Photopigment basis for dichromatic color vision in the horse

Department of Cell Biology, Neurobiology & Anatomy, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
Journal of Vision (Impact Factor: 2.39). 08/2001; 1(2):80-7. DOI: 10.1167/1.2.2
Source: PubMed


Horses, like other ungulates, are active in the day, at dusk, dawn, and night; and, they have eyes designed to have both high sensitivity for vision in dim light and good visual acuity under higher light levels (Walls, 1942). Typically, daytime activity is associated with the presence of multiple cone classes and color-vision capacity (Jacobs, 1993). Previous studies in other ungulates, such as pigs, goats, cows, sheep and deer, have shown that they have two spectrally different cone types, and hence, at least the photopigment basis for dichromatic color vision (Neitz & Jacobs, 1989; Jacobs, Deegan II, Neitz, Murphy, Miller, & Marchinton, 1994; Jacobs, Deegan II, & Neitz, 1998). Here, electroretinogram flicker photometry was used to measure the spectral sensitivities of the cones in the domestic horse (Equus caballus). Two distinct spectral mechanisms were identified and are consistent with the presence of a short-wavelength-sensitive (S) and a middle-to-long-wavelength-sensitive (M/L) cone. The spectral sensitivity of the S cone was estimated to have a peak of 428 nm, while the M/L cone had a peak of 539 nm. These two cone types would provide the basis for dichromatic color vision consistent with recent results from behavioral testing of horses (Macuda & Timney, 1999; Macuda & Timney, 2000; Timney & Macuda, 2001). The spectral peak of the M/L cone photopigment measured here, in vivo, is similar to that obtained when the gene was sequenced, cloned, and expressed in vitro (Yokoyama & Radlwimmer, 1999). Of the ungulates that have been studied to date, all have the photopigment basis for dichromatic color vision; however, they differ considerably from one another in the spectral tuning of their cone pigments. These differences may represent adaptations to the different visual requirements of different species.

Download full-text


Available from: Christopher J Murphy
  • Source
    • "We used a customizable Colour Vision Simulator software program[46], which allows us to set the peak sensitivity of the cone photopigments to adjust the chromaticity of the spatially filtered digital images to accord with known species-specific colour sensitivities. We used values of 430 nm for the peak sensitivity of the short-wave sensitive (blue) cones for all species, and 545 nm (zebra) and 553 nm (lion, hyaena) for long-wave sensitive cones47484950. Although this programme was developed to simulate variants of primate vision–as are commercially available alternatives (e.g., Vischeck)—and thus may introduce biases (e.g. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The century-old idea that stripes make zebras cryptic to large carnivores has never been examined systematically. We evaluated this hypothesis by passing digital images of zebras through species-specific spatial and colour filters to simulate their appearance for the visual systems of zebras’ primary predators and zebras themselves. We also measured stripe widths and luminance contrast to estimate the maximum distances from which lions, spotted hyaenas, and zebras can resolve stripes. We found that beyond ca. 50 m (daylight) and 30 m (twilight) zebra stripes are difficult for the estimated visual systems of large carnivores to resolve, but not humans. On moonless nights, stripes are difficult for all species to resolve beyond ca. 9 m. In open treeless habitats where zebras spend most time, zebras are as clearly identified by the lion visual system as are similar-sized ungulates, suggesting that stripes cannot confer crypsis by disrupting the zebra’s outline. Stripes confer a minor advantage over solid pelage in masking body shape in woodlands, but the effect is stronger for humans than for predators. Zebras appear to be less able than humans to resolve stripes although they are better than their chief predators. In conclusion, compared to the uniform pelage of other sympatric herbivores it appears highly unlikely that stripes are a form of anti-predator camouflage.
    Full-text · Article · Jan 2016 · PLoS ONE
  • Source
    • "Previous studies using different methods indicated that the horse has two cone pigments (Sandmann et al., 1996; Carroll et al., 2001; Hall et al., 2006). Carroll et al. (2001) reported that the cone spectral sensitivity for the M/L photopigment of the horses has a spectral peak (λmax) of 539 nm and that the best fitting S cone pigment curve had a λmax "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: There is general agreement that horses have dichromatic colour vision with similar capabilities to human beings with red-green colour deficiencies. However, whether colour perception has an impact on equine jumping performance and how pronounced the colour stimulus might be for a horse is unknown. The present study investigated the relationship between the colour of the fences (blue or green) and the show jumping performance of 20 horses ridden by two riders using an indoor and outdoor set of green and blue fences. In the indoor arena, significantly more touches and faults were made on blue fences in comparison to green fences (median difference of 2.5 bars). When only touched bars were included, a significant median difference of 1 bar was found. Mares (n = 4) demonstrated more faults and had a significantly greater difference in touches and faults between the two colours than male horses (n = 16). Repeating the same experiment with eight horses in an outdoor grass arena revealed no significant differences between the two colours. In order to draw any definite conclusions, more research concerning the colour perception, influence of contrast with the arena surface and sex of horse is required.
    Full-text · Article · Oct 2014 · The Veterinary Journal
  • Source
    • "Scientifically, this interest focuses on the gathering of as much data as possible about a particular sensory ability of a species, which then provides important information to the horse public regarding the visual abilities of their animals. Investigations to date centered on equine color vision (Pick et al., 1994; Macuda and Timney, 1999; Carroll et al., 2001; Hanggi et al., 2007), depth perception and visual acuity (see Timney and Macuda, 2001; Waring, 2003 for reviews), interocular transfer (Hanggi, 1999a), and scotopic vision (Hanggi and Ingersoll, 2009a). The horse's field of view is another aspect of equine vision that has been the subject of some discussion. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This study investigated lateral vision in horses (Equus caballus) for the first time from a behavioral point of view. Three horses were tested using a novel experimental design to determine the range of their lateral and caudolateral vision with respect to stimulus detection and discrimination. Real-life stimuli were presented along a curvilinear wall in one of four different positions (A, B, C, D) and one of two height locations (Top, Bottom) on both sides of the horse. To test for stimulus detection, the correct stimulus was paired against a control; for stimulus discrimination, the correct stimulus was paired against another object. To indicate that the correct stimulus was detected or discriminated, the horses pushed one of two paddles. All horses scored significantly above chance on stimulus detection trials regardless of stimulus position or location. They also accurately discriminated between stimuli when objects appeared in positions A, B, and C for the top or bottom locations; however, they failed to discriminate these stimuli at position D. This study supports physiological descriptions of the equine eye and provides new behavioral data showing that horses can detect the appearance of objects within an almost fully encompassing circle and are able to identify objects within most but not all of their panoramic field of view.
    Full-text · Article · Jun 2012 · Behavioural processes
Show more