ArticlePDF Available

Occurrence and Fate of Hormone Steroids in the Environment

  • Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry

Abstract and Figures

Hormone steroids are a group of endocrine disruptors, which are excreted by humans and animals. In this paper, we briefly review the current knowledge on the fate of these steroids in the environment. Natural estrogenic steroids estrone (E1), 17beta-estradiol (E2) and estriol (E3) all have a solubility of approximately 13 mg/l, whereas synthetic steroids 17alpha-ethynylestradiol (EE2) and mestranol (MeEE2) have a solubility of 4.8 and 0.3 mg/l, respectively. These steroids have a moderate binding on sediments and are reported to degrade rapidly in soil and water. Estrogenic steroids have been detected in effluents of sewage treatment plants (STPs) in different countries at concentrations ranging up to 70 ng/l for E1, 64 ng/l for E2, 18 ng/l for E3 and 42 ng/l for EE2. E2 concentrations in river waters from Japan, Germany, Italy and the Netherlands ranged up to 27 ng/l. In addition, E2 concentrations ranging from 6 to 66 ng/l have also been measured in mantled karst aquifers in northwest Arkansas. This contamination of ground water has been associated with poultry litter and cattle manure waste applied on the land. Although hormone steroids have been detected at a number of sources worldwide, currently, there is limited data on the environmental behaviour and fate of these hormone steroids in different environmental media. Consequently, the exposure and risk associated with these chemicals are not adequately understood.
Content may be subject to copyright.
Review article
Occurrence and fate of hormone steroids in the environment
Guang-Guo Ying
*, Rai S. Kookana
, Ying-Jun Ru
CSIRO Land and Water, Adelaide Laboratory, PMB 2, Glen Osmond, SA 5064, Australia
SARDI Livestock Systems, Roseworthy Campus, Roseworthy, SA 5371, Australia
Received 24 May 2002; accepted 6 September 2002
Hormone steroids are a group of endocrine disruptors, which are excreted by humans and animals. In this paper, we briefly review the
current knowledge on the fate of these steroids in the environment. Natural estrogenic steroids estrone (E1), 17h-estradiol (E2) and estriol
(E3) all have a solubility of approximately 13 mg/l, whereas synthetic steroids 17a-ethynylestradiol (EE2) and mestranol (MeEE2) have a
solubility of 4.8 and 0.3 mg/l, respectively. These steroids have a moderate binding on sediments and are reported to degrade rapidly in soil
and water. Estrogenic steroids have been detected in effluents of sewage treatment plants (STPs) in different countries at concentrations
ranging up to 70 ng/l for E1, 64 ng/l for E2, 18 ng/l for E3 and 42 ng/l for EE2. E2 concentrations in river waters from Japan, Germany, Italy
and the Netherlands ranged up to 27 ng/l. In addition, E2 concentrations ranging from 6 to 66 ng/l have also been measured in mantled karst
aquifers in northwest Arkansas. This contamination of ground water has been associated with poultry litter and cattle manure waste applied
on the land. Although hormone steroids have been detected at a number of sources worldwide, currently, there is limited data on the
environmental behaviour and fate of these hormone steroids in different environmental media. Consequently, the exposure and risk associated
with these chemicals are not adequately understood.
D2002 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Steroids; Sorption; Degradation; Endocrine disruptors; Effluent; Animal waste
1. Introduction
Steroid hormones are a group of biologically active
compounds that are synthesized from cholesterol and have
in common a cyclopentan-o-perhydrophenanthrene ring.
Natural steroids are secreted by the adrenal cortex, testis,
ovary and placenta in human and animal, and include
progestogens, glucocorticoids, mineralocorticoids, andro-
gens and estrogens (Raven and Johnson, 1999). Estrogens
(estradiol, estrone and estriol) are predominantly female
hormones, which are important for maintaining the health
of the reproductive tissues, breasts, skin and brain. Proges-
togens (progesterone) can be thought of as a hormonal
balancer, particularly of estrogens. Androgens (testosterone,
dehydroepiandrosterone and androstenedione) play an
important role in tissue regeneration, especially the skin,
bones and muscles. Glucocorticoids (cortisol) are produced
by the adrenal glands in response to stressors such as
emotional upheaval, exercise, surgery, illness or starvation.
All the steroid hormones exert their action by passing
through the plasma membrane and binding to intracellular
receptors. In addition, there are some synthetic steroids such
as ethynylestradiol (EE2) and mestranol (MeEE2) used as
All humans as well as animals can excrete hormone
steroids from their bodies, which end up in the environment
through sewage discharge and animal waste disposal. Those
steroids have been detected in effluents of sewage treatment
plants (STPs) and surface water (e.g. Desbrow et al., 1998;
Kuch and Ballschmiter, 2001; Ternes et al., 1999a). They
may interfere with the normal functioning of endocrine
systems, thus affecting reproduction and development in
wildlife (Jobling et al., 1998). The steroids of concern for
the aquatic environment due to their endocrine disruption
potential are mainly estrogens and contraceptives, which
include 17h-estradiol (E2), estrone (E1), estriol (E3), 17a-
ethynylestradiol (EE2) and mestranol (MeEE2) (Fig. 1).
Vitellogenesis (plasma vitellogenin induction) and femi-
nisation in male fish have been observed in British rivers and
are attributed to the presence of these estrogenic compounds
0160-4120/02/$ - see front matter D2002 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
PII: S 0160-4120(02)00075-2
* Corresponding author. Fax: +61-9-83038565.
E-mail address: (G.-G. Ying).
Environment International 28 (2002) 545 – 551
(Desbrow et al., 1998; Jobling et al., 1998). Concentrations as
low as 1 ng/l of E2 led to induction of vitellogenin in male
trout (Hansen et al., 1998; Purdom et al., 1994). Hormone
steroids in the environment may affect not only wildlife and
humans but also plants (Shore et al., 1995b; Lim et al., 2000).
Alfalfa irrigated with sewage effluent, which contained
hormone steroids, was observed to have elevated levels of
phytoestrogens (Shore et al., 1995b).
In addition to estrogenic steroids, there is also a concern
about the use of steroid drugs used as growth promoters in
livestock (Schiffer et al., 2001). However, little research has
been conducted on the fate of these steroids excreted by
animals and their effect on wildlife and human health.
In this brief review, we provide an overview of sources,
environmental concentrations in surface and ground water,
and summarize the current knowledge on fate and behaviour
of these steroid compounds.
2. Physicochemical properties
Natural estrogens, namely estradiol, estrone and estriol,
have solubilities of approximately 13 mg/l. Synthetic estro-
genic steroids have much lower solubilities of 4.8 mg/l for
EE2 and 0.3 mg/l for mestranol (Lai et al., 2000). All these
steroids have very low vapor pressures ranging from
2.3 10
to 6.7 10
mm Hg (Table 1), indicating
low volatility of these compounds. The log K
values of
natural steroids are 2.81 for E3, 3.43 for E1 and 3.94 for E2.
Synthetic steroids have higher log K
values, 4.15 for EE2
and 4.67 for mestranol. From the physicochemical proper-
ties of these steroids, it can be seen that estrogens are
hydrophobic organic compounds of low volatility. It is
expected that the sorption on soil or sediment will be a
significant factor in reducing aqueous phase concentrations.
3. Levels in the environment
3.1. Wastewater
The presence of estrogenic compounds in the environ-
ment has become a concern because they may interfere with
the reproduction of man, livestock and wildlife. The hor-
mones 17h-estradiol and estrone are naturally excreted by
women (2 12 and 3 –20 Ag/person/day, respectively) and
female animals, as well as by men (estrone 5 Ag/person/day)
(Gower, 1975). Based on the survey and previous measure-
ments of human estrogen excretion, Johnson et al. (2000)
estimated the daily excretion of estrogens from males and
females (Table 2). Males were excreting 1.6 Ag/day of E2,
3.9 Ag/day of E1 and 1.5 Ag/day of E3 in their urine.
Menstruating females were excreting 3.5 Ag/day of E2, 8
Ag/day of E1 and 4.8 Ag/day of E3 in their urine. The
menopausal women were taken as excreting 2.3 Ag/day of
E2, 4 Ag/day of E1 and 1 Ag/day of E3. Pregnant women
were excreting 259 Ag/day E2, 600 Ag/day of E1 and 600
Ag/day of E3. After reviewing the quantity of EE2 in the
oral contraceptive pills, 35 Ag/day was estimated as the
Fig. 1. Structures of hormone steroids.
Table 1
Physicochemical properties of steroids
(mg/l at 20 jC)
(mm Hg)
270.4 13 2.3 10
272.4 13 2.3 10
288.4 13 6.7 10
296.4 4.8 4.5 10
310.4 0.3 7.5 10
Lai et al. (2000).
Octanol – water partition coefficient.
Table 2
Daily excretion (Ag) of estrogenic steroids in humans
Category E2 E1 E3 EE2
Males 1.6 3.9 1.5
Menstruating females 3.5 8 4.8
Menopausal females 2.3 4 1
Pregnant women 259 600 6000
Women – 35
Johnson et al. (2000).
G.-G. Ying et al. / Environment International 28 (2002) 545–551546
daily excretion of EE2. Based on daily excretion of estro-
gens by humans, dilution factor and previous measurements,
ng/l levels of estrogens are expected to be present in
aqueous environmental samples from English rivers (John-
son et al., 2000).
Estrogenic steroids have been detected in influents and
effluents of sewage treatment plants in different countries
(Baronti et al., 2000; Belfroid et al., 1999; Desbrow et al.,
1998; Kuch and Ballschmiter, 2001; Nasu et al., 2000;
Snyder et al., 1999; Ternes et al., 1999a). Average concen-
trations of estrogenic steroids (E3, E2, E1 and EE2) in
influents of six Italian activated sludge STPs were 80, 12,
52 and 3 ng/l, respectively (Baronti et al., 2000). However,
E3 was rarely reported to occur in such a high concentration
(80 ng/l). E3 was not detected in most of the influents
studied. In the raw sewage of the Brazilian STPs, estrogenic
steroids E2, E1 and EE2 were detected with average con-
centrations of 21, 40 and 6 ng/l, respectively (Ternes et al.,
1999a). Estrogen levels were lower with average concen-
trations of 15, 27 and 1.4 ng/l for E2, E1 and EE2,
respectively (Ternes et al., 1999a,b). Estrogenic steroids
were detected in three Dutch STPs with concentrations
ranging from < LOD to 48 ng/l for E2, from 11 to 140 ng/
l for E1 and from < 0.2 to 8.8 ng/l for EE2 (Johnson et al.,
2000). The concentrations of E2 in influents of Japanese
STPs ranged from 30 to 90 ng/l in autumn and from 20 to 94
ng/l in summer (Nasu et al., 2000).
The concentrations of estrogenic steroids in the effluents
ranged from below detection limit (LOD) to 64 ng/l for E2,
from < LOD to 82 ng/l for E1, from 0.43 to 18 ng/l for E3 and
from < LOD to 42 ng/l for EE2 (Table 3). From the table, it
can be seen that E2 was present at higher concentrations in the
effluents from STPs in Canada, UK and Japan than those
from other countries. E2 was detected in Japanese STP
effluent samples with concentrations ranging from 3.2 to 55
ng/l in summer and from 2.8 to 30 ng/l in autumn (Tabata et
al., 2001). The average concentrations in the effluents were
18 and 12 ng/l, respectively. Nasu et al. (2000) also measured
estrogenic steroids in effluents of Japanese STPs with similar
concentration ranges. In British STPs, the concentrations of
E1 in the effluents varied widely from 1.4 to 76 ng/l, while E2
concentrations lie in a similar range to that of Japanese STPs
(Desbrow et al., 1998). However, EE2 was only found in 7 of
21 effluent samples from domestic STPs in UK, with con-
centrations ranging from < LOD to 7 ng/l. In Canadian STPs,
E1 and E2 were determined with maximum concentrations of
48 and 64 ng/l, respectively. EE2 was detected in 9 of 10
effluent samples with a maximum concentration of 42 ng/l
(Ternes et al., 1999a). In comparison, the concentrations of
E2 in the effluents from German, Italian, Dutch, Swedish and
American STPs were lower, ranging from < LOD to 5.2 ng/l
(Baronti et al., 2000; Belfroid et al., 1999; Kuch and Ballsch-
miter, 2001; Larsson et al., 1999; Snyder et al., 1999; Ternes
et al., 1999a,b). However, Spengler et al. (2001) recently
reported a maximum concentration of 15 ng/l for E2 in
effluents of STPs in SE Germany, and they also detected
mestranol with a maximum concentration of 2.7 ng/l. The
levels of estrone in the effluents from different countries are
quite comparable. Estriol (E3) was only reported in Italian
STP influents and effluents (Baronti et al., 2000).
3.2. Animal waste
The other major source of hormone steroids is livestock
waste. Livestock such as sheep, cattle, pigs and poultry, as
well as other animals, excrete hormone steroids. In poultry
waste, a concentration ranging from 14 to 533 ng/g dry
waste with an average of 44 ng/g for E2 was reported by
Table 3
Concentration of hormones in effluents of sewage treatment plants (STPs)
Location Sampling date Sample no. Concentration (ng/l)
Estrone 17h-Estradiol Estriol Ethynylestradiol
Italy 10/99 – 03/00 30 2.5 – 82.1 (9.3) 0.44 – 3.3 (1.0) 0.43 – 18 (1.3) < LOD – 1.7 (0.45) 1
Netherlands 10/97, 12/97 6 < 0.4 – 47 (4.5) < 0.1 – 5.0 ( < LOD)
< 0.2 –7.5 ( < LOD) 2
Germany 11/97 16 < LOD – 70 (9) < LOD – 3 ( < LOD) <LOD – 15 (1) 3
Canada 11/97 10 < LOD 48 (3) < LOD– 64 (6) <LOD –42 (9) 3
UK 05/95 – 01/96 21 1.4 – 76 (9.9) 2.7– 48 (6.9) < LOD – 7 ( < LOD) 4
Japan 07/98– 03/99 27 3 3.2 – 55 (14)
< LOD – 43 (13)
0.3 – 30 (14)
USA 05/97, 10/97 5 0.477 – 3.66 (0.9) < LOD– 0.759 (0.248) 6
Germany 06 – 10/00 16 < 0.1– 18 (1.5) < 0.15 – 5.2 (0.4) < 0.10 – 8.9 (0.7) 7
Concentration range and median in parentheses.
References: (1) Baronti et al. (2000), (2) Belfroid et al. (1999), (3) Ternes et al. (1999a), (4) Desbrow et al. (1998), (5) Nasu et al. (2000), (6) Snyder et al.
(1999), (7) Kuch and Ballschmiter (2001).
LOD = limit of detection.
Summer sampling.
Autumn sampling.
Winter sampling.
G.-G. Ying et al. / Environment International 28 (2002) 545–551 547
Shemesh and Shore (1994) and Shore et al. (1988, 1995a).
The E2 concentration in urine of cattle was found to be 13
ng/l on average by Erb et al. (1977).
Steroid drugs are frequently used in cattle as well as other
livestock, which control the oestrous cycle, treat reproduc-
tive disorders and induce abortion (Refsdal, 2000). This
could greatly increase the generation of hormone steroids in
urine of livestock (Callantine et al., 1961). Many cattle in
United States are also fed muscle-building androgens such
as trenbolone acetate (TbA) and melengestrol acetate
(MGA) (Schiffer et al., 2001). Manure from cattle treated
with TbA and MGA were collected and found to contain 5 –
75 ng/g TbOH and 0.3 8 ng/g MGA (Schiffer et al., 2001).
After 4.5 5.5 months of storage, levels up to 10 ng/g
trenbolone and 6 ng/g MGA were detected with a half-life
of 267 days for trenbolone.
3.3. Surface water
There are some reports on the levels of estrogenic
steroids in surface waters (Baronti et al., 2000; Belfroid
et al., 1999; Kuch and Ballschmiter, 2001; Tabata et al.,
2001).Tabata et al. (2001) conducted an extensive survey
of estrogenic steroids in 109 Japanese rivers and found E2
in 222 of 256 samples in summer with a mean concen-
tration of 2.1 ng/l and in 189 of 261 samples in autumn
with a mean concentration of 1.8 ng/l (Table 4). Estrone
(E1) was detected in 7 of 11 Dutch coastal/estuarine and
freshwater samples with a median concentration of 0.3 ng/l,
while E2 and EE2 were only detected in 4 and 3 of 11
samples, with most of the concentrations below the quanti-
fication limit of < 1 ng/l (Belfroid et al., 1999).The
measurements in Germany resemble the situation in the
Netherlands (Belfroid et al., 1999; Kuch and Ballschmiter,
2001). Estrogenic steroids were also detected in some
drinking water samples from southern Germany with an
average concentration of 0.4, 0.7 and 0.35 ng/l, respectively
(Kuch and Ballschmiter, 2001). E3 was found in Tiber river
water in Italy with a concentration of 0.33 ng/l, while E2
and E1 were 0.11 and 1.5 ng/l in the river water, respec-
tively (Baronti et al., 2000).
3.4. Ground water
Recent studies have shown that disposal of animal manure
to agricultural land could lead to movement of estrogenic
steroids into surface and ground water (Bushe
´e et al., 1998;
Nichols et al., 1997, 1998; Peterson et al., 2001; Shore et al.,
1995a). E2 has been found mobile and detected in runoff from
manured land (Nichols et al., 1997, 1998).Nichols et al.
(1998) determined an average E2 concentration of 3500 ng/l
in the runoff from a pastural land applied with 5 Mg/ha of
manure (poultry litter). Ground water has been reported to be
contaminated with E2 (Peterson et al., 2001; Shore et al.,
1995a).Shore et al. (1995a) believed that a constant E2
concentration of about 5 ng/l in spring waters was caused by
infiltration of E2 through the soil profile to the ground water.
Peterson et al. (2001) measured E2 concentrations ranging
from 6 to 66 ng/l in mantled karst aquifers in northwest
Arkansas. The observed E2 concentration trends imitated the
changes in stage over the recharge event. The contamination
was associated with poultry litter and cattle manure waste
applied on the area.
4. Fate in the environment
4.1. Sorption
The distribution and partitioning of estrogenic steroids in
the environment are determined by their physicochemical
properties and site-specific environmental conditions. Wil-
liams et al. (1999) estimated the likely distribution of the
steroid estrogens, E1, E2 and EE2, in three English rivers and
predicted that the concentrations of these steroids under
average conditions varied between 0.21 and 0.37 ng/l for
E2, 0.27 and 0.44 ng/l for E1 and 0.024 and 0.038 ng/l for
EE2. Bed sediments were shown to account for between 13%
Table 4
Concentration of hormone steroids in surface water
Location Sample type Concentration (ng/L)
estrone 17h-estradiol estriol ethynylestradiol
Japan 109 major rivers < LOD – 27 (2.1)
< LOD – 24 (1.8)
Germany river water 0.10 – 4.1 (0.40) 0.15 – 3.6 (0.3) 0.10 – 5.1 (0.4) 2
Italy Tiber river water 1.5 0.11 0.33 0.04 3
The Netherlands coastal/estuarine water and rivers (11 locations) < 0.1 – 3.4 (0.3) < 0.3 – 5.5 ( < 0.3) < 0.1 – 4.3 ( < 0.1) 4
Concentration range and median in parentheses.
References: (1) Tabata et al. (2001), (2) Kuch and Ballschmiter (2001), (3) Baronti et al. (2000), (4) Belfroid et al. (1999).
Arithmetic mean ( Fstandard deviation) in parentheses.
LOD = limit of detection.
Summer sampling.
Autumn sampling.
G.-G. Ying et al. / Environment International 28 (2002) 545–551548
and 92% of the chemical loads in the river system. Lai et al.
(2000) measured sorption coefficients of E1, E2, E3, EE2 and
MeEE2 on a sediment and the log K
values were 1.71, 1.56,
1.33, 1.72 and 2.26, respectively. They found the sorption on
sediments was nonlinear with sorption constants ranging
from 0.57 to 0.83, thus the log K
values were not defined.
However, in Table 5, we converted the log K
values into K
values, which ranged from about 1900 to 16 000. This data
indicates that estrogenic steroids adsorb moderately onto
sediment. The sorption of estrogens correlated with the
presence of organic carbon content and also increased with
salinity in water (Lai et al., 2000). Although the K
from this study, as well as K
values of these estrogenic
steroids in Table 1, suggest their hydrophobic nature and high
binding with sediment/soil particles, these compounds have
been widely reported not only in surface water but also in
ground water. Clearly, there is a need to better understand
their behaviour in different environmental media.
4.2. Degradation
In humans and animals, estrogens undergo various trans-
formations mainly in the liver. They are frequently oxidized,
hydroxylated, deoxylated and methylated prior to the final
conjugation with glucuronic acid or sulphate. 17h-Estradiol
is rapidly oxidized to estrone, which can be further con-
verted into estriol, the major excretion product. Many other
polar metabolites like 16-hydroxy-estrone, 16-ketoestrone
or 16-epiestriol are formed and can be present in urine and
faeces. The contraceptive ingredient mestranol is converted
after administering into 17a-ethynylestradiol by demethy-
lation (Ternes et al., 1999a).17a-Ethynylestradiol is mainly
eliminated as conjugates, whereas other metabolic trans-
formations occur, but are of minor relevance. Therefore,
estrogens are excreted mainly as inactive conjugates of
sulphuric and glucuronic acids. Although steroid conjugates
do not possess a direct biological activity, they can act as
precursor hormone reservoirs able to be reconverted to free
steroids by bacteria in the environment (Baronti et al., 2000;
Ternes et al., 1999a). Due to the presence of microorganisms
in raw sewage and STPs, these inactive conjugates of
estrogenic steroids are cleaved, and active estrogenic ste-
roids are released to the environment (Baronti et al., 2000;
Ternes et al., 1999a).
In an aerobic batch experiments with activated sludge,
E2 was oxidized to E1, which was further eliminated with-
out any degradation products observed (Ternes et al.,
1999b). The contraceptive EE2 was principally persistent
under selected aerobic conditions, where mestranol was
rapidly eliminated and small portions of EE2 were formed
by demethylation. In another experiment (Layton et al.,
2000), 70 80% of added E2 was mineralized to CO
24 h by biosolids from wastewater treatment plants, whereas
the mineralization of EE2 was 25 75-fold less. EE2 was
also reported to be degraded completely within 6 days by
nitrifying activated sludge and resulted in the formation of
hydrophilic compounds (Vader et al., 2000).
The half-lives of estrogenic steroids were estimated to be
2 6 days in water and sediment (Williams et al., 1999).
Microorganisms in water samples from English rivers were
capable of transforming E2 to E1 with half-lives of 0.2 9
days when incubated at 20 jC, and E1 was then further
degraded at similar rates (Ju
¨rgens et al., 2002). E2 could
also be degraded when incubated with aerobic and anaero-
bic riverbed sediments. Compared to E2, EE2 was much
more resistant to biodegradation in water from English
rivers (Ju
¨rgens et al., 2002).
Removal during sewage treatment is used as a collective
term to describe the disappearance of chemicals due to
processes such as biodegradation and adsorption on sludges.
It depends on the plant performance and input of wastes. By
comparing influent and effluent estrogen concentrations,
Baronti et al. (2000) calculated that removal rates of E3,
E2, EE2 and E1 from wastewater in activated STPs were
95%, 87%, 85% and 61%, respectively. Low removal rates
for E1 may be related to transformations of estradiol in
STPs. In the Brazilian STPs, the observed removal rates
ranged from 64% to 78% for EE2, from 67% to 83% for E1
and from 92% to 99.9% for E2 (Ternes et al., 1999a).
However, in German STPs, the removal rates were very low,
e.g. only 64% for E2. In the Japanese STPs, the removal
rates were reported to be more than 99% in autumn and
from 7% to >99% in summer (Nasu et al., 2000). The reason
behind this large difference in removal rates is still unclear.
Johnson and Sumpter (2001) recently reviewed the removal
of endocrine-disrupting chemicals in activated sludge treat-
ment works and suggested that the activated sludge treat-
ment process can consistently remove over 85% of E2, E3
and EE2, but the removal performance for estrone (E1)
appears to be less and is more variable.
In many countries, biosolids, recycled water and animal
waste, which contain hormone steroids are often applied to
agricultural land. The persistence of estradiol, estrone and
17a-ethynylestradiol in soils was examined recently in
laboratory incubations (Colucci and Topp, 2001; Colucci
et al., 2001). E2 was rapidly removed in the agricultural
soils incubated under a range of conditions. At 30 jC,
following 3 days incubation, more than 56% of E2 applied
Table 5
Sorption and half-lives of steroids
Chemical name Sorption constant
) Half-life
Estrone (E1) 4882 2 –3
17h-Estradiol (E2) 3300 2 – 3; 0.2 – 9
Estriol (E3) 1944 NR
17a-Ethynylestradiol (EE2) 4770 4 – 6
Mestranol (MeEE2) 16 542 NR
NR = not reported; Williams et al. (1999).
Lai et al. (2000).
Half-life in river water (days).
¨rgens et al. (2002).
G.-G. Ying et al. / Environment International 28 (2002) 545–551 549
(1 mg/kg) in three agricultural soils with a moisture content
of 13% was non-extractable with its half-life of less than 0.5
days in all cases (Colucci et al., 2001). E2 was abiotically
transformed into estrone (E1) in both sterile and nonsterile
soils. In contrast, E1 and EE2 were found to be microbially
degraded (Colucci and Topp, 2001; Colucci et al., 2001).
The dissipation half-life of EE2 ranged from 7.7 days at 4
jC to 3 days at 30 jC(Colucci and Topp, 2001). However,
the behaviour and persistence of E1 in the soils studied were
5. Summary and recommendations
Hormone steroids excreted by humans and animals enter
the environment through the discharge of domestic sewage
effluents and disposal of animal waste. These compounds
could affect wildlife and human health by disrupting their
normal endocrine systems. Hormone steroids have been
detected in wastewater effluents and surface water as well
as ground water at various levels. The behaviour and fate of
these hormone steroids in the environment depend on their
physiochemical properties and environmental media.
Natural estrogenic steroids (E1, E2 and E3) have higher
solubilities than synthetic steroids 17a-ethynylestradiol
(EE2) and mestranol (MeEE2). Limited studies indicated
that they all have moderate sorption on sediments and short
half-lives in soils and water. These natural and synthetic
steroids undergo rapid transformations in sewage treatment
plants. Their removal rates in STPs are dependent on the
plant design and waste load.
There have been limited reports on the occurrence of
hormone steroids in the environment. Detailed surveys are
necessary to understand the distribution of hormone steroids
in the environment, especially in STPs effluents, soils,
surface water and ground water. Animal waste and biosolids
as well as recycled wastewater have been increasingly
applied to agricultural land; therefore, it is vital to estimate
the input of steroids and their possible movement into
surface and ground water through runoff and leaching.
There is also a scarcity of data on daily excretion of steroids
from different domestic animals, which could be used to
calculate the steroid loads on agricultural land.
Although estrogenic steroids were reported to degrade
rapidly in soil and water in laboratory incubations, more
research is needed to investigate the dissipation and path-
ways of these steroids in different media such as river water,
seawater and ground water as well as sediments and soils.
Factors (biotic and abiotic) influencing their degradation
need to be explored further. In addition, most of the studies
in the literature focused on estrogenic steroids; little research
has been conducted on androgens. Steroid growth promoters
are widely used in livestock in some countries and have
become a recent public concern. Persistence of these steroid
drugs in the environment and their possible effects on
wildlife and human health still remain unclear.
The authors would like to thank Dr. A. Juhasz and Dr. A.
Kumar for their valuable comments.
Baronti C, Curini R, D’Ascenzo G, Di Corcia A, Gentili A, Samperi R.
Monitoring natural and synthetic estrogens at activated treatment plants
and in receiving river water. Environ Sci Technol 2000;34:5059– 66.
Belfroid AC, Van der Horst A, Vethaak AD, Schafer AJ, Ris GBJ, Wegener
J, et al. Analysis and occurrence of estrogenic hormones and their
glucuronides in surface water and waste water in the Netherlands. Sci
Total Environ 1999;225:101 – 8.
´e EL, Edwards DR, Moore PA. Quality of runoff from plots treated
with municipal sludge and horse bedding. Trans ASAE 1998;41:
1035 – 41.
Callantine MR, Stob M, Andrews FN. Faecal elimination of estrogens by
cattle treated with diethylstilbestrol and hexestrol. Am J Vet Res
1961;22:462 – 5.
Colucci MS, Topp E. Persistence of estrogenic hormones in agricultural
soils: II. 17a-Ethynylestradiol. J Environ Qual 2001;30:2077 – 80.
Colucci MS, Bork H, Topp E. Persistence of estrogenic hormones in agri-
cultural soils: I. 17hestradiol and estrone. J Environ Qual 2001;30:
2070 – 6.
Desbrow C, Routledge EJ, Brighty GC, Sumpter JP, Waldock M. Identi-
fication of estrogenic chemicals in STW effluent: 1. Chemical fractio-
nation and in vitro biological screening. Environ Sci Technol 1998;
32:1549 – 58.
Erb RE, Chew BP, Keller HF. Relative concentrations of estrogen and
progesterone in milk and bold, and excretion of estrogen in urine. J
Anim Sci 1977;46:617– 26.
Gower DB. Catabolism and excretion of steroids. In: Makin HLJ, edi-
tor. Biochemistry of steroid hormones. Oxford, UK: Blackwell; 1975.
p. 127 – 48.
Hansen PD, Dizer H, Hock B, Marx A, Sherry J, McMaster M, et al.
Vitellogenin—a biomarker for endocrine disruptors. Trends Anal Chem
1998;17:448 – 51.
Jobling S, Nolan M, Tyler CR, Brighty G, Sumpter JP. Widespread sexual
disruption in wild fish. Environ Sci Technol 1998;32:2498 – 506.
Johnson AC, Sumpter JP. Removal of endocrine-disrupting chemicals in
activated sludge treatment works. Environ Sci Technol 2001;35:
4697 – 703.
Johnson AC, Belfroid A, Di Corcia A. Estimating steroid oestrogen inputs
into activated sludge treatment works and observations on their removal
from the effluent. Sci Total Environ 2000;256:163 – 73.
¨rgens MD, Holthaus KIE, Johnson AC, Smith JJL. The potential for
estradiol and ethynylestradiol degradation in English rivers. Environ
Toxicol Chem 2002;21:480 – 8.
Kuch HM, Ballschmitter K. Determination of endocrine-disrupting phe-
nolic compounds and estrogens in surface and drinking water by
HRGC-(NCI)-MS in the picogram per liter range. Environ Sci Technol
2001;35:3201 – 6.
Lai KM, Johnson KL, Scrimshaw MD, Lester JN. Binding of waterborne
steroid estrogens to solid phases in river and estuarine systems. Environ
Sci Technol 2000;34:3890 – 4.
Larsson DGJ, Adolfsson-Eric M, Parkkonen J, Pettersson M, Berg AH,
Olsson PE, et al. Ethynylestradiol—an undesired fish contraceptive?
Aquat Toxicol 1999;45:91 – 7.
Layton AC, Gregory BW, Seward JR, Schultz TW, Sayler GS. Mineraliza-
tion of steroidal hormones by biosolids in wastewater treatment systems
in Tennessee, USA. Environ Sci Technol 2000;34:3925 – 31.
Lim R, Gale S, Doyle C. Endocrine disrupting compounds in sewage treat-
ment plant (STP) effluent reused in agriculture—is there a concern? In:
G.-G. Ying et al. / Environment International 28 (2002) 545–551550
Dillon PJ, editor. Water recycling Australia. Australia: CSIRO and
AWA; 2000. p. 23 – 8.
Nasu M, Goto M, Kato H, Oshima Y, Tanaka H. Study on endocrine
disrupting chemicals in wastewater treatment plants. Water Sci Technol
2000;43(2):101 – 8.
Nichols DJ, Daniel TC, Moore Jr PA, Edwards DR, Pote DH. Runoff of
estrogen hormone 17 beta-estradiol from poultry litter applied to pas-
ture. J Environ Qual 1997;26:1002 – 106.
Nichols DJ, Daniel TC, Edwards DR, Moore Jr PA, Pote DH. Use of grass
filter strips to reduce 17 beta-estradiol in runoff from fescue-applied
poultry litter. J Soil Water Conserv 1998;53:74 – 7.
Peterson EW, Davis RK, Orndorff HA. 17h-Estradiol as an indicator of
animal waste contamination in mantled karst aquifers. J Environ Qual
2001;29:826 – 34.
Purdom CE, Hardiman PA, Byre VJ, Eno NC, Tyler CR, Sumpter JP.
Estrogenic effects of effluents from sewage treatment works. Chem
Ecol 1994;8:275 – 85.
Raven PH, Johnson GB. Biology. 5th ed. Boston: WCB/McGraw-Hill; 1999.
Refsdal AO. To treat or not to treat: a proper use of hormones and anti-
biotics. Anim Reprod Sci 2000;60/61:109 – 19.
Schiffer B, Daxenberger A, Meyer K, Meyer HHD. The fate of trenbolone
acetate and melengestrol acetate after application as growth promoters
in cattle: environmental studies. Environ. Health Perspect. 2001;109:
1145– 51.
Shemesh M, Shore LS. Effect of hormones in the environment on repro-
duction in cattle. In: Fields MJ, Sand RS, editors. Factors affecting calf
crop. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 1994. p. 287 – 97.
Shore LS, Shemesh M, Cohen R. The role of oestradiol and oestrone in
chicken manure silage in hyperoestrogen in cattle. Aust Vet J 1988;
Shore LS, Correll DL, Chakraborty PK. Relationship of fertilization with
chick manure and concentrations of estrogens in small streams. In:
Steele K, editor. Animal waste and the land –water interface. Boca
Raton, FL: CRC Press; 1995a. p. 155 62.
Shore LS, Kapulnik Y, Gurevich M, Wininger S, Badamy H, Shemesh M.
Induction of phytoestrogen production in Medicago sativa leaves by
irrigation with sewage water. Environ Exp Bot 1995b;35:363 – 9.
Snyder SA, Keith TL, Verbrugge DA, Snyder EM, Gross TS, Kannan K,
Giesy JP. Analytical methods for detection of selected estrogenic com-
pounds in aqueous mixtures. Environ Sci Technol 1999;33:2814– 20.
Spengler P, Korner W, Metzger JW. Substances with estrogenic activity in
effluents of sewage treatment plants in south-western Germany: 1.
Chemical analysis. Environ Toxicol Chem 2001;20:2133 – 41.
Tabata A, Kashiwa S, Ohnishi Y, Ishikawa H, Miyamoto N, Itoh M, et al.
Estrogenic influence of estradiol-17h,p-nonylphenol and bisphenol A
on Japanese Medaka (Oryzias iatipes) at detected environmental con-
centrations. Water Sci Technol 2001;43(2):109 – 16.
Ternes TA, Stumpf M, Mueller J, Haberer K, Wilken RD, Servos M.
Behaviour and occurrence of estrogens in municipal sewage treatment
plants—I. Investigations in Germany, Canada and Brazil. Sci Total
Environ 1999a;225:81 – 90.
Ternes TA, Kreckel P, Mueller J. Behaviour and occurrence of estrogens in
municipal sewage treatment plants—II. Aerobic batch experiments with
activated sludge. Sci Total Environ 1999b;225:91 – 9.
Vader JS, van Ginkel CG, Sperling FMGM, de Jong J, de Boer W, de Graaf
JS, et al. Degradation of ethynyl estradiol by nitrifying activated sludge.
Chemosphere 2000;41:1239 – 43.
Williams RJ, Jurgen MD, Johnson AC. Initial predictions of the concen-
trations and distribution of 17h-estradiol, oestrone and ethynyl oestra-
diol in 3 English rivers. Water Res 1999;33(7):1663– 71.
G.-G. Ying et al. / Environment International 28 (2002) 545–551 551
... Natural SEs such as 17α-estradiol (17α-E2), 17β-estradiol (17β-E2), estrone (E1), and estriol (E3) are persistent in livestock manure and present severe water and soil pollution concerns because they can trigger endocrine disruption (Kidd et al., 2007). The primary introduction pathway of SEs into the ecosystem are leakages from feedlots and animal storage facilities, discharge of effluents, biosolid fertilizers, land application of manure as fertilizers, and runoffs from agroecosystems (Gray et al., 2017;Ying et al., 2002;Zhao et al., 2010). A previous study showed that estrogen at minimal concentrations (ng/L) could cause the feminization of male fish (Jobling et al., 2003). ...
... Soil as a medium is often contaminated by SEs from applications of livestock manure to agricultural land and thorough irrigation using wastewaters (Gray et al., 2017;Jones, 2006, 2009;Tran et al., 2018;Ying et al., 2002). In soils, these compounds may be transformed further into other compounds by soil living organisms, taken up by plants, or leach to underground water sources, consequently posing ecological risks (Goeppert et al., 2014;Ma and Yates, 2018). ...
... Manure-borne SEs tend to have a short half-life of 2-6 days in both sediments and water. Their hydrophobic nature contributes to significant dissipation in the aqueous phase (Ying et al., 2002). Half-lives of SEs vary depending on the redox conditions and location. ...
Full-text available
Over the past two decades, steroidal estrogens (SEs) such as 17α-ethylestradiol (EE2), 17β-estradiol (E2),17α-estradiol (17α-E2), estriol (E3) and estrone (E1) have elicited worldwide attention due to their potentially harmful effects on human health and aquatic organisms even at low concentration ng/L. Natural steroidal estrogens exhibit greater endocrine disruption potency due to their high binding effect on nuclear estrogen receptors (ER). However, less has been explored regarding their associated environmental risks and fate. A comprehensive bibliometric study of the current research status of SEs was conducted using the Web of Science to assess the development trends and current knowledge of SEs in the last two decades, from 2001 to 2021 October. The number of publications has tremendously increased from 2003 to 2021. We summarized the contamination status and the associated ecological risks of SEs in different environmental compartments. The results revealed that SEs are ubiquitous in surface waters and natural SEs are most studied. We further carried out an in-depth evaluation and synthesis of major research hotspots and the dominant SEs in the matrices were E1, 17β-E2, 17α-E2, E3 and EE2. Nonetheless, investigations of SEs in soils, groundwater, and sediments remain scarce. This study elucidates SEs distribution, toxicological risks, ecological fate and mitigation measures, which will be beneficial for future monitoring, management, and risk assessment. Further studies are recommended to assess the toxicological risks of different SEs in complex environmental matrices to pursue a more precise and holistic quantitative estimation of estrogenic risk.
... Since conventional WWTPs do not remove efficiently estrogens, they are considered to be the major point sources of pollution with estrogens [4]. In fact, the best control strategy for the problem of estrogens pollution is to remove estrogens efficiently during wastewater treatment [5]. This means that conventional WWTPs have to be upgraded/ optimized for estrogens removal and regulations must be issued to regulate discharges of estrogens from WWTPs. ...
Full-text available
Estrogens are endocrine-disrupting chemicals that impact both human and animal health, even at very low levels. Fate of estrogens were evaluated for three municipal wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) in Kuwait, through determination of estrogens concentrations in influent and effluent streams. The solid-phase extraction gas chromatography-mass spectrometry method was used for analysis of estrogens concentrations in wastewater. Obtained results indicated that concentration of estrogens in the influent streams ranged from 0.0 to 474 ng/L, while that in the effluent streams were between 0.0 to 233 ng/L. Both influent and effluent concentrations showed high variations around mean values. Total removal of estrogens were found to be 13%, 79%, 68%, for Kabd, Sulaibiya and Umm Al Hayman, respectively. Even with high influent loadings, Sulaibiya plant achieved the highest removal of all types of estrogens, except estrone. The obtained results demonstrated that WWTPs require upgrading/optimization to maximize estrogens' removal. The study also discussed the potential impacts of estrogens in treated wastewater reused as irrigation water and recommended that Kuwait urgently needs to develop regulations for estrogens discharges from WWTPs in order to prevent further pollution of marine environment and groundwater with estrogens.
... The range of E2 concentrations examined in this experiment was consistent with the concentrations typically found in Canadian surface and ground waters, and fish-farming wastewaters [57][58][59]. Moreover, a reduced range of steroid concentrations was chosen for investigation, considering two additional important points: (a) toxicity of the hormones to plants and algae; and (b) in an attempt to avoid the possibility of hormone accumulation in the algal cells. ...
Full-text available
As fish farm wastewaters have detectable levels of fish hormones, such as 17β-estradiol (E2), an understanding of the influence of fish steroids on algal (Scenedesmus quadricauda) and duckweed (Lemna minor) physiology is relevant to the potential use of fishery wastewaters for microalgae and plant biomass production. The study was conducted using three types of media: Bold Basal Medium (BBM), natural fishery wastewater (FWW), and reconstituted fishery wastewater (RFWW) with the nutrient composition adjusted to mimic FWW. During the experiment, the media were aerated and changes in the pH and conductivity of the water were closely monitored. E2 promoted the growth of S. quadricauda and L. minor, with significant accumulation of high-value biomolecules at very low steroid concentrations. However, clear differences in growth performance were observed in both test cultures, S. quadricauda and L. minor, grown in different media, and the most effective hormone concentrations were evidently different for the algae and the plant.
... These steroids have a mild binding on precipitates and degrade rapidly in water and soil. This groundwater pollution is connected with cattle manure waste and poultry litter applied to the soils (Ying et al. 2002). ...
Full-text available
Veterinarians and animal producers use non-essential compounds via either feed additives or implantation for a long history as growth promoters for farm animals. These compounds, such as anabolic hormones, bovine somatotropin, Beta-agonists, have multiple positive effects and improve animal performance in many meat-exporting countries due to their anabolic activity. However, some of them may cause carcinogenic effects to the consumer. Anabolic hormones are now permitted to be used as growth promoters on a global scale, but have not been permitted in the EU since 1988. Unlawfully, drugs are sometimes added to farm animal feeds to improve muscle growth, feed utilization efficiency, milk production, and nitrogen retention in order to obtain an economic benefit in a shorter period.. In this article, we review the current knowledge on the safety and hazard of an anabolic compound as endocrine disruptor, not only on food, animals and public health but also on the environment, to arrive at recommendations for risk management and avoidance. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration approves seven hormone drugs (testosterone propionate, trenbolone acetate, estradiol, zeranol, progesterone, melengestrol acetate, and bovine somatotropin) for use in food animals for many purposes. Synthetic hormones were higher stability and longer persistence in the environment.
... interfering with the function of the endocrine system (Scholz et al., 2013). Chemicals with estrogenic activity, estrogens, are EDCs which find their way into the environment mainly through effluents from municipal treatment plants, hospitals, and livestock activities (Ying et al., 2002). Among the estrogens, 17α-ethynylestradiol (EE2) is an active ingredient in oral contraceptive pills. ...
17α-Ethynylestradiol (EE2) is a synthetic hormone that has become a widespread problem in the aquatic environments. The immunomodulatory effects of EE2 in fish have attracted much attention in recent years; however, little is known about its immunotoxicological impacts. This study was conducted to investigate the immune function of female Siamese fighting fish exposed to an environmental concentration of EE2, 10 ng/L. Aggressive reproductive behavior in this species often results in injuries to females after spawning, and thus they are a good candidate in immunotoxic actions of EE2. Fish were exposed to EE2 for 15 days and then distributed for breeding. Immune function, pathogen resistance, and survival rate were assessed after spawning. Immune responses including serum concentrations of IgM, lysozyme, complement, and bactericidal activity were lower in EE2-exposed females than the control fish. Also, EE2-exposed females showed higher mortality rate regardless of whether they were challenged with the bacterium. These results suggest that EE2 suppressed immune responses of spawned female fighting fish, thereby reducing its potential to resist against opportunistic pathogens.
17α-ethinylestradiol (EE2) is an anthropogenic estrogen that is widely used for hormone therapy and oral contraceptives. It was reported that EE2 exposure induced reproductive impairments through processes affecting reproduction behavior and inducing ovotestis. However, the effects of continuous EE2 exposure on the reproductive performance remain largely unknown. In this study, adult marine medaka fish (Oryzias melastigma) were exposed to EE2 (85 ng/L) for one (F0) and two (F1) generations. Our results indicate that continuous EE2 exposure reduced fecundity and sperm motility. The testicular transcriptome, followed by bioinformatic analysis revealed the dysregulation of pathways related to steroidogenesis, sperm motility, and reproductive system development. Collectively, our findings indicate that continuous EE2 exposure directly affected sperm quality via the alteration of steroidogenesis and dysregulation of reproductive system development. The identified key factors including DNM1, PINK1, PDE7B, and SLC12A7 can serve as biomarkers to assess EE2-reduced sperm motility.
Endocrine-disrupting potential was evaluated during the sewage treatment process using in vitro bioassays. Aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR)-, androgen receptor (AR)-, glucocorticoid receptor (GR)-, and estrogen receptor (ER)-mediated activities were assessed over five steps of the treatment process. Bioassays of organic extracts showed that AhR, AR, and GR potencies tended to decrease through the sewage treatment process, whereas ER potencies did not significantly decrease. Bioassays on reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography fractions showed that F5 (log KOW 2.5-3.0) had great ER potencies. Full-scan screening of these fractions detected two novel ER agonists, arenobufagin and loratadine, which are used pharmaceuticals. These compounds accounted for 3.3-25% of the total ER potencies and 4% of the ER potencies in the final effluent. The well-known ER agonists, estrone and 17β-estradiol, accounted for 60 and 17% of the ER potencies in F5 of the influent and primary treatment, respectively. Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry analysis showed that various molecules were generated during the treatment process, especially CHO and CHOS (C: carbon, H: hydrogen, O: oxygen, and S: sulfur). This study documented that widely used pharmaceuticals are introduced into the aquatic environments without being removed during the sewage treatment process.
The presence of natural hormones in water resources has gained considerable attention in recent years due to their capacity to cause imbalances in several biological systems. Studies have shown that estrone (E1), 17β-estradiol (E2), and estriol (E3) have a high contamination potential even in low concentrations. Thus, new methods are needed to remove these contaminants directly at the source. The present study evaluated the use of the in natura soybean hull as a biosorbent for the removal of estrone (E1), 17β-estradiol (E2), and estriol (E3) from swine manure, using single and multi-component systems. Best hormone removal conditions were performed at room temperature (25 oC) with no pH adjustment. Equilibrium for a single component (SC) and multi-component (MC) systems was reached in 1 h for E1 and 2 h for E2 and E3, and the kinetics were well described by the pseudo-first-order model. Ternary equilibrium models indicated that there was no competition among the hormones. For the MC system, Langmuir model showed maximum adsorption capacities of 2.560 mg g⁻¹, 1.978 mg g⁻¹ and 0.835 mg g⁻¹ for E1, E2, and E3, respectively. Thermodynamic analysis indicated that the adsorption was favorable and spontaneous with physisorption characteristics. The hydrogen-bonding represented the primary adsorption mechanism between the hormones and the adsorbent. The in natura soybean hulls, used as an adsorbent, showed to be promising for removing hormones present in the biofertilizer (swine manure), with characteristics that allow the adsorbent to remain together with the biofertilizer at its final destination. Therefore, an environmentally friendly technology.
This work proposes the development of a screen-printed electrode (SPE) modified with a mixture of Printex 6L carbon and deep eutectic solvent (DES) (SPE-P6LCDES), used for detection of 17β-estradiol (E2) in mineral water, synthetic urine, and artificial saliva. The characterization of SPE was evaluated by Scanning Electron Microscopy, Fourier Transform Infrared and Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy. Electrochemical studies for E2 detection were performed in 0.1 mol L-1 phosphate buffer solution at pH 7.0. The linear range of E2 concentration was 0.00732 – 0.417 μmol L-1 to unmodified SPE and 0.00090 – 0.21 μmol L-1 to SPE-P6LCDES, with LOD of 0.177 μmol L-1 and 0.0065 μmol L-1, respectively. The use of DES + Printex 6L carbon as a modifier allowed strong intramolecular interactions between DES and the E2 molecule, increasing the intensity of the current response, since it showed high sensibility, sensitivity and reproducibility. The results obtained to E2 recovery on samples were between 92.15% and 102.10%. The validation study (UV-Vis spectroscopy) demonstrated recovery of +99.16% (+ 1.4%) and +100.16% (+1.9%) to 10 and 60 μmol L-1 E2, respectively.
The aim of this work was to investigate the characteristics of estrogen degradation in livestock manures during composting. Natu⁃ ral estrogens containing estriol(E3)and 17β-estradiol(17β-E2), were detected in chicken, pig, and cow manures from farms in Nanjing.The synthetic estrogen, containing ethinyloestradiol(EE2)and bisphenol A(BPA), were also detected. Experimental composting of three livestock manures was conducted, and the concentrations of four estrogens were detected at 0, 2, 4, 8, 16 days, and 32 days. Cow manure, as a representative of all manures, was composted under different turning frequencies(i.e., never turned, turned once every two days, and turned twice every day)to study the impact of turning frequency on estrogen degradation. The results showed a high concentration of native estrogens detected in all three livestock manures. Chicken and cow manures contained synthetic estrogen. The EEQ values of estrogen in chicken, pig, and cow manures were 3 595.86, 268.84 µg·kg-1, and 1 207.12 µg·kg-1, respectively. A high contamination risk existed in all three livestock manures. The residual rates of EEQ in chicken, pig, and cow manures were 10.1%, 10.6%, and 0 after 32 d of composting, which showed that composting could significantly reduce the risk of estrogen contamination. The initial concentration of estrogen had a sig⁃ nificant impact on their degradation when various estrogens were detected in livestock manures. The estrogen with the highest concentration degraded faster than other estrogens. Furthermore, estrogen degradation changed with microbial activity in the manure piles. Microbial activity was most active during the mid-stage of composting, and the degradation rate of estrogens was higher during this period than during the early and later stages. Turning the cow manure pile increased its oxygen content, which significantly accelerated estrogen degradation. Thus, turning the manure pile during composting was effective. However, there was little difference in rate of estrogen degradation between turning once every two days and turning twice per day, and the increase in turning frequency did not significantly influence manure composting. Keywords:chicken manure; pig manure; cow manure; composting; estrogen; degradation 摘 要: 为探究畜禽粪便堆肥过程中雌激素降解特征,测定了南京附近养殖场的鸡粪、猪粪、牛粪中天然雌激素雌三醇(E3)、 17β-雌二醇(17β-E2)和人工合成雌激素炔雌醇(EE2)、双酚A(BPA)含量。对三种粪便进行堆肥实验,测定了堆肥0、2、4、8、16 d和 32 d时四种雌激素的浓度;并以牛粪为代表,对堆体进行不翻堆、两日一翻堆和一日两翻堆处理,研究了翻堆对堆肥过程中雌 激素降解的影响。结果表明,三种畜禽粪便均含有较高浓度的天然雌激素,鸡粪和牛粪还含有人工合成雌激素,而鸡粪、猪粪、牛 粪中雌激素的活性当量浓度EEQ值分别为3 595.86、268.84、1 207.12 μg·kg-1,存在较大的雌激素污染风险;在堆肥32 d,鸡粪、猪 粪、牛粪的EEQ残留率分别为10.1%、10.6%、0,堆肥处理很大程度上降低了雌激素污染风险。当畜禽粪便中多种雌激素共存时, 雌激素降解受初始浓度影响显著,浓度高者具有较大的降解速率。雌激素降解速率随堆体内微生物活动发生改变,堆肥中期微 生物活动最为活跃,雌激素降解速率高于堆肥前期和后期。对牛粪堆肥进行翻堆处理,增加了堆体内氧气含量,雌激素降解明显加 快,翻堆有利于提高堆肥效果。而两日一翻和一日两翻堆肥中雌激素降解无明显差异,增加翻堆次数并不能显著提高堆肥效果。 关键词:鸡粪;猪粪;牛粪;堆肥;雌激素;降解
Full-text available
The poultry and cattle industries comprise a large segment of the agricultural economy in the mantled karst area of northwest Arkansas. The associated risks of nutrient and bacterial contamination to karst aquifers by poultry litter have been well documented. However, only recently have the risks associated with hormones, specifically 17 β-estradiol (E2), been addressed. During a winter recharge event, five springs in northwest Arkansas were samples and the waters were analyzed for E2, fecal coliform, and Escherichia coli. Analyses of the waters from five springs representing three different water-bearing formations revealed that E2 is present in the waters. Concentrations of E2 ranged from 6 to 66 ng/L. The observed E2 concentration trends imitated the changes in stage over the recharge event. The E2 concentration trends were similar to the concentration trends of both fecal coliform and E. coli at all five springs, indicating that the three components move in the mantled karst system similarly.
Discharge of hormones contained in poultry litter into the environment may disrupt the health and reproduction of fish and other animals. A runoff study was conducted to evaluate grass filter effectiveness in reducing transport of the estrogen hormone 17β-estradiol in runoff from pasture-applied poultry litter. The study objectives were to determine the effects of source (litter-treated) length and grass filter length on runoff concentrations and loss of 17β-estradiol from poultry litter applied to tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea Schreber) plots. Litter was applied at 5 Mg/ha (2.2 ton/ac) to the upslope 6.1, 12.2, and 18.3 m (20, 40, and 60 ft) of 24.4-m (80-ft) long grass strips. The corresponding grass filter lengths were 18.3, 12.2, and 6.1 m (60, 40, and 20 ft), respectively, with the downslope edge of source areas evaluated as a 0-m long filter. Simulated rain was applied at 50 mm/h (2 in/h) to produce runoff samples for 17β-estradiol analysis. Runoff concentrations and mass losses were not significantly affected by source length and averaged 3.5 μg/L (ppb) and 1413 mg/ha (0.02 oz/ac), respectively. Runoff concentrations were reduced by 58, 81, and 94% and mass losses by 79, 90, and 98% by filter lengths of 6.1, 12.2, and 18.3 m (20, 40, and 60 ft), respectively. The data from this research indicates that grass filter strips can effectively reduce runoff transport of 17β-estradiol from tall fescue-applied poultry litter.
Land application of horse stall bedding and municipal sludge can increase runoff concentrations of nutrients, organic matter, and bacteria as well as steroidal hormones such as estrogen. Concentrations of materials in runoff from sites treated with animal manure can be reduced by aluminum sulfate, or alum [Al2(SO4)3 °14H2O] treatment. The objectives of this study were to assess plots treated with horse stall bedding or municipal sludge for: (a) runoff quality [concentrations of nitrate nitrogen (NO3-N), ammonia nitrogen (NH3-N), orthophosphate-phosphorus (PO4-P), fecal coliform (FC), chemical oxygen demand (COD) and 17-β estradiol (17β-E, a form of estrogen)]; (b) changes in runoff quality caused by alum treatment; and (c) time variations in concentrations of the analysis parameters. Horse bedding and municipal sludge were applied to twelve 2.4 x 6.1 m fescue plots (six each for the bedding and sludge). Three of the bedding-treated and three of the sludge-treated plots were also treated with alum. Simulated rainfall (64 mm/h) was applied to the 12 treated plots and to three control (no treatment) plots. The data were analyzed as originating from separate completely randomized, one-way designs with three replications of each treatment. The first design had treatment levels of bedding, bedding and sludge, and control, while the second design had treatment levels of sludge, sludge and alum, and control. The control data were common to both designs. The first 0.5 h runoff was sampled and analyzed for the parameters described above. Analysis parameter concentrations for the waste treated plots were generally lower than those previously reported for runoff after organic treatments. In some cases, concentrations were no different from the controls. Mass losses of all parameters were low and agronomically insignificant. Alum addition decreased runoff PO4-P concentrations and increased NO3-N concentrations but had no effect on concentrations of other parameters. A significant effect of alum addition on 17β-E and COD concentrations was anticipated on the basis of previous studies; its absence might have been due to inadequate mixing or interval between addition and simulated rainfall. Relationships between concentration and collection time followed two patterns: (a) highest concentrations occurring during the first sample (two minutes following runoff initiation; NO3-N, COD, FC and 17β-E) and (b) delay in peak concentration until four minutes following runoff initiation (NH3-N and PO4-P). The detection of different general relationships between concentration and time suggests that different mechanisms are dominant in transport of the parameters analyzed.
This article describes the use of vitellogenin as a biomarker for endocrine disruption in fish. The lowest effective concentrations of vitellogenin are reported for oestrogenic compounds like 17β-oestradiol, nonylphenol and bisphenol A. Comparative studies of oestrogens detected in sewage plants from Germany and the UK are discussed. The article points out future directions in the application of vitellogenin ELISA assays and how these assays can provide additional information for a better understanding of the environmental behaviour of pollutants.
From July 1998 to March 1999, a study was made of a total of 27 treatment plants for the principal purpose of understanding the actual condition of endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs) in sewage, and the behavior of EDCs in wastewater treatment plants. The results showed actual levels of influent and effluent concentrations of EDCs in sewage. Substances detected above the minimum limit of determination were 15 for wastewater influent and 6 for effluent. Similarly, nonyl phenol ethoxylate and 17β-estradiol, which are highlighted as pertinent substances, were detected. It was confirmed that the reduction ratio of EDCs in treatment plants was 90% or more for almost all substances. The behavior of EDCs in general in treatment plants was also studied. As a result, the EDCs reduction effect was recognized in both the primary settling tank and biological reaction tank, though the trend varies among substances.
During the past several years, concern has risen over potential pollution of waterways with estrogenic compounds, including steroidal hormones from human and animal sources. One potential source of steroid hormone contamination is through the incomplete removal of these compounds in wastewater treatment systems (WTS). To address this issue, laboratory mineralization assays using 14C-labeled estrogens and testosterone were performed with biosolids from four municipal treatment plants and one industrial system. The importance of adapted microbial populations in the removal of estrogen was shown by the dramatic differences in mineralization of 14C-17β-estradiol by biosolids from a municipal plant compared to that from the industrial plant, 84% versus 4%, respectively. Indeed, biosolids from all of the municipal plants mineralized 70−80% of added 14C-17β-estradiol to 14CO2 in 24 h. Removal of 14C-17β-estradiol from the aqueous phase by biodegradation and/or biosorption to cell matter was greater than 90%. A recombinant yeast estrogen assay (YES assay) also confirmed that biological estrogenic activity was removed from the biosolid samples to below the detection limit (1.56 nM). 14C-Testosterone was mineralized to 14CO2 in all four municipal biosolids in amounts ranging from 55% to 65%; moreover, total removal of 14C-testosterone from the aqueous phase was 95%. First-order rate constants k were obtained for the mineralization and removal from the aqueous phase of natural and a synthetic steroid hormone in biosolids from one WTP. In these biosolids, 14C-17β-estradiol and 14C-testosterone were rapidly mineralized to 14C-CO2 (k = 0.0042 ±0.0002 min-1 and 0.0152 ± 0.0021 min-1, respectively), whereas the mineralization of the synthetic estrogen 14C-17α-ethinylestradiol was 25−75-fold less (k = 0.0002 ± 0.0000 min-1). In addition, mineralization of 14C-ethinylestradiol did not reach completion in 24 h with only 40% mineralized to 14C-CO2. Approximately 20% of the 14C-ethinylestradiol remained in the aqueous phase and was biologically active as determined by the YES assay. Changes in temperature of approximately 15 °C had a statistically significant effect on the rate of mineralization and removal of 14C-17β-estradiol from the aqueous phase but not for 14C-testosterone or 14C-17α-ethinylestradiol. These results suggest that biosolids in municipal plants in this region have the capability to remove natural steroid hormones in their influents over a range of temperatures but may be less effective at removing the synthetic estrogen 17α-ethinylestradiol.