SARS-CoV-2 Origins Research & Censorship: The arc of Inquiry bends towards Enlightenment
A resource for anyone interested in the primary source documents from which a significant portion of the evidence of a non-natural origin for SARS-CoV-2 has been discovered
A linked, single-page PDF that provides an introduction to the timeline and evidence of direct collusion amongst senior officials, scientists and publishers during the first few months of the COVID-19 pandemic. All information has been derived from FOIA documents and published written work by individuals below, based upon my own complete review of the evidence and additional analysis by US Right-to-Know, among others. Among the included institutions & organizations: The National Institutes of Health [NIH], NIAID, EcoHealth Alliance, Wellcome Trust & the Wuhan Institute of Virology Among the included individuals: Anthony Fauci, Francis Collins, David Morens, Erik Stemmy, Alan Embry, Ralph Baric, Peter Daszak, Ian Lipkin, Stanley Perlman, Edward Holmes, Zheng-Li Shi
Update #6 - I've uploaded a new version of this file [5/14/22]; the overall count of sources has grown from 1,036 to 1,368 and the overall number of tabs has grown from 24 to 31. New tabs include HIV/SARS tied research & in-depth censorship & narrative charts/data. Update #5 - I've uploaded a new version of this file [1/15/22]; the overall count of sources has grown from 925 to 1,036, and the overall number of tabs has grown from 14 to 24. New tabs include topics like Gain-of-Function, FOIA & other primary source documents, and a list of DRASTIC's major findings & projects. Update #4 - I've uploaded a new version of this file [10/14]; the overall count of sources has grown from 798 to 925. Update #3 - I've uploaded a new version of this file [9/15]; the overall count of sources has grown from 703 to 798. Update #2 - I've uploaded a new version of this file [8/13]; the overall count of sources has grown from 598 to 703. I've also added additional tabs. Update #1 - This is an update of my ongoing compilation of COVID-19 origin investigation sources, taking the total from 520 to 598. This version will finally sport a DOI. I've recopied the explanation of my purpose and my thesis below, but my intent remains to provide a comprehensive, free compilation of worthwhile references & evidence - that I've read, and that I'm currently using in my work as part of DRASTIC's investigation. -Rixey 'The arc of inquiry bends towards enlightenment' In addition to addressing the need for broader access to the ongoing scientific debate concerning the origins of COVID-19, my expectation is that the aggregation and sorting of research will support the following hypothesis: *The actions taken to curtail scientific research into a non-zoonotic emergence hypothesis of the SARS-CoV-2 virus were based on external considerations, not a dispassionate, scientific review of the available evidence.* Over time, the arc of inquiry bends towards enlightenment - therefore, the volume of research will tend to shift in the direction of the correct answer as discoveries strengthen or weaken a hypothesis. This should be clearly identifiable by a positive correlation between the volume of research directed towards the ultimately correct hypothesis, and a corresponding decline in the intensity of resources devoted towards less likely conclusions. *** Furthermore, if that hypothesis is correct, it will provide compelling evidence in support of a larger hypothesis concerning the origins of SARS-CoV-2 and the COVID-19 pandemic. The sum of literary & epidemiological evidence will ultimately confirm that SARS-CoV-2 is a product of lab research, rather than zoonotic emergence.
This works contains 2 parts: 1) My combined raw commentaries concerning ongoing censorship of research into the potential lab-leak origins of SARS-CoV-2 2) An appendix with 173 pages of FOIA email correspondence and other documents, as well as my analysis of trends that show this censorship. The FOIA documents all derive from requests made by US Right to Know and Buzzfeed.