Article

Significance of silent ischemia andmicroalbuminuria in predicting coronaryevents in asymptomatic patients with type 2 diabetes

Department of Medicine, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
Journal of the American College of Cardiology (Impact Factor: 16.5). 08/2002; 40(1):56-61. DOI: 10.1016/S0735-1097(02)01910-1
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study was to investigate the relationships between future coronary heart disease (CHD) events and baseline silent myocardial ischemia (SMI) and microalbuminuria (MA) in subjects with type 2 diabetes (T2D) free from known CHD.
Coronary heart disease is often asymptomatic in subjects with diabetes. There is limited information on the prognostic value of SMI and MA in this group.
Eighty-six patients with T2D and no history of CHD were studied (43 with MA individually matched with 43 normoalbuminuric patients; mean [SD] age 62 [+/-7] years, 62 men). Metabolic assessment, three timed overnight urine collections for albumin excretion rate, a treadmill exercise test and ankle brachial index (ABI) were performed at baseline. Patients were followed for 2.8 years.
Forty-five (52%) patients had SMI during treadmill testing. At review, there had been 23 coronary (CHD) events in 15 patients. Univariate Cox regression analysis showed that CHD events were significantly related to baseline ABI (p = 0.014), SMI (p = 0.020), MA (p = 0.046), 10-year Framingham CHD risk >30% (p = 0.035) and fibrinogen (p = 0.026). In multivariate analysis, SMI was the strongest independent predictor of CHD events (p = 0.008); risk ratio (95% confidence interval) for SMI: 21 (2 to 204). In the prediction of CHD events, SMI showed higher sensitivity and positive predictive value than MA or Framingham calculated CHD risk.
The presence of baseline SMI and MA are associated with future CHD events in asymptomatic patients with T2D and may be of practical use in risk stratification.

Full-text preview

Available from: sciencedirect.com
  • Source
    • "Recent studies have confirmed that albuminuria is another strong risk factor for cardiovascular disease [4-7]. This association holds true for albuminuria which occurs early in life [8]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c), blood pressure and body mass index (BMI) are risk factors for albuminuria, the latter in turn can lead to hyperlipidaemia. We used novel statistical analyses to examine how albuminuria and chronic kidney disease (CKD) may influence the effects of other risk factors on coronary heart disease (CHD). A prospective cohort of 7067 Chinese type 2 diabetic patients without history of CHD enrolled since 1995 were censored on July 30th, 2005. Cox proportional hazard regression with restricted cubic spline was used to auto-select predictors. Hazard ratio plots were used to examine the risk of CHD. Based on these plots, non-linear risk factors were categorised and the categorised variables were refitted into various Cox models in a stepwise manner to confirm the findings. Age, male gender, duration of diabetes, spot urinary albumin: creatinine ratio, estimated glomerular filtration rate, total cholesterol (TC), high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and current smoking status were risk factors of CHD. Linear association between TC and CHD was observed only in patients with albuminuria. Although in general, increased HDL-C was associated with decreased risk of CHD, full-range HDL-C was associated with CHD in an A-shaped manner with a zenith at 1.1 mmol/L. Albuminuria and CKD were the main contributors for the paradoxically positive association between HDL-C and CHD for HDL-C values less than 1.1 mmol/L. In type 2 diabetes, albuminuria plays a linking role between conventional risk factors and CHD. The onset of CKD changes risk associations between lipids and CHD.
    Full-text · Article · Feb 2007 · Cardiovascular Diabetology
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Der koronaren Herzkrankheit (KHK) kommt bei Diabetikern eine äußerst wichtige Bedeutung zu, da Diabetiker mit einer KHK eine stark erhöhte Mortalität aufweisen. Die Frage stellt sich, ob und wie Diabetiker auf eine KHK gescreent werden sollten. Bei Patienten mit Angina Pectoris und auch atypischen sowie anginaäquivalenten Symptomen (v. a. Dyspnoe) ist eine weitere Abklärung indiziert. Ein generelles Screening von asymptomatischen Patienten scheint unselektioniert nicht sinnvoll zu sein. Die einzige große prospektive Studie in dieser Hinsicht hat keinen Überlebensvorteil für gescreente Patienten gezeigt. Allerdings stellt sich die Frage, ob besondere Hochrisikogruppen identifiziert und gescreent werden sollten. Eine spezielle Situation stellt in dieser Hinsicht die präoperative Risikostratifikation dar. Werden die Patienten gescreent, stellt sich die Frage, ob beim Screening ein anatomischer Test (z. B. Kalzium-Scoring oder nichtinvasive Koronarangiographie) oder ein funktioneller Test (Ischämiesuche) zur Anwendung kommen soll. Bei Diabetikern mit bereits ausgebauter Therapie hinsichtlich koronarer Prävention dürfte eine anatomische Darstellung als erster Schritt weniger Sinn machen als eine funktionelle (außer bei fehlenden Veränderungen mit dann ausgezeichnet negativ prädiktivem Wert). Diese Aussage begründet sich damit, dass lediglich eine prognostisch relevante Ischämie eine invasive Abklärung nach sich ziehen würde, wogegen Verkalkungen oder weiche Plaques ohne Ischämie darin bestärken, dass Diabetiker eine gute Prävention brauchen. Somit ist es wichtig, Patienten individuell zu beraten und langfristig zu begleiten, insbesondere solange keine evidenzbasierten Guidelines verfügbar sind.
    No preview · Article · May 2012 · Herz
  • Source

    Full-text · Article · May 2003 · Diabetes Care
Show more