Hepatitis C virus-polymerase chain reaction minipool testing: 3 years in the largest Swiss blood transfusion service
Blood Transfusion Service SRC Berne, Switzerland. Vox Sanguinis
(Impact Factor: 2.8).
03/2003; 84(2):105-10. DOI: 10.1046/j.1423-0410.2003.00263.x
Hepatitis C virus-polymerase chain reaction (HCV-PCR) minipool testing can improve the safety of labile blood products owing to a reduction in the diagnostic preseroconversion window period. In Switzerland, HCV-PCR minipool testing for the release of labile blood components became mandatory in September 1999. In the largest Swiss blood transfusion centre, HCV-PCR minipool testing began in January 1999. This report analyses the performance of the test during a 3-year period: 1 January 1999 to 31 December 2001.
EDTA-blood was collected in either standard tubes or plasma preparation (PPT) tubes from 10 blood transfusion services in Switzerland and then sent to the Blood Transfusion Service SRC Berne. Up to 48 donor samples were pooled overnight using Tecan Genesis RSP 200/8 pipettors. Viral RNA was extracted by using the Qiagen QIAamp 96 viral RNA BioRobot kit on a BioRobot 9604. For PCR amplification and detection of HCV or internal control (IC) sequences, the Roche Cobas Amplicor v2.0 test kit was used. Data management, pool resolution and identification of positive samples were performed using the PMS Software from Tecan.
In the 3-year period from 1 January 1999 to 31 December 2001, 839056 blood donor samples were tested in minipools of up to 48 samples. Thirty-five HCV-PCR-positive donations were identified. Thirty-four samples had antibodies against HCV and were therefore also detected by screening for antibody to HCV (anti-HCV). In October 2001, one seronegative (but PCR-positive) donor was detected.
HCV-PCR minipool testing was successfully introduced in the largest Swiss blood transfusion service. It was shown that the release of HCV-PCR minipool results can be accomplished concurrently with the results of serological analysis. The challenge with a seronegative, but PCR-positive, donor demonstrates that the minipool testing strategy adds additional safety to blood products.
Available from: Peter U Fischer
[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The prevalence of lymphatic filariasis was estimated by PCR-based pool screening of night blood collected from 865 individuals living in ten areas endemic for Wuchereria bancrofti, Brugia malayi or B. timori in Indonesia. A total of 232 microfilaraemics were identified by filtration of 1 ml of blood. The microfilaria (mf) prevalence ranged from 6% to 54%, and the mf density in microfilaraemics ranged from 1 mf/ml to 6028 mf/ml. PCR assays both for W. bancrofti or Brugia spp. detected a single mf present on a 30 microl dried filter paper blood spot. One hundred and seventy-eight pools of five blood spots in each pool (pool-5) were tested by PCR and 101 (57%) pools were positive. When pool size was increased to 10 spots per pool (pool-10), 65 (70%) of 93 pools were positive. Pearson's correlation and linear regression showed a strong correlation between filtration and pool screen PCR results for pool-10 (r=0.835) and pool-5 (r=0.695). Based on the determination coefficient (R), the results of pool-10 PCR (R=0.697) gave a better prediction compared with pool-5 PCR (R=0.483). This study suggests that pool screen PCR may be a useful tool for monitoring the Global Program to Eliminate Lymphatic Filariasis.
[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: This study was carried out to determine the prevalence of isolated anti-HBc among blood donors in this province and its impact on rejection of collected blood units. Isolated hepatitis B core positivity was found 15% in blood center but in this population we have found no HBV-DNA positivity. We proposed that in order to detect mutant hepatitis B viruses in blood donor population, multi-center studies must be done in this country.
Data provided are for informational purposes only. Although carefully collected, accuracy cannot be guaranteed. The impact factor represents a rough estimation of the journal's impact factor and does not reflect the actual current impact factor. Publisher conditions are provided by RoMEO. Differing provisions from the publisher's actual policy or licence agreement may be applicable.