Article

Findings of the first national clinical audit of treatment for people with HIV

British HIV Association, Royal Free and University College Medical School, and Royal Free Hampstead NHS Trust, London, UK.
HIV Medicine (Impact Factor: 3.99). 02/2003; 4(1):11-7. DOI: 10.1046/j.1468-1293.2003.00137.x
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT

We reviewed the impact of and assessed adherence to British HIV Association (BHIVA) guidelines in routine clinical practice. Feedback has been provided to clinical centres to facilitate any necessary change.
We used a questionnaire to gauge clinicians' views on the guidelines and availability of antiretroviral therapy (ART) drugs and specialized tests. A case note review of 2044 patients was conducted to assess adherence to guideline recommendations plus patterns of use of HIV resistance testing.
Most clinicians (74.1%) report that BHIVA guidelines have influenced care at their centres. A significant minority report problems with access to specialized tests. Most patients who started ART did so at CD4 counts lower than guidelines recommend but in most cases this reflected the CD4 count at diagnosis of HIV. Of patients on ART, an overwhelming majority (97.6%) were receiving three or more drugs. Of those on three or more drugs, 58.9% had latest viral load (VL) below 50 HIV-1 RNA copies/mL and a further 18.1% below 500 copies/mL. Only 19.3% of patients had been tested for HIV resistance, of whom more than half showed resistance to more than one class of drugs.
This clinical audit provides encouraging evidence of the quality of care offered to people with diagnosed HIV in the UK. However late diagnosis means most people start ART at a more advanced stage than guidelines recommend.

Full-text preview

Available from: onlinelibrary.wiley.com

  • No preview · Article ·

  • No preview · Article · May 2003 · Clinical medicine (London, England)
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The introduction, in 1995, of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) dramatically reduced the morbidity and mortality of HIV-infected patients. However, the brain remains a site of viral replication for HIV and thus is still an important target for antiretroviral agents. Consequently, a clear understanding of how the current anti-HIV drugs reach the CNS, and interact at the level of the blood-brain barrier and blood-CSF barrier, is important if we are to maximise viral suppression and improve clinical outcome. It would also contribute to the development of new anti-HIV drugs and the identification of transport inhibitors that could be used as adjuvant therapies. In this review we focus on the role of the blood-brain and blood-CSF barriers in the delivery of the main classes of approved anti-HIV drugs. Among these groups, the CNS distribution of the nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors is the best characterised. It involves probenecid efflux transport mechanisms, which limit their brain delivery and probably their, neurological efficacy. Nevirapine and efavirenz, the commonly prescribed non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, can readily enter the CSF, however, it remains to be seen if a transport system is involved in their distribution. The protease inhibitors have only a limited ability to reach the CNS, with the majority of this class of drugs not even being detected in human CSF after administration. This is partly the result of their removal from the CNS by the efflux transporters; P-glycoprotein, and possibly multi-drug resistance associated protein (MRP).
    No preview · Article · Feb 2004 · Current Pharmaceutical Design
Show more