Homing in pelagic birds: A pilot experiment with white-chinned petrels released in the open sea

French National Centre for Scientific Research, Lutetia Parisorum, Île-de-France, France
Behavioural processes (Impact Factor: 1.57). 03/2003; 61(1-2):95-100. DOI: 10.1016/S0376-6357(02)00168-7
Source: PubMed


During the breeding period white-chinned petrels (Procellaria aequinoctialis) repeatedly perform long foraging trips in the open ocean from their breeding island, and are able to home with an astonishing precision. The orientation mechanisms involved are not yet known. By analogy with those used by desert ants moving in a similarly "featureless" environment, one can hypothesise that petrels may home using path-integration. We displaced 11 white-chinned petrels 725-785km from their burrows to the open sea, preventing them from using visual and magnetic route-based information. Three birds carried satellite transmitters. Our results showed that they can home rather efficiently in such conditions.

Download full-text


Available from: Joël Bried
  • Source
    • "Nonetheless, some individuals utilised agricultural infrastructure such as ground tanks in both the desert regions and the more mesic agricultural districts. The observed pattern of movement suggests that Grey Teal interact with available habitat at broad scales and that movement at these scales is, at least in part, based on experience and spatial memory (see Benhamou & Poucet 1995, Benhamou 1997, Bingman and Able 2002, Benhamou et al. 2003, Lipp et al. 2004, and references therein). Some tagged individuals moved large distances between wetlands, reaches and catchments over regions with a multitude of other natural and man-made wetland resources, to settle on small wetlands or in regions with few significant wetland resources. "

    Preview · Article · Apr 2008
  • Source
    • "Although olfactory (e.g. Nevitt 2000) and magnetic orientation (Benhamou et al. 2003a) have been considered, it is currently believed that seabirds rely largely on visible cues for navigation (e.g. sun/star compass, wave patterns) (Benhamou et al. 2003b). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Yellow-eyed penguins Megadyptes antipodes seemingly forage at discrete marine locations over the continental shelf, where they are believed to feed predominantly at the seafloor. Such behaviour would distinguish them from most other penguin species that generally employ pelagic foraging strategies. From 2003 to 2005 we studied the foraging behaviour of yellow-eyed penguins breeding near Oamaru, New Zealand. We used 2 types of data loggers: GPS loggers recorded geographical position and dive depth at set intervals, while time-depth recorders (TDRs) recorded only dive depth. The penguins performed day trips (range: 12 to 20 km from the coast) or shorter evening trips (range: <7 km). Consecutive foraging trips of individuals revealed remarkably consistent foraging routes. Birds travelled along similar—at times congruent—paths, markedly changed course at distinct locations, and revisited certain locations on separate trips, indicating skilful navigation. Three trip stages could be distinguished on one-day trips. During the outgoing (seaward travelling) and incoming (shoreward travelling) stages the birds followed linear courses. These stages were separated by a period of midday activity in which birds exhibited higher dive effort and often tended to stay within confined areas. The diving behaviour revealed an exclusive bottom-foraging strategy, with 87% of all dives being benthic dives; the majority of non-benthic dives occurred during the last 2 to 3 h of the trip, indicating primarily travelling behaviour. Furthermore, yellow-eyed penguins employ benthic dives not only when feeding but also frequently when travelling. We suggest that benthic dives might facilitate navigation and, consequently, account for the consistent foraging patterns of yellow-eyed penguins.
    Full-text · Article · Aug 2007 · Marine Ecology Progress Series
  • Source
    • "We believe a combined effort using experimental paradigms (e.g. Kenyon and Rise 1958, Dall&apos;Antonia et al. 1995, Papi et al. 2000, Luschi et al. 2001, A ˚ kesson et al. 2003, Hays et al. 2003, Benhamou et al. 2003, Bonadonna et al. 2003c, Mouritsen et al. 2003) and tracking of natural migrations (e.g. Papi et al. 2000, Weimerskirch and Wilson 2000, Croxall et al. 2005 "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Albatrosses are known for their extreme navigation performance enabling them to locate isolated breeding islands after long-distance migrations across open seas. Little is known about the migration of young albatrosses and how they reach the adults' navigation and foraging skills during the period of immaturity lasting several years and spent permanently flying across the open ocean. We tracked by satellite telemetry the dispersal and migration of 13 juvenile wandering albatrosses from the Crozet Islands during their first year at sea. The young albatrosses covered an average distance of 184,000 km during the first year, restricting their dispersal movement to the unproductive and low wind subtropical Indian Ocean and Tasman Sea. The juveniles initiated the migration by an innate phase of rapid dispersal encoded as a fixed flight direction assisted by southerly winds towards north and northeast. Thereafter each individual restricted its movement to a particular zone of the ocean that will possibly be used until they start breeding 7–10 years later and return in contact with breeding adults. This dispersal in young birds corresponds well with movements observed for adult non-breeding wandering albatrosses. The results show clearly an inherited ability to navigate back to already visited areas in young wandering albatrosses. The juvenile dispersal behaviour and migration at sea suggest a genetically based migration program, encoding navigation to a destination area used throughout the life.
    Full-text · Article · Aug 2005 · Journal of Navigation
Show more