Modern Eastern Anatolia is a high-plateau region characterized by active
N-S crustal shortening, mostly accommodated along strike-slip faults,
and recent, abundant volcanism. Due to the extensive Cenozoic marine and
Quaternary volcano-sedimentary covers, Tetyhan palaeogeography and
related tectonic settings, and thence their impact on modern strain
partitioning, in this region are particularly difficult to unravel, and
therefore remains strongly debated. According to recent works in Armenia
and northernmost Eastern Anatolia, blueschists dated to middle
Cretaceous times record the accretion of the South-Armenian Block to the
southern Eurasian margin, now separated by the Sevan-Akera Suture.
Further south, we recently documented Late Cretaceous HP-LT metamorphism
in the Bitlis Complex, which belongs to a micro-continental block
isolated between the South-Armenian Block and the Arabian Platform. In
order to gain further insights into Eastern Anatolia's tectonic
architecture, and its continuation into the better-established Central
and Western Anatolian tectonic domains, we collected petrologic data
from slightly- to strongly metamorphosed sedimentary and crustal
lithologies of scattered localities of SE Anatolia, west and north of
the Bitlis Complex. From our field observations, we report only
low-grade metamorphic assemblages in metasedimentary rocks of the
Pütürge Massif, which was commonly considered as the western
equivalent of the Bitlis Massif, but obviously did, in contrast to the
latter, not experienced HP-LT metamorphism. Nevertheless,
glaucophane-bearing rocks were found farther west, north of
Adıyaman, might represent the west continuation of the Bitlis HP
Complex. From near Malatya, north of the Pütürge Massif and
south of the Eastern Tauride non-metamorphosed carbonate platform,
eastwards via Elazig and Bingöl, to Aǧrı, between the
Bitlis Massif and the South-Armenian Block, we found numerous, scattered
occurrences of HT metamorphic assemblages in metasedimentary rocks,
likely belonging to the South-Armenian Block. These findings outline a
HT metamorphic belt continuous over ca. 500 km. Assuming that
amphibolites recently reported from near Malatya are part of the same
belt, we envisage that HT metamorphism might have taken place during the
Late Cretaceous. No hint for a westward continuation of the HT
metamorphic belt was found, but it might correlate eastwards with the
Sirjan-Sanandaj magmatic belt in NW Iran. The Malatya-Aǧrı
HT belt might record the same back-arc rifting event as the one
responsible for the genesis of oceanic material obducted as the Khoy
Ophiolites in NW Iran. We take this as a strong indication that, before
collision, the Bitlis Block, the South-Armenian Block and, to the west,
the Anatolide-Tauride Block might have been separated micro-continents.
Compiling the petrologic record points to the successive accretion of
several micro-continental blocks during the middle Cretaceous to the
early Eocene, and to a highly-segmented East-Anatolian lithosphere prior
to the Neogene.