... Accordingly, the American Psychiatric Association (1995), the American Society for Addiction Medicine (ASAM; 2001), and Department of Veterans' Affairs Office of Quality and Managing Chronic Addiction -8 Performance (2004) have issued clinical practice guidelines recommending that patients being discharged from intensive levels of addiction treatment be transferred to outpatient treatment for a period of time before being discharged from the addiction treatment systems. A number of studies demonstrate that patients who did so were more likely to remain abstinent and avoid arrest than those who did not (e.g., Brown et al., 1994; Donovan, 1998; Gilbert, 1988; Godley et al., in press; Higgins, Badger, & Budney, 2000; Ito & Donovan, 1986; Kosten et al., 1992; McKay, 2001; McKay et al., 1998; Moos, Schaefer, Andrassy, & Moos, 2001; Moos & Moos, 2003; Ouimette, Moos, & Finney, 1998; Peterson et al., 1994; Ritsher, McKellar, Finney, Otilingam, & Moos, 2002; Sannibale et al., 2003; Walker, Donovan, Kivlahan, & O'Leary, 1983). Conversely, in one of the few economic evaluations of long-term management of chronic SUD, French and colleagues (2000) found that while the outlay to provide a full continuum of inpatient and outpatient care was greater than that for outpatient treatment alone ($2,530 vs. $1,138; p<.05), the cost differential was offset by significantly greater reductions in societal costs over the subsequent 9 months (savings of $17,833 vs. $11,173; p<.05). ...