ArticlePDF Available

The Interactive Effects of Conscientiousness and Agreeableness on Job Performance



The authors hypothesized that the relationship between conscientiousness and job performance would be stronger for persons high in agreeableness than for those low in agreeableness. Results of hierarchical moderated regression analyses for 7 independent samples of employees across diverse occupations provided support for the hypothesis in 5 of the samples. In samples supporting the hypothesis, among the highly conscientious workers, those low in agreeableness were found to receive lower ratings of job performance than workers high in agreeableness. One explanation for lack of an interaction between conscientiousness and agreeableness in the other 2 samples is that those jobs were not characterized by frequent, cooperative interactions with others. Overall, the results show that highly conscientious workers who lack interpersonal sensitivity may be ineffective, particularly in jobs requiring cooperative interchange with others.
The Interactive Effects of Conscientiousness and Agreeableness
on Job Performance
L. A. Witt
University of New Orleans
Lisa A. Burke
Louisiana State University at Shreveport
Murray R. Barrick
Michigan State University
Michael K. Mount
University of Iowa
The authors hypothesized that the relationship between conscientiousness and job performance would be
stronger for persons high in agreeableness than for those low in agreeableness. Results of hierarchical
moderated regression analyses for 7 independent samples of employees across diverse occupations
provided support for the hypothesis in 5 of the samples. In samples supporting the hypothesis, among the
highly conscientious workers, those low in agreeableness were found to receive lower ratings of job
performance than workers high in agreeableness. One explanation for lack of an interaction between
conscientiousness and agreeableness in the other 2 samples is that those jobs were not characterized by
frequent, cooperative interactions with others. Overall, the results show that highly conscientious workers
who lack interpersonal sensitivity may be ineffective, particularly in jobs requiring cooperative inter-
change with others.
In personality research, conscientiousness has been the most
consistent and universal predictor of job performance (Barrick,
Mount, & Judge, in press). Surprisingly, there is a paucity of
research examining whether a conscientious employee’s standing
on other personality traits affects how successful he or she is in the
workplace. In other words, certain personality traits may interact
with others to result in desirable, as well as undesirable, workplace
behaviors. Hogan, Hogan, and Roberts (1996) cautioned research-
ers against examining personality constructs on an individual basis
because the way in which each trait operates depends, in part, on
the pattern of other traits.
Personality and Performance
Many scholars have embraced the five-factor model of person-
ality (FFM) as a replicable and unifying taxonomy of personality
(e.g., Digman, 1990; Goldberg, 1992). This model advances con-
scientiousness, agreeableness, extraversion, emotional stability,
and openness to experience as five distinct traits that predict work
attitudes and behaviors. Meta-analytic studies have shown that
conscientiousness and emotional stability have been the most
consistent FFM predictors of performance (e.g., Barrick et al., in
press; Salgado, 1997), whereas other FFM constructs are relevant
in specific jobs or criteria. Recent primary studies have indicated
that personality tests can account for significant incremental va-
lidity beyond that accounted for by biodata (e.g., McManus &
Kelly, 1999), mental ability (McHenry, Hough, Toquam, Hanson,
& Ashworth, 1990), assessment centers (Goffin, Rothstein, &
Johnston, 1996), and interviews (e.g., Cortina, Goldstein, Payne,
Davison, & Gilliland, 2000).
Workers high in conscientiousness are predisposed to be orga-
nized, exacting, disciplined, diligent, dependable, methodical, and
purposeful. Thus, they are more likely than low-conscientiousness
workers to thoroughly and correctly perform work tasks, to take
initiative in solving problems, to remain committed to work per-
formance, to comply with policies, and to stay focused on work
tasks. Recent research has revealed that managers perceive cogni-
tive ability and conscientiousness as the most important attributes
related to applicants’ hirability (Dunn, Mount, Barrick, & Ones,
1995). Barrick et al. (in press) performed a second-order meta-
analysis of previous meta-analytic studies that examined
personality–performance relationships and reported that conscien-
tiousness was the only FFM construct to predict supervisory rat-
ings of job performance across jobs and organizations. However,
L. A. Witt, Department of Management, University of New Orleans;
Lisa A. Burke, Department of Management and Marketing, Louisiana State
University at Shreveport; Murray R. Barrick, Department of Management,
Michigan State University; Michael K. Mount, Department of Manage-
ment and Organizations, University of Iowa.
Murray R. Barrick is now at the College of Business Administration,
University of Iowa.
We presented an earlier version of this article at the 16th Annual
Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology,
April 2001, San Diego, California.
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to L. A.
Witt, Department of Management, University of New Orleans, New Or-
leans, Louisiana 70148-1560. E-mail:
Journal of Applied Psychology Copyright 2002 by the American Psychological Association, Inc.
2002, Vol. 87, No. 1, 164–169 0021-9010/02/$5.00 DOI: 10.1037//0021-9010.87.1.164
This document is copyrighted by the American Psychological Association or one of its allied publishers.
This article is intended solely for the personal use of the individual user and is not to be disseminated broadly.
they also reported variability in the validities of conscientiousness
across studies (
.23; 90% credibility values range from .10 to
.35). In fact, the mean observed correlations between conscien-
tiousness and performance typically hover in the low teens (e.g.,
r .10 in Salgado, 1997). The variability and the small size of the
correlations suggest the presence of moderators.
Agreeableness, or likability (Hogan, 1986), refers to such traits
as selflessness, cooperativeness, helpfulness, tolerance, flexibility,
generosity, sympathy, and courtesy (Digman, 1990). Some re-
searchers have suggested that agreeableness is the primary concept
to consider in the assessment of individual differences (e.g.,
Havill, Besevegis, & Mouroussaki, 1998). However, agreeableness
seems to be most relevant to job performance in situations in
which joint action and collaboration are needed (Mount, Barrick,
& Stewart, 1998). Work contexts having a fairly high level of
interpersonal interaction require selflessness, tolerance, and flexi-
bility. Agreeable persons tend to deal with conflict cooperatively
or collaboratively, strive for common understanding, and maintain
social affiliations (Digman, 1990).
Conscientiousness Agreeableness
Limited research exists on the interaction of individual differ-
ences on performance. Most personality–performance studies have
examined the moderating influence of mental ability (e.g., Wright,
Kacmar, McMahan, & Deleeuw, 1995) or situational variables,
such as autonomy (e.g., Barrick & Mount, 1993) and organiza-
tional politics (Hochwarter, Witt, & Kacmar, 2000). Although
prior published research has stopped short of analyzing interac-
tions among personality variables (e.g., high conscientiousness in
the absence of agreeableness), support for a “constellation ap-
proach” to examine personality’s influence on work behavior is
occasionally called for in the literature (Hogan et al., 1996; Organ,
1996). In light of this gap, researchers have identified the need to
expand models of the personality–job performance relationship to
account for cross-dimensional effects of personality traits (Hogan
et al., 1996; Wright et al., 1995). However, we are unaware of any
published research on interactions among the Big Five traits in
predicting performance.
We suggest that a particularly relevant interaction effect exists
between conscientiousness and agreeableness in explaining job
performance. It has been argued that when highly conscientious
people lack interpersonal competence, dysfunctional outcomes
may result (Goleman, 1998). Recent findings in the contextual
performance literature (e.g., McManus & Kelly, 1999; Van Scotter
& Motowidlo, 1996) add empirical support to this contention.
Specifically, Kiker and Motowidlo (1999) found in a lab experi-
ment using a managerial in-basket simulation that technical effec-
tiveness pays off more in supervisory reward decisions for people
who are interpersonally effective. Logically then, this finding
suggests that workers who are technically effective (i.e., of which
conscientious is a key component) should be rated more favorably
if they also exhibit interpersonal effectiveness (i.e., agreeableness).
Perhaps it is counterintuitive to think that high levels of consci-
entiousness could in any way be associated with less effective
behaviors. Other factors being equal, individuals who are high on
conscientiousness perform better than those who are low on con-
scientiousness (Barrick & Mount, 1991). However, if other factors,
such as relevant personality traits, are not equal, individuals may
be less effective despite their high conscientiousness. For example,
when conscientious individuals are also highly disagreeable (i.e.,
vengeful, hostile, inconsiderate, uncooperative, or aloof), they are
likely to lack important interpersonal skills. As expected, low
levels of agreeableness have been associated with lower contextual
performance (McManus & Kelly, 1999; Motowidlo & Van Scot-
ter, 1994) and with antisocial or dysfunctional behaviors (Cortina,
Doherty, Schmitt, & Kaufman, 1992) in prior empirical studies.
Ultimately, highly conscientious, highly disagreeable people
may be perceived as micromanaging, unreasonably demanding,
inflexible, curt, and generally difficult to deal with, suggesting that
conscientiousness and agreeableness may interact in the prediction
of performance. Because of predispositions to work hard and
interact cooperatively with others, workers high in conscientious-
ness and agreeableness are likely to be more effective. In contrast,
without the tendency to be cooperative, considerate, and trusting
(i.e., low in agreeableness), conscientiousness will likely add little
to performance.
Hypothesis: The relationship between conscientiousness and supervi-
sory ratings of job performance is stronger among workers high in
agreeableness than among those low in agreeableness.
We attempted to provide a rigorous test of this hypothesis by
examining it across multiple diverse samples with varying occu-
pations. Specifically, we investigated the hypothesized relation-
ship by using seven samples with jobs of different content. Al-
though this interaction is likely strongest in jobs requiring
substantial cooperative interaction (because traits associated with
agreeableness are most relevant in these situations), our data were
part of larger test validation studies, thereby allowing cooperative
action to be quantified only in a post hoc fashion. Thus, we
considered this aspect of our study to be exploratory.
Participants and Procedure
As part of a series of concurrent validity studies, we collected data from
employees and their supervisors in one public-sector and six private-sector
organizations. We described the purposes of the study and the procedures
to the workers and assured them that their responses would be treated
Sample 1. As part of a larger study (Mount, Witt, & Barrick, 2000), we
collected complete data on 371 clerical workers in a private-sector orga-
nization; 84% were women. Their functions were in support of either
internal or external customers. Their tasks required some interdependence
with their coworkers.
Sample 2. As part of a larger study (Hochwarter et al., 2000), we
collected complete data on 271 sales agents of a private-sector organiza-
tion; 70% were women. Although workers interacted primarily with ex-
ternal customers, they occasionally interacted with coworkers in a support-
ing role.
Sample 3. We collected complete data on 206 sales representatives in
a large appliance manufacturing organization. The typical participant was
male, was in his late 30s, had a college degree, and had 10 years of tenure
in the organization. The sales representatives generated sales from distrib-
utors in a well-defined geographical region. The distributors were long-
standing customers; typical interactions involved dealing with customer
This document is copyrighted by the American Psychological Association or one of its allied publishers.
This article is intended solely for the personal use of the individual user and is not to be disseminated broadly.
service issues as well as generating future sales. Data for 91 of these 206
subjects were previously reported in a study by Barrick, Mount, and
Strauss (1993).
Sample 4. As part of a larger study (Mount et al., 1998), we collected
complete data on 250 production workers in a manufacturing plant that
relied on work teams to organize jobs. On average, the teams had been
intact for 5 to 6 years, and members’ average tenure within the teams was 4
years. Participants were primarily male (69%), were in their mid-40s, had
at least a high school degree and some college courses, and had more
than 15 years of tenure with the plant. The teams had extensive self-
leadership responsibilities, but they were not fully self-autonomous (e.g.,
they did not make firing decisions).
Sample 5. As part of a larger study (Mount et al., 1998), we collected
complete data from 273 production workers in another manufacturing plant
organized using teams (average team tenure 5 years; average member
tenure within the teams was 3 years). The typical participant was male, was
in his early 40s, had a high school degree and some college courses, and
had more than 14 years of tenure in the firm. These teams shared leadership
responsibilities between the supervisor and the team.
Sample 6. Our public-sector data came from 146 civilian managers
participating in the U.S. Army Management Training Program (Barrick &
Mount, 1993). The participants were primarily male, college graduates, and
middle-aged. In all cases, managers were responsible for closely supervis-
ing other civilians in day-to-day operations in U.S. Army installations
located across the country. Their interactions with others were primarily
characterized by activities associated with leading, directing, and coaching
subordinates, rather than working collaboratively.
Sample 7. As part of a larger study (Barrick & Mount, 1996), we
collected complete data on 256 truck drivers in two long-haul transporta-
tion firms. The typical participant was male, was in his late 20s or early
30s, and had a high school education. Their primary duty was to drive
cross-country to deliver products. They worked alone or in dyads and had
relatively little interaction with others.
Job performance. In Samples 1 and 2, we used 10 items to assess job
performance (e.g., Sample 1: “[employee name] consistently produces the
right quantity or volume of work,” Sample 2: “[employee name] takes the
initiative to do what is needed without having to be told”). We developed
these items on the basis of job analyses performed in both organizations.
Supervisory ratings were made on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 (weak or
bottom 10%)to5(best or top 10%). In Samples 3 through 7, between 8
and 11 aspects of job performance were developed, which were also based
on a job analysis of each job. The dimensions were quality of work,
quantity of work, initiative, customer communications, planning, organi-
zational commitment, job knowledge, allocation, interpersonal orientation,
self-development, and account management. Supervisory ratings were
made on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 (somewhat below)to5(consis-
tently exceeds job requirements). All items were summed to yield a total
performance score.
Personality. The 120-item Personal Characteristics Inventory (Mount
& Barrick, 1995) assessed the FFM personality constructs. The workers
rated each item on a 3-point Likert-type scale (1 disagree,3 agree).
Evidence has demonstrated its convergent validity and divergent validity
with other FFM measures (Mount, Barrick, Laffitte, & Callans, 1999).
First, we entered scores for conscientiousness and agreeableness to
control for their main effects.
Then, we entered the Conscientiousness
Agreeableness cross-product term to test the hypothesis.
We present descriptive statistics and reliability estimates in
Table 1 and the intercorrelation matrices in Table 2. Conscien-
tiousness (r .22, sum of N 1,738 across all seven samples)
scores were significantly related to job performance scores in all
samples (rs ranged from .16 to .28). The mean observed correla-
tion between agreeableness and supervisory ratings of perfor-
mance for the five samples (1–5) whose jobs appeared to require
substantial cooperative interaction was .15. In contrast, the sample-
size weighted, mean correlation for the two samples whose jobs
did not require cooperative interaction was .00.
Table 3 presents results of the regression analyses. In support of
the hypothesis, the addition of the Conscientiousness Agree-
ableness cross-product term at the second step was significant in
the explanation of job performance in the first five samples. It did
not add incremental variance in the U.S. Army civilian manager or
truck driver samples (Samples 6 and 7). The effect sizes (R
) in
Samples 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 were within the range of .01 to .03 for
moderator effects typically reported in nonexperimental studies
(Champoux & Peters, 1987).
To identify the forms of the interactions, we plotted the expla-
nation of job performance scores at the mean as well as at high and
low levels of agreeableness for each of the samples (1.0 and 1.0
standard deviations from the mean; Stone & Hollenbeck, 1989).
Consistent with expectations, the conscientiousness–job perfor-
mance relationships were stronger among workers around the
mean or at high levels of agreeableness than among workers low
in agreeableness. As an example of the form of the interactions, we
present Figure 1. It reveals that the Sample 1 workers high in both
conscientiousness and agreeableness received the highest ratings
of job performance. Specifically, agreeableness had at least a small
effect on performance among workers with conscientiousness
scores at or above 2.69 (z .11). Among the highly conscientious
workers, those who were low in agreeableness received lower
ratings of job performance than those high in agreeableness. Fi-
nally, for low-conscientious workers, agreeableness was unrelated
to ratings of performance.
This is the first published study of which we are aware to
examine the effects of interactions among personality dimensions
on success at work. Consistent with the notion that highly consci-
entious workers without interpersonal sensitivity may be ineffec-
tive, we found that among highly conscientious workers, those
high in agreeableness received higher ratings of job performance
than those low in agreeableness across the majority of the samples.
Perhaps because highly conscientious workers tend to hold others
to their own performance and motivational standards and because
they prefer personal responsibility, they may perform ineffectively
when also uncooperative and inconsiderate of others.
Recognizing that general mental ability (GMA) has been shown to be
a nontrivial predictor of performance (e.g., Hunter, 1983), we included
GMA as a control variable in the regression analyses for the samples in
which it was available—Samples 1, 2, 4, and 5. Because the inclusion of
GMA had no appreciable effects on the results and because we did not
measure GMA in three of the samples, we did not report those results here.
This document is copyrighted by the American Psychological Association or one of its allied publishers.
This article is intended solely for the personal use of the individual user and is not to be disseminated broadly.
Even more noteworthy is the finding that supervisors viewed
conscientious workers with low levels of agreeableness as per-
forming at lower levels than conscientious workers with high
levels of agreeableness. This finding suggests caution in relying on
bivariate personality–performance research to support employee
selection decisions. Therefore, we advocate that personality re-
searchers begin to consider an interactive profile approach when
analyzing the FFM and its influence on employee work outcomes.
Confidence in our contribution stems from two strengths of
this study. First, we found a consistent conscientiousness–
agreeableness interaction across five different samples, providing
some evidence of replication as advocated by Golding (1975).
Second, our measures of job performance were based on job
analyses and thus were organizationally relevant.
However, the hypothesized interaction was not found in all
samples. One explanation for this finding is that the posited inter-
action may be influenced by the characteristics of the job. There
are certain jobs in which substantial interaction with others and
cooperation are critical for success at work. In other jobs, there is
little need for social dealings, or the nature of the interactions with
others is not primarily cooperative. Careful examination of our
samples indicated that the first five jobs (interdependent clerical
Table 1
Means, Standard Deviations, and Reliability Estimates
Sample Job performance Conscientiousness Agreeableness Interaction
Sample 1
M 3.28 2.79 2.63 7.14
SD 0.82 0.19 0.27 1.01
Reliability estimate 0.87 0.78 0.79
Sample 2
M 3.13 2.66 2.65 7.08
SD 0.75 0.23 0.31 1.20
Reliability estimate 0.91 0.74 0.77
Sample 3
M 1.65 2.60 2.57 6.68
SD 0.70 0.23 0.23 0.87
Reliability estimate 0.78 0.84 0.71
Sample 4
M 3.40 2.59 2.49 6.49
SD 0.86 0.29 0.36 1.36
Reliability estimate 0.84 0.86 0.80
Sample 5
M 3.50 2.62 2.51 6.62
SD 0.84 0.29 0.35 1.36
Reliability estimate 0.80 0.87 0.82
Sample 6
M 81.56 2.48 2.49 6.20
SD 13.59 0.32 0.31 1.17
Reliability estimate 0.88 0.89 0.67
Sample 7
M 2.28 2.65 2.51 6.69
SD 0.65 0.28 0.37 1.32
Reliability estimate 0.79 0.87 0.82
Note. The reliability estimates are alphas.
Table 2
Intercorrelation Matrices
Sample 1/2 Sample 3/4 Sample 5/6 Sample 7
1. Job performance .16** .12* .17* .16** .28** .28** .24** .01 .17*
2. Conscientiousness .28** .44** .79** .24** .40** .78** .17** .17* .78* .27**
3. Agreeableness .06 .38** .89** .05 .07 .88** .28** .37** .74* .00 .40**
4. Interaction .18** .74** .89** .20** .73** .73** .28** .77** .87** .14* .78** .88**
Note. Correlations between the conscientiousness–agreeableness interaction measure and all other variables have not been reported before. Zero-order
correlations were previously reported in Mount et al. (1998; Samples 4 and 5), Barrick and Mount (1993; Sample 6), and Barrick and Mount (1996; Sample
7). For Sample 1/2, the correlations for Sample 1 are below the diagonal, and the correlations for Sample 2 are above the diagonal. For Sample 3/4, the
correlations for Sample 3 are below the diagonal, and the correlations for Sample 4 are above the diagonal. For Sample 5/6, the correlations for Sample 5
are below the diagonal, and the correlations for Sample 6 are above the diagonal.
* p .05. ** p .01.
This document is copyrighted by the American Psychological Association or one of its allied publishers.
This article is intended solely for the personal use of the individual user and is not to be disseminated broadly.
workers, sales representatives with long-term customer relations,
and production workers whose work was organized into teams)
can be characterized as having substantial social interaction re-
quiring cooperation and collaboration. Consistent with this reason-
ing, significant conscientiousness–agreeableness interactions were
found in all five of these samples. Although not definitive, these
results suggest that disagreeable people are likely to be particularly
ineffective in such work contexts. In contrast, the present findings
suggest that the conscientiousness–agreeableness interaction is
likely to have less of an impact on performance when frequent
interaction with others is not an important part of the job (e.g.,
cross-country truck drivers) or when the nature of the interactions
is characterized by leading, supervising, delegating to, and coach-
ing others (as with managers). Indeed, research suggests that the
best managers tend to be low in the need to be liked and accepted
by others (Boyatzis, 1984). It might, therefore, be useful for future
researchers to examine the importance of interpersonal relations
(particularly when cooperation and collaboration are required) in
the interaction between conscientiousness and agreeableness in
work settings.
Implications for Practice
Although evidence suggests that conscientiousness is the con-
struct in the FFM that most consistently predicts job performance
(e.g., Barrick et al., in press), the present results suggest that
selection criteria should also consider the relevance of agreeable-
ness among workers who are high in conscientiousness. High
levels of agreeableness appear to give conscientious workers the
boost necessary to be effective in the workplace, particularly when
interaction or joint collaboration is necessary. More important, low
levels of agreeableness canceled the positive effect of conscien-
tiousness on job performance. Consequently, staffing specialists
using only conscientiousness, and thus hiring candidates high in
conscientiousness, may actually be inhibiting organizational effec-
tiveness when hiring those who are also low in agreeableness.
As organizations become more organic and flexible, which is
likely to promote “weaker situations” (Mischel, 1977), the influ-
ence of employees’ personalities on organizational outcomes is
likely to become even more pronounced. Therefore, research ef-
forts to identify interactions that predict preferred work behaviors
might have increasing utility.
Directions for Future Research
We suggest three areas for possible future research. First, further
replication is needed to determine how the findings reported here
correspond to the results of studies conducted in other work
environments. In particular, we believe that the degree of cooper-
ative interaction required to perform a job is an important variable
that affects the Conscientiousness Agreeableness interaction.
Research that investigates the boundary conditions of this variable
would be helpful. Second, efforts that directly assess social skill by
using construct valid measures may provide a more robust test of
Figure 1. Job performance regressed on conscientiousness scores: low-,
average- (avg), and high-agreeableness groups from Sample 1. Y (2.82
1.72f)X (3.18f 10.06). Low score equals one standard deviation
below the mean; high score equals one standard deviation above the mean.
Only scores plus or minus one standard deviation from the mean of
conscientiousness scores are plotted.
Table 3
Multiple Regression Results
Sample 1 Sample 2 Sample 3 Sample 4 Sample 5 Sample 6 Sample 7
Step 1
Conscientiousness 0.72 0.88† 1.01 0.81* 0.46 0.41 0.05
Agreeableness 1.59* 1.31* 1.20 0.87* 0.47 0.13 0.50
.08** .03* .06* .08* .07* .06* .09*
Adjusted R
.08** .02* .05* .07* .06* .04* .08*
Step 2
Cross-product 2.14* 2.04* 1.82* 1.69* 1.04* 0.25 0.54
.09** .05** .07* .11* .08* .06* .09*
Adjusted R
.09** .04** .06* .09* .07* .04* .08*
.01* .02* .01* .02* .01* .00 .00
Note. The standardized betas presented are those derived at the second step.
p .10. * p .05. ** p .01.
This document is copyrighted by the American Psychological Association or one of its allied publishers.
This article is intended solely for the personal use of the individual user and is not to be disseminated broadly.
our argument. Third, researchers may find it useful to examine the
interactive effects of FFM variables on other work outcomes, such
as merit increases, career progression, and turnover. These results
suggest that researchers might find it helpful to consider the full
constellation of personality characteristics to enhance psycholog-
ical theory and practice.
Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The Big Five personality dimen-
sions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44,
Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1993). Autonomy as a moderator of the
relationship between the Big Five personality dimensions and job per-
formance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 111–118.
Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1996). Effects of impression management
and self-deception on the predictive validity of personality constructs.
Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 261–272.
Barrick, M. R., Mount, M. K., & Judge, T. A. (in press). The Big Five
personality dimensions and job performance: A quantitative review of
prior meta-analyses. International Journal of Selection and Assessment.
Barrick, M. R., Mount, M. K., & Strauss, J. P. (1993). Conscientiousness
and performance of sales representatives: Test of the mediating effects
of goal setting. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 715–722.
Boyatzis, R. E. (1984). The need for close relationships and the manager’s
job. In D. A. Kolb, I. M. Rubin, & J. M. McIntyre (Eds.), Organizational
psychology: Readings on human behavior in organizations (4th ed., pp.
81–86). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Champoux, J., & Peters, W. (1987). Form, effect size, and power in
moderated regression analysis. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 60,
Cortina, J. M., Doherty, M. L., Schmitt, N., & Kaufman, G. (1992). The
“Big Five” personality factors in the IPI and MMPI: Predictors of police
performance. Personnel Psychology, 44, 119–140.
Cortina, J. M., Goldstein, N. B., Payne, S. C., Davison, H. K., & Gilliland,
S. W. (2000). The incremental validity of interview scores over and
above cognitive ability and conscientiousness scores. Personnel Psy-
chology, 53, 325–352.
Digman, J. (1990). Personality structure: Emergence of the five-factor
model. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 417–440.
Dunn, W. S., Mount, M. K., Barrick, M. R., & Ones, D. S. (1995). Relative
importance of personality and general mental ability in managers’ judg-
ments of applicant qualifications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80,
Goffin, R. D., Rothstein, M. G., & Johnston, N. G. (1996). Personality
testing and the assessment center: Incremental validity for managerial
selection. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 746–756.
Goldberg, L. R. (1992). The development of markers for the Big Five
factor structure. Psychological Assessment, 4, 2642.
Golding, S. L. (1975). Flies in the ointment: Methodological problems in
the analysis of the percentage of variance due to persons and situations.
Psychological Bulletin, 82, 278–288.
Goleman, D. (1998). Working with emotional intelligence. New York:
Bantam Books.
Havill, V. L., Besevegis, E., & Mouroussaki, S. (1998). Agreeableness as
a diachronic personality trait. In G. A. Kohnstamm & C. F. Halverson,
Jr. (Eds.), Parental descriptions of child personality: Developmental
antecedents of the Big 5 (pp. 4964). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Hochwarter, W. A., Witt, L. A., & Kacmar, M. K. (2000). Perceptions of
organizational politics as a moderator of the relationship between con-
scientiousness and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85,
Hogan, R. (1986). Manual for the Hogan Personality Inventory. Minne-
apolis, MN: National Computer Systems.
Hogan, R., Hogan, J., & Roberts, B. W. (1996). Personality measurement
and employment decisions: Questions and answers. American Psychol-
ogist, 51, 469477.
Hunter, J. E. (1983). A causal model of cognitive ability, job knowledge,
job performance, and supervisor ratings. In F. Landy, S. Zedeck, & J.
Cleveland (Eds.), Performance measurement and theory (pp. 257–266).
Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Kiker, D. S., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1999). Main and interaction effects of
task and contextual performance on supervisory reward decisions. Jour-
nal of Applied Psychology, 84, 602–609.
McHenry, J. J., Hough, L. M., Toquam, J. L., Hanson, M. A., & Ashworth,
S. (1990). Project A validity results: The relationship between predictor
and criterion domains. Personnel Psychology, 43, 335–354.
McManus, M. A., & Kelly, M. L. (1999). Personality measures and
biodata: Evidence regarding their incremental predictive value in the life
insurance industry. Personnel Psychology, 52, 137–148.
Mischel, W. (1977). The interaction of person and situation. In D. Mag-
nusson & N. S. Endler (Eds.), Personality at the crossroads: Current
issues in interactional psychology (pp. 333–352). Hillsdale, NJ:
Motowidlo, S. J., & Van Scotter, J. R. (1994). Evidence that task perfor-
mance should be distinguished from contextual performance. Journal of
Applied Psychology, 79, 475–480.
Mount, M. K., & Barrick, M. R. (1995). Manual for the Personal Char-
acteristics Inventory. Libertyville, IL: Wonderlic Personnel Test.
Mount, M. K., Barrick, M. R., Laffitte, L., & Callans, M. (1999). The
Personal Characteristics Inventory manual. Libertyville, IL: Wonderlic
Mount, M. K., Barrick, M. R., & Stewart, G. L. (1998). Five-factor model
of personality and performance in jobs involving interpersonal interac-
tions. Human Performance, 11, 145–165.
Mount, M. K., Witt, L. A., & Barrick, M. R. (2000). Incremental validity
of empirically-keyed biodata scales over GMA and the Big Five per-
sonality constructs. Personnel Psychology, 53, 299–323.
Organ, D. (1996). Personality and organizational citizenship behavior.
Journal of Management, 20, 465–479.
Salgado, J. (1997). The five factor model of personality and job perfor-
mance in the European community. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82,
Stone, E. F., & Hollenbeck, J. R. (1989). Clarifying some controversial
issues surrounding statistical procedures for detecting moderator vari-
ables: Empirical evidence and related matters. Journal of Applied Psy-
chology, 74,3–10.
Van Scotter, J. R., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1996). Interpersonal facilitation and
job dedication as separate facets of contextual performance. Journal of
Applied Psychology, 81, 525–532.
Wright, P. M., Kacmar, K. M., McMahan, G. C., & Deleeuw, K. (1995).
P f(M A): Cognitive ability as a moderator of the relationship
between personality and job performance. Journal of Management, 21,
Received September 6, 2000
Revision received February 24, 2001
Accepted February 25, 2001
This document is copyrighted by the American Psychological Association or one of its allied publishers.
This article is intended solely for the personal use of the individual user and is not to be disseminated broadly.
... Savjesniji zaposleni su i više odani organizaciji (Meyer & Herscovitch, 2001;Mirković, 2013;Mirković i Čizmić, 2013). Takođe, Vit, Burke, Barik i Maunt (Witt, Burke, Barrick & Mount, 2002) su utvrdili da su zaposleni sa izraženom savjesnošću metodični i temeljiti u poslu, te skloniji preduzimanju inicijative. Ekstraverzija se, takođe, pokazala značajnom determinantom uspjeha u poslu, naročito u zanimanjima koja zahtijevaju socijalne interakcije (Barrick & Mount, 1991;Bing & Lounsbury, 2000;Lowery & Krilowicz, 1994;Piedmont & Weinstein, 1994;Vinchur et al., 1998). ...
... toga, pokazalo se da je izražena otvorenost ka iskustvu u pozitivnoj korelaciji sa kreativnim ponašanjem na radnom mjestu (George & Zhou, 2001), te da su pojedinci sa izraženom otvorenošću najviše posvećeni timskim ciljevima (Neuman, Wagner & Christiansen, 1999). Zaposleni sa izraženom prijatnošću pokazuju veći stepen interpersonalne kompetencije (Witt et. al, 2002), te efikasnije sarađuju na zajedničkim aktivnostima i skloniji su odgovornom organizacionom ponašanju (Mirković i Čizmić, 2017a;Mirković i Čizmić, 2017b;Organ & Ryan, 1995). Konačno, Barik i saradnici (Barrick et al., 2001) tvrde da je emocionalna stabilnost najsnažnija determinanta uspjeha u radnim timovima. ...
... Conscientious employees are driven to create order in fulfilling work role expectations (Witt, Burke, Barrick, & Mount, 2002). In so doing, these employees tend to "autonomously" develop structure and routine in their role (Mount, Barrick, & Strauss, 1999: 710), take a "handson approach" to tasks, and possess "a strong desire to take charge of" goal accomplishment (Hu & Judge, 2017: 939). ...
Full-text available
Over the past century, conscientiousness has become seen as the preeminent trait for predicting performance. This consensus is due in part to these employees’ ability to work with traditional, 20th century technology. Such pairings balance the systematic nature of conscientious employees with the technology’s need for user-input and direction to perform tasks—resulting in a complementary match. However, the 21st century has seen the incorporation of intelligent machines (e.g., artificial intelligence, robots, and algorithms) into employee jobs. Unlike traditional technology, these new machines are equipped with the capability to make decisions autonomously. Thus, their nature overlaps with the orderliness subdimension of conscientious employees—resulting in an non-complementary mismatch. This calls into question whether the consensus about conscientious employees’ effectiveness with 20th century technology applies to 21st century jobs. Integrating complementarity and role theory, we refine this consensus. Across three studies using distinct samples (an experience-sampling study, a field experiment, and an online experiment from working adults in Malaysia, Taiwan, and the United States), each focused on a different type of intelligent machine, we show not only that using intelligent machines has benefits and consequences, but importantly that conscientious (i.e., orderly) employees are less likely to benefit from working with them.
... Persons with elevated C-scores are competent, industrious, disciplined, reliable and motivated through targeted activity (McCrae & Costa Jr, 1997), and they show good academic and job performance (Conard, 2006;Witt et al., 2002). However, the relationship between C and job pressure has been scantly studied. ...
Full-text available
The need for recovery after work (NFR) is an important warning of work-related fatigue. NFR is linked to prolonged work-related efforts and depletion of resources, creating a need for temporary respite from work demands. The aim of the current study was to investigate the relationships between NFR and the five-factor model (FFM), comprising the personality traits of emotional stability (ES), extraversion (E), agreeableness (A), conscientiousness (C), and openness to experience (O). Perceived job pressure and perceived social support were included as mediators. The study was conducted using structural equation modelling (SEM) on cross-sectional data from a sample of 681 participants from several work sectors (N females = 376, N males = 305; M age = 46.9 years; SD = 11.1). The results showed that NFR was affected both directly and indirectly by FFM traits. High ES and high O contributed directly to reduced and increased NFR, respectively. High perceived social support contributed to reduced NFR, while high perceived job pressure contributed to increased NFR. High ES contributed indirectly to reduced NFR through perceived job pressure and social support, high O contributed indirectly to increased NFR through perceived social support, and high E contributed indirectly to increased NFR through perceived job pressure. A and C were not related to NFR. The findings demonstrate that personality traits, especially ES, are firmly related to NFR and highlight the importance of incorporating personality factors into studies of work environmental factors on NFR. Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12144-022-02950-1.
... • La capacité d'être agréable Cette capacité se concentre sur les compétences interpersonnelles telles que le comportement et la capacité d'interagir avec les autres dans des situations sociales. Dans un contexte professionnel, un employé agréable a une grande capacité à établir des relations avec les autres et à collaborer efficacement avec eux (Witt, 2002). En même temps, les employés moins agréables vivent plus de conflits (Assendorpf, Wilpens 1998). ...
Le multiculturalisme est une nouvelle ère de mondialisation et la diversité culturelle est inévitable, mais cette diversité peut ajouter de la valeur aux entreprises. À l’avenir, il y aura une relation de plus en plus étroite entre la mondialisation, la diversité culturelle, le management opérationnel et la gestion des relations avec les parties prenantes.Le sport est caractérisé par une concurrence féroce. Les organisations sportives sont de plus en plus contraintes de transposer les pratiques managériales présentes dans les entreprises et d’adopter les caractéristiques opérationnelles et structurelles des entreprises commerciales. La pression pour atteindre les objectifs économiques et la concurrence exercée par les organisations sportives a encouragé les dirigeants sportifs à considérer les outils et les concepts appliqués dans les affaires tels que la culture organisationnelle. Contrairement à d’autres domaines d’activité, le sport présente certaines particularités. La plupart du temps dans le sport, une seule organisation peut atteindre son objectif de remporter la compétition, et les situations dans lesquelles plusieurs équipes atteignent leur objectif sont rares. Toutes les équipes, quel que soit le sport et quel que soit le niveau de ressources disponibles, essaient de gagner chaque match et chaque compétition. Aucune équipe qui se respecte n’entre sur le terrain avec l’idée de perdre. Ainsi, au fil du temps, il y a eu des exemples d’organisations qui, avec des ressources minimales, ont réussi à dépasser dans les classements et les organisations de compétitions avec des ressources beaucoup plus précieuses.Tout d’abord, la question du management multiculturel prend de plus en plus d’importance à mesure que la société se mondialise de plus en plus. Ainsi, dans le contexte de la mondialisation, de plus en plus d’individus différents doivent travailler ensemble et former une équipe, et cet aspect est de plus en plus visible dans le sport.Deuxièmement, chaque société et chaque organisation ont besoin de règles pour fonctionner dans un environnement optimal. Ces réglementations doivent être proposées par un organe décisionnel légitime, qui donne confiance à ceux qui sont sous l’influence de ces réglementations. Dans une société de plus en plus mondialisée, il y a à la fois des réglementations internationales et nationales, et celles-ci peuvent influencer positivement ou négativement l’activité des organisations sportives multiculturelles. Par exemple, il y a des réglementations nationales qui exigent un nombre minimum de joueurs locaux ou interdisent l’accès des joueurs qui n’ont pas joué pour leur équipe nationale. D’autre part, il y a des réglementations qui facilitent l’obtention plus rapide d’une citoyenneté ou des réglementations qui interdisent les confrontations sportives entre certains pays ayant connu des conflits historiques.
... For instance, agreeableness is conceivably more helpful in jobs that require social skills or working with others (Judge & Zapata, 2015). Another explanation for the weak linear relationship with performance and the sometimes nonlinear relationship between personality traits and performance could be the existence of individual differences (Guay et al., 2013;Thoresen, Bradley, Bliese, & Thoresen, 2004;Witt, Burke, Barrick, & Mount, 2002). For example, conscientiousness (Le et al., 2011) and extraversion (Grant, 2013) have shown a curvilinear relationship with performance. ...
Full-text available
The role congruity theory and research on gender stereotypes suggest that communion and agency tendencies explain gender discrimination in performance evaluations. We propose that high agreeableness, a Big Five personality trait, captures the communal dimension of an individual’s concern for others. Across two studies conducted in India and the United States, we found evidence that the relationship between agreeableness and performance evaluations is nonlinear for female employees. Women are rated as high performers when they exhibit moderate levels of agreeableness. For male employees, we find a communal bonus effect in which they benefit from being agreeable in the workplace. Our findings demonstrate the stability of these findings across Indian and North American cultures. Our findings contribute to the literature on role congruity, personality theories, and job performance.
... Conscientious individuals are usually goal-oriented and determined to achieve their aims. In addition, individuals high on conscientiousness are quite disciplined, methodical, dependable and diligent (Witt et al., 2002). Hence, they are highly likely to make decisions based on available guidelines and established goals, and it is reasonable to assume that such individuals would be inclined to follow all rules and regulations imposed by governments to control and stop the spread and/or recurrence of a health crisis. ...
The tourism sector has been deeply ravaged by the COVID-19 pandemic as many individuals abstained entirely from travel. Thus, before contemplating the trajectory of the sector’s recovery, it is essential to understand individuals’ travel intentions both during and after the pandemic. The present study contributes in this regard by examining the impact of individuals’ personality traits categorised by the five-factor model, or the Big Five, on their leisure travel intentions during and after the pandemic. To this end, we utilised an artificial neural network (ANN) approach to analyse 500 responses from individuals residing in Japan. The results reveal that extraversion has the strongest relative influence on intentions to travel during the pandemic, whereas openness to experience has the strongest influence on travel intentions after the pandemic. This study is the first of its kind to examine the influence of the Big Five personality traits on travel intentions in the context of a pandemic.
... Agreeableness is a personality trait that can be translated into collaboration for conflict resolution, mutual understanding and low competitiveness (Black, 1990;Ones andViswesvaran, 1999, Tung, 1981). In a professional context, an agreeable employee has a high ability to relate to other people and to collaborate effectively with them (Witt, 2002). At the same time, employees who are less pleasant experience more conflicts (Assendorpf, Wilpens 1998). ...
Full-text available
In an increasingly globalized world, sport has become a promoter of multiculturalism and sports teams can be considered true multinational organizations. In such a world, the concept of cultural intelligence is gaining increasing interest because it explains why individuals may or may not adapt to a new cultural context. Cultural intelligence is a form of intelligence that can be applied even in the field of sports, where huge amounts of money are allocated to expatriate athletes to add value to organizations. Cultural intelligence is a factor that influences the successful adaptation to a new cultural context, but in turn it can be influenced by other factors. Successful adaptation to a new cultural environment can lead to increased self-confidence, team integration and increased market share of athletes. This research is based on the responses of 150 athletes evolving in multicultural teams in France and Romania and analyzes how cultural intelligence influences adaptation to a new cultural context but also how adaptation influences the market share of athletes. Although the sample is represented by athletes, the research results can be useful for all those interested in multicultural management.
Full-text available
The central question for this research was how can self-regulating teamwork behaviors (SRTB) be accomplished in Low-Volume and High-Complexity (LVHC) production work teams? Naturalistic case studies were used to explore factors in team composition, team context, and organization context that influence the generation and development of those behaviors in production work groups.
In diesem Hauptkapitel wird aus Unternehmenssicht aufgezeigt, warum eine gewissenhafte Belegschaft eine überaus wertvolle Ressource ist. Es wird verdeutlicht, zu welchen Handlungsfeldern und wichtigen unternehmerischen Zielgrößen dieses Persönlichkeitsmerkmal essenzielle Beiträge leisten kann. Im Einzelnen sind das u. a.: Leistungs-, Motivations-, und Zufriedenheitssteigerung, Senkung von Fehlzeiten und Fluktuation, positive Effekte auf die Mitarbeiterführung und Zusammenarbeit. So weit wie möglich, werden für die Argumentation empirische Studien genutzt, die mit ihren Ergebnissen, theoretischen Hintergründen und Praxisimplikationen vorgestellt werden. Für die Unternehmenspraxis werden erste Handlungsempfehlungen abgeleitet.
Full-text available
In 3 prior meta-analyses, the relationship between the Big Five factors of personality and job criteria was investigated. However, these meta-analyses showed different findings. Furthermore, these reviews included studies carried out only in the United States and Canada. This study reports meta-analytic research on the same topic but with studies conducted in the European Community, which were not included in the prior reviews. The results indicate that Conscientiousness and Emotional Stability are valid predictors across job criteria and occupational groups. The remaining factors are valid only for some criteria and for some occupational soups. Extraversion was a predictor for 2 occupations, and Openness and Agreeableness were valid predictors of training proficiency. These findings are consistent with M. R. Barrick and M. K. Mount (1991) and L. M. Hough, N. K. Eaten, M. D. Dunnette, J. D. Kamp, and R. A, McCloy (1990). Implications of the results for future research and the practice of personnel selection are suggested.
Full-text available
This study tested the validity of the use of personality tests with aptitude tests as predictors of performance for 203 warehousers using an interactive model. Results indicated cognitive ability explained a significant 2% of the variance in performance, with the interaction between cognitive ability and personality explaining a significant incremental 9% of the variance in performance. These results indicate a need to expand our models of the relationship between personality characteristics and job performance.
Full-text available
Meta-analytic studies of the relationships between the five-factor model of personality constructs and job performance indicate that conscientiousness has been the most consistent predictor. Recent research has sought to identify situational factors that may explain additional variance beyond what has been reported by simple bivariate relationships. The authors hypothesized that perceptions of organizational politics would moderate the relationship between conscientiousness and job performance. Data collected from 234 male and 579 female workers in 4 organizations indicated that conscientiousness was related to job performance among workers perceiving average to high levels of organizational politics but unrelated to performance among workers perceiving low levels of organizational politics. Moreover, perceptions of organizational politics were negatively related to job performance only among workers of average to low levels of conscientiousness. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2012 APA, all rights reserved)
Data used by Arnold (1982) to demonstrate the need for separate data analytic methods to assess form of relationship and degree of relationship differences were shown to have such problems as nonhomogeneous variance and heteroscedasticity, making them unsuitable for analysis with moderated regression. After applying variance-stabilizing transformations, we analyzed the same data by using moderated regression. Results of these analyses showed that the results reported by Arnold (1982) do not serve as a viable basis for perpetuating the practice of assessing degree of relationship differences with the subgrouping method. Moreover, the moderated regression strategy is capable of detecting not only form of relationship differences but also degree of relationship differences. Implications of these findings are discussed. In addition, a number of other issues surrounding the detection and description of moderating effects are considered.
In this study we investigated the moderating role of autonomy on the relationships between the Big Five personality dimensions and supervisor ratings of job performance. On the basis of data from 146 managers, results indicated that two dimensions of personality, Conscientiousness (r =.25) and Extraversion (r =.14), were significantly related to job performance. Consistent with our expectations, the validity of Conscientiousness and Extraversion was greater for managers in jobs high in autonomy compared with those in jobs low in autonomy. The validity of Agreeableness was also higher in high-autonomy jobs compared with low-autonomy ones, but the correlation was negative. These findings suggest that degree of autonomy in the job moderates the validity of at least some personality predictors. Implications for future research are noted.
The authors used 91 sales representatives to test a process model that assessed the relationship of conscientiousness to job performance through mediating motivational (goal-setting) variables. Linear structural equation modeling showed that sales representatives high in conscientiousness are more likely to set goals and are more likely to be committed to goals, which in turn is associated with greater sales volume and higher supervisory ratings of job performance. Results also showed that conscientiousness is directly related to supervisory ratings. Consistent with previous research, results showed that ability was also related to supervisory ratings of job performance and, to a lesser extent, sales volume. Contrary to expectations, 1 other personality construct, extraversion, was not related to sales volume or to supervisory ratings of job performance. Implications and future research needs are discussed.
This study investigated the relation of the "Big Five" personality di- mensions (Extraversion, Emotional Stability, Agreeableness, Consci- entiousness, and Openness to Experience) to three job performance criteria (job proficiency, training proficiency, and personnel data) for five occupational groups (professionals, police, managers, sales, and skilled/semi-skilled). Results indicated that one dimension of person- ality. Conscientiousness, showed consistent relations with all job per- formance criteria for all occupational groups. For the remaining per- sonality dimensions, the estimated true score correlations varied by occupational group and criterion type. Extraversion was a valid pre- dictor for two occupations involving social interaction, managers and sales (across criterion types). Also, both Openness to Experience and Extraversion were valid predictors of the training proficiency criterion (across occupations). Other personality dimensions were also found to be valid predictors for some occupations and some criterion types, but the magnitude of the estimated true score correlations was small (p < .10). Overall, the results illustrate the benefits of using the 5- factor model of personality to accumulate and communicate empirical findings. The findings have numerous implications for research and practice in personnel psychology, especially in the subfields of person- nel selection, training and development, and performance appraisal.