to access,
but the Food and Drug Administration–approved product
information
11
for Celexa (citalopram) lists bradycardia as
an infrequent adverse event. Infrequent adverse events are
defined as those occurring in less than 1/100 patients but in
at least 1/1000 patients. One small study
12
demonstrated
that therapeutic use of citalopram and fluoxetine induced
bradycardia more often than amitriptyline. Another trial
13
reported bradycardia in two of 21 patients on citalopram,
with one patient developing a heart rate of 44 beats/min.
Postmarketing surveillance
9
of citalopram in more than 5
million people revealed only 17 reports of prolonged QTc
interval and/or arrhythmia; however, the number of cases
of bradycardia was not given. There has been one pub-
lished report
14
of asymptomatic bradycardia in a patient re-
Citalopram-Induced Bradycardia and Presyncope
Geoffrey K Isbister, Felicity H Prior, and Aidan Foy
OBJECTIVE: To report a case of symptomatic bradycardia and hypotension that resulted from the therapeutic use of citalopram and
to review any previous reports in the literature, from the manufacturer, and the Australian Drug Reaction Advisory Committee
(ADRAC).
CASE SUMMARY: A 60-year-old white woman who had been taking citalopram 20 mg/d for two weeks presented to the hospital with
a heart rate of 39 beats/min, mild hypotension (systolic BP 105 mm Hg), and a normal electrocardiogram (QTc <440 msec),
following a presyncopal episode. The patient was admitted for cardiac monitoring, and citalopram was discontinued. The
bradycardia and hypotension resolved in the 48-hour period following cessation of citalopram. No other medical or pharmacologic
cause was found for the adverse drug reaction.
DISCUSSION: Bradycardia has been reported rarely with citalopram in therapeutic doses, but this is the first detailed case with a dose
of only 20 mg. The manufacturer reports bradycardia as an infrequent adverse effect (0.1–1%) of citalopram. There have been no
reports to ADRAC or to the manufacturer in postmarketing surveillance. There is a case report of asymptomatic bradycardia in a
patient whose dose was increased to 40 mg. In the case reported here, there was no QTc prolongation consistent with previous
reports. The sinus bradycardia reported more often with therapeutic doses would appear to be distinct to QT abnormalities seen
with citalopram overdose.
CONCLUSIONS: Citalopram should be used with care in the elderly and in persons with a history of heart disease. Heart rate and
blood pressure should be monitored in the first week of therapy and when doses are modified.
KEY WORDS: bradycardia, citalopram.
Ann Pharmacother 2001;35:1552-5.
Author information provided at the end of the text.
by guest on October 11, 2013aop.sagepub.comDownloaded from by guest on October 11, 2013aop.sagepub.comDownloaded from by guest on October 11, 2013aop.sagepub.comDownloaded from by guest on October 11, 2013aop.sagepub.comDownloaded from
ceiving citalopram 40 mg/d and a report
15
of a citalopram
overdose causing sinus bradycardia and hypotension re-
quiring a temporary pacemaker for six days.
We report a case of symptomatic bradycardia in a patient
who had been taking citalopram 20 mg/d. We also contact-
ed the Australian Drug Reaction Advisory Committee
(ADRAC) to see whether there were any other sponta-
neous reports of bradycardia associated with citalopram.
CASE REPORT
A 60-year-old white woman presented to the emergency depart-
ment (ED) on December 10, 2000, with lumbar back pain fol-
lowing an episode of presyncope. The patient had leaned over,
coughed, then felt unwell and faint, and developed back pain.
She continued to be “shaky” and felt she was “going to die”; she
presented to the hospital several hours later. She continued to
have “funny feelings” in her stomach, but the back pain was re-
solving. Her past medical history included depression and anxi-
ety, gastro-esophageal reflux, recurrent urinary tract infections,
and an appendectomy. She was a smoker, denied alcohol use, and
reported no allergies. Her medications included omeprazole 20
mg/d, alprazolam 1 mg as required for anxiety, and citalopram 20
mg/d for two weeks. There was no recent history of feeling un-
well.
On examination, the patient was alert, with HR 50 beats/min,
BP 105/57 mm Hg, RR 20 breaths/min, and T 37.1 ˚C. On car-
diovascular examination, she had dual heart sounds, no murmurs
or additional sounds, normal jugular venous pressure, and normal
peripheral pulses. Chest and abdominal examinations were nor-
mal. Her neurologic examination was also normal. On examina-
tion of the woman’s back, there was mild right lumbosacral para-
vertebral tenderness and pain on movement. Her HR varied from
39 to 50 beats/min on cardiac monitoring, and a 12-lead ECG
showed sinus bradycardia (39 beats/min), QT 460 msec, and QTc
370 msec. The HR increased to 72 beats/min after she stood up
to walk. Records of previous admissions to the ED revealed HRs
ranging from 60 to 70 beats/min, and BP 125/70 mm Hg, which
was confirmed by her usual physician.
A suspected diagnosis of bradycardia causing presyncope sec-
ondary to citalopram was made. The back pain was thought to be
muscular strain following bending over and straightening sud-
denly. Citalopram was discontinued, and the woman was admit-
ted to the medical unit overnight for hourly HR and BP measure-
ments (Figure 1). The following morning, she reported fatigue
and nausea. Vital signs showed HR 50 beats/min and BP 95/50
mm Hg. She was then discharged home.
Forty-eight hours after her initial presentation, the woman was
seen by her local physician. She was well, with HR 66 beats/min
and BP 120/70 mm Hg. Holter monitoring showed no significant
abnormalities. She had no further problems. The depression was
subsequently treated with another antidepressant with no adverse
effects.
Discussion
The case we present describes an elderly woman who
developed symptomatic sinus bradycardia and mild hy-
potension two weeks after commencing treatment with
citalopram 20 mg/d. She had at least one presyncopal
episode, which resulted in a muscular injury, but no further
complications. The cardiovascular effects resolved in 48
hours following cessation of citalopram.
According to the Naranjo probability scale,
16
this reac-
tion was probable. No other drugs had been recently initi-
ated and thus implicated. There was no other medical rea-
son to explain the episode of bradycardia. The woman usu-
ally had a slow heart rate, but not <60 beats/min. The use
of omeprazole, a CYP2C19 inhibitor, may have caused in-
creased concentrations of citalopram, which is a substrate
of CYP2C19. The patient was not rechallenged because of
the considerable risk of recurrent bradycardia.
Although symptomatic bradycardia can be a serious
problem, it appears to be an infrequent adverse effect of
citalopram. The incidence of bradycardia in premarketing
clinical trials was between 0.1% and 1%.
11
There have
been two detailed reports
13,14
of bradycardia with therapeu-
tic doses of citalopram, and a recent report
15
of severe pro-
tracted bradycardia and symptomatic hypotension follow-
ing an overdose of citalopram 800 mg. This patient re-
quired a temporary pacemaker for six days, but recovered
without sequelae.
15
There have been no reports of brady-
cardia with citalopram to ADRAC, the national body in
Australia that collects data on adverse reactions; however,
these are all spontaneous reports. This type of postmarket-
ing data, like the postmarketing surveillance of the compa-
ny,
1
is likely to underestimate the true incidence of adverse
effects.
17
This may be particularly true for bradycardia,
which can be asymptomatic in many patients.
As of March 2001, ADRAC had 18 reports of heart rate
and rhythm disorders with citalopram implicated as the
suspected agent. Tachycardia and palpitations were the
most common adverse effects described and, in the majori-
ty of cases, these were also associated with other symp-
The Annals of Pharmacotherapy
2001 December, Volume 35
1553
www.theannals.com
Figure 1. Time course of heart rate and blood pressure in the 48 hours fol-
lowing presentation, time zero being when the patient presented to the emer-
gency department. = systolic; = diastolic.
toms of serotonin excess (increased sweating, agitation, di-
arrhea, tremor).
18
There were eight reports of palpitations,
with causality assessed as certain in three cases, probable
in three cases, and possible in two cases. Six cases of
tachycardia were reported, with causality assessed as prob-
able in five cases and possible in one case. The remaining
four cases were assessed as only possible and included re-
ports of ventricular ectopic beats, supraventricular tachy-
cardia, prolonged QT interval, and cardiac arrest.
In the case we describe, the patient’s ECG demonstrated
only sinus bradycardia, with no evidence to suggest any
other abnormalities. Although the QT length was 460
msec, the QTc was much shorter at 370 msec, which is
within the normal range.
19
In the only other detailed re-
port
14
of bradycardia, the QTc was 463 msec while the pa-
tient received citalopram 40 mg, and 440 msec after the
drug was ceased. This is only a borderline increase in the
QTc for women (>470 msec regarded as significant), and
the small decrease after citalopram was discontinued sug-
gests there was a preexisting abnormality.
19
QT abnormalities have been reported with citalopram
overdoses. In a case series from Sweden,
8
six of 18 pa-
tients who ingested more than 600 mg of citalopram had
QT abnormalities. Conversely, in another reported
15
over-
dose causing severe bradycardia, there was no change in
the QTc interval. The QT prolongation seen with citalo-
pram overdose would appear to be distinct to the sinus
bradycardia that has been reported more often with thera-
peutic doses.
12-14
In clinical trials, the most common adverse effects asso-
ciated with citalopram were nausea, dry mouth, somno-
lence, and, in elderly patients, increased sweating.
1
The pa-
tient reported here had nausea and significant symptoms
that resulted from the bradycardia and presyncope, but no
increased sweating or somnolence.
Citalopram, like other SSRIs, is more commonly report-
ed
8
to cause tachycardia in both therapeutic doses and in
overdose. This is supported by reports to ADRAC, where
the majority of rhythm disorders were either palpitations or
tachycardia. Nine of the 12 cases reported to ADRAC de-
scribed associated symptoms of serotonin toxicity. Al-
though there have been only a few reports
20,21
of citalopram
alone causing serotonin syndrome, it is likely that, in many
cases, citalopram-induced tachycardia is associated with
other evidence of serotonin toxicity.
Summary
We report a case of symptomatic bradycardia and hy-
potension that was probably caused by citalopram. Al-
though this is a potentially serious adverse effect, it appears
to be infrequent, based on our own research and previous
large studies.
1,9
We support the current recommendations
in the company’s product information
22
that citalopram
should be used with care in elderly patients and in persons
with known heart disease. The patient’s heart rate and
blood pressure should be monitored during the first week
of citalopram use, and when changes to the dose are made.
Geoffrey K Isbister BSc MB BS, Senior Registrar, Department of
Clinical Toxicology and Pharmacology, Newcastle Mater Hospital,
Newcastle, Australia
Felicity H Prior BPharm Grad Dip Epi (Pharmaco), Director, Hunter
Drug Information Service, Newcastle Mater Hospital
Aidan Foy FRACP MD, Director and Associate Professor, Depart-
ment of Medicine, Newcastle Mater Hospital
Reprints: Geoffrey K Isbister BSc MB BS, Department of Clinical
Toxicology and Pharmacology, Newcastle Mater Misericordiae Hos-
pital, Locked Bag 7, Hunter Region Mail Centre NSW 2310, New-
castle, Australia, FAX 612 49 211 870, E-mail gsbite@bigpond.com
We thank ADRAC for supplying the information on adverse drug reactions to citalo-
pram in Australia. We also thank Ian Whyte MBBS FRACP for his advice.
References
1. Willetts J, Lippa A, Beer B. Clinical development of citalopram. J Clin
Psychopharmacol 1999;19(5 suppl 1):36S- 46S.
2. Ekselius L, von Knorring L, Eberhard G. A double-blind multicenter tri-
al comparing sertraline and citalopram in patients with major depression
treated in general practice. Int Clin Psychopharmacol 1997;12:323-31.
3. Bech P, Cialdella P. Citalopram in depression — meta-analysis of intend-
ed and unintended effects. Int Clin Psychopharmacol 1992;6(suppl 5):
45-54.
4. Ostrom M, Eriksson A, Thorson J, Spigset O. Fatal overdose with citalo-
pram. Lancet 1996;348:339- 40.
5. Power A. Drug treatment of depression. Citalopram in overdose may re-
sult in serious morbidity and death. BMJ 1998;316:307-8.
6. Personne M, Persson H, Sjöberg G. Citalopram toxicity. Lancet 1997;
350:518-9.
7. Barbey JT, Roose SP. SSRI safety in overdose. J Clin Psychiatry
1998;59(suppl 15):42-8.
8. Personne M, Sjöberg G, Persson H. Citalopram overdose — review of
cases treated in Swedish hospitals. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 1997;35:237-
40.
9. Rasmussen SL, Overo KF, Tanghoj P. Cardiac safety of citalopram:
prospective trials and retrospective analyses. J Clin Psychopharmacol
1999;19:407-15.
10. Pedersen OL, Kragh-Sorensen P, Bjerre M, Overo KF, Gram LF. Citalo-
pram, a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor: clinical antidepressive and
long-term effect — a phase II study. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 1982;
77:199-204.
11. Product information. Celexa TM (citalopram). Forest Pharmaceuticals,
USA. http://www.fda.gov/cder/foi/nda/98/020822a_appltr_prntlbl.pdf
[cited 2001 October 26].
12. Hosak L, Tuma I, Hanus H. A comparative study of three antidepres-
sants with different mechanisms of action in hospitalized patients. Ceska
Slovenska Psychiatrie 1999;95:146-56.
13. Dufour H, Bouchacourt M, Thermoz P, Viala A, Phak RP, Gouezo F, et
al. Citalopram — a highly selective 5-HT uptake inhibitor — in the treat-
ment of depressed patients. Int Clin Psychopharmacol 1987;2:225-37.
14. Favre MP, Sztajzel J, Bertschy G. Bradycardia during citalopram treat-
ment: a case report. Pharmacol Res 1999;39:149-50.
15. Rothenhausler H-B, Haberl C, Ehrentraut S, Kapfhammer H-P, Weber
MM. Suicide attempt by pure citalopram overdose causing long-lasting
severe sinus bradycardia, hypotension and syncopes: successful therapy
with a temporary pacemaker. Pharmacopsychiatry 2000;33:150-2.
16. Naranjo CA, Busto U, Sellers EM, Sandor P, Ruiz I, Roberts EA, et al.
A method for estimating the probability of adverse drug reactions. Clin
Pharmacol Ther 1981;30:239- 45.
17. Kennedy DL, Goldman SA, Lillie RB. Spontaneous reporting in the
United States. In: Strom BL, ed. Pharmacoepidemiology. 3rd ed. Chi-
chester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, 2000:151-74.
18. Lane R, Baldwin D. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor–induced sero-
tonin syndrome: review. J Clin Psychopharmacol 1997;17:208-21.
19. Moss AJ. The QT interval and torsade de pointes. Drug Saf 1999;21
(suppl 1):5-10.
20. Fischer P. Serotonin syndrome in the elderly after antidepressive
monotherapy. J Clin Psychopharmacol 1995;15:440-2.
21. Voirol P, Hodel PF, Zullino D, Baumann P. Serotonin syndrome after
small doses of citalopram or sertraline. J Clin Psychopharmacol 2000;
20:713- 4.
1554
The Annals of Pharmacotherapy
2001 December, Volume 35
www.theannals.com
GK Isbister et al.
Case Reports
The Annals of Pharmacotherapy
2001 December, Volume 35
1555
www.theannals.com
22. Product information. Cipramil TM (citalopram). Lundbeck, Australia Pty.
1998. In: 2001 MIMS annual. 25th ed. Singapore: Tien Wah Press (Pte.),
2001.
EXTRACTO
OBJETIVO: Reportar un caso de bradicardia sintomática e hipotensión que
resultó del uso terapéutico de citalopram. Repasar los informes previos
en la literatura, del fabricante y del Comité Asesor de Reacciones de
Fármacos Australiano (ADRAC, por sus siglas en inglés).
RESUMEN DEL CASO: Una paciente femenina de 60 años de edad que
había estado tomando 20 mg de citalopram diarios por dos semanas se
presentó al hospital con una frecuencia cardíaca (HR) de 39 bpm,
hipotensión leve (presión sistólica <100 mg Hg) y un ECG normal (QTc
<440 msec) después de un episodio de pre-síncope. La paciente fue
admitida para seguimiento cardíaco, y el citalopram fue descontinuado.
La bradicardia y la hipotensión se resolvieron en un periodo de tiempo
de 48 horas después de la suspensión del citalopram. No se encontró
ninguna otra causa médica o farmacológica para la reacción adversa al
fármaco.
DISCUSIÓN: La bradicardia raramente ha sido reportada con el uso de
citalopram en dosis terapéuticas, pero este es el primer caso detallado
con una dosis de sólo 20 mg. El fabricante reporta la bradicardia como
un efecto adverso no frecuente (0.1–1.0%). No han habido reportes a la
ADRAC o al fabricant en las evaluaciones post-mercadeo. Existe un
informe de un caso de bradicardia sintomática en un paciente a quien se
le aumentó la dosis a 40 mg. En el caso reportado al presente, no hubo
prolongació de QTc consistente con informes previos. La bradicardia
sinusal reportada más frecuentemente con dosis terapéuticas parecería
distinta a las anormalidades de QT observadas con una sobredosis de
citalopram.
CONCLUSIONES: Citalopram debe usarse con cuidado en ancianos y en
personas con un historial de enfermedad cardíaca. El ritmo cardíaco y la
presión sanguínea deben ser monitoreadas durante la primera semana.
Brenda R Morand
RÉSUMÉ
OBJECTIF: Signaler un cas d’hypotension et de bradycardie
symptomatique résultant de l’utilisation de citalopram. Réviser tout cas
signalé antérieurement dans la documentation scientifique, au
manufacturier et à l’Australian Drug Reaction Advisory Committee
(ADRAC).
PRÉSENTATION SOMMAIRE DU CAS: Une dame âgée de 60 ans qui prend 20
mg de citalopram par jour depuis deux semaines se présente à l’hôpital
avec un rythme cardiaque de 39 battements par minute, une hypotension
légère (tension artérielle systolique <100 mm Hg) et un électrocardio-
gramme normal (QTc <440 msec) après avoir failli s’évanouir. La
patiente a été admise pour un monitorage cardiaque, et le citalopram a
été cessé. La bradycardie et l’hypotension se sont résorbées dans les 48
heures suivant l’arrêt du citalopram. Aucune autre cause médicale ou
pharmacologique n’a été trouvée pour expliquer cet effet indésirable.
DISCUSSION: La bradycardie a été signalée rarement avec le citalopram
utilisé à dose thérapeutique, mais il s’agit du premier cas décrit avec une
dose de seulement 20 mg. Le manufacturier présente la bradycardie
comme étant un effet indésirable peu fréquent (0.1% à 1%) du
citalopram. Aucun cas n’a été signalé à l’ADRAC ou au manufacturier
depuis la mise en marché du produit. On a retrouvé un cas de
bradycardie asymptomatique signalé chez un patient dont la dose venait
d’être augmenté à 40 mg. Dans le cas décrit ici, comme dans les cas
précédemment signalés, il n’y a pas eu de prolongation du QTc. La
bradycardie sinusale signalée plus souvent avec des doses
thérapeutiques semblerait distincte des anormalités du QT rencontrées
lors d’une surdose de citalopram.
CONCLUSIONS: Le citalopram devrait être utilisé avec précaution chez les
personnes âgées et chez celles avec un antécédent de maladie cardiaque.
Le rythme cardiaque et la pression sanguine devraient être surveillés
durant la première semaine de traitement.
Marie Larouche
... Für eine Beteiligung des Citalopram gibt es bei dem vorliegenden Fall keinerlei Anhaltspunkte, es wurde bis zur Entlassung weiter gegeben ohne irgendeine kardiovaskuläre Symptomatik, insbesondere ohne Hinweis auf eine Erhöhung der QT c-Zeit. Theoretisch möglich wären insbesondere eine tachykarde Rhythmusstörung vermittelt über eine QT c-Zeit-Verlängerung oder eine Bradykardie[12]; für beides gab es in den EKG-Untersuchungen nach den Ereignissen keine Hinweise. Allerdings sind in der UAW-Datenbank des BfArM auch insgesamt 54 Verdachtsfälle von Synkopen für Citalopram bei Monotherapie angegeben. ...
... In der AMSP-Datenbank ist Citalo pram in neun Fällen als Mit-Verursacher für einen Kollaps und in zwei Fällen für eine Synkope angeschuldigt, in keinem Fall jedoch allein. Es gibt eine veröffentlichte Falldarstellung einer 60-jährigen Patientin, die unter 20 mg/Tag Citalopram eine Bradykardie mit 39 bpm und eine moderate systolische Hypotension entwickelte und folgend eine " Präsynkope " gezeigt haben soll[12], wobei angemerkt werden muss, dass Präsynkopen nicht eindeutig definiert sind. Auch Prothipendyl kann die QT cZeit erhöhen[10], es gab aber wie erwähnt im EKG keine entsprechenden Hinweise. ...
Article
Full-text available
A physically healthy patient with no history of syncopes suffered two successive syncopal events after receiving prothipendyl for the first time. Most likely prothipendyl was the main contributing factor in the multifactorial mechanism of syncope. Through their adrenolytic mechanism a variety of psychopharmaceuticals can facilitate syncopes with risk of falls and severe injuries. This case was documented and discussed in the context of the pharmacovigilance project AMSP (Drug Safety in Psychiatry). We conclude that non specific signs of poor orthostatic tolerance such as vertigo or unsteady gait should be followed up with for example a simple Schellong test.
... It may influence the outcome of interaction especially in a senior population because of physiological changes due to the aging process. Additionally, citalopram has been associated with an increased risk of bradycardia particularly in the elderly population [49][50][51][52][53]. The risk might be even higher in elderly patients with cardiovascular problems who are treated with metoprolol. ...
Article
Full-text available
Aim: Metoprolol (a CYP2D6 substrate) is often co-prescribed with paroxetine/fluoxetine (CYP2D6 inhibitor) because the clinical relevance of this drug-drug interaction (DDI) is still unclear. This review aimed to systematically evaluate the available evidence and quantify the clinical impact of the DDI. Method: Pubmed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library and Embase were searched for studies reporting on the effect of the DDI among adults published until April 2018. Data on pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and clinical outcomes from experimental, observational and case report studies were retrieved. The protocol of this study was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42018093087). Results: We found nine eligible articles that consisted of four experimental and two observational studies as well as three case reports. Experimental studies reported that paroxetine increased the AUC of metoprolol three to five times, and significantly decreased systolic blood pressure and heart rate of patients. Case reports concerned bradycardia and atrioventricular block due to the DDI. Results from observational studies were conflicting. A cohort study indicated that the DDI was significantly associated with the incidence of early discontinuation of metoprolol as an indicator of the emergence of metoprolol-related side effects. In a case-control study, the DDI was not significantly associated with bradycardia. Conclusion: Despite the contradictory conclusions from the current literature, the majority of studies suggest that the DDI can lead to adverse clinical consequences. Since alternative antidepressants and beta-blockers with comparable efficacy are available, such DDIs can be avoided. Nonetheless, if prescribing the combination is unavoidable, a dose adjustment or close monitoring of the metoprolol-related side effects is necessary.
... #Other CYP2D6 inhibitors consist of cimetidine (A02BA01), amiodarone (C01BD01), terbinafine (D01BA02), quinidine (C01BA01), bupropion (N06AX12), chlorpromazine (N05AA01), dexchlorpheniramine (R06AB02), clomipramine (N06AA04), doxorubicin (L01DB01), haloperidol (N05AD01), levomepromazine (N05AA02), metoclopramide (A03FA01), mibefradil (C08CX01), moclobemide (N06AG02), ranitidine (A02BA02), ritonavir (J05AE03), sertraline (N06AB06), diphenhydramine (R06AA02), perphenazine (N05AB03), hydroxyzine (N05BB01), propafenone (C01BC03), mirabegron (G04BD12), cinacalcet (H05BX01), panobinostat (L01XX42), abiraterone (L02BX03), aripiprazole (N05AX12), doxepin (N06AA12), venlafaxine (N06AX16), duloxetine (N06AX21), methadone (N07BC02), fluvoxamine (N06AB08), and tripelennamine (R06AC04).^Patients using chronotropic drugs such as verapamil (C08DA01), diltiazem (C08DB01), and digoxin (C01AA05) [Colour figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]reported more common in the older (>65 years) than in the younger population.[40][41][42][43][44] This side effect may also be more apparent in the elderly using metoprolol. ...
Article
Full-text available
Purpose Co‐prescription of paroxetine/fluoxetine (a strong CYP2D6 inhibitor) in metoprolol (a CYP2D6 substrate) users is common, but data on the clinical consequences of this drug‐drug interaction are limited and inconclusive. Therefore, we assessed the effect of paroxetine/fluoxetine initiation on the existing treatment with metoprolol on the discontinuation and dose adjustment of metoprolol among elderly. Methods We performed a cohort study using the University of Groningen IADB.nl prescription database (www.IADB.nl). We selected all elderly (≥60 years) who had ever been prescribed metoprolol and had a first co‐prescription of paroxetine/fluoxetine, citalopram (weak CYP2D6 inhibitor), or mirtazapine (negative control) from 1994 to 2015. The exposure group was metoprolol and paroxetine/fluoxetine co‐prescription, and the other groups acted as controls. The outcomes were early discontinuation and dose adjustment of metoprolol. Logistic regression was applied to estimate adjusted odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results Combinations of metoprolol‐paroxetine/fluoxetine, metoprolol‐citalopram, and metoprolol‐mirtazapine were started in 528, 673, and 625 patients, respectively. Compared with metoprolol‐citalopram, metoprolol‐paroxetine/fluoxetine was not significantly associated with the early discontinuation and dose adjustment of metoprolol (OR = 1.07, 95% CI:0.77‐1.48; OR = 0.87, 95% CI:0.57‐1.33, respectively). In comparison with metoprolol‐mirtazapine, metoprolol‐paroxetine/fluoxetine was associated with a significant 43% relative increase in early discontinuation of metoprolol (OR = 1.43, 95% CI:1.01‐2.02) but no difference in the risk of dose adjustment. Stratified analysis by gender showed that women have a significantly high risk of metoprolol early discontinuation (OR = 1.62, 95% CI:1.03‐2.53). Conclusion Paroxetine/fluoxetine initiation in metoprolol prescriptions, especially for female older patients, is associated with the risk of early discontinuation of metoprolol.
... 62 Citalopram has been shown to increase the risk of bradycardia and heart block in elderly patients. 129,130 Trazodone can also cause conduction abnormalities including bradycardia, heart block, and prolonged PQ interval. 131,132 Atrial fibrillation Like other cardiac illness, providers should take into account the presence of AF in the treatment of depression. ...
Article
Depressed patients are at increased risk of cardiovascular (CV) disease (CVD) and those with concomitant depression and CVD are at increased risk of death. The safety and efficacy of antidepressants in patients with CVD varies greatly between the agent used and type of disease. This review will summarize the CV adverse effect and drug interaction profile of antidepressants and discuss the use of antidepressants in CVD patients. We searched MEDLINE, PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science, PsycINFO, and The Cochrane Library from inception to June 2014 to identify studies relevant to antidepressant use in patients with CVD. Primary references from the identified articles were also evaluated for inclusion. Descriptive analysis was performed for the included studies in this review. Orthostatic hypotension was more common with tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs), trazodone and monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs). Hypertension can be significant with serotonin norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) and MAOIs. The potential for QT prolongation is present with TCAs, certain selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), certain SNRIs and mirtazapine. Due to its low risk of drug-drug interactions, adverse effect profile and potential for beneficial antiplatelet activity, sertraline could be considered the choice antidepressant for patients with ischemic heart disease. SSRIs and potentially SNRIs are relatively safe and effective options for patients with heart failure. In patients at high risk for ventricular arrhythmias, bupropion has the overall lowest risk for QT prolongation. TCAs and MAOIs should be avoided in patients with concomitant CVD. In conclusion, due to the increased morbidity and mortality associated with comorbid CVD and depression, practitioners should readily assess and initiate management of depression in such patients. The choice of antidepressant should take into account the potential CV impact of the various agents balancing safety and efficacy.
Article
The recently released American Heart Association (AHA) scientific statement on drug-induced arrhythmias discusses medications commonly associated with bradycardia, supraventricular tachycardias, and ventricular arrhythmias. The foundational data for this statement are collected from general outpatient and inpatient populations. Patients undergoing surgical and minimally invasive treatments are a unique subgroup, as they may experience hemodynamic changes associated with anesthesia and their procedure, receive multiple drug combinations not given in either in- or out-patient settings, or experience post-procedural inflammatory syndromes. Accordingly, the generalizability of the AHA scientific statement to this perioperative population is unclear. This focused review highlights important aspects of the new AHA scientific statement and their application to the perioperative setting. We review medications frequently encountered and given by anesthesiologists and their risk of drug-induced arrhythmias. We discuss common anesthetic and adjunctive medications and their associated risks of bradycardia, atrial fibrillation, torsades de pointes, and drug-induced Brugada syndrome. In many instances, the risk of arrhythmia reported by the AHA scientific statement in the general population appears to be higher than found in perioperative arenas. Furthermore, we discuss the arrhythmia risk of additional medications commonly ordered or administered by anesthesiologists that are not included in the AHA scientific statement. As patient and procedural complexity increases and novel anesthetic combinations propagate, further research and observational studies will be required to further delineate perioperative risks for drug-induced arrhythmia.
Chapter
Brady-arrhythmias are responsible for both overt as well as subtle neurologic signs and symptoms, from the seemingly benign and nonspecific symptoms associated with presyncope, to sudden focal neurologic deficits. A brief background on nodal and infra-nodal brady-arrhythmias is provided, followed by extensive discussion regarding neurologic complications of brady-arrhythmias. The multiple mechanisms of and associations between Brady-arrhythmias and transient ischemic attacks and ischemic stroke are discussed. Controversial associations between brady-arrhythmias and neurologic disease are discussed as well, such as potential roles of brady-arrhythmias in cognitive impairment and sequelae of chronotropic incompetence; and the contribution of brady-arrhythmias to syncope and associated injuries to the nervous system. The chapter is written to stand on its own, with guidance toward other pertinent sections of this text where appropriate for further reading.
Article
Full-text available
Cardiotoxicity is an important adverse effect of some psychotropic drugs. However, cardiac side effects with mirtazapine, which is used for an effective treatment of depression and anxiety, are rare. In this article, a forty-eight-year-old woman referred to psychiatric clinics with depressive symptoms. According to Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders Fifth Edition (DSM-5) criteria, major depressive disorder was diagnosed and mirtazapine 30mg/day was started. 30 minutes after the first dose of mirtazapine was brought to the emergency room with syncope, nausea, vomiting. She was examined in emergency service. Routine blood tests and ECG was studied. During the examination, the patient was followed up with a heart rate of 33 beats per minute, blood pressure arterial 80/50mmHg and a temperature of 36.1°C. 0.5mg atropine IV and theophylline inhaler were administered and cardiology consultation was requested. After atropine and theophylline administration, the heart rate was 48 beats/min in the second ECG. To the best of our knowledge, it is the first bradycardia developed after mirtazapine use in the literature. Bradycardia has been resolved after the half-life of mirtazapine has passed (37 hours for women). The initial heart rate of our patient was within normal limits prior to mirtazapine administration. There was no reason to explain bradycardia, we think that symptomatic bradycardine is caused by mirtazapine. In conclusion, this case report suggests that mirtazapine may cause bradycardia in patients. Risk factors for bradycardia caused by mirtazapine are unknown. Although in many patients this bradycardine does not cause a clinical outcome, clinicians should be aware of this and should perform ECG monitoring in patients with underlying cardiac disease, especially when prescribing mirtazapine. © 2018 Yerkure Tanitim ve Yayincilik Hizmetleri A.S..All right reserved.
Chapter
IntroductionTerminologyDose–response and time–action with special reference to toxicologySafety studies in new drug discoveryExamplesReferences and further reading
Article
Psychoactive drugs have been associated with arrhythmias for more than 40 years. Torsades de pointes was originally seen in patients with pre-existing heart disease or with intoxication. Now, there is increasing awareness that drugs used for non-antiarrhythmic and non-cardiovascular indications can exert significant effects on repolarisation and may cause ventricular tachyarrhythmias. Considering the likelihood of developing a serious arrhythmia three perspectives are important: The vulnerable individual, high-risk drugs and drug interactions. Female gender, low left ventricular ejection fraction, long QT-interval, electrolyte disturbance and old age are associated with increased cardiac risk. Among psychotrophic drugs the low-potency phenothiazines have most often been implicated, particularly thioridazine. For the high-potency phenothiazines and butyrophenones there are fewer reports on serious arrhythmia. Drug interactions, primarily involving CYP 2D6 and CYP 3A4, played a role in many fatalities with QT-prolonging drugs and are important. 5 to 10% of caucasians are poor metabolizers of the CYP 2D6 isoenzyme and are at higher risk of adverse effects.
Article
Psychoactive drugs have been associated with arrhythmias for more than 40 years. Torsades de pointes was originally seen in patients with pre-existing heart disease or with intoxication. Now, there is increasing awareness that drugs used for non-antiarrhythmic and non-cardiovascular indications can exert significant effects on repolarisation and may cause ventricular tachyarrhythmias. Considering the likelihood of developing a serious arrhythmia three perspectives are important: The vulnerable individual, high-risk drugs and drug interactions. Female gender, low left ventricular ejection fraction, long QT-interval, electrolyte disturbance and old age are associated with increased cardiac risk. Among psychotrophic drugs the low-potency phenothiazines have most often been implicated, particularly thioridazine. For the high-potency phenothiazines and butyrophenones there are fewer reports on serious arrhythmia. Drug interactions, primarily involving CYP 2D6 and CYP 3A4, played a role in many fatalities with QT-prolonging drugs and are important. 5 to 10% of Caucasians are poor metabolizers of the CYP 2D6 isoenzyme and are at higher risk of adverse effects.
Article
Full-text available
The estimation of the probability that a drug caused an adverse clinical event is usually based on clinical judgment. Lack of a method for establishing causality generates large between-raters and within-raters variability in assessment. Using the conventional categories and definitions of definite, probable, possible, and doubtful adverse drug reactions (ADRs), the between-raters agreement of two physicians and four pharmacists who independently assessed 63 randomly selected alleged ADRs was 38% to 63%, kappa (k, a chance-corrected index of agreement) varied from 0.21 to 0.40, and the intraclass correlation coefficient of reliability (R[est]) was 0.49. Six (testing) and 22 wk (retesting) later the same observers independently reanalyzed the 63 cases by assigning a weighted score (ADR probability scale) to each of the components that must be considered in establishing causal associations between drug(s) and adverse events (e.g., temporal sequence). The cases were randomized to minimize the influence of learning. The event was assigned a probability category from the total score. The between-raters reliability (range: percent agreement = 83% to 92%; κ = 0.69 to 0.86; r = 0.91 to 0.95; R(est) = 0.92) and within-raters reliability (range: percent agreement = 80% to 97%; κ = 0.64 to 0.95; r = 0.91 to 0.98) improved (p < 0.001). The between-raters reliability was maintained on retesting (range: r = 0.84 to 0.94; R(est) = 0.87). The between-raters reliability of three attending physicians who independently assessed 28 other prospectively collected cases of alleged ADRs was very high (range: r = 0.76 to 0.87; R(est) = 0.80). It was also shown that the ADR probability scale has consensual, content, and concurrent validity. This systematic method offers a sensitive way to monitor ADRs and may be applicable to postmarketing drug surveillance.
Article
Verifying therapeutic efficacy and tolerance of amitriptyline, citalopram and fluoxetine in hospitalized depressed patients was the main aim of the study. 17 men and 57 women (average age 45.3 years) suffering from major depression were treated with the investigated drugs for four weeks in a natural and open study. The authors did not prove a significant difference between amitriptyline, citalopram and fluoxetine in their therapeutic efficacy as assessed on the Hamilton scale. The amitriptyline patients suffered from adverse effects of the drug - dry mouth, tachycardia and orthostatic hypotension significantly more often than the citalopram or fluoxetine patients. Bradycardia in the citalopram and fluoxetine patients, due to a stimulation of vagal neurons through central serotonergic receptors, was an interesting electrocardiographic finding.
Article
Editor—When talking about selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in his comprehensive review of depressive illness, Hale states that “All seem safe in overdose.”1 Fresh evidence suggests that this may not be so. The most recently introduced, and most selective, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor—citalopram—is associated with electrocardiographic changes and generalised seizures in overdose.2 These abnormalities include widened QRS complexes at doses above 600 mg (15-30 times the usual therapeutic dose). All patients reported on were treated with gastric lavage or given activated charcoal and survived with supportive treatment. An electrocardiography database exists for more than 1700 patients taking therapeutic doses of citalopram, and no important electrocardiographic abnormalities, particularly QTc changes, were observed.3 This shows that the true safety of a drug, particularly in overdose, cannot be fully determined until the drug has seen extensive clinical use. öström et al have reported six cases of suicide in which ingestion of citalopram was strongly suspected of causing death.4 Although their evidence could not be considered conclusive, all patients had raised blood concentrations of citalopram at postmortem examination. Drug overdose remains a relatively uncommon method of suicide. Prescribers should nevertheless take note of the evidence from Sweden (where citalopram is the most commonly prescribed antidepressant) that serious morbidity and death may result from overdose with this drug. Gastric lavage, the administration of activated charcoal, and electrocardiographic monitoring may be crucial in the management of patients after overdose.5 References1.↵Hale AS. ABC of mental health: depression BMJ 1997;315:43-6. (5 July.)
Article
An updated qualitative meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials is presented. When compared to reference drugs, especially tricyclics, citalopram after 6 weeks of treatment showed a similar intended effect on the depression index of the Hamilton scale. However, on the sleep index of the scale citalopram was weaker than tricyclics. When compared to placebo, citalopram after 6 weeks of treatment showed to be significantly superior on the Hamilton scale and on the global assessment scales. Analysis of unintended effects showed that citalopram had fewer side-effects than tricyclics, especially of anticholinergic types. In conclusion, citalopram has been found to be a non-sedating antidepressant which is well accepted by the patients due to its lack of unintended effects.
Article
In an open, clinical trial comprising a total of 21 depressed in-patients (6 men and 15 women) citalopram was administered in doses of 20-60 mg once daily for a period of at least 3 weeks. Fourteen of the patients were treated for 4 weeks, and 6 of these patients were treated for another 2 weeks. The CPRS subscale for depression (MADRS) and a global evaluation were used for assessment of the therapeutic effect. Twelve patients showed complete or partial response to treatment, and generally onset of therapeutic effect was seen within the first 2 weeks of treatment. Side-effects were generally few and mild, anxiety being the most frequent one. No pathological laboratory values were recorded, and apart from one case of slight and transient bradycardia no changes were observed in the cardiovascular parameters. Determination of plasma levels in 16 of the patients under presumed steady-state conditions showed an inter-individual variation between 28 and 616 nM/l for citalopram and between 32 and 338 nM/l for its monodemethylated metabolite for daily citalopram doses of 30-60 mg. The average ratio citalopram-desmethyl citalopram was 1.70. No correlation was found between clinical response and the plasma levels.
Article
In a phase II study the antidepressive effect of citalopram, a selective and potent serotonin reuptake inhibitor, was examined in 20 endogenously and three nonendogenously depressed hospitalized patients. Four endogenously depressed patients dropped out due to deterioration early in the treatment period. The remaining 19 patients completed a 4–6 week treatment schedule. Of 16 endogenously depressed patients 11 responded, one was a partial responder and four did not respond. Of three patients with non-endogenous depressions, two responded and one did not respond. No correlation between plasma citalopram concentration and therapeutic outcome was found. Fourteen patients were given maintenance treatment for 8–113 weeks. One patient developed depression when the dose was reduced from 60 to 40 mg and one patient became manic. After discontinuation of treatment seven patients had a depressive relapse and six of these who again were treated with citalopram responded completely. Side effect rating scores of symptoms usually associated with depression or treatment with tricyclic antidepressants declined during treatment. Three patients complained of increased need of sleep for a period after several weeks of treatment. Apart from an unspecific, transient rise in liver enzymes in two patients, detailed biochemical laboratory tests were all normal. There were no effects on blood pressure, pulse rate, orthostatic reaction, or electrocardiogram. One patient took an overdose of citalopram resulting in plasma levels about six times higher than the average therapeutic level, but there were no signs of severe toxicity. In particular no change in consciousness, electrocardiogram or blood pressure occurred. Pharmacokinetic variables such as dose schedule, steady state kinetics, and metabolism are discussed.
Article
The toxic effects of acute citalopram overdose are reported by the Swedish Poisons Information Centre. Case reports received from Swedish hospitals during 1995 have been analyzed. Forty-four cases of pure citalopram intoxication have been studied in detail. At doses below 600 mg, mild symptoms were observed. Doses above 600 mg caused ECG abnormalities and convulsions in some patients, while doses greater than 1900 mg caused such symptoms in all patients. The findings are consistent with previous reports claiming that selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors are less toxic compared to tricyclic antidepressants. However, there is a risk of developing serious symptoms when large doses have been ingested.