ArticlePDF Available

Household Composition and Risk of Fatal Child Maltreatment


Abstract and Figures

Approximately 2000 children die annually in the United States from maltreatment. Although maternal and child risk factors for child abuse have been identified, the role of household composition has not been well-established. Our objective was to evaluate household composition as a risk factor for fatal child maltreatment. Population-based, case-control study using data from the Missouri Child Fatality Review Panel system, 1992-1994. Households were categorized based on adult residents' relationship to the deceased child. Cases were all maltreatment injury deaths among children <5 years old. Controls were randomly selected from natural-cause deaths during the same period and frequency-matched to cases on age. The main outcome measure was maltreatment death. Children residing in households with adults unrelated to them were 8 times more likely to die of maltreatment than children in households with 2 biological parents (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 8.8; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.6-21.5). Risk of maltreatment death also was elevated for children residing with step, foster, or adoptive parents (aOR: 4.7; 95% CI: 1.6-12.0), and in households with other adult relatives present (aOR: 2.2; 95% CI: 1.1-4.5). Risk of maltreatment death was not increased for children living with only 1 biological parent (aOR: 1.1; 95% CI: 0.8-2.0). Children living in households with 1 or more male adults that are not related to them are at increased risk for maltreatment injury death. This risk is not elevated for children living with a single parent, as long as no other adults live in the home.
Content may be subject to copyright.
DOI: 10.1542/peds.109.4.615
2002;109;615-621 Pediatrics
Bernard G. Ewigman
Michael N. Stiffman, Patricia G. Schnitzer, Patricia Adam, Robin L. Kruse and
Household Composition and Risk of Fatal Child Maltreatment
This information is current as of December 16, 2005
located on the World Wide Web at:
The online version of this article, along with updated information and services, is
reserved. Print ISSN: 0031-4005. Online ISSN: 1098-4275.
Village, Illinois, 60007. Copyright © 2002 by the American Academy of Pediatrics. All rights
trademarked by the American Academy of Pediatrics, 141 Northwest Point Boulevard, Elk Grove
andpublication, it has been published continuously since 1948. PEDIATRICS is owned, published,
PEDIATRICS is the official journal of the American Academy of Pediatrics. A monthly
at UNIV OF CHICAGO on December 16, 2005 www.pediatrics.orgDownloaded from
Household Composition and Risk of Fatal Child Maltreatment
Michael N. Stiffman, MD, MSPH*; Patricia G. Schnitzer, PhD‡; Patricia Adam, MD, MSPH§;
Robin L. Kruse, PhD, MSPH‡; and Bernard G. Ewigman, MD, MSPH‡
ABSTRACT. Objective. Approximately 2000 children
die annually in the United States from maltreatment.
Although maternal and child risk factors for child abuse
have been identified, the role of household composition
has not been well-established. Our objective was to eval-
uate household composition as a risk factor for fatal child
Methodology. Population-based, case-control study
using data from the Missouri Child Fatality Review
Panel system, 1992–1994. Households were categorized
based on adult residents’ relationship to the deceased
child. Cases were all maltreatment injury deaths among
children <5 years old. Controls were randomly selected
from natural-cause deaths during the same period and
frequency-matched to cases on age. The main outcome
measure was maltreatment death.
Results. Children residing in households with adults
unrelated to them were 8 times more likely to die of
maltreatment than children in households with 2 biolog-
ical parents (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 8.8; 95% confi-
dence interval [CI]: 3.6–21.5). Risk of maltreatment death
also was elevated for children residing with step, foster,
or adoptive parents (aOR: 4.7; 95% CI: 1.6–12.0), and in
households with other adult relatives present (aOR: 2.2;
95% CI: 1.1–4.5). Risk of maltreatment death was not
increased for children living with only 1 biological par-
ent (aOR: 1.1; 95% CI: 0.8–2.0).
Conclusions. Children living in households with 1 or
more male adults that are not related to them are at
increased risk for maltreatment injury death. This risk is
not elevated for children living with a single parent, as
long as no other adults live in the home. Pediatrics 2002;
109:615–621; epidemiology, injury, child abuse and neglect,
fatalities, mortality, maltreatment, case-control study,
death, risk factors, behavior.
ABBREVIATIONS. CFRP, Missouri Child Fatality Review Panel;
SIDS, sudden infant death syndrome; aOR, adjusted odds ratio;
CI, confidence interval.
Maltreatment of children causes an estimated
2000 deaths annually in the United States.
Ninety percent of these deaths occur among
children 5 years of age, making maltreatment the
leading cause of injury fatality in this age group.
Reports of fatal child abuse and neglect as well as
child homicide rates are rising steadily.
methodologic challenges in child maltreatment re-
search have hampered identification of important
risk factors and the development of effective preven-
tion strategies.
Several studies have identified the following ma-
ternal risk factors for fatal child maltreatment and
child homicide
: young maternal age,
12 years of maternal education,
late or no pre-
natal care,
unmarried parents,
and higher parity.
Child characteristics
that are risk factors include male gender
and low
birth weight.
Previously documented maltreat-
ment is a strong risk factor for child homicide.
These studies are limited by their lack of information
on household composition at the time of the child’s
death. Another limitation is their use of death certif-
icate designation of homicide or intentional injury as
the criterion for maltreatment. Because most mal-
treatment deaths are neither intentional nor homi-
cide, studies that use those narrower terms to define
maltreatment miss more than half of the cases.
The association of household composition with
child maltreatment has been studied for over 20
years. The earliest reports identified substantial
proportions (35%–54%) of maltreated children in
single-parent households and in stepfamilies.
Subsequent studies suggest an increased risk of mal-
treatment in such households.
However, these
studies are descriptive, lack a nonabused comparison
group, and do not control for confounding. To ade-
quately determine risk factors for fatal child mal-
treatment, researchers need data on maternal, child,
and family factors, including household composi-
To better recognize fatal maltreatment of children,
the state of Missouri in 1991 mandated the Missouri
Child Fatality Review Panel (CFRP) system. This
system ensures that child deaths (birth through age
17) are comprehensively reviewed and that stan-
dardized data are collected.
Because standard
items include household composition—people living
in the decedent child’s household at the time of death
and their relationships to the child—the CFRP data
are uniquely suited to evaluate risk factors for mal-
treatment fatality, including household composition.
From the *HealthPartners Research Foundation, Minneapolis, Minnesota;
‡Center for Family Medicine Science, Department of Family and Commu-
nity Medicine, University of Missouri–Columbia, Missouri; §Department of
Family Practice and Community Health, University of Minnesota, Minne-
apolis, Minnesota.
This work was completed at the Department of Family and Community
Medicine, University of Missouri–Columbia.
Received for publication Apr 5, 2001; accepted Sep 27, 2001.
Reprint requests to (M.N.S.) HealthPartners, 8450 Seasons Pkwy, Wood-
bury, MN 55125. E-mail:
PEDIATRICS (ISSN 0031 4005). Copyright © 2002 by the American Acad-
emy of Pediatrics.
PEDIATRICS Vol. 109 No. 4 April 2002 615
at UNIV OF CHICAGO on December 16, 2005 www.pediatrics.orgDownloaded from
We report here a case-control study of household
composition and risk of fatal child maltreatment us-
ing these CFRP data.
Population and Data Sources
Our study population included all Missouri resident children
5 years of age who died in Missouri from January 1, 1992, to
December 31, 1994. State law mandates that each county CFRP
collect and record information on each deceased child. First, the
county coroner or medical examiner and Chair of the Child Fatal-
ity Review Team systematically review each child death and com-
plete a data Form 1. Then, a county-level interdisciplinary child
fatality review teamincluding law enforcement, child protective
services, public health, medicine, the coroner or medical examiner,
and the county prosecuting attorneyconvenes to further review
deaths that meet any of 19 criteria (Table 1), and complete a data
Form 2. Deaths not meeting these criteria may also be reviewed at
the discretion of the panel chair. In addition to gathering detailed
information on the circumstances of each death, data on house-
hold members and their relationship to the decedent children are
gathered on all deceased children, regardless of cause of death,
even if the county CFRP team does not review the death. These
household composition data include the number of children in the
household; the parent or guardians marital status; the number of
adults in the household; how the adults were related to the child
decedent and to each other; their age and gender; plus the de-
ceased childs age, race, gender, and county of residence. For each
decedent, we obtained and linked the completed CFRP data
forms, the computerized CFRP data file, documentation of sub-
stantiated child abuse and neglect, Medicaid eligibility status,
birth certificate data, and death certificate data. All children with
a Missouri death certificate had a matched CFRP form, and 95%
had a matched birth certificate.
The study protocol was exempted from review by the institu-
tional review board at the University of Missouri Health Sciences
Case Definition
Our case definition of maltreatment is based on the definition
of the National Institute of Child Health and Human Develop-
ment Working Group on Standard Definitions for Child Injury
Data: Child maltreatment is behavior directed toward a child,
which is outside the norms of conduct, and entails a substantial
risk of causing physical or emotional harm. Behaviors include
both actions and omissions (failure to act), and may be intentional
or unintentional.
We defined maltreatment injuries as those
that were either inflicted directly by a parent or other adult
caregiver responsible for the child at the time of injury, or that
resulted when the parent or caretaker failed to protect the child
from a hazardous circumstance. These failure-to-protect deaths
were considered maltreatment if the adult responsible for the
child was not present at the time of the fatal injury event, failed to
use legally mandated safety protective devices (car seats or water
flotation devices), or was present but was not capable of protect-
ing the child (intoxicated). Examples of hazardous circumstances
include handling a loaded gun, playing with a cigarette lighter, or
playing near a body of water or busy street.
Three authors (M.N.S., P.A., B.G.E.) manually reviewed all
hard copy data sources on all children less than age 5 who died
from an injury and whose death had been reviewed by the full
CFRP (N291). The investigators examined the injury circum-
stances and identified deaths meeting the maltreatment case def-
inition. We included cases regardless of whether the death oc-
curred in or out of the home, and regardless of the relationship of
the person in charge of the child at the time of death. When the
circumstances of a death were unclear, or when the files contained
conflicting information, we obtained copies of the autopsy reports,
reviewed the circumstances with the State Technical Assistance
Team for the CFRP system, and/or consulted a forensic patholo-
gist for a recommendation to guide our decision. We excluded
deaths that remained undetermined or that lacked sufficient in-
formation to be classified as maltreatment.
Selection of Controls
Children under age 5 who died of natural causes were eligible
to serve as controls. We excluded natural cause deaths related to
prematurity or congenital anomalies because the majority of these
children died before hospital discharge and therefore were never
members of a household in the same manner as cases. Deaths
related to unmet needswere also excluded. We included sud-
den infant death syndrome (SIDS) deaths as natural-cause deaths.
SIDS is a diagnosis of exclusion for the unexplained sudden death
of an infant 1 year old after 1) thorough case investigation,
including performance of an autopsy, 2) examination of the death
scene, and 3) review of the clinical history.
Missouris mandatory
CFRP review of all unexplained deaths among children 1 year of
age leaves little likelihood that a child abuse death could be
misclassified as a SIDS death.
Controls were randomly selected from the eligible deaths and
frequency-matched to cases by age at death. This matching was by
month of age for children 12 months old and by year of age for
children 1 through 4 years old. Our goal was to match 2 controls
to each case. To ensure the deaths were in fact attributable to
natural causes and that SIDS criteria were documented, we ran-
domly selected and reviewed 10% of controls. This review con-
firmed that the random sample of controls died of natural causes
or SIDS.
Classification of Household Composition
We classified households into 5 mutually exclusive categories:
households with 1) 2 biological parents of the deceased child and
no other adults, 2) 1 biological parent and no other adults, 3) 1 or
2 biological parents and another adult relative resident (grand-
mother, aunt, etc), 4) at least 1 step, foster, or adoptive parent, and
5) 1 or 2 biological parents and another, unrelated adult resident
(paramour, friend). Households in categories 3 through 5 with
residents in 1 category were coded using the following hierar-
chy. Households with an unrelated adult present were classified
in the last category, regardless of other household members.
Households with a step, foster, or adoptive parent in addition to
another relative were categorized in the step, foster, adoptive
parent group. Households with 2 biological parents and no other
adult residents were the reference group for analysis.
Statistical Analysis
We examined univariate and bivariate distributions of the vari-
ables of interest. We calculated odds ratios using logistic regres-
sion. The odds ratio provides an estimate of the relative risk of
maltreatment death associated with the particular household com-
position category.
Adjusted odds ratios (aORs) were calculated with logistic re-
gression, controlling for confounding factors. Based on prelimi-
nary analyses, potential confounding variables (those related to
both household composition and maltreatment death) were the
childs sex, race, age, and Medicaid-eligibility status; mothers age,
TABLE 1. Criteria for Child Fatality Review by the Full, Mul-
tidisciplinary County Panel, Missouri, 1992-1994
Sudden unexplained death, age 1y
Death unexplained/undetermined manner
Division of Family Services reports on the decedent or other
persons in the residence
Decedent in Division of Family Services custody
Possible inadequate supervision
Possible malnutrition or delay in seeking medical care
Possible suicide
Possible inflicted injury
Any firearm injury
Injury not witnessed by person in charge at the time of injury
Death attributable to confinement
Bathtub or bucket drowning
Suffocation or strangulation
Any poisoning
Severe unexplained injury
Pedestrian vehicle/driveway injury
Suspected sexual assault
Death attributable to any fire injury
Other suspicious findings (in injuries such as electrocution,
crush injury, or fall)
at UNIV OF CHICAGO on December 16, 2005 www.pediatrics.orgDownloaded from
education, and late or no prenatal care; the presence of siblings
under age 5 in the household, and a previous Division of Family
Services substantiation of abuse. We considered a variable to be a
confounder if inclusion in the logistic regression model resulted in
a change in the effect estimate of 10% or more.
Missing data were
imputed. Imputation is less biased than deleting records with
missing values when developing multivariable models.
data were coded to the low-risk or reference category for that
variable. For example, mothers educationwas missing for 49
(10.4%) of the 471 study participants, and these were coded as
high school graduate.
Subgroup Analyses
To evaluate whether the association between household com-
position and maltreatment death might differ for deaths caused by
inflicted injuries versus deaths from exposure to hazards, we
conducted 2 separate logistic regression analyses, 1 for each of
these subgroups.
We conducted 2 additional subgroup analyses to determine
whether the effects of household composition were different for
homicide cases, and substantiated child abuse or neglect cases.
Most studies of child maltreatment have used the homicide des-
ignation on the death certificate or substantiation of child abuse or
neglect by the appropriate state agency to define maltreatment.
Although we believe that these case definitions lead to substantial
misclassification and missed cases, we performed these analyses
so our findings could be compared with previous literature.
There were 2591 Missouri resident children under
age 5 that died in Missouri from 1992 through 1994.
A total of 952 deaths related to congenital malforma-
tions (427), prematurity (259), and other or undeter-
mined cause of death (266) were excluded, leaving
1639 deaths for study (Fig 1). Of the 291 injury
deaths, 175 (60%) met the study definition of mal-
treatment; 296 controls were selected from the 1348
eligible noninjury deaths. We were unable to select 2
controls for each case because of a lack of eligible 2-
and 3-year-old controls.
In 55 (31%) of the 175 maltreatment deaths, a par-
ent or other caregiver directly inflicted the fatal in-
jury. Of these, 39 (71%) were inflicted by shaking,
dropping, or hitting the child; 11 (20%) involved the
use of physical objects including firearms; and the
method of injury for the remaining 5 (9%) inflicted
injury deaths was unknown.
One hundred twenty (69%) maltreatment deaths
resulted when a parent or caregiver failed to protect
the child from a hazard. These deaths resulted from
fires (37, 31%), drowning (31, 26%), unsafe sleeping
arrangements (17, 14%), motor vehicles (17, 14%),
choking or strangulation (8, 7%), and other miscella-
neous hazards, including falls from heights, poisons,
and electrocution (10, 8%).
Select child, maternal, and household variables are
presented in Table 2. Compared with controls, chil-
dren who died of maltreatment were more likely to
be male, black, and the third or later child born to
their mother. Their mothers were more likely to have
been unmarried, have had less than a high school
education when the child was born, and to have
sought prenatal care after the fourth month of preg-
nancy, or not at all. Case children also were more
likely to have resided in households: 1) including
another relative, step-parent, or unrelated adult res-
ident, 2) where siblings 5 years old also lived, and
3) where abuse or neglect had been previously sub-
stantiated. Additional variables such as birth weight
and gestational age were evaluated in the univariate
and bivariate analyses but were not used in addi-
tional analyses because we found no differences be-
tween cases and controls. The age and education of
the childs father had over 40% of missing values,
and were not analyzed further.
Household Composition and Risk of Maltreatment
Children residing in households with adults unre-
lated to them had the highest risk of maltreatment
death compared with decedent children residing in
households with 2 biological parents and no other
adults (aOR: 8.8; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.6
21.5; Table 2). Children in households with step,
foster, or adoptive parents also had an increased risk
of maltreatment death (aOR: 4.7; 95% CI: 1.612.0)
as did children in households with other relatives
present (aOR: 2.2; 95% CI: 1.14.5).
The majority (83%) of households with at least 1
unrelated adult resident consisted of the childs bio-
logical mother and her boyfriend. Similarly, 70% of
Fig 1. Selection of cases and controls from
population of children who died in Missouri,
at UNIV OF CHICAGO on December 16, 2005 www.pediatrics.orgDownloaded from
the case households (and only 30% of control house-
holds) in the step, foster, and adoptive category con-
tained a biological mother and stepfather. Therefore,
the increased risk of maltreatment death we found
occurs primarily in households including biologi-
cally unrelated adult males and boyfriends of the
childs mother. Thirty-nine percent of our control
children resided in households with only 1 biological
parent. Risk was not increased for children in house-
holds with 1 biological parent and no other adult
residents. Based on national data on household com-
position from the Federal Interagency Forum on
Child and Family Statistics,
we calculated a popu-
lation attributable risk of 12% for households with
single mothers and their partners, and 8% for step-
parent households. In our study, the partners were
mainly boyfriends; the identity of the partners were
not specified in the Federal Interagency Forum on
Child and Family Statistics data.
Subgroup Analyses
We considered subgroups of maltreatment deaths
by inflicted injury and exposure to hazardous cir-
cumstances. aORs for each household category were
similar to findings for all maltreatment deaths, ex-
cept for households with an unrelated adult (Table
3). Nineteen (34%) of the 55 children who died of
inflicted injuries lived in households with a steppar-
or another unrelated adult.
Most of these in-
juries (15 of 19) were inflicted by the mothers boy-
friend or childs stepfather. The risk of death
attributable to an inflicted injury among children in
TABLE 2. Distribution of Select Child, Maternal, and Household Variables for Cases and Controls
Variable (Number Missing) Cases (%) Controls (%) Odds Ratio (95%CI)
Child variables
Male 117 (67) 162 (55) 1.7 (1.12.5)
Female 58 (33) 134 (45) Reference
Black 63 (36) 78 (26) 1.6 (1.12.4)
White/other 112 (64) 218 (74) Reference
Age at death
1 y old 65 (37) 115 (39) 1.5 (0.83.1)
1 y old 39 (22) 75 (25) 1.4 (0.73.0)
2 y old 33 (19) 38 (13) 2.3 (1.15.1)
3 y old 25 (14) 33 (11) 2.0 (0.94.6)
4 y old 13 (7) 35 (12) Reference
Medicaid eligibility
Eligible 96 (55) 147 (50) 1.2 (0.91.8)
Not eligible 79 (45) 149 (50) Reference
Birth order (24)
Third or subsequent 83 (47) 87 (29) 2.2 (1.43.5)
Second child 38 (22) 81 (27) 1.1 (0.61.9)
First child 48 (27) 110 (37) Reference
Maternal variables
Age at childs birth (29)
20 y old 44 (25) 60 (20) 1.2 (0.81.9)
20 y old 127 (73) 211 (71) Reference
Education at childs birth (49)
Less than high school 82 (47) 96 (32) 1.7 (1.12.5)
High school graduate 82 (47) 162 (55) Reference
Marital status at childs birth (46)
Not married 98 (56) 121 (41) 1.8 (1.22.6)
Married 65 (37) 141 (48) Reference
Month of first prenatal visit (49)
None 8 (5) 8 (3) 1.7 (0.65.2)
5th9th month 35 (20) 35 (12) 1.7 (1.03.0)
1st4th month 123 (70) 213 (72) Reference
Household variables
Household composition*
One biological parent only 41 (23) 83 (28) 1.2 (0.82.0)
Other relative present 20 (11) 20 (7) 2.5 (1.34.9)
Step, other parent present 14 (8) 7 (2) 5.0 (2.112.0)
Other, unrelated adult present 29 (17) 7 (2) 10.3 (4.921.9)
Two biological parents only 71 (41) 177 (60) Reference
Siblings under the age of 5 (42)
Yes 102 (58) 92 (31) 3.1 (2.14.6)
No 62 (35) 173 (58) Reference
Previous Division of Family Services
substantiation of abuse
Yes 19 (11) 5 (2) 7.1 (2.917.1)
No 156 (89) 291 (98) Reference
Urban 72 (41) 126 (43) 0.9 (0.71.4)
Nonurban 103 (59) 170 (57) Reference
* Two controls lived in institutions, not residences, at the time of their death so they were not included in the household composition
at UNIV OF CHICAGO on December 16, 2005 www.pediatrics.orgDownloaded from
households with another unrelated adult was 27
times the risk of natural death.
Two additional subgroup analyses considered the
52 (30%) maltreatment deaths recorded as homicides
on death certificates and the 78 (45%) deaths substan-
tiated as child abuse or neglect fatalities by the Mis-
souri Department of Social Services (Table 4). The
aORs for step, foster, and adoptive parent house-
holds were again somewhat higher, and they were
markedly higher for households with unrelated
adults than for our broader maltreatment case defi-
We had perpetrator information for most of the 55
maltreatment deaths that resulted from an inflicted
injury (Table 5). Of these 21 children, 38% sustained
injuries inflicted by a biological parent (18% by the
biological mother and 20% by the biological father).
Fourteen of the children (25%) were injured by their
mothers boyfriend, whereas only 1 child (2%) was
injured by their fathers girlfriend. The perpetrator
was unknown or not identified for 7 children (13%).
Table 5 also identifies the household composition
category of the decedent child. It is worth noting,
however, that perpetrators were not necessarily res-
idents of the decedent childs household.
Our study shows that Missouri children who died
from maltreatment injury were more likely to reside
in households with an unrelated adult, primarily an
adult male, than were children who died of natural
causes. This study also clarifies the role of single-
parent households as a risk factor for maltreatment
death. We found that children who died from mal-
treatment injury were no more likely than controls to
live in households with a single biological parentas
long as there were no other adults in the household.
Previous studies have not measured household com-
position or were unable to control for multiple vari-
ables. Our study design and unique data allowed us
to determine that 2 key risk factors are living with a
stepfather or the mothers boyfriend. This is the first
population-based case-control study to document an
increased risk of maltreatment death in households
where men unrelated to the decedent child reside
and the first to show that the increased risk in single-
parent households is present only when other adults
also reside in the house.
Our findings support previous studies and add
important new information to this body of literature.
A majority (58%) of our maltreated children resided
in households with only 1 biological parent (with or
without other adults). This proportion is similar to
the 35% to 57% of abused children residing with
single-parent families or stepfamilies cited in the lit-
In contrast to past research, we found no increased
risk of maltreatment death in households with a
single biological parent and no other adult resident.
This may be attributable to our ability to categorize
households with only 1 biological parent separately
from households that also had other adults. For ex-
ample, the Third National Incidence Study of Child
Abuse and Neglect reported that children living with
single parents had 77% and 87% greater risk, respec-
tively, of harm by physical abuse and physical ne-
glect compared with children living with 2 parents.
No additional household composition data were re-
ported. Our findings suggest that the National Inci-
dence Study findings may reflect the increased risk
TABLE 3. aOR for the Association Between All Maltreatment Deaths, Deaths Attributable to Inflicted Injuries, and Deaths Attrib-
utable to Exposure to Hazards, and the Relationship of the Deceased Child to the Adults in the Household (Household Composition)
Household Composition aOR* (95% CI) for
All Maltreatment Deaths
aOR(95% CI) for
Deaths Attributable
to Inflicted Injury
Only (n55)
aOR(95% CI) for
Deaths Attributable to
Exposure to Hazards
Only (n120)
Two biological parents only Reference Reference Reference
One biological parent only 1.1 (0.82.0) 0.9 (0.32.1) 1.4 (0.82.4)
Other relative present 2.2 (1.14.5) 2.2 (0.76.7) 2.2 (1.04.9)
Step, foster, adoptive parent 4.7 (1.612.0) 5.0 (1.122.9) 5.1 (1.715.3)
Other, unrelated adults present 8.8 (3.621.5) 26.9 (7.2100.2) 6.5 (2.318.1)
* Adjusted for presence of siblings under age 5 in the household, and previous Division of Family Services substantiation of abuse.
Adjusted for the decedents age, race, and medicaid status, mothers age and month of first prenatal visit, presence of siblings under age
5 in the household, and previous Division of Family Services substantiation of abuse.
Adjusted for the decedents Medicaid status, mothers education, presence of siblings under age 5 in the household, and previous
Division of Family Services substantiation of abuse.
TABLE 4. aOR for Homicide Deaths and Substantiated Abuse and Neglect Deaths
Household Composition aOR* (95% CI) for
Deaths (n52)
aOR* (95% CI) for Substantiated
Abuse and Neglect
Deaths (n78)
Two biological parents only Reference Reference
One biological parent only 1.0 (0.42.5) 1.5 (0.73.1)
Other relative present 2.6 (0.88.2) 1.8 (0.65.1)
Step, foster, adoptive parent 6.1 (1.327.9) 8.3 (2.428.2)
Other, unrelated adults present 30.5 (8.1115.1) 17.9 (5.558.8)
* Adjusted for the decedents age, race, and Medicaid status; mothers age and month of first prenatal visit; presence of siblings under age
5 in the household; and previous Division of Family Services substantiation of abuse.
at UNIV OF CHICAGO on December 16, 2005 www.pediatrics.orgDownloaded from
among single-parent households in which an unre-
lated adult male also resides.
Wilson and Daly
reported increased injury risk
for children living with single mothers resulted most
often from abuse, not by their mother, but by their
mothers boyfriend. Our data show the same pattern.
The reason children were more likely to die from
maltreatment if an unrelated adult resided in the
household is not clear. We suspect it may be the
result of a combination of factors. Perhaps the pres-
ence of an unrelated adult in the home is a marker
for instability in the household. It is also possible
that unrelated adults are not as keenly involved in
protecting children from harm as their biological
parents. In any event, our data cannot establish
cause-and-effect relationships, but it can identify as-
sociations and provide information for future ave-
nues of research.
Our studys strengths are attributable primarily to
the unique population-based CFRP data we used.
These data permitted classification of injury deaths
based on a definition of fatal maltreatment that was
developed to guide research and prevention. This
definition does not rely on knowledge of intent or on
labels assigned by law enforcement, the medical ex-
aminer, or the state child protective services agency.
Therefore, biases limiting much previous research
the underreporting of child abuse deaths and the
misclassification of infant and child homicides as
unintentional injury deathwere virtually elimi-
nated in this study.
The detailed CFRP data on
household composition also made apparent the key
role of the unrelated adult male. Although 53 chil-
dren who died of SIDS served as controls, misclassi-
fication of an abuse death as SIDS would bias our
results toward the null.
We view the ability to use this research definition
of maltreatment as a study strength. We believe it
more accurately and completely identifies child mal-
treatment than the social or legal designation of child
abuse and neglect. To make our findings comparable
with other research or existing data, we have in-
cluded subgroup analyses using the more traditional
designations of substantiated child abuse or neglect
and homicide.
Using a control group of children who died of
natural causes is a limitation of this study. Although
this design allows us to compare children who die of
maltreatment with other children who die, it pro-
vides no insight on how fatally maltreated children
may differ from children who lived. A second limi-
tation is our inability to address risk factors for our
reference population, the 41% of maltreatment
deaths among children that resided in households
with 2 biological parents and no other adults. Finally,
the small number of study participants reduces the
precision of effect estimates (especially in subgroup
analyses) and limits analyses of other potential risk
factors and interaction effects.
Maltreatment accounts for most injury deaths
among young children, yet fatal maltreatment itself
is relatively uncommon. Although the relative risk of
fatal maltreatment is increased substantially if an
unrelated adult male resides with a child, the abso-
lute risk is relatively low. Therefore, most children in
this circumstance will not die from maltreatment.
Research is needed to show how household compo-
sition and other risk factors affect morbidity and
mortality related to child maltreatment, and what
interventions may reduce the risk. In the meantime,
professionals concerned with protecting children
should note the presence of unrelated adult males in
the home as 1 of many factors to consider when
assessing a childs risk for fatal maltreatment.
TABLE 5. Household Composition Category and Perpetrator of Injury for Children Who Died of Inflicted Injuries, Missouri,
Perpetrator Household Composition Category Total
2 Biological
1 Biological
Parent Only
Other, Unrelated
Biological parent
Biological mother 5 3 2 10
Biological father 8 1 1 1 11
Unrelated male
Boyfriend of mother 1 1 12 14
Stepfather 213
Boyfriend/husband of babysitter 1 1 2
Male friend not living with mother 2 2
Related male
Uncle 11
Unrelated female
Girlfriend of father 11
Babysitter 1 1
Sibling/step-sibling/half-sibling 18 y old 3 3
Unknown perpetrator
Child in care of
Babysitter 11
Grandmother and aunt 1 1
Stepfather and mother 1 1
Biological mother and father 2 2
Unknown 2 2
Total 20 10 6 4 15 55
at UNIV OF CHICAGO on December 16, 2005 www.pediatrics.orgDownloaded from
Dr Stiffman was funded, in part, by faculty development grant
DHHS 5 D15 57 00811; Dr Adam was funded, in part, by NRSA
training grant 5T32 PE1700107; and Dr Kruse was funded, in
part, by NRSA training grant PE1003801. All were academic
fellows in the Department of Family and Community Medicine at
the University of MissouriColumbia during a portion of the time
this research was conducted. Drs Schnitzer and Ewigman were
funded, in part, by a grant from the American Academy of Family
Physicians to the Center for Family Medicine Science in the De-
partment of Family and Community Medicine.
We would like to thank Darla Horman for her conscientious
data management; Katherine Kaufer Christoffel, MD, MPH, for
her helpful consultation and review of an earlier version of this
manuscript; and Jay Dix, MD, forensic pathologist, for his time
and expertise. The Missouri Department of Health, the Missouri
Department of Social Services, and the State Technical Assistance
Team for the CFRP system and all the county CFRP teams made
the study possible through their diligent data collection and state-
of-the-art investigation system. Gary Stangler, Director of the Mis-
souri Department of Social Services, deserves special acknowledg-
ment for his unfailing support of this research.
1. McClain PW, Sacks JJ, Froehlke RG, Ewigman BG. Estimates of fatal
child abuse and neglect, United States, 1979 through 1988. Pediatrics.
2. Ewigman B, Kivlahan C, Land G. The Missouri child fatality study:
underreporting of maltreatment fatalities among children younger than
five years of age, 1983 through 1986. Pediatrics. 1993;91:330337
3. Brenner RA, Overpeck MD, Trumble AC, DerSimonian R, Berendes H.
Deaths attributable to injuries in infants, United States, 19831991.
Pediatrics. 1999;103:968974
4. Herman-Giddens ME, Brown G, Verbiest S, et al. Underascertainment
of child abuse mortality in the United States. JAMA. 1999;282:463467
5. Overpeck MD, Brenner RA, Trumble AC, Trifiletti LB, Berendes HW.
Risk factors for infant homicide in the United States. N Engl J Med.
6. National Research Council. Panel on Research on Child Abuse and
Neglect. Understanding Child Abuse and Neglect. Panel on Research on
Child Abuse and Neglect, Commission on Behavioral and Social Sci-
ences and Education, National Research Council. Washington, DC:
National Academy of Sciences; 1993
7. Emerick SJ, Foster LR, Campbell DT. Risk factors for traumatic infant
death in Oregon, 1973 to 1982. Pediatrics. 1986;77:518522
8. Winpisinger KA, Hopkins RS, Indian RW, Hostetler JR. Risk factors for
childhood homicides in Ohio: a birth certificate-based case-control
study. Am J Public Health. 1991;81:10521054
9. Scholer SJ, Mitchel EF Jr, Ray WA. Predictors of injury mortality in early
childhood. Pediatrics. 1997;100:342347
10. Sorenson SB, Peterson JG. Traumatic child death and documented
maltreatment history, Los Angeles. Am J Public Health. 1994;84:623627
11. Sabotta EE, Davis RL. Fatality after report to a child abuse registry in
Washington State, 19731986. Child Abuse Negl. 1992;16:627635
12. Siegel CD, Graves P, Maloney K, Norris JM, Calonge BN, Lezotte D.
Mortality from intentional and unintentional injury among infants of
young mothers in Colorado, 1986 to 1992. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med.
13. Cummings P, Theis MK, Mueller BA, Rivara FP. Infant injury death in
Washington State, 1981 through 1990. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1994;
14. Baldwin JA, Oliver JE. Epidemiology and family characteristics of se-
verely abused children. Br J Prev Soc Med. 1975;29:205221
15. Smith SM, Hanson R, Noble S. Social aspects of the battered baby
syndrome. Br J Psychiatry. 1974;125:568582
16. Ebbin AJ, Gollub MH, Stein AM, Wilson MG. Battered child syndrome
at the Los Angeles County General Hospital. Am J Dis Child. 1969;118:
17. Wilson M, Daly M, Weghorst SJ. Household composition and the risk of
child abuse and neglect. J Biosoc Sci. 1980;12:333340
18. Daly M, Wilson MI. Some differential attributes of lethal assaults on
small children by stepfathers versus genetic fathers. Ethol Sociobiol.
19. Wilson M, Daly M. Risk of maltreatment of children living with step-
parents. In: Gelles RJ, Lancaster JB, eds. Child Abuse and Neglect: Biosocial
Dimensions. New York, NY: Aldine De Gruyter; 1987:215232
20. Daly M, Wilson M. Child abuse and other risks of not living with both
parents. Ethol Sociobiol. 1985;6:197210
21. Sedlak AJ, Broadhurst DD. Third National Incidence Study of Child Abuse
and Neglect: Final Report. Washington, DC: US Department of Health
and Human Services, National Center on Child Abuse and Neglect;
22. Wissow LS. Infanticide. N Engl J Med. 1998;339:1239 1241
23. Durfee MJ, Gellert GA, Tilton-Durfee D. Origins and clinical relevance
of child death review teams. JAMA. 1992;267:31723175
24. Monteleone JA. Review process. In: Monteleone JA, Brodeur AE, eds.
Child Maltreatment: A Clinical Guide and Reference. St Louis, MO: GW
Medical Publishing, Inc; 1994:309385
25. American Academy of Pediatrics, Committee on Child Abuse and
Neglect and Committee on Community Health Services. Investigation
and review of unexpected infant and child deaths. Pediatrics. 1999;104:
26. Christoffel KK, Scheidt PC, Agran PF, Kraus JF, McLoughlin E, Paulson
JA. Standard definitions for childhood injury research: excerpts of a
conference report. Pediatrics. 1992;89:10271034
27. Anonymous. Sudden infant death syndromeUnited States, 19831994.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 1996;45:859863
28. Rothman KJ, Greenland S. Modern Epidemiology. Philadelphia, PA:
Lippincott-Raven; 1998
29. Harrell FE Jr, Lee KL, Mark DB. Multivariable prognostic models: issues
in developing models, evaluating assumptions and adequacy, and mea-
suring and reducing errors. Stat Med. 1996;15:361387
30. Federal Interagency Forum on Child and Family Statistics. America’s
Children: Key National Indicators of Well-Being, 2000. Washington, DC:
The Forum; 2000
31. Winn DG, Agran PF, Anderson CL. Sensitivity of hospitalsE-coded
data in identifying causes of childrens violence-related injuries. Public
Health Rep. 1995;110:277281
32. Bonner BL, Crow SM, Logue MB. Fatal child neglect. In: Dubowitz H,
ed. Neglected Children: Research, Practice, and Policy. Thousand Oaks, CA:
SAGE Publications, Inc; 1999:156173
33. Jason J, Carpenter MM, Tyler CW Jr. Underrecording of infant homicide
in the United States. Am J Public Health. 1983;73:195197
at UNIV OF CHICAGO on December 16, 2005 www.pediatrics.orgDownloaded from
DOI: 10.1542/peds.109.4.615
2002;109;615-621 Pediatrics
Bernard G. Ewigman
Michael N. Stiffman, Patricia G. Schnitzer, Patricia Adam, Robin L. Kruse and
Household Composition and Risk of Fatal Child Maltreatment
This information is current as of December 16, 2005
& Services
Updated Information
including high-resolution figures, can be found at:
This article has been cited by 3 HighWire-hosted articles:
Subspecialty Collections
following collection(s):
This article, along with others on similar topics, appears in the
Permissions & Licensing
tables) or in its entirety can be found online at:
Information about reproducing this article in parts (figures,
Information about ordering reprints can be found online:
at UNIV OF CHICAGO on December 16, 2005 www.pediatrics.orgDownloaded from
... Department of Health & Human Services [USDHHS], 2019). There is a growing body of literature that has identified child, family, and household characteristics that place children at risk for experiencing a maltreatment death (Anderson et al., 1983;Douglas, 2015, Graham et al., 2010Schnitzer & Ewigman, 2008;Stiffman et al., 2002;Yampolskaya et al., 2009). Despite this body of research that highlights the risk factors and prevalence of child maltreatment fatalities (CMFs), there is a dearth of recent literature that focuses on the criminal and prosecutorial side of fatal child maltreatment. ...
In the United States child maltreatment fatalities (CMFs) do not usually meet the standard for manslaughter or murder, resulting in convictions of lesser crimes and little jail time. This exploratory study examined the charges brought against suspected CMF perpetrators in 2017. Univariate and bivariate analyses were conducted using data obtained from the Nexis Uni newspaper database, that has over 40,000 high quality media sources, for the year 2017. We found that the most frequently used charges were endangering the welfare of a child and murder, the former of which was more related to neglect-deaths and the latter to physical abuse-deaths. There was no difference between charges for male and female perpetrators. Practical implications for research, policy, and practice are discussed.
... HC has established impacts on: physical health in terms of contagious disease exposure and transmission patterns [2][3][4][5][6]; older age care, isolation, and role of family carers [7][8][9][10]; mental health [11][12][13][14][15]; social factors including deprivation [1], inequalities linked to overcrowding, multi-generational living and housing security [1,11]; family justice and child wellbeing (effect on health, educational [16], maltreatment and child protection [17][18][19][20][21][22]); as well as providing further depth and granularity of the home environment for wider-ranging research. ...
Full-text available
Background Physical housing and household composition have an important role in the lives of individuals and drive health and social outcomes, and inequalities. Most methods to understand housing composition are based on survey or census data, and there is currently no reproducible methodology for creating population-level household composition measures using linked administrative data. Methods Using existing, and more recent enhancements to the address-data linkage methods in the SAIL Databank using Residential Anonymised Linking Fields we linked individuals to properties using the anonymised Welsh Demographic Service data in the SAIL Databank. We defined households, household size, and household composition measures based on adult to child relationships, and age differences between residents to create relative age measures. Results Two relative age-based algorithms were developed and returned similar results when applied to population and household-level data, describing household composition for 3.1 million individuals within 1.2 million households in Wales. Developed methods describe binary, and count level generational household composition measures. Conclusions Improved residential anonymised linkage field methods in SAIL have led to improved property-level data linkage, allowing the design and application of household composition measures that assign individuals to shared residences and allow the description of household composition across Wales. The reproducible methods create longitudinal, household-level composition measures at a population-level using linked administrative data. Such measures are important to help understand more detail about an individual’s home and area environment and how that may affect the health and wellbeing of the individual, other residents, and potentially into the wider community.
... The "Cinderella effect" explains that the likelihood of a child being abused or killed by a parent is far higher when that parent is a not genetically or biologically related. Rates of child abuse in stepparent families far exceed that of biologically intact families (Daly and Wilson 1988;Schnitzer and Ewigman 2008;Stiffman et al. 2002). Stiffman et al. estimates that children "were eight times more likely to die" (2002,615) at the hands of a non-genetically related adult living in their household when compared to a household that consisted of an intact, two biological parent arrangement. ...
The present study analyzes how Confucian family centrism influences criminality within society. In many ways Confucian culture is Chinese culture, so to understand Confucian crime control practices is to understand China. Material relating to crime prevention was filtered out of prominent Confucian texts, and it was then evaluated and tested using NLSY97 data. The data was obtained from the first wave of responses produced by the NLSY97, with a sample of 4,599 males from the United States between the ages of 12-16. Confucian family centrism was linked to lower levels of delinquency and other negative life outcomes in males. Results showed that boy’s delinquency, behavioral/emotional problems, and stealing were significantly lower with authoritative fathering, a style of parenting associated with Confucian family centrism. Furthermore, higher levels of parental monitoring exhibited by the residential father produced significantly lower levels of delinquency, substance abuse, behavioral/ emotional problems, and stealing among boys; higher levels of parental monitoring are strongly Confucian family centric in nature. These findings hold even after controlling for numerous variables including ethnicity, age, the mothers parenting style, family income, and so on. This test of Confucian family centrism adds support to Confucian parenting theory and Confucian criminological theory.
... I n 2016, 1750 children or 2.36 per 100 000 children in the USA died from abuse or neglect (US Department of Health & Human Services, 2018a). A growing body of literature has identified child, family and household characteristics that place children at risk of experiencing a maltreatment death (Anderson et al., 1983;Douglas, 2015;Graham et al., 2010;Schnitzer and Ewigman, 2008;Stiffman et al., 2002;Yampolskaya et al., 2009). Additional research has examined child maltreatment fatalities (CMFs) through different social science theories (Douglas, 2015) and has also examined the use of social services to prevent CMFs (Chance and Scannapieco, 2002;Douglas, 2013;Douglas and Mohn, 2014). ...
Full-text available
The challenges associated with determining causes of fatal child maltreatment have been documented by multiple professional fields and by the US government. This study explored these challenges, as well as the relative lethality of determinations of general neglect, medical neglect and physical abuse. Existing sources of information were used for this study: (1) data from the US National Child Abuse and Neglect Data System (NCANDS) data set extracted from annual Child Maltreatment reports published by the US Department of Health and Human Services; and (2) information published in recent state‐level child death review team (CDRT) reports. Results from the NCANDS data set indicated that more children died from general neglect (x̅ = 70.9%) than abuse (x̅ = 44.8%) or medical neglect (x̅ = 8.2%). Children who experienced medical neglect died at the highest rate (6.82 per 1000 medical neglect victims), making it the most lethal, followed by physical abuse and general neglect. The findings from CDRT reports were inconsistent, with some states indicating that more children died from abuse than neglect, which is in direct contrast to national statistics. The inconsistent and confusing use of language and constructs from CDRTs has important implications for multiple child‐serving fields. Key Practitioner Messages • Professional child‐serving fields struggle with making accurate determinations of abuse or neglect‐related fatalities. • Most child maltreatment fatalities are related to neglect. In terms of lethality, medical neglect appears to be most lethal, followed by physical abuse, and then general neglect. • US‐state CDRT reports are not consistent in their use of terms and confuse constructs such as ‘neglect’ and ‘accident’. This makes it challenging to use their reviews as reliable sources of information. • We recommend the adoption of consistency in the use and understanding of terms related to child maltreatment deaths, at a minimum across all jurisdictions in the USA, if not across all nations.
... Stiffman et al revealed that children living with at least one stepparent had a higher risk of death from maltreatment than those who lived with only birth parent(s) and without any stepparent (258). Papers suggested that stepparents allocated less economic resource for children's higher education (259), whilst stepparents' sense of entitlement to their children (260) and time engaged with their children (261) were not different from birth parents'. ...
Full-text available
Objectives: This study aimed to conduct an epidemiological study of the prevalence and aetiology of traumatic dental injuries (TDI) in a sample of students aged 15 to 18 years resident in Kaohsiung City, Taiwan. A special interest was to identify the role of factors such as socioeconomic status (SES), family structure, physical fitness and risk taking behaviour. It was hypothesised that adolescents experiencing TDI tended to have a lower SES, tended to live with non-birth parents, performed more risk taking behaviours and were less fit. Material and Methods: A random sample of 6,504 fifteen-to-eighteen-year-olds from all senior high schools in Kaohsiung City, Taiwan, was selected. Each completed a supervised questionnaire and was examined using standard clinical procedures. Results: The participation rate was 90.4%. Those participants that were male (OR=1.64, 95% CI: 1.43, 1.88), that lived with at least a non-birth parent (OR=1.28, 95% CI: 1.01, 1.63), that had a family head with a secondary level of education (OR=1.29, 95% CI: 1.11, 1.51), that had a higher Adolescent Risk Taking Scale score (OR=1.06, 95% CI: 1.04, 1.09), that had an overjet larger than five millimetres (OR=1.66, 95% CI: 1.41, 1.95), or that showed inadequate lip coverage (OR=1.36, 95% CI: 1.19, 1.55), were at greater risk of TDI. The prevalence of TDI was 20.0% (95% CI: 19.1%, 21.1%). Main causes of TDI were sports and leisure accidents (23.8%), followed by eating (15.8%), falls (15.3%), traffic accidents (7.6%), collisions (5.6%), inappropriate use of teeth (3.8%) and violence (2.9%). Up to 22.2% of TDI had unknown causes. II Conclusions: In this study, risk taking behaviour was the leading determinant of TDI, greater than gender, family structure, family head's level of education, overjet and lip coverage. The prevalence of TDI in Taiwan was similar to that found in other countries. Sports and leisure accidents were the most common cause of TDI.
This paper tests the hypothesis that state‐level restrictions on abortion access are linked to increases in child fatal‐injury rates. The rationale is that such restrictions may disproportionately increase births of “unwanted” children as well as births to young, single, and low socioeconomic‐status mothers, which in turn may lead to more adverse child outcomes—including more child fatal injury deaths. The paper uses state‐level data on child fatal injuries in the 0‐4 age group for 1981‐2002, and estimates count‐data models with state and year effects separately for white and black children. The abortion restrictions considered are enforced parental consent and notification laws, no public funding, and mandatory delays. Many of the restrictions are found to be significantly associated with increased homicide‐resultant fatal injuries for white and black children, and increased unintentional fatal injuries for white children. Results for unintentional fatal injuries for black children are mixed.
Das misshandlungsbedingte Kopftrauma stellt eine der schwersten Formen der Kindesmisshandlung dar und geht mit einer hohen Letalität und Morbidität sowie enormen gesellschaftlichen Kosten einher. Präventionsprogramme bauen in der Regel auf eine Ansprache von Müttern kurz nach der Entbindung. Allerdings ist das Vorwissen der Mütter häufig bereits hoch und es ist bekannt, dass die Mehrzahl der "Täter" beim Schütteltrauma Männer sind. Trotzdem konnten einzelne Programme, die gezielt unter anderem auf den Einbezug auch der Väter setzten zeigen, dass die Inzidenz gesenkt werden kann. Bislang bestehen für Deutschland kaum empirische Daten, um die Effektivität dieser Intervention beurteilen zu können Daher wurde untersucht, welche Einflussfaktoren für das Wissen um das Schütteltrauma besteht. Darüber hinaus wurde untersucht, welche Faktoren die Zustimmung zu problematischen Methoden der Säuglingspflege beeinflussen. Hierfür wurde eine Umfrage in einer repräsentativen Stichprobe der deutschen Bevölkerung über 14 Jahren durchgeführt. Erfragt wurde das Wissen um das Schütteltrauma, über die Gefahren des Schütteltraumas, über Möglichkeiten der sicheren Säuglingspflege, über die Zustimmung zu problematischen Methoden der Säuglingspflege und zu eigenen belastenden Kindheitserfahrungen. Weibliches Geschlecht, eigene Kinder sowie ein hoher Bildungsabschluss hatten einen erheblichen positiven Einfluss auf das Wissen um das Schütteltrauma. Etwa vier von fünf Befragten waren vollständig über die Gefahren des Schüttelns informiert. Etwa ein Viertel der Befragten erinnerte sich daran, von Angehörigen der Gesundheitsberufe aufgeklärt worden zu sein, vier von fünf gaben an, aus den Medien darüber erfahren zu haben. Bestimmte belastende Kindheitserfahrungen erhöhten bei männlichen Befragten die Wahrscheinlichkeit, schütteln für eine angemessene Erziehungsmethode bei einem weinenden Säugling zu halten. Zusammenfassend konnten Risikogruppen identifiziert werden, die einen besonders hohen Informationsbedarf zum Schütteltrauma haben. Darüber hinaus wurde ein Präventionsprogramm entwickelt, welches die Befunde aufgreift und somit eine evidenzbasierte Prävention des Schütteltraumas in Deutschland ermöglichen soll.
Full-text available
This Campbell systematic review examines whether kinship care is more effective than foster care in ensuring the safety, permanency and wellbeing of children removed from their home for maltreatment. The review summarizes findings from 102 studies involving 666,615 children. 71 of these studies were included in meta‐analyses. Kinship care is a viable option for the children that need to be removed from the home for maltreatment. However, policy issues remain to balance the cost‐effectiveness of kinship care with a possible need for increased levels of caseworker involvement and service delivery. A considerable number of the included studies showed weaknesses in their methodologies and designs. There is a need to conduct more high quality quantitative studies of the effects of kinship care based on robust longitudinal designs and psychometrically sound instruments Abstract BACKGROUND Every year a large number of children around the world are removed from their homes because they are maltreated. Child welfare agencies are responsible for placing these children in out‐of‐home settings that will facilitate their safety, permanency, and well‐being. However, children in out‐of‐home placements typically display more educational, behavioural, and psychological problems than do their peers, although it is unclear whether this results from the placement itself, the maltreatment that precipitated it, or inadequacies in the child welfare system. OBJECTIVES To evaluate the effect of kinship care placement compared to foster care placement on the safety, permanency, and well‐being of children removed from the home for maltreatment. SEARCH METHODS We searched the following databases for this updated review on 14 March 2011: the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Sociological Abstracts, Social Science Citation Index, ERIC, Conference Proceedings Citation Index‐Social Science and Humanities, ASSIA, and Dissertation Express. We handsearched relevant social work journals and reference lists of published literature reviews, and contacted authors. SELECTION CRITERIA Controlled experimental and quasi‐experimental studies, in which children removed from the home for maltreatment and subsequently placed in kinship foster care were compared with children placed in non‐kinship foster care for child welfare outcomes in the domains of well‐being, permanency, or safety. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently read the titles and abstracts identified in the searches, and selected appropriate studies. Two review authors assessed the eligibility of each study for the evidence base and then evaluated the methodological quality of the included studies. Lastly, we extracted outcome data and entered them into Review Manager 5 software (RevMan) for meta‐analysis with the results presented in written and graphical forms. RESULTS One‐hundred‐and‐two quasi‐experimental studies, with 666,615 children are included in this review. The 'Risk of bias' analysis indicates that the evidence base contains studies with unclear risk for selection bias, performance bias, detection bias, reporting bias, and attrition bias, with the highest risk associated with selection bias and the lowest associated with reporting bias. The outcome data suggest that children in kinship foster care experience fewer behavioural problems (standardised mean difference effect size ‐0.33, 95% confidence interval (CI) ‐0.49 to ‐0.17), fewer mental health disorders (odds ratio (OR) 0.51, 95% CI 0.42 to 0.62), better well‐being (OR 0.50, 95% CI 0.38 to 0.64), and less placement disruption (OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.40 to 0.69) than do children in non‐kinship foster care. For permanency, there was no difference on reunification rates, although children in non‐kinship foster care were more likely to be adopted (OR 2.52, 95% CI 1.42 to 4.49), while children in kinship foster care were more likely to be in guardianship (OR 0.26, 95% CI 0.17 to 0.40). Lastly, children in non‐kinship foster care were more likely to utilise mental health services (OR 1.79, 95% CI 1.35 to 2.37). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS This review supports the practice of treating kinship care as a viable out‐of‐home placement option for children removed from the home for maltreatment. However, this conclusion is tempered by the pronounced methodological and design weaknesses of the included studies.
Between 1973 and 1986, 11,085 children born in Washington State were reported to the state child abuse registry. We analyzed the fatality rate subsequent to reported abuse for this cohort of children compared to a population of nonabused children matched on sex, county of birth, and year of birth. Children reported to the child abuse registry had an almost threefold greater risk of death than the comparison population. A report of physical abuse carried the greatest risk of subsequent death. However, the relative risks were also elevated for children who suffered neglect or sexual abuse. Children reported to the registry were almost 20 times more likely than the comparison population to die from homicide. Children less than 1 year of age at time of reported abuse had the highest fatality rate subsequent to abuse, but adolescents had the highest relative risk for fatality after abuse, compared to the population of nonabused children. Rates of fatality subsequent to abuse were equal for males and females. Although this study could not measure the extent to which any given intervention reduced the risk of subsequent fatality in abused children, registries can serve a valuable function in identifying subpopulations at risk and quantifying that risk relative to the general population.
This study was undertaken to quantify various risks to children as a function of the identity of the person(s) in loco parentis. The household circumtances of children in Hamilton (a midsized Canadian city) were surveyed by telephone, and combined with information on child abuse victims, runaways, and juvenile offenders, to arrive at victimization rates according to age and household type.Both abuse and police apprehension were least likely for children living with two natural parents. Preschoolers living with one natural and one stepparent were 40 times more likely to become child abuse cases than were like-aged children living with two natural parents. Whereas abuse risk was significantly higher for children living with a stepparent than for those with a single parent, the reverse was true of the risk of apprehension for criminal offenses.Several variables were examined as possible confounds of household composition. Socioeconomic status, family size, and maternal age at the child's birth were all predictors of abuse risk, but these factors differed little or not at all between natural-parent and stepparent families and could not account for the stepparent-abuse association. As predicted from Darwinian considerations, stepparents themselves evidently constitute a risk factor for child abuse.
Killings of children less than five years of age by stepfathers versus (putative) genetic fathers are compared on the basis of Canadian and British national archives of homicides. In addition to previously reported differences in gross rates, the two categories of killings differed in their attributes. Beatings constituted a relatively large proportion of steppaternal homicides, whereas genetic fathers were relatively likely to shoot or asphyxiate their victims. A substantial proportion of killings by genetic fathers, but almost none of those by stepfathers, were accompanied by suicide and/or uxoricide. These contrasts lend support to the hypothesis that the differential risks incurred by children in different household types reflect the differential parental solicitude that is predictable from an evolutionary model of parental motivation.
Severe child abuse in north-east Wiltshire was studied retrospectively during the period 1965-71, and prospectively for 18 months from January 1972, after a period of consultative activity with those actively involved to increase awareness of the phenomenon. Severe abuse was strictly defined. A rate of 1 per thousand children under four years old was obtained, together with a death rate of 0-1 per thousand. The families of the retrospective series of abused children were studied in detail and identifying characteristics of large family size, youthfulness, low social-class, instability, and gross psychiatric, medical, and social pathology described. The implications of the ascertainment and death rates are discussed in relation to data from some other studies, and the need emphasized for detailed studies of the apparent clustering of disorder in the families, using linked record systems.
As awareness of the huge human and other costs of injury has grown, research has expanded. There has not been any standard set of terminology for use in this research. As a result, research and surveillance data are too often difficult to interpret and compare. To overcome this impediment to gains in needed knowledge about childhood injuries, a conference was held in 1989 by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development to develop a set of standard definitions. The full conference report is available from the US Government Printing Office. This report presents excerpts, emphasizing those--core--variables likely to be of use to the largest number of investigators. The conference recommendations presented address cross-cutting factors (age, race/ethnicity, location, socioeconomic status, and biopsychosocial development), effect modifiers (exposure, medical risk factors, substance abuse, time, injury severity, and social risk factors), and specific injuries (motor vehicle injuries, central nervous system injuries, falls, fire/burns, drowning, and violence). It is expected that childhood injury investigators will strive to meet the recommendations of this conference and that use of these definitions will lead to improvements in research and, ultimately, to revision of the definitions.
Interagency child death review teams have emerged in response to the increasing awareness of severe violence against children in the United States. Since 1978, when the first team originated in Los Angeles, Calif, child death review teams have been established across the nation. Approximately 100 million Americans or 40% of the nation's population now live in counties or states served by such teams; most have been formed since 1988. Multiagency child death review involves a systematic, multidisciplinary, and multiagency process to coordinate and integrate data and resources from coroners, law enforcement, courts, child protective services, and health care providers. This article provides an introduction to the unique factors and magnitude of suspicious child deaths, and to the concept and process of interagency child death review. Future expansion of this process should lead to more effective multiagency case management and prevention of future deaths and serious injuries to children from child abuse and neglect.
Death certificate of children less than 8 years of age who were killed between 1979 and 1986 were linked to their Ohio birth certificates and compared with those of Ohio children born in 1983 (controls). Having an unmarried mother increased risk of homicide almost fivefold (odds ratio 4.87). Having a teenage mother, a mother who had not graduated from high-school, and being of Black race or low birthweight each increased the risk by approximately threefold. Increases in the proportion of children born to unmarried mothers may contribute to increases in childhood homicide rates.
A retrospective study of risk factors for traumatic infant deaths in Oregon occurring from 1973 through 1982 was performed using vital records and medical examiner records. A total of 146 such deaths occurred during this period. Relative risks were calculated for various risk factors in the study group compared with all Oregon births. Factors found to be significantly associated with all traumatic deaths were low maternal age, out-of-hospital birth, unwed mother, late or no prenatal care, low birth weight, and low maternal education. Race, sex, and birth order were not associated with traumatic infant death. The traumatic deaths were grouped into homicides and accidents. The same risk factor associations, with the exception of out-of-hospital birth, were found for each group.