Project

Partial restoration of native biodiversity in an urban fringe: Recreational development as a tool to combat overgrazing

Goal: Evaluation of different threats on biodiversity of the inland desert habitat of UAE and its implications for the sustainable management

Date: 1 August 2016

Updates
0 new
2
Recommendations
0 new
0
Followers
0 new
7
Reads
0 new
60

Project log

Tamer Khafaga
added a research item
Urban developments affect neighbouring ecosystems in multiple ways, usually decreasing native biodiversity. Arabian arid rangeland was studied to identify the primary causes of biodiversity variation. Al Marmoum is a 990 km2 area on the urban edge of Dubai, designated for ecological ‘enhancement’ and outdoor recreational use. The area lacks historical biodiversity data but is thought to be primarily influenced by camel herbivory. Perennial floral and faunal diversity was assessed at 54 sites. Counts of reintroduced ungulates (Arabian Oryx, Arabian and Sand Gazelle) were made at 79 separate sites. Correlations of observed biodiversity with substrate type, anthropogenic structures, and ungulate distribution were assessed. Native biodiversity was substantially higher in north-northwest locations near recreational facilities, with the most likely cause being differential browsing pressure. Camel browsing faced greater communal regulation in the north-northwest, while oryx and gazelles congregated at feed points in the south-southeast that were farther from human activity. Arid rangeland in this socio-ecological landscape exhibits greater natural biodiversity at the urban fringe. Human activity reduces ungulate density, enabling a greater diversity of perennial flora which then attracts non-ungulate fauna. Anthropogenic features can therefore offer conservation value in landscapes where ungulate populations are artificially elevated.
Tamer Khafaga
added an update
Title changed to " Proximity to urban fringe recreational facilities increases native biodiversity in an arid rangeland "
 
Tamer Khafaga
added an update
Field data have been collected during the month of August and September 2016, now we are in the phase of writing the final results.
The Important Value Index; how powerful this index is in describing the dominance of species in a community? is there is any debate about its validity to measure the density, frequency and the abundance of the species? any supported reference would be very useful, or if there is any article reviewing this index?
 
Tamer Khafaga
added 3 project references
Tamer Khafaga
added a project goal
Evaluation of different threats on biodiversity of the inland desert habitat of UAE and its implications for the sustainable management