Sexual dimorphism in the energy content of weight change

University of Verona, Verona, Veneto, Italy
International Journal of Obesity (Impact Factor: 5). 11/2002; 26(10):1339-48. DOI: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0802065
Source: PubMed


The energy content of weight change is assumed to be sex- and age-neutral at 3,500 kcal/pound or 32.2 MJ/kg.
As sexual dimorphism in body composition generally exists in mammals, the primary hypothesis advanced and tested was that the energy content of weight change differs between men and women.
The energy content of 129 adult men and 287 women was measured by neutron activation analysis. Cross-sectional energy content prediction models were developed and then evaluated in two longitudinal samples: one that used the same methods in 26 obese women losing weight; and the other a compilation of 18 previously reported weight change-body composition studies.
Multiple regression modeling identified weight, sex, age and height as total energy content predictor variables with significant sex x weight (P<0.001) and age x weight (P<0.001) interactions; total model r(2) and s.e.e. were 0.89 and 107.3 MJ, respectively. The model's predictive value was supported in both longitudinal evaluation samples. Model calculations using characteristics of representative adults gaining or losing weight suggested that the energy content of weight change in women (approximately 30.1-32.2 MJ/kg) is near to the classical value of 32.2 MJ/kg and that in men the value is substantially lower, approximately 21.8-23.8 MJ/kg. The predicted energy content of weight change increases by about 10% in older (age approximately 70 y) vs younger (approximately 35 y) men and women.
Sexual dimorphism and age-dependency appears to exist in the estimated energy content of weight change and these observations have important clinical and research implications.

Download full-text


Available from: Xavier Pi-Sunyer, May 30, 2014
  • Source
    • "Conventional thought was that human biology included homeostatic feedback mechanisms designed to regulate body weight [8] [9]. The average adult gains approximately 0.5 kg per year, which translates to approximately 3500 kcal surplus [10] [11] [12] [13]. Given an average consumption of approximately 900,000 kcal per year [10] [11], this equals only about a 0.5% discrepancy, suggesting that homeostatic regulation of energy balance is relatively tight [14]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Weight loss dieting remains the treatment of choice for the vast majority of obese individuals, despite the limited long-term success of behavioral weight loss interventions. The reasons for the near universal unsustainability of behavioral weight loss in [formerly] obese individuals have not been fully elucidated, relegating researchers to making educated guesses about how to improve obesity treatment, as opposed to developing interventions targeting the causes of weight regain. This article discusses research on several factors that may contribute to weight regain following weight loss achieved through behavioral interventions, including adipose cellularity, endocrine function, energy metabolism, neural responsivity, and addiction-like neural mechanisms. All of these mechanisms are engaged prior to weight loss, suggesting that so called "anti-starvation" mechanisms are activated via reductions in energy intake, rather than depletion of energy stores. Evidence suggests that these mechanisms are not necessarily part of a homeostatic feedback system designed to regulate body weight or even anti-starvation mechanisms per se. Though they may have evolved to prevent starvation, they appear to be more accurately described as anti-weight loss mechanisms, engaged with caloric restriction irrespective of the adequacy of energy stores. It is hypothesized that these factors may combine to create a biological disposition that fosters the maintenance of an elevated body weight and work to restore the highest sustained body weight, thus precluding the long-term success of behavioral weight loss. It may be necessary to develop interventions that attenuate these biological mechanisms in order to achieve long-term weight reduction in obese individuals.
    Full-text · Article · Aug 2013 · Physiology & Behavior
  • Source
    • "One possible explanation is that women are more efficient at conserving energy and storing it as fat. Supporting this notion is the recognition that women must reduce their dietary intake by a greater proportion to achieve the same degree of weight loss as men [12]. Another observation is that in the first half of pregnancy, women increase their FM without evident increases in energy intake or decreases in expenditure. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Women have a higher proportion of body fat compared to men. However, women consume fewer kilojoules per kilogram lean mass and burn fat more preferentially during exercise compared with men. During gestation, women store even greater amounts of fat that cannot be solely attributed to increased energy intake. These observations suggest that the relationship between kilojoules consumed and kilojoules utilised is different in men and women. The reason for these sex differences in energy metabolism is not known; however, it may relate to sex steroids, differences in insulin resistance, or metabolic effects of other hormones such as leptin. When considering lifestyle modifications, sex differences in energy metabolism should be considered. Moreover, elucidating the regulatory role of hormones in energy homeostasis is important for understanding the pathogenesis of obesity and perhaps in the future may lead to ways to reduce body fat with less energy restriction.
    Full-text · Article · Jun 2011 · Journal of nutrition and metabolism
  • Source
    • "The average adult has been reported to gain from approximately 0.2 to 1.0 kg/year (an average of about 4000 kcal stored energy/year) (Du et al., 2009; Forouhi et al., 2009; Lewis et al., 2000); (Pietrobelli et al., 2002) despite ingesting between 800,000-950,000 kcal/year (Du et al., 2009; Forouhi et al., 2009), i.e., energy intake and output are " balanced " to within about 0.5% over time. This regulation does not preclude the increasing prevalence of obesity (Flegal, 2005; Ogden et al., 2003; Ogden et al., 2006) since even a small degree of weight gain (approximately 0.6 kg/year) will result in significant weight gain over time (2.0 kg/m 2 / decade for someone who is 1.75m tall and weighs 75kg). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Almost anyone who has ever lost weight can attest that it is harder to sustain weight loss than to lose weight. Maintenance of a 10% or greater reduced body weight is accompanied by decreases in energy expenditure to levels significantly below what is predicted solely on the basis of weight and body composition changes. This disproportionate decline in energy expenditure would not be sufficient to account for the over 80% recidivism rate to pre-weight loss levels of body fatness after otherwise successful weight reduction if there were a corresponding reduction in energy intake. In fact, reduced body weight maintenance is accompanied by increased energy intake above that required to maintain reduced weight. The failure to reduce energy intake in response to decreased energy output reflects decreased satiation and perception of how much food is eaten and multiple changes in neuronal signaling in response to food which conspire with the decline in energy output to keep body energy stores (fat) above a CNS-defined minimum (threshold). Much of this biological opposition to sustained weight loss is mediated by the adipocyte-derived hormone "leptin."
    Full-text · Article · Sep 2010 · Brain research
Show more