Project

Branding & Communications

Updates

0 new
7
Recommendations

0 new
0
Followers

0 new
1
Reads

0 new
54

Project log

George Rossolatos
added 2 research items
This volume addresses some of the most important conceptual, methodological, and empirical challenges and opportunities with which the sister disciplines of semiotics and discourse analysis are mutually confronted in the context of considering new avenues of cross-disciplinary application to distinctive branding research streams. In continuation of the collective volume 'Handbook of Brand Semiotics' (Kassel University Press, 2015), which sought to consolidate relevant scholarship and to identify the main territories that have been established at the cross-roads between branding and semiotic research, the current 'Advances in Brand Semiotics & Discourse Analysis' aims at accomplishing further strides in critical areas, such as the exigency for reconsidering the aptness of existing semiotic theories in the face of the radically shifting co-creative landscape of digital branding, the benefits of systematically micro-analyzing brand communities’ discourses by drawing on CAQDAS programs, the combination of big data analytics with discourse theory in corpus analysis, and the epistemological issues that emerge while combining discourse analysis with time-hallowed marketing qualitative and quantitative research methods. At the same time, the volume hosts a resourceful blend of empirical studies and novel conceptual frameworks in burgeoning streams, such as place, heritage, culinary, personal, and political branding. https://vernonpress.com/book/1669 http://grossolatos.blogspot.com/2021/07/advances-in-brand-semiotics-discourse.html
George Rossolatos
added a research item
This paper furnishes a brand storytelling account of the Covid-19 pandemic. By adopting a fictional ontological standpoint, the virus’ narrative space is mapped out by recourse to metaphorical modeling. The disease imagery stems from global mainstream media in the context of Covid-19’s brand globalization, as increasing interconnectedness of and interdependence between social, cultural and economic discourses. The main narrative components (actors, settings, actions, relationships) are outlined as episodes that make up the virus’ brand personality, against the background of a reading grid. Subsequently, a nexus of ontological (deep) metaphors is identified as the virus’ master narrative, by identifying transfers between the global mediascape and the brand’s narrative space. Deep metaphors are equivalent to cultural archetypes or mythopoetic structures which make up a collective structural unconscious. Deep metaphors stem from reducing surface metaphors to their most universal semantic dimensions by identifying permeating themes. Instead of ascribing primacy to the
George Rossolatos
added 3 research items
The cultural consumption research landscape of the 21st century is marked by an increasing cross-disciplinary fermentation. At the same time, cultural theory and analysis have been marked by successive ‘inter-’ turns, most notably with regard to the Big Four: multimodality (or intermodality), interdiscursivity, transmediality (or intermediality), and intertextuality. This book offers an outline of interdiscursivity as an integrative platform for accommodating these notions. To this end, a call for a return to Foucault is issued via a critical engagement with the so-called practice-turn. This re-turn does not seek to reconstitute venerably Foucauldianism, but to theorize ‘inters-’ as vanishing points that challenge the integrity of discrete cultural orders in non-convergent manners. The propounded interdiscursivity approach is offered as a reading strategy that permeates the contemporary cultural consumption phenomena that are scrutinized in this book, against a pan-consumptivist framework. By drawing on qualitative and mixed methods research designs, facilitated by CAQDAS software, the empirical studies that are hosted here span a vivid array of topics that are directly relevant to both traditional and new media researchers, such as the consumption of ideologies in Web 2.0 social movements, the ability of micro-celebrities to act as cultural game-changers, the post-loyalty abjective consumption ethos. The theoretically novel approaches on offer are coupled with methodological innovations in areas such as user-generated content, artists’ branding, and experiential consumption.
This paper aims at unearthing the appeals, the argumentative schemes and the modes of rhetorical configuration that make up the rhetorical structure of the anti-ageing skin care product category’s print advertising discourse. To this end, the pragma-ontological approach is put forward as an offshoot of the pragma-dialectical perspective in rhetorical analysis and criticism. The pragma-ontological approach adds interpretative depth to the overt argumentation structure of anti-ageing products’ ads on the grounds of fundamental ontology/existential phenomenology. The analysis points to three levels where the ads’ arguments function: an overt level and two covert ones. On the overt level the ads function against the background of mixed ethos/pathos/logos appeals that buttress an argumentation scheme from values. On a primary covert level, the ads appear to be functioning through an indirect appeal to fear, while resting on an argumentation scheme from consequences. On a secondary covert level, the ads are shown to be appealing indirectly to ontological angst, while manifesting an argumentation scheme per impossibile. The cultural implications for policy-making are highlighted amidst a predicament where anti-ageing claims are attracting heavy criticism.
George Rossolatos
added a research item
This paper offers a brand storytelling, that is a narratological account of Covid-19 pandemic’s emergence phase. By adopting a fictional ontological standpoint, the virus’ deploying media story-world is identified with a process of narrative spacing. Subsequently, the brand’s personality is analyzed as a narrative place brand. The narrative model that is put forward aims at outlining the main episodes that make up the virus’ brand personality as process and structural components (actors, settings, actions, relationships). A series of deep or ontological metaphors are singled out as the core DNA of this place brand, by applying metaphorical modeling to the tropical articulation of Covid-19’s narrative. The virus’ kernel is identified with terror, as a menacing force that wipes out existing regimes of signification due to its uncertain motives, origins and operational mode. In this context, familiar urban spaces, cultural practices and intersubjective communications are redefined, repurposed and reprogrammed. This process is called terrorealization, as the desertification and metaphorical sublation of all prior territorial significations. This study contributes to the narrative sub-stream of place branding by approaching a globally relevant sociocultural phenomenon from a brand storytelling perspective.
George Rossolatos
added a research item
This chapter introduces critical argumentation theory and analysis to cultural consumer research with a view to affording a cultural understanding of advertising discourse. Although rhetorical figures and rhetorical appeals have been amply scrutinized in the marketing discipline, argumentation schemes remain as yet untapped as regards their potential for offering nuanced insights about advertising claims by attending to the multiple layers of ad texts’ argumentative structuration. In order to illustrate the areas of contribution of critical argumentation, a corpus of print ads from the anti-ageing product category is drawn upon. The analysis unearths layers of argumentation by attending to latent statements, hidden premises and logical fallacies. The implications for critical marketing and for policy-making are highlighted amidst an external marketing environment where anti-ageing claims are attracting heavy criticism.
George Rossolatos
added a research item
User-generated advertising (UGA) has been blossoming over the past few years as marketers are actively seeking to tighten bonds with consumers through engagement methods. Despite the rampant availability of listening technologies and the ever more nuanced mining of social media through Big Data applications, our understanding of the implications and the potential of UGA from a digital humanities point of view remains limited. This study ventures into mapping the interdiscursive cultural terrain of UGA with a view to furnishing a systematic account of how it affords to flesh out co-creatively a brand vision. To this end, a sociosemiotic approach is adopted that dimensionalizes the cultural resources employed in UGA as a nested structure that combines macrocultural aspects of cultural order/type with microcultural ones, such as genre and concrete cultural representations. The conceptual model is exemplified by recourse to a UGA corpus from the 10th and final wave of Doritos’ Crash the Super Bowl promotion, undergirded by a mixed methods research design that features a grounded theoretical procedure, facilitated by quantitative analyses.
George Rossolatos
added a research item
Social media brand communities (SMBCs) have been heralded for their co‐creative, participatory potential whereby consumers actively contribute to the proliferation of meaningful brand avenues in a virtuously circular relationship with brands. Elevated loyalty and enhanced brand equity have been posited repeatedly as likely outcomes of a positively engaged community of brand aficionados. However, evidence to the contrary as negative brand co‐creation or brand co‐destruction has been progressively piling up in the extant literature. This paper contributes to the meaning co‐creation in SMBCs literature primarily on two grounds: first, by offering a methodological framework for adapting the laddering research technique in a mixed methods vein to SMBCs data in a thread‐specific context, by leveraging the analytical capabilities of NVivo CAQDAS software; second, by addressing bottlenecks in the applicability of the proposed methodology in light of negative brand co‐creation.
George Rossolatos
added an update
Indicative citations of Rossolatos’ research in books, papers and theses 1.  Douglas Tallack (2013). Critical Theory. London: Routledge. “Marketing semiotics or commercial semiotics is an application of semiotic methods and semiotic thinking in the analysis and development of advertising and brand communications in cultural context. Key figures include Virginia Valentine, Malcolm Evans, Greg Rowland, George Rossolatos” (p. 124) 2. Mathieu Deflem (2017). Lady Gaga and the Sociology of Fame. London: Palgrave. Tying in with Lady Gaga’s acceptance and embrace of freakishness and monstrosity (Corona 2013 ; Macfarlane  2012 ; Rossolatos  2015 ), everybody who is part of her world is meant to be accepted for who they are and who they wish to be, even and especially when they by the conventions of mainstream society judged not to be sexy or even thought to be unattractive.” (p. 174) Citing Rossolatos, George (2014g). Lady Gaga as (dis)simulacrum of monstrosity. Celebrity Studies 6(2), pp.231-246. 3. Yuliya Martinavichene (2017). The Use of Semiotics in Content Analysis: The Case of Belarusian Patriotic  Advertising, in Readings in Numanities, Springer 29-47 Citing Rossolatos, George. 2013. //rhetor.dixit// Understanding ad texts’ rhetorical structurefor differential figurative advantage. Amazon Publishing.Google Scholar  (https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Rossolatos%2C%20George.%202013.%20%2F%2Frhetor.dixit%2F%2F%20Understanding%20ad%20texts%E2%80%99%20rhetorical%20structure%20for%20differential%20figurative%20advantage.%20CreateSpace%20Independent%20Publishing%20Platform.) 4. Louise J. Ravelli and Robert J. McMurtrie (2016). Multimodality in the Built Environment: Spatial Discourse Analysis Citing Rossolatos, G. (2012) ‘Towards a semiotics of brand equity: Brand coherence and communicative consistency through structuralist operations and rhetorical transformations’.International Association for Semiotic Studies. <http://www.academia.edu/2041287/Towards_a_semiotics_of_brand_equity_Brand_coherence_and_communicative_consistency_through_structuralist_operations_and_rhetorical_transformations                                                                                                                                                                                      5. Derek Bryce (2016). Domesticating      Fears   and      Fantasies         of         'theEast':   integrating       the       Ottoman          legacy  within European          heritage. Journal            of         Marketing         Management    ·           May      2016 “As noted by Rossolatos (2015) semiotic analysis is a fruitful analytical tool incultural consumption research as it allows integration along different analyticallevels. Semiotic analysis thus offers important analytical steps within the text, butan additional stage of analysis is necessary to place sign systems at the service ofmore diffuse discursive systems to which they adhere.” Citing Rossolatos, G. (2015) Taking the “multimodal turn” in interpreting consumption experiences, Consumption Markets & Culture, 18(5) 427-446, 6. Simon Moberg Torp and Lars Pynt Andersen (2018). Marketing Rhetoric and the Rhetoric of Marketing: Manipulation or Mutuality? In the Handbook of Organizational Rhetoric and Communication. New Jersey: Wiley, 67-80.                                                                                                                               Citing Rossolatos, G. (2014). Brand equity planning with structuralist rhetorical semiotics. Kassel: Kassel University Press. 7. L. van Zoonen (2017). Intertextuality. The International Encyclopedia of Media Effects. New Jersey: Wiley, 1–12. “Rossolatos (2014) is more cynical when he says that Gaga’s experimentation is a stylistic exercise, a ‘post-ideological potpourri’ (p. 242) rather than a substantial defense of diversity and difference. Nevertheless, her billions of fans communing under the label that Lady Gaga gave to them, Little Monsters, connect to her performances recognizing them as authenticexpressions of her own experiences, and appreciating them as ways of finding out who they want to be (cf. Bels, 2015; Gellel, 2013).” Citing Rossolatos, G. (2014).Lady Gaga as (dis)simulacrum of monstrosity. Celebrity Studies, 6(2), p. 231246. 8. Angela Gracia B. Cruz, Margo Buchanan-Oliver, (2017) "Moving toward settlement: tourism as acculturation practice", European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 51 Issue: 4,pp. 772-794 “Three key techniques were deployed to enhance reflexivity (Thompson et al., 1998). First, the interview design incorporated a visual elicitation technique informed by the Zaltman Metaphor Elicitation Technique (ZMET; Zaltman and Coulter, 1995) and the more recent “multi-modal turn” in consumption research (Rossolatos, 2015, p. 427). Participants were asked to bring at least 12 objects or photographs representing their experience of settling inNew Zealand. Second, participants were asked to draw a self-portrait and a relational map (Bagnoli, 2009). Rather than using multi-modal techniques to reduce and abstract the complexity of participant narratives to elicit a “deeper” mental structure, as in a “pure” ZMET approach, these were used to enable the complexity and fluidity of “intersubjective meaning generation” (Rossolatos, 2015, p. 429) to emerge.” (p.777) Citing Rossolatos, G. (2015), “Taking the ‘multimodal turn’ in interpreting consumption experiences”,Consumption Markets & Culture, Vol. 18 No. 5, pp. 427-446.                                                      9. Sergio Salvatore, Viviana Fini, Terri Mannarini,  Giuseppe Alessandro Veltri, Evrinomi Avdi  Fiorella Battaglia, Jorge Castro-Tejerina, Enrico Ciavolino, Marco Cremaschi, Irini Kadianaki, Nikita A. Kharlamov, Anna Krasteva, Katrin Kullasepp, Anastassios Matsopoulos, Claudia Meschiari, Piergiorgio Mossi, Polivios Psinas, Rozlyn Redd, Alessia Rochira, Alfonso Santarpia, Gordon Sammut, Jaan Valsiner, Antonella Valmorbida, on behalf of the Re.Cri.Re.Consortium (2018). Symbolic universes between present and future of Europe. First results of the map of European societies' cultural milieu, PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0189885 January 3, 2018 “We prefer the term semiotic capitalΊ to the more used symbolic capital, because the latter is more strictly related to the Bourdieu's theory and intended in terms of prestige and celebrity -degree of accumulated prestige, celebrity or honour and is founded on a dialectic of knowledge and recognition ([38], p. 7). Rossolatos [39] has recently used the term semiotic capital in a similar way adopted here.” (p. 23) Citing Rossolatos, George  (2016a).  Before  the  consummation what?  On the  role  of  the  semiotic economy of seduction.Continuum: Journal of Media & Cultural Studies 30(4): 451-465. 10. Ochoa G.G., Lorimer S. (2017) The Role of Narrative in the Creation of Brand identity. In: Monk N., Lindgren M., McDonald S., Pasfield-Neofitou S. (eds) Reconstructing Identity. Palgrave Macmillan.                                       “Semiotics, the field of research that studies signs and symbols, allowsus to track historical and cultural shifts. As such, it can help companiesmake sense of the alternative narratives they can create for themselvesand is an important tool in the formation of brand identity (Batey 2008;Oswald 2012; Rossolatos 2015).” (p. 253) Citing Rossolatos, George. 2015. Handbook of brand semiotics. Kassel: Kassel University Press. 11. V.  Ushchapovska (2017). CONVERGENCE OF BRAND LANGUAGE ELEMENTS. UDC 81’26 Citing Rossolatos, George. 2015. Handbook of brand semiotics. Kassel: Kassel University Press. 12. Elizabeth S. Gunawan  & Paul van den Hoven (2017). Global Brand Identity as a Network of Localized Meanings.International Journal of Marketing Studies; Vol. 9, No. 2; 2017 “In the academic field, an academic handbook has been published (Rossolatos, 2015) and a journal has been established:International Journal of Marketing Semiotics: http://ijmarketingsemiotics.com/.This rise of semiotics in this field is no coincidence as it fits into the shift from marketer to customer, from sender to audience.” (p. 67) Citing Rossolatos, George (ed. and co-author) (2015b). Handbook of Brand Semiotics. Kassel: Kassel University Press.http://ijmarketingsemiotics.com/handbook-of-brand-semiotics/  13. Gemma Burgess, Mihaela Kelemen, Sue Moffat, Elizabeth Parsons (2017). "Using performative knowledge production to explore marketplace exclusion", Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, Vol. 20 Issue: 4, pp.486-511 “According to Rossolatos (2013), a multi-modal approach provides researchers with the tools to understand how languages is influenced and influences social and material practices and images. From here stems its potential for performativity and change.” (p. 494). Citing Rossolatos, G. (2013), “Rhetorical transformations in multimodal advertising texts: from general to local degree zero”, Hermes-Journal of Language and Communication in Business, Vol. 50, pp. 97-118. available at: http://download2.hermes.asb.dk/archive/download/Hermes-50-8-rossolatos.pdf 14. B. Wiggins (2017). NAVIGATING DIGITAL CULTURE: REMIX CULTURE, VIRAL MEDIA, AND INTERNET MEMES.Proceedings of INTED2017 Conference 6th-8th March 2017, Valencia, Spain Citing Rossolatos, G. (2015). The Ice-Bucket Challenge: The Legitimacy of the Memetic Mode of Cultural Reproduction is the Message. Signs and Society, 3(1): 132-152. 15. Angela Gracia B. Cruz, Margo Buchanan-Oliver. (2017) Mobile masculinities: performances of remasculation. European Journal of Marketing 51:7/8, pages 13741395. Citing Rossolatos, G. (2015), “Taking the ‘multimodal turn’ in interpreting consumption experiences”,Consumption Markets & Culture, Vol. 18 No. 5, pp. 427-446.                                                      16. Amrita Joshi (2017).  Logo dynamics for investment branding: a visual–semiotic analysis. Place Branding and Public DiplomacyAug 2017 Citing Rossolatos, George (2012). Applying Structuralist Semiotics to Brand Image Research. Amazon Press. 17. James Fredal (2018). Is the Enthymeme a Syllogism? Philosophy & Rhetoric Vol. 51, No. 1, 24-49 Citing Rossolatos, George (2014b). On the pathology of the enthymeme: Accounting for   hidden visual premises in advertising discourse. Signs and Society 2(1): 1-27. 18. Per Østergaard1, Judy Hermansen2 and James Fitchett (2015). Structures of brand and anti-brand meaning: A semiotic square analysis of reflexive consumption. Journal of Brand Management (2015) 22, 60–77.“Inspired by Floch (2001) who has conducted several studies that analyze consumerdilemmas, we will now build on these conceptual innovations to further explore theantagonisms of consumer reflexivity and activism by means of an analytical approachcalled the Semiotic Square (Greimas, 1987; Rossolatos, 2012).” Citing Rossolatos, George (2012b). Applications, implications and limitations of the semiotic square for analyzing advertising discourse and discerning alternative brand futures. Signs: An international Journal of Semiotics Vol.6: 1-48.http://vip.iva.dk/sis/index.php?journal=signsandpage=articleandop=viewandpath%5B%5D=45andpath%5B%5D=pdf 19. Michael Everts (2014). Inductive Programming: Designing Activities and Space with 4D Parametric Modeling| Montana State University. Design Communication Conference, Design & Graphic Palimpsest: [Dialogue-Discourse-Discussion] Design Communication, CHAPTER 04: Paper Sessions D1, D2, D3, D4 Paper Session D1: Digital Exploration: Parametric Modelinghttp://www.dcaconference2014.org/2014%20Proceedings/5.%20DCA%202014%20Proceedings_P%20187-280_Chapter%204_Session%20D.pdf “Using the semiotic square, George Rossolatos anacademic researcher and marketing practitioner, deconstructed a popular Pot Noodle advertising campaign to categorize and explain its successful performance. He outlined how the ads established new relations of meaning over time, constructing a new virtual universe where the Pot Noodle brand was thedesired component. His study provides a process for mapping the performance of brand communications. It suggests that the extent to which consumers recognize, internalize and relate to the (virtual) space of a brand is not just an academic question, but a performativeapproach to financial and customer value (9). It is a process of interaction between a participant and a space that generates a meaningful evolution of new possibilities and associations. This directly relates to the aspect of the programming tool used for continuously programming during the life of the project” Citing Rossolatos, George (2012b). Applications, implications and limitations of the semiotic square for analyzing advertising discourse and discerning alternative brand futures. Signs: An international Journal of Semiotics Vol.6: 1-48.http://vip.iva.dk/sis/index.php?journal=signsandpage=articleandop=viewandpath%5B%5D=45andpath%5B%5D=pdf 20. Emily Underwood-Lee, ‘Bangers to Cancer’: Social media, charity fundraising and objectificationhttps://www.bstjournal.com/articles/36/ George Rossolatos suggests that the essential purpose of any online phenomenon with nomination and replication at its core is to perpetuate itself and the cultural ideology it promotes (2014: 2-3).”Citing Rossolatos, George (2015c). The ice-bucket challenge: The legitimacy of the memetic mode of cultural reproduction is the message. Signs & Society 3(1): 132-152. 21. Giorgio Baruchello (2015). A classification of classics. Gestalt psychologyand the tropes of rhetoric. New Ideas in Psychology, 36, 10-24.https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0732118X14000294“In contemporary academe, rhetoric still finds ample room for both study and teaching, not only in the field of rhetoric as such or within English and communication departments, but also amongst scholars in literature and poetry at large (e.g. Shen, 2013), philosophers interested in argumentation and persuasion (e.g. Andrews, 2013), explorers of Greek and Roman antiquity (e.g. Hutchinson, 2013), educators cultivating their students' skills in public speaking and composition (e.g. Hale, 2013), keen researchers in media and socio-political studies (e.g. Martin, 2013), psychologists figuring out how people can change one another's beliefs and actions by talking or writing well (e.g. Kaufman & Kaufman, 2009), or more practically orientedcoaches in business (e.g. Barker, 2013), marketing (e.g. Rossolatos, 2013), advertising (e.g. Hoyer, MacInnis, & Pieters, 2012), graphic design (e.g. Dabner, Calvert, & Casey, 2009), IT development (e.g. Killian, 2013), architecture (e.g. Spiller, 2013), political lobbying (e.g. Dobrin & Moray, 2009) and photography (e.g. Bate, 2009).” Citing Rossolatos, George (2013). //rhetor.dixit//: Understanding Ad Texts’ Rhetorical Structure for Differential Figurative Advantage. Amazon Press. 
22. Samuel Curtis Johnson (2014). Dirty Oil, Ethical Oil. 6th Annual ARCS Research Conference Proceedings
http://corporate-sustainability.org/events/6th_annual_arcs_research_conference/ “For example, semiotic oppositions in texts can be indicated using evaluative and emotionally-laden words, usually adjectives or adverbs (Flottum & Dahl, 2012; Rossolatos, 2011; Bakhtine, 1981) that mark key preferences in concept formation (cf. Somers, 1994; Fiss & Hirsch, 2005)”Citing Rossolatos, G. 2011. Applications, implications, and limitations of the semiotic square for analyzing advertising discourse and discerning brand futures. Presented at the 11th World Semiotics Conference. 23. Joshi Geetika (2013). Role of semiotics in branding. South Asian Journal of Marketing & Management Research, 3(3), 1-16.Citing Rossolatos, George (2012). Applying structuralist semiotics to brand image research. Public Journal of Semiotics 4(1): 25-82
24. Amrita Joshi (2017). Logo dynamics for investment branding: a visual–semiotic analysis of the reframing devices in the Make in India logo. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy 14(9/10):1-12Citing Rossolatos, George (2012a). Applying structuralist semiotics to brand image research. Public Journal of Semiotics 4(1): 25-82.http://journals.lub.lu.se/index.php/pjos/article/view/8838/7937(paper also presented at the 11th  World Semiotics Congress, Nanjing University, China, October 5 2012)http://www.slideboom.com/presentations/621488/g_rossolatos-11th-Semiotics-World-Congresspres
25. Jacqueline Byrne (2014). Rebranding and Repositioning: The Kentucky State Parks Restaurants,Western Kentucky University, PhDThesis
“According to George Rossolatos, “Brand name and brand logo constitute the very foundations of a brand’s identity. It aids in maintaining identity through time, while visualizing a brand name, thus adding up to its synaesthetic image capital” (Rossolatos 23)”Consistency is key to maintaining a whole brand image (Rossolatos 32).Rossolatos notes “brand identity is not about the repeating the same message over and over, but about maintaining a signification kernel through variable communicative manifestations” (16). Citing: Rossolatos, George (2014). Brand Equity Planning with Structuralist Rhetorical Semiotics. Kassel, Germany: Kassel University Press. 26. S. Rattasepp, K. Kull (2015). Semiotics.   The Wiley Blackwell Encyclopedia of Consumption and Consumer Studies https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/9781118989463.wbeccs205 Citing: Rossolatos, George (2014). Brand Equity Planning with Structuralist Rhetorical Semiotics. Kassel, Germany: Kassel University Press. 27. Angela Bargenda (2014). The paradox of contemporary brand architecture.  International Journal of Marketing Semiotics & Discourse Studies Vol. II, 23-47.Citing Rossolatos, George (2013l).  An anatomy of the multimodal rhetorical landscape of the world’s most valuable brands.International Journal of Marketing Semiotics Vol.I: 73-125.http://ijmarketingsemiotics.com/journal-contents-2/ 28. Huey Fen Cheong & Surinderpal Kaur (2015): Legitimising male grooming through packaging discourse: a linguistic analysis, Social Semiotics Vol. 25, No. 3, 364–385 “As George Rossolatos (2012, 27) states, “Positioning is not what you do to a product. Positioning is what you do to the mind of the prospect”. In other words, it is about how you “position the product in the mind of the prospect” (Ries and Trout 2000, cited in Rossolatos 2012, 27). Again, this reflects marketing’s utmost concern – the customers, i.e. how their customers think about them (brand image). Basically, brand image attributes are represented through “the metaphor of brand personality” (Rossolatos 2012, 27), which is defined by “the set of human characteristics associated with a brand” (Aaker 1997, cited in Pantin-Sohier 2009, 55). In marketing discourse, positioning often “associates brands with masculine or feminine personality traits” (Grohmann 2009, 105). Citing Rossolatos, George. 2012. “Applying Structuralist Semiotics to Brand Image Research.” The Public Journal of Semiotics 4 (1): 25–82. 29. Rachel C. StinnettEva E. Hardy, Richard D. Waters (2013). Who are we? The impacts of anthropomorphism and the humanization of nonprofits on brand personality.International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, 10 (1), 31-48Citing Rossolatos, George (2013b). Repressenting the manimal: A semiotic/psychoanalytic approach to the strategic importance of anthropomorphism in branding. Proceedings of the 12 International Marketing Trends Conference, Paris, France, 17-19 Januaryhttps://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1999716 30. Nadia Sorokina (2015). Introduction to Semiotics and Business Research. Tourism and Hospitality Management Quarterly Review, Vol.13http://www.muic.mahidol.ac.th/eng/wp-content/downloads/THM/THM_1315.pdfCiting Rossolatos, George. 2012. “Applying Structuralist Semiotics to Brand Image Research.” The Public Journal of Semiotics 4 (1): 25–82.
31. Michael P.Schlaileab,Theresa Knausbergc, Matthias Muellera, JohannesZemand (2018). Viral ice buckets: A memetic perspective on the ALS Ice Bucket Challenge’s diffusion. Cognitive Systems Research Volume 52, December 2018, 947-969
In line with Rossolatos (2015, p. 133), who argues that the IBC meme is a “multimodal unit … (further decomposable into subunits)”, and because we cannot be certain that the IBC memeplex would have succeeded as it did without some of its components, we will henceforth speak of the IBC meme, despite being aware that it consists of several distinct elements, which have to be illuminated as well”Citing Rossolatos, George (2015c). The ice-bucket challenge: The legitimacy of the memetic mode of cultural reproduction is the message. Signs & Society 3(1): 132-152. 32. Susanne Friese (2014).Methods and methodologies for qualitative data analysis. ATLAS.ti User Conference 2013 : Fostering Dialog on Qualitative methods Editor: Susanne Friese Berlin: Universitätsverlag der TU Berlin, 2014 Citing: Rossolatos, George (2013r). A methodological framework for conducting multimodal rhetoricalanalyses of advertising films with ATLAS.ti. In Atlas.ti User Conference 2013: Fostering Dialog onQualitative Methods, Susanne Friese and Thomas Ringmayr (eds.), Berlin, Germany: BerlinTechnical University Press.http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2315566 
33. Bent Sorensen (2017). Branding and communities: The normative dimension. Semiotica
https://www.degruyter.com/view/j/semi.ahead-of-print/sem-2017-0092/sem-2017-0092.xmlCiting: Rossolatos, George (ed. and co-author) (2015b). Handbook of Brand Semiotics. Kassel: Kassel University Press. 34. Jennifer Miller (2018). Digital Citizenship Tools for Cause-Based Campaigns: A Broadened Spectrum of Social Media Engagement and Participation-Scale Methodology.PhD thesis University of Central FloridaRossolatos (2015) moved from the term meme in his discussion of the Ice Bucket Challenge, preferring “cultural sign” (p.133) and thus purposely shifting to semiotics from memetics. This shift is warranted because there is an “intricate relationship between memetics and semiotics: ‘Memes are signs, or more accurately sign vehicles’ (Deacon, 1999, para. 11). The newfangled meme is an underdeveloped special version of [the] concept of sign” (Rossolatos, 2015, p. 134). Rossolatos (2015) argues that “signs are tantamount to memes as minimal units of cultural reproduction” (p. 135). Kien (2014) also discusses memes as a form of semiotics and simulacra, or rather signs far removed or disconnected from what they represent (p. 555). Further, internet memes operate in a highly simulated digital environment as signs, which may only vaguely represent reality” (p. 35) Citing Rossolatos, George (2015c). The ice-bucket challenge: The legitimacy of the memetic mode of cultural reproduction is the message. Signs & Society 3(1): 132-152. 35. Brendan Canavan and Claire McCamley (2018). The passing of the postmodern in pop? Epochal consumption and marketing from Madonna, through Gaga, to Taylor. Journal of Business Researchhttps://reader.elsevier.com/reader/sd/pii/S0148296318306167?token=68AC4248FA383DCF01DF9E1C141F38F77D538EAF84C962899D8A04D4F12C78F221D5921F5B5B54601AB1DD9A44A76BBBLinking this with her social engagement Rossolatos (2015) outlines Gaga's crafting of a manifesto to define and regulate the parameters of her follower community.” (p.5)“Gaga is extremely simulacral highlights Rossolatos (2015).” (p. 5)Citing Rossolatos, George (2014g). Lady Gaga as (dis)simulacrum of monstrosity. Celebrity Studies 6(2), pp.231-246.
36. Angela Bargenda (2015). Sense-making in financial communication: Semiotic vectors and iconographic strategies in banking advertising. Studies in Communication Sciences
Volume 15, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 93-102
37. Lenna V.ShulgaaJames A.BusserbBillyBai (2018). Factors affecting willingness to participate in consumer generated advertisement. Studies in Communication Sciences
Volume 15, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 93-102what drives customers to voluntarily participate and engage in the process of CGA co-creation with the brand still requires further examination (Rossolatos, 2017)”Citing Rossolatos, George (2018a). A sociosemiotic approach to consumer engagement in usergenerated advertising.  Social Semiotics 28(4),555-58938.ブランド理論の記号論的展開過程 ─近年における記号論立脚的ブランド理論の特色─https://kuir.jm.kansai-u.ac.jp/dspace/bitstream/10112/9371/1/KU-1100-20150925-04.pdfCiting R2:Rossolatos, G. (2012), Applying Structuralist Semiotics to Brand Image Research The Public Journal of Semiotics, V. iv, pp.25-82. R3:Rossolatos, G. (2013), Brand Equity Planning with Structuralist Rhetorical Semiotics: A Conceptual Framework, The Qualitative Report, Vol.18, pp.1-20
39. Maria Elisa Fina (2018). Comparing introductory sections in city audio guides in Italian and English. Languages in Contrast
Citing Rossolatos, George (2013). //rhetor.dixit//: Understanding Ad Texts’ Rhetorical Structure for Differential Figurative Advantage. Amazon Press.
40. FilaretiKotsiaMelodena StephensBalakrishnanbIanMichaelaThomas ZoëgaRamsøy (2018). Place branding: Aligning multiple stakeholder perception of visual and auditory communication elements. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management
Volume 7, March 2018, Pages 112-130Citing Rossolatos, George (2014a). Exploring the rhetorical semiotic brand image structure of ad films with multivariate mapping techniques. Semiotica Vol.200: 335-358.
41.  Christine A. Oskar-Poisson (2017). Preparing English Educators to Teach Rhetorical Analysis as a Writing Skill: A Descriptive Program Analysis of New Hampshire Institutions of Higher Education. PhDThesisNew England College
Citing Rossolatos, George (2014a). Exploring the rhetorical semiotic brand image structure of ad films with multivariate mapping techniques. Semiotica Vol.200: 335-358. 42. CULACHE, OANA (2014). BRAND BUILDING IN A SEMIOTIC AGE: DEVELOPING MEANINGFUL BRANDS WITH CREATIVE MULTIMODAL TOOLS. Journal Of Inventics,  17 (Dec), 1-10. https://www.worldcat.org/title/revista-de-inventica-romanian-journal-for-creativity-in-engineering-and-technology-research-and-education-reports/oclc/226181677
43.  Paul G NixonIsabel K. Düsterhöft (2017). Sex in the Digital Age. Routledge
Citing Rossolatos, George (2017b). Toy stories: On the disciplinary regime of vibration. Semiotica 218 (Sep), pp. 145-164. 44. Wiggins, B.E. (2017, July). Constructing malleable truth: Memes from the 2016 U.S. Presidential campaign. Proceedings of the 4th annual European Conference on Social Media (ECSM), (p. 315-324) Vilnius, Lithuania. Citing Rossolatos, George (2015c). The ice-bucket challenge: The legitimacy of the memetic mode of cultural reproduction is the message. Signs & Society 3(1): 132-152. 45.  Hoyskolen Kristiania (2016). ponsing i sykkelsporten:Utfordringene ved innhenting av sponsorer. Thesis. Norway. Citing Rossolatos, George (2013n) “I know half the money I spend on advertising is wasted, but I do not know which half (J. Wannamaker)”: Semiotic answers to perennial branding troubles. Social Semiotics 23(4): 545-560. 46. HILARIA LESTARI BUDININGSIH  (2014). PENGARUH BRAND IMAGE DAN MOTIVASI PADA MINAT UNTUK PUBLIKASI DI JURNAL-JURNAL FAKULTAS KEDOKTERAN UNIVERSITAS GADJAH MADA, YOGYAKARTA.Thesis. UNIVERSITAS GADJAH MADA, YOGYAKARTA, Indonesia Citing Rossolatos, George (2013k). A methodological framework for projecting brand equity: Putting back the imaginary into brand knowledge structures. Sign Systems Studies 42(1): 98-136. 47.  Gabriela Alejandra Guerrero Perez (2016).Análisis histórico y actual de la imagen publicitaria en músicos que forman parte de la cultura popUniversita de Las Americas, Ecuador PhDthesis.http://dspace.udla.edu.ec/handle/33000/5476 Citing Rossolatos, George. 2012. “Applying Structuralist Semiotics to Brand Image Research.” The Public Journal of Semiotics 4 (1): 25–82. 48. Vasile HODOROGEA (2016). Values and their communicationin the advertising discourse of FMCG’s. CULTURES DE LA COMMUNICATION, 1/2016 Citing Rossolatos, George (2013m). On the textual economy of brand equity: Accounting semiotically for the difference between axiology and linguistic value. Proceedings of the 11th Annual International Conference on Marketing, Athens, Greece, 1-4 July.http://www.atiner.gr/papers/BUS2013-0477.pdf   49. Sharifa Khalid Masorong (2015). Cultural Colors Used By Maranaos And Tausugs As Reflections Of Their Characteristics And Behaviors. JOURNAL          OF            INTERDISCIPLINARY    RESEARCH     CitingRossolatos, George (2015a). Semiotics of Popular Culture. Kassel: Kassel University PressRossolatos, George. 2012).Applying Structuralist Semiotics to Brand Image Research.” The Public Journal of Semiotics 4 (1): 25–82. 50. STEPHANIE L. WIDEMAN (2017). PATHETIC POLITICS:  AN ANALYSIS OF EMOTION AND EMBODIMENT IN FIRST LADY RHETORIC. pHd DISSERTATION, Graduate School of Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan. Citing Rossolatos, George (2014b). On the pathology of the enthymeme: Accounting for hidden visual premises in advertising discourse. Signs and Society 2(1): 1-27. 51. 6TH CRITICAL APPROACHES TO DISCOURSE ANALYSIS ACROSS DISCIPLINES CONFERENCECADAAD 2016 Citing Rossolatos, George (ed. and co-author) (2015b). Handbook of Brand Semiotics. Kassel: Kassel University Press. 52. PROCEEDINGS OF THE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON TOURISM (ICOT2014) Tradition Meets Modernity:Time for a Rethink of Policies,Planning and Development InitiativesDalian, China 25-28 June 2014 Citing Rossolatos, George. 2012. “Applying Structuralist Semiotics to Brand Image Research.” The Public Journal of Semiotics 4 (1): 25–82. 53. Evinc Dogan, Goran Petkovic (2016). Nation Branding in A Transnational Marketing Context: Serbia’s Brand Positioning Through Food and Wine. Transnational Marketing Journal 4 (2), 84 – 99. Rossolatos, G. (2012). “From Code to Super-Signs: For a Semiotics of Brand Equity”,Semiofest 2012, London.  [Online] Available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2062654(Accessed: 12 August 2015). 54. Inmaculada Acal Diaz (2015). Analisis Documental de Contenido de los documentos publicitarios en imagen fija: Propuesta Metodologica. PhD Thesis Universidad de Granada, Spain. Citing Rossolatos, George (2014a). Exploring the rhetorical semiotic brand image structure of ad films with multivariate mapping techniques. Semiotica Vol.200: 335-358. 55.  Ana Maria Rodriguez (2017).Interpretacion biblica en comunidades de fe virtuales/Biblical Interpretation in Virtual Faith Communities. Citing Rossolatos, George (2015c). The ice-bucket challenge: The legitimacy of the memetic mode of cultural reproduction is the message. Signs & Society 3(1): 132-152. 56. Dina Shirley Gomez Lozano & Leticia Tian Zhang (2018). Representacion de la mujer y poder persuasivo en las tarjetas de masaje oriental. Discurso & Sociedad, Vol. 1(1), 2018, 29-5 Citing Rossolatos, George (ed. and co-author) (2015b). Handbook of Brand Semiotics. Kassel: Kassel University Press. 57. Siva M. Kumar & K. R. Jayasimha (2018). Brand verbs: brand synonymity and brand leadership. Journal of Brand Management (May). Citing Rossolatos, George (2013q). Brand equity planning with structuralist rhetorical semiotics: A conceptual framework. The Qualitative Report 18(90): 1-20.http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR18/rossolatos90.pdf 58. Hajdas, Monika (2017). Influence of the residual code of masculinity on brand-related effects. MarketingI Zarzadzanie, 1 (47), 197–207. Citing Rossolatos, George (2013q). Brand equity planning with structuralist rhetorical semiotics: A conceptual framework. The Qualitative Report 18(90): 1-20.http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR18/rossolatos90.pdf 59. Kirsten Hardie (2014). Fictitious People As Food Brand Icons: Their Role And Visual Representation InContemporary International Food Packaging.PhD thesis,University of Brighton UK. Citing Rossolatos, George (2013b). Repressenting the manimal: A semiotic/psychoanalytic approach to the strategic importance of anthropomorphism in branding. Proceedings of the 12 International Marketing Trends Conference, Paris, France, 17-19 Januaryhttps://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1999716 60. Kyle Chapman (2016). Digital Activism: How Social Media Prevalence has Impacted Modern Activism. Thesis,University of  Washington. Citing Rossolatos, George (2015c). The ice-bucket challenge: The legitimacy of the memetic mode of cultural reproduction is the message. Signs & Society 3(1): 132-152. 61. Gabriele Marino; Mattia Thibault (2016). Oh, You Just Semioticized Memes? You Must Know Everything. Un punto (e accapo) sulla semiotica della viralità / LEXIA.  25-26(2016), pp. 11-42. https://iris.unito.it/retrieve/handle/2318/1677777/441417/Oh%2c%20You%20Just%20Semioticized%20Memes%20You%20Must%20Know%20Everything.pdf Citing Rossolatos, George (2015c). The ice-bucket challenge: The legitimacy of the memetic mode of cultural reproduction is the message. Signs & Society 3(1): 132-152. 66. Lucas Parker, Dang Nguyen and Linda Brennan (2017). Digital advertising and the new world of 'viral' advertising. In Global Advertising Practice in a Borderless World, Robert Crawford, Linda Brennan, Lukas Parker (Eds.), London: Routledge 42-48. Citing Rossolatos, George (2015c). The ice-bucket challenge: The legitimacy of the memetic mode of cultural reproduction is the message. Signs & Society 3(1): 132-152. http://downloads.atlasti.com/docs/conference/2015/presentations/Herkama_et_al_Systematic_Lit_Review.pdf Citing Rossolatos, G. (2014). Conducting multimodal rhetorical analysis of TV ads with ATLAS.ti 7. Multimodal Communication, 3(1), 51–84 Citing Rossolatos, George. 2015. Handbook of brand semiotics. Kassel: Kassel University Press.  70. Charo Lacalle & Cristina Pujol (2017). Online Communication and Everyday Life: Female Social Audience and TV Fiction. UNIVERSUM 32 (2), 117-132. Citing Rossolatos, George. 2015. Handbook of brand semiotics. Kassel: Kassel University Press. Citing Rossolatos, George (2012b). Applications, implications and limitations of the semiotic square for analyzing advertising discourse and discerning alternative brand futures. Signs: An international Journal of Semiotics Vol.6: 1-48.https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2000507 72. Review of the Handbook of Brand Semiotics http://www.communicationtoday.sk/wp-content/uploads/REVIEWS-TODAY-%E2%80%93-CT-1-2016.pdf  73. Rafael Barreiros Porto & Luana Garcia Dias (2018). Efetividade da Declaração do Posicionamento: Teste Experimental dos Contextos Competitivos no Conhecimento da Marca. Revista Eletrônica de Ciência Administrativa v.17 n.1,84-113. Citing Rossolatos, G. (2014). Brand equity planning with structuralist rhetorical semiotics. Kassel: Kassel University Press. 74. Rebecca Stakun (2017). Terror and Transcendence in the Void: Viktor Pelevin’s Philosophy of Emptiness. PhD thesis, University of Kansas. Citing: Rossolatos, George (2015). Is the semiosphere post-modernist? Kodikas: Ars Semeiotica 38(1): 95-113. 75. Eliud KibuchiPatrick SturgisGabriele B. DurrantOlga Maslovskaya (2019). Interviewers Moderate: The Effect of Monetary Incentives on Response Rates in Household Interview Surveys? Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodologyhttps://doi.org/10.1093/jssam/smy026 Citing: Rossolatos, George (2013) “I know half the money I spend on advertising is wasted, but I do not know which half (J. Wannamaker)”: Semiotic answers to perennial branding troubles. Social Semiotics 23(4): 545-560. 76. PN Valbuena Hernández (2018). Semiótica del dinero: significados y usos en la novela. PhD thesis, Universidad Externado de Colombia. Citing: Rossolatos, George (2013) “I know half the money I spend on advertising is wasted, but I do not know which half (J. Wannamaker)”: Semiotic answers to perennial branding troubles. Social Semiotics 23(4): 545-560. 77. Sebastian Zenker & Erik Braun (2017). Questioning a “one size fits all” city brand: Developing a branded house strategy for place brand management. Journal of Place Management and Development, Vol. 10 Issue 3, 270-287. Citing: Rossolatos, George (2018). Post-place branding as nomadic experiencing. Journal of Place Branding & Public Diplomacy 14(4), pp. 285-304. 79. Tea Koskela (2018). Semioottinen analyysi Raskasta Joulua -uusheimon rakentumisesta Twitterissä. Thesis. Citing: Rossolatos, George (2015). Servicing a heavy metal fandom posthumously: A sociosemiotic account of collective identity formation in Dio’s memorial. Social Semiotics 25(5): 633-655. 80. Acal Diaz (2015). Metodologías para el análisis de la imagen fija en los documentos publicitarios: revisión y aplicaciones. Revista General de Información y Documentación Vol. 25 (2), 425-446. Citing: Rossolatos, G. (2014). Brand equity planning with structuralist rhetorical semiotics. Kassel: Kassel University Press. 81. Vasile Hodorogea (2016). Values and their communication in the advertising discourse. FMCG’s. Cultures of Communication – Cultures de la communication 1, 57-73. Citing: Rossolatos, George (2013). On the textual economy of brand equity: Accounting semiotically for the difference between axiology and linguistic value. Proceedings of the 11th Annual International Conference on Marketing, Athens, Greece, 1-4 July.http://www.atiner.gr/papers/BUS2013-0477.pdf 82. Melissa Lynne Murphy (2017). Startup Storytelling: An Analysis of Narrative in Rewards and Equity Based Crowdfunding Campaigns. PhD thesis, University of Texas at Austin. Citing: Rossolatos, George (2014b). On the pathology of the enthymeme: Accounting for   hidden visual premises in advertising discourse. Signs and Society 2(1): 1-27.
83. CA Oskar-Poisson (2018). Preparing English Educators to Teach Rhetorical Analysis as Writing Skill: A Descriptive Program Analysis of New Hampshire Institutions of Higher Education. PhD thesis New England College
Citing: Citing Rossolatos, G. (2014). Conducting multimodal rhetorical analysis of TV ads with ATLAS.ti 7. Multimodal Communication, 3(1), 51–84 84. Irena V. Aleksić (2016). The Multimodality of Advertising Discourse in English and Serbian. PhD Thesis, University of Belgrade. Citing:  Citing Rossolatos, G. (2014). Conducting multimodal rhetorical analysis of TV ads with ATLAS.ti 7. Multimodal Communication, 3(1), 51–84
85. Larson, Marisa (2014). Iconic multimodal communication: A case study of Apple's iPod silhouette ad campaign. PhD thesis,Montana Tech, University of Montana.
Citing: Rossolatos, George (2012). Applying structuralist semiotics to brand image research. Public Journal of Semiotics 4(1): 25-82
86. Angela Williams (2017). Ambient advertising: An investigation into the effect that the Visual Impact, Environmental Impact and Pedestrian Interpretation has on creating the Ambient Advertising message. Citing: Rossolatos, George (2012). Applying structuralist semiotics to brand image research. Public Journal of Semiotics 4(1): 25-82
87.  Esther De Baecke (2017). Boundless Storytelling: An Investigation of the Transmedial Expansion of George R. R. Martin’s A Song of Ice and Fire. Thesis, Ghent University, Belgium. Citing: Rossolatos, George. 2015. Handbook of brand semiotics. Kassel: Kassel University Press.
88. Maria Elisa Fina (2018). Comparing introductory sections in city audio guides in Italian and English. Languages in Contrast https://doi.org/10.1075/lic.16017.fin
Citing: Rossolatos, G. 2013 Understanding Ad Texts’ Rhetorical Structure for Differential Figurative Advantage. Amazon Press. 89. Ana Filipa Sousa Alves (2017). Transmedia storytelling no B2B: O caso de estudo do storysd. Thesis Universidade do Porto, Portugal. Citing: Rossolatos, George. 2015. Handbook of brand semiotics. Kassel: Kassel University Press. 90. Veronika Tesařová (2018). Role sémiotiky vizuálního marketingu při budování značky. Thesis Univerzita Karlova V Praze, Czech Republic. Citing: Rossolatos, George. 2015. Handbook of brand semiotics. Kassel: Kassel University Press.Citing Rossolatos, G. (2014). Brand equity planning with structuralist rhetorical semiotics. Kassel: Kassel University Press. 91. Maria Cuñat Agut (2016). The role of persuasive and emotive resources, during the oral discourse of two Ted speeches. Anuari Psicologia 17 (1), 95-117. Citing: Rossolatos, George. 2015. Handbook of brand semiotics. Kassel: Kassel University Press. 92. M. Pallares Maíques (2016). Redaccción publicitaria en Internet la ilusión de conversar. PhD Thesis, Barcelona Universita Autonoma. Citing: Rossolatos, George. 2015. Handbook of brand semiotics. Kassel: Kassel University Press.
 
George Rossolatos
added an update
Indicative citations of Rossolatos’ research in books, papers and theses
1. Douglas Tallack (2013). Critical Theory. London: Routledge.
“Marketing semiotics or commercial semiotics is an application of semiotic methods and semiotic thinking in the analysis and development of advertising and brand communications in cultural context. Key figures include Virginia Valentine, Malcolm Evans, Greg Rowland, George Rossolatos” (p. 124)
2. Mathieu Deflem (2017). Lady Gaga and the Sociology of Fame. London: Palgrave.
Tying in with Lady Gaga’s acceptance and embrace of freakishness and monstrosity (Corona 2013 ; Macfarlane 2012 ; Rossolatos 2015 ), everybody who is part of her world is meant to be accepted for who they are and who they wish to be, even and especially when they by the conventions of mainstream society judged not to be sexy or even thought to be unattractive.” (p. 174)
Citing Rossolatos, George (2014g). Lady Gaga as (dis)simulacrum of monstrosity. Celebrity Studies 6(2), pp.231-246.
3. Yuliya Martinavichene (2017). The Use of Semiotics in Content Analysis: The Case of Belarusian Patriotic Advertising, in Readings in Numanities, Springer 29-47
Citing Rossolatos, George. 2013. //rhetor.dixit// Understanding ad texts’ rhetorical structure
for differential figurative advantage. Amazon Publishing.
q=Rossolatos%2C%20George.%202013.%20%2F%2Frhetor.dixit%2F%2F%20Understa
nding%20ad%20texts%E2%80%99%20rhetorical%20structure%20for%20differential%
20figurative%20advantage.%20CreateSpace%20Independent%20Publishing%20Platfor
m.)
4. Louise J. Ravelli and Robert J. McMurtrie (2016). Multimodality in the Built Environment: Spatial Discourse Analysis
Citing Rossolatos, G. (2012) ‘Towards a semiotics of brand equity: Brand coherence and communicative consistency through structuralist operations and rhetorical transformations’.
International Association for Semiotic Studies. <http://www.academia.
edu/2041287/Towards_a_semiotics_of_brand_equity_Brand_coherence_and_
communicative_consistency_through_structuralist_operations_and_rhetorical_transformations
5. Derek Bryce (2016). Domesticating Fears and Fantasies of 'the
East': integrating the Ottoman legacy within European heritage. Journal of Marketing Management · May 2016
“As noted by Rossolatos (2015) semiotic analysis is a fruitful analytical tool in
cultural consumption research as it allows integration along different analytical
levels. Semiotic analysis thus offers important analytical steps within the text, but
an additional stage of analysis is necessary to place sign systems at the service of
more diffuse discursive systems to which they adhere.”
Citing Rossolatos, G. (2015) Taking the “multimodal turn” in interpreting consumption experiences, Consumption Markets & Culture, 18(5) 427-446,
6. Simon Moberg Torp and Lars Pynt Andersen (2018). Marketing Rhetoric and the Rhetoric of Marketing: Manipulation or Mutuality? In the Handbook of Organizational Rhetoric and Communication. New Jersey: Wiley, 67-80.
Citing Rossolatos, G. (2014). Brand equity planning with structuralist rhetorical semiotics. Kassel: Kassel University Press.
7. L. van Zoonen (2017). Intertextuality. The International Encyclopedia of Media Effects. New Jersey: Wiley, 1–12.
“Rossolatos (2014) is more cynical when he says that Gaga’s experimentation is a stylistic exercise, a ‘post-ideological potpourri’ (p. 242) rather than a substantial defense of diversity and difference. Nevertheless, her billions of fans communing under the label that Lady Gaga gave to them, Little Monsters, connect to her performances recognizing them as authentic
expressions of her own experiences, and appreciating them as ways of finding out who they want to be (cf. Bels, 2015; Gellel, 2013).”
Citing Rossolatos, G. (2014).Lady Gaga as (dis)simulacrum of monstrosity. Celebrity Studies, 6(2), p. 231246.
8. Angela Gracia B. Cruz, Margo Buchanan-Oliver, (2017) "Moving toward settlement: tourism as acculturation practice", European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 51 Issue: 4,pp. 772-794
“Three key techniques were deployed to enhance reflexivity (Thompson et al., 1998). First, the interview design incorporated a visual elicitation technique informed by the Zaltman Metaphor Elicitation Technique (ZMET; Zaltman and Coulter, 1995) and the more recent “multi-modal turn” in consumption research (Rossolatos, 2015, p. 427). Participants were asked to bring at least 12 objects or photographs representing their experience of settling in
New Zealand. Second, participants were asked to draw a self-portrait and a relational map (Bagnoli, 2009). Rather than using multi-modal techniques to reduce and abstract the complexity of participant narratives to elicit a “deeper” mental structure, as in a “pure” ZMET approach, these were used to enable the complexity and fluidity of “intersubjective meaning generation” (Rossolatos, 2015, p. 429) to emerge.” (p.777)
Citing Rossolatos, G. (2015), “Taking the ‘multimodal turn’ in interpreting consumption experiences”,
Consumption Markets & Culture, Vol. 18 No. 5, pp. 427-446.
9. Sergio Salvatore, Viviana Fini, Terri Mannarini, Giuseppe Alessandro Veltri, Evrinomi Avdi Fiorella Battaglia, Jorge Castro-Tejerina, Enrico Ciavolino, Marco Cremaschi, Irini Kadianaki, Nikita A. Kharlamov, Anna Krasteva, Katrin Kullasepp, Anastassios Matsopoulos, Claudia Meschiari, Piergiorgio Mossi, Polivios Psinas, Rozlyn Redd, Alessia Rochira, Alfonso Santarpia, Gordon Sammut, Jaan Valsiner, Antonella Valmorbida, on behalf of the Re.Cri.Re.Consortium (2018). Symbolic universes between present and future of Europe. First results of the map of European societies' cultural milieu, PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0189885 January 3, 2018
“We prefer the term semiotic capitalΊ to the more used symbolic capital, because the latter is more strictly related to the Bourdieu's theory and intended in terms of prestige and celebrity -degree of accumulated prestige, celebrity or honour and is founded on a dialectic of knowledge and recognition ([38], p. 7). Rossolatos [39] has recently used the term semiotic capital in a similar way adopted here.” (p. 23)
Citing Rossolatos, George (2016a). Before the consummation what? On the role of the semiotic economy of seduction. Continuum: Journal of Media & Cultural Studies 30(4): 451-465.
10. Ochoa G.G., Lorimer S. (2017) The Role of Narrative in the Creation of Brand identity. In: Monk N., Lindgren M., McDonald S., Pasfield-Neofitou S. (eds) Reconstructing Identity. Palgrave Macmillan.
Semiotics, the field of research that studies signs and symbols, allows
us to track historical and cultural shifts. As such, it can help companies
make sense of the alternative narratives they can create for themselves
and is an important tool in the formation of brand identity (Batey 2008;
Oswald 2012; Rossolatos 2015).” (p. 253)
Citing Rossolatos, George. 2015. Handbook of brand semiotics. Kassel: Kassel University Press.
11. V. Ushchapovska (2017). CONVERGENCE OF BRAND LANGUAGE ELEMENTS. UDC 81’26
Citing Rossolatos, George. 2015. Handbook of brand semiotics. Kassel: Kassel University Press.
12. Elizabeth S. Gunawan & Paul van den Hoven (2017). Global Brand Identity as a Network of Localized Meanings. International Journal of Marketing Studies; Vol. 9, No. 2; 2017
“In the academic field, an academic handbook has been published (Rossolatos, 2015) and a journal has been established: International Journal of Marketing Semiotics: http://ijmarketingsemiotics.com/.
This rise of semiotics in this field is no coincidence as it fits into the shift from marketer to customer, from sender to audience.” (p. 67)
Citing Rossolatos, George (ed. and co-author) (2015b). Handbook of Brand Semiotics. Kassel: Kassel University Press.
13. Gemma Burgess, Mihaela Kelemen, Sue Moffat, Elizabeth Parsons (2017). "Using performative knowledge production to explore marketplace exclusion", Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, Vol. 20 Issue: 4, pp.486-511
“According to Rossolatos (2013), a multi-modal approach provides researchers with the tools to understand how languages is influenced and influences social and material practices and images. From here stems its potential for performativity and change.” (p. 494).
Citing Rossolatos, G. (2013), “Rhetorical transformations in multimodal advertising texts: from general to local degree zero”, Hermes-Journal of Language and Communication in Business, Vol. 50, pp. 97-118. available at: http://download2.hermes.asb.dk/archive/download/Hermes-50-8-rossolatos.pdf
14. B. Wiggins (2017). NAVIGATING DIGITAL CULTURE: REMIX CULTURE, VIRAL MEDIA, AND INTERNET MEMES. Proceedings of INTED2017 Conference 6th-8th March 2017, Valencia, Spain
Citing Rossolatos, G. (2015). The Ice-Bucket Challenge: The Legitimacy of the Memetic Mode of Cultural Reproduction is the Message. Signs and Society, 3(1): 132-152.
15. Angela Gracia B. Cruz, Margo Buchanan-Oliver. (2017) Mobile masculinities: performances of remasculation. European Journal of Marketing 51:7/8, pages 13741395.
Citing Rossolatos, G. (2015), “Taking the ‘multimodal turn’ in interpreting consumption experiences”,
Consumption Markets & Culture, Vol. 18 No. 5, pp. 427-446.
16. Amrita Joshi (2017). Logo dynamics for investment branding: a visual–semiotic analysis. Place Branding and Public DiplomacyAug 2017
Citing Rossolatos, George (2012). Applying Structuralist Semiotics to Brand Image Research. Amazon Press.
17. James Fredal (2018). Is the Enthymeme a Syllogism? Philosophy & Rhetoric Vol. 51, No. 1, 24-49
Citing Rossolatos, George (2014b). On the pathology of the enthymeme: Accounting for hidden visual premises in advertising discourse. Signs and Society 2(1): 1-27.
18. Per Østergaard1, Judy Hermansen2 and James Fitchett (2015). Structures of brand and anti-brand meaning: A semiotic square analysis of reflexive consumption. Journal of Brand Management (2015) 22, 60–77.
“Inspired by Floch (2001) who has conducted several studies that analyze consumer
dilemmas, we will now build on these conceptual innovations to further explore the
antagonisms of consumer reflexivity and activism by means of an analytical approach
called the Semiotic Square (Greimas, 1987; Rossolatos, 2012).”
Citing Rossolatos, George (2012b). Applications, implications and limitations of the semiotic square for analyzing advertising discourse and discerning alternative brand futures. Signs: An international Journal of Semiotics Vol.6: 1-48.
19. Michael Everts (2014). Inductive Programming: Designing Activities and Space with 4D Parametric Modeling| Montana State University. Design Communication Conference, Design & Graphic Palimpsest: [Dialogue-Discourse-Discussion]
Design Communication, CHAPTER 04: Paper Sessions D1, D2, D3, D4 Paper Session D1: Digital Exploration: Parametric Modeling
Using the semiotic square, George Rossolatos anacademic researcher and marketing practitioner, deconstructed a popular Pot Noodle advertising campaign to categorize and explain its successful performance. He outlined how the ads established new relations of meaning over time, constructing a new virtual universe where the Pot Noodle brand was the
desired component. His study provides a process for mapping the performance of brand communications. It suggests that the extent to which consumers recognize, internalize and relate to the (virtual) space of a brand is not just an academic question, but a performative
approach to financial and customer value (9). It is a process of interaction between a participant and a space that generates a meaningful evolution of new possibilities and associations. This directly relates to the aspect of the programming tool used for continuously programming during the life of the project”
Citing Rossolatos, George (2012b). Applications, implications and limitations of the semiotic square for analyzing advertising discourse and discerning alternative brand futures. Signs: An international Journal of Semiotics Vol.6: 1-48.
20. Emily Underwood-Lee, ‘Bangers to Cancer’: Social media, charity fundraising and objectification https://www.bstjournal.com/articles/36/
George Rossolatos suggests that the essential purpose of any online phenomenon with nomination and replication at its core is to perpetuate itself and the cultural ideology it promotes (2014: 2-3).”
Citing Rossolatos, George (2015c). The ice-bucket challenge: The legitimacy of the memetic mode of cultural reproduction is the message. Signs & Society 3(1): 132-152.
21. Giorgio Baruchello (2015). A classification of classics. Gestalt psychology
and the tropes of rhetoric. New Ideas in Psychology, 36, 10-24. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0732118X14000294
“In contemporary academe, rhetoric still finds ample room for both study and teaching, not only in the field of rhetoric as such or within English and communication departments, but also amongst scholars in literature and poetry at large (e.g. Shen, 2013), philosophers interested in argumentation and persuasion (e.g. Andrews, 2013), explorers of Greek and Roman antiquity (e.g. Hutchinson, 2013), educators cultivating their students' skills in public speaking and composition (e.g. Hale, 2013), keen researchers in media and socio-political studies (e.g. Martin, 2013), psychologists figuring out how people can change one another's beliefs and actions by talking or writing well (e.g. Kaufman & Kaufman, 2009), or more practically oriented
coaches in business (e.g. Barker, 2013), marketing (e.g. Rossolatos, 2013), advertising (e.g. Hoyer, MacInnis, & Pieters, 2012), graphic design (e.g. Dabner, Calvert, & Casey, 2009), IT development (e.g. Killian, 2013), architecture (e.g. Spiller, 2013), political lobbying (e.g. Dobrin & Moray, 2009) and photography (e.g. Bate, 2009).”
Citing Rossolatos, George (2013). //rhetor.dixit//: Understanding Ad Texts’ Rhetorical Structure for Differential Figurative Advantage. Amazon Press.
22. Samuel Curtis Johnson (2014). Dirty Oil, Ethical Oil. 6th Annual ARCS Research Conference Proceedings
“For example, semiotic oppositions in texts can be indicated using evaluative and emotionally-laden words, usually adjectives or adverbs (Flottum & Dahl, 2012; Rossolatos, 2011; Bakhtine, 1981) that mark key preferences in concept formation (cf. Somers, 1994; Fiss & Hirsch, 2005)”
Citing Rossolatos, G. 2011. Applications, implications, and limitations of the semiotic square for analyzing advertising discourse and discerning brand futures. Presented at the 11th World Semiotics Conference.
23. Joshi Geetika (2013). Role of semiotics in branding. South Asian Journal of Marketing & Management Research, 3(3), 1-16.
Citing Rossolatos, George (2012a). Applying structuralist semiotics to brand image research. Public Journal of Semiotics 4(1): 25-82
24. Amrita Joshi (2017). Logo dynamics for investment branding: a visual–semiotic analysis of the reframing devices in the Make in India logo. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy 14(9/10):1-12
Citing Rossolatos, George (2012a). Applying structuralist semiotics to brand image research. Public Journal of Semiotics 4(1): 25-82.
(paper also presented at the 11th World Semiotics Congress, Nanjing University, China, October 5 2012)
25. Jacqueline Byrne (2014). Rebranding and Repositioning: The Kentucky State Parks Restaurants,Western Kentucky University, PhDThesis
“According to George Rossolatos, “Brand name and brand logo constitute the very foundations of a brand’s identity. It aids in maintaining identity through time, while visualizing a brand name, thus adding up to its synaesthetic image capital” (Rossolatos 23)”
Consistency is key to maintaining a whole brand image (Rossolatos 32).
Rossolatos notes “brand identity is not about the repeating the same message over and over, but about maintaining a signification kernel through variable communicative manifestations” (16).
Citing: Rossolatos, George (2014). Brand Equity Planning with Structuralist Rhetorical Semiotics. Kassel, Germany: Kassel University Press.
26. S. Rattasepp, K. Kull (2015). Semiotics. The Wiley Blackwell Encyclopedia of Consumption and Consumer Studies
Citing: Rossolatos, George (2014). Brand Equity Planning with Structuralist Rhetorical Semiotics. Kassel, Germany: Kassel University Press.
27. Angela Bargenda (2014). The paradox of contemporary brand architecture. International Journal of Marketing Semiotics & Discourse Studies Vol. II, 23-47.
Citing Rossolatos, George (2013l). An anatomy of the multimodal rhetorical landscape of the world’s most valuable brands. International Journal of Marketing Semiotics Vol.I: 73-125.
28. Huey Fen Cheong & Surinderpal Kaur (2015): Legitimising male grooming through packaging discourse: a linguistic analysis, Social Semiotics Vol. 25, No. 3, 364–385
“As George Rossolatos (2012, 27) states, “Positioning is not what you do to a product. Positioning is what you do to the mind of the prospect”. In other words, it is about how you “position the product in the mind of the prospect” (Ries and Trout 2000, cited in Rossolatos 2012, 27). Again, this reflects marketing’s utmost concern – the customers, i.e. how their customers think about them (brand image). Basically, brand image attributes are represented through “the metaphor of brand personality” (Rossolatos 2012, 27), which is defined by “the set of human characteristics associated with a brand” (Aaker 1997, cited in Pantin-Sohier 2009, 55). In marketing discourse, positioning often “associates brands with masculine or feminine personality traits” (Grohmann 2009, 105).
Citing Rossolatos, George. 2012. “Applying Structuralist Semiotics to Brand Image Research.” The Public Journal of Semiotics 4 (1): 25–82.
29. Rachel C. Stinnett, Eva E. Hardy, Richard D. Waters (2013). Who are we? The impacts of anthropomorphism and the humanization of nonprofits on brand personality.International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, 10 (1), 31-48
Citing Rossolatos, George (2013b). Repressenting the manimal: A semiotic/psychoanalytic approach to the strategic importance of anthropomorphism in branding. Proceedings of the 12
International Marketing Trends Conference, Paris, France, 17-19 January
30. Nadia Sorokina (2015). Introduction to Semiotics and Business Research. Tourism and Hospitality Management Quarterly Review, Vol.13
Citing Rossolatos, George. 2012. “Applying Structuralist Semiotics to Brand Image Research.” The Public Journal of Semiotics 4 (1): 25–82.
31. Michael P.Schlaileab,Theresa Knausbergc, Matthias Muellera, JohannesZemand (2018). Viral ice buckets: A memetic perspective on the ALS Ice Bucket Challenge’s diffusion. Cognitive Systems Research Volume 52, December 2018, 947-969
In line with Rossolatos (2015, p. 133), who argues that the IBC meme is a “multimodal unit … (further decomposable into subunits)”, and because we cannot be certain that the IBC memeplex would have succeeded as it did without some of its components, we will henceforth speak of the IBC meme, despite being aware that it consists of several distinct elements, which have to be illuminated as well”
Citing Rossolatos, George (2015c). The ice-bucket challenge: The legitimacy of the memetic mode of cultural reproduction is the message. Signs & Society 3(1): 132-152.
32. Susanne Friese (2014).
Methods and methodologies for qualitative data analysis. ATLAS.ti User Conference 2013 : Fostering Dialog on Qualitative methods Editor: Susanne Friese Berlin: Universitätsverlag der TU Berlin, 2014
Citing: Rossolatos, George (2013r). A methodological framework for conducting multimodal rhetorical
analyses of advertising films with ATLAS.ti. In Atlas.ti User Conference 2013: Fostering Dialog on
Qualitative Methods, Susanne Friese and Thomas Ringmayr (eds.), Berlin, Germany: Berlin
Technical University Press.
33. Bent Sorensen (2017). Branding and communities: The normative dimension. Semiotica
Citing: Rossolatos, George (ed. and co-author) (2015b). Handbook of Brand Semiotics. Kassel: Kassel University Press.
34. Jennifer Miller (2018). Digital Citizenship Tools for Cause-Based Campaigns: A Broadened Spectrum of Social Media Engagement and Participation-Scale Methodology.PhD thesis University of Central Florida
Rossolatos (2015) moved from the term meme in his discussion of the Ice Bucket Challenge, preferring “cultural sign” (p.133) and thus purposely shifting to semiotics from memetics. This shift is warranted because there is an “intricate relationship between memetics and semiotics: ‘Memes are signs, or more accurately sign vehicles’ (Deacon, 1999, para. 11). The newfangled meme is an underdeveloped special version of [the] concept of sign” (Rossolatos, 2015, p. 134). Rossolatos (2015) argues that “signs are tantamount to memes as minimal units of cultural reproduction” (p. 135). Kien (2014) also discusses memes as a form of semiotics and simulacra, or rather signs far removed or disconnected from what they represent (p. 555). Further, internet memes operate in a highly simulated digital environment as signs, which may only vaguely represent reality” (p. 35)
Citing Rossolatos, George (2015c). The ice-bucket challenge: The legitimacy of the memetic mode of cultural reproduction is the message. Signs & Society 3(1): 132-152.
35. Brendan Canavan and Claire McCamley (2018). The passing of the postmodern in pop? Epochal consumption and marketing from Madonna, through Gaga, to Taylor. Journal of Business Research https://reader.elsevier.com/reader/sd/pii/S0148296318306167?token=68AC4248FA383DCF01DF9E1C141F38F77D538EAF84C962899D8A04D4F12C78F221D5921F5B5B54601AB1DD9A44A76BBB
Linking this with her social engagement Rossolatos (2015) outlines Gaga's crafting of a manifesto to define and regulate the parameters of her follower community.” (p.5)
“Gaga is extremely simulacral highlights Rossolatos (2015).” (p. 5)
Citing Rossolatos, George (2014g). Lady Gaga as (dis)simulacrum of monstrosity. Celebrity Studies 6(2), pp.231-246.
36. Angela Bargenda (2015). Sense-making in financial communication: Semiotic vectors and iconographic strategies in banking advertising. Studies in Communication Sciences
Volume 15, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 93-102
37. Lenna V.ShulgaaJames A.BusserbBillyBai (2018). Factors affecting willingness to participate in consumer generated advertisement. Studies in Communication Sciences
Volume 15, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 93-102
what drives customers to voluntarily participate and engage in the process of CGA co-creation with the brand still requires further examination (Rossolatos, 2017)”
Citing Rossolatos, George (2018a). A sociosemiotic approach to consumer engagement in usergenerated advertising. Social Semiotics 28(4),
555-589
38.ブランド理論の記号論的展開過程 ─近年における記号論立脚的ブランド理論の特色─
Citing R2:Rossolatos, G. (2012), Applying Structuralist Semiotics to Brand Image Research The Public Journal of Semiotics, V. iv, pp.25-82. R3:Rossolatos, G. (2013), Brand Equity Planning with Structuralist Rhetorical Semiotics: A Conceptual Framework, The Qualitative Report, Vol.18, pp.1-20
39. Maria Elisa Fina (2018). Comparing introductory sections in city audio guides in Italian and English. Languages in Contrast
Citing Rossolatos, George (2013). //rhetor.dixit//: Understanding Ad Texts’ Rhetorical Structure for Differential Figurative Advantage. Amazon Press.
40. FilaretiKotsiaMelodena StephensBalakrishnanbIanMichaelaThomas ZoëgaRamsøy (2018). Place branding: Aligning multiple stakeholder perception of visual and auditory communication elements. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management
Volume 7, March 2018, Pages 112-130
Citing Rossolatos, George (2014a). Exploring the rhetorical semiotic brand image structure of ad films with multivariate mapping techniques. Semiotica Vol.200: 335-358.
41. Christine A. Oskar-Poisson (2017). Preparing English Educators to Teach Rhetorical Analysis as a Writing Skill: A Descriptive Program Analysis of New Hampshire Institutions of Higher Education. PhDThesisNew England College
Citing Rossolatos, George (2014a). Exploring the rhetorical semiotic brand image structure of ad films with multivariate mapping techniques. Semiotica Vol.200: 335-358.
42. CULACHE, OANA (2014). BRAND BUILDING IN A SEMIOTIC AGE: DEVELOPING MEANINGFUL BRANDS WITH CREATIVE MULTIMODAL TOOLS. Journal Of Inventics, 17 (Dec), 1-10.
43. Paul G Nixon, Isabel K. Düsterhöft (2017). Sex in the Digital Age. Routledge
Citing Rossolatos, George (2017b). Toy stories: On the disciplinary regime of vibration. Semiotica 218 (Sep), pp. 145-164.
44. Wiggins, B.E. (2017, July). Constructing malleable truth: Memes from the 2016 U.S. Presidential campaign. Proceedings of the 4th annual European Conference on Social Media (ECSM), (p. 315-324) Vilnius, Lithuania.
Citing Rossolatos, George (2015c). The ice-bucket challenge: The legitimacy of the memetic mode of cultural reproduction is the message. Signs & Society 3(1): 132-152.
45. Hoyskolen Kristiania (2016). ponsing i sykkelsporten:
Utfordringene ved innhenting av sponsorer. Thesis. Norway.
Citing Rossolatos, George (2013n) “I know half the money I spend on advertising is wasted, but I do not know which half (J. Wannamaker)”: Semiotic answers to perennial branding troubles. Social Semiotics 23(4): 545-560.
46. HILARIA LESTARI BUDININGSIH (2014). PENGARUH BRAND IMAGE DAN MOTIVASI PADA MINAT UNTUK PUBLIKASI DI JURNAL-JURNAL FAKULTAS KEDOKTERAN UNIVERSITAS GADJAH MADA, YOGYAKARTA.Thesis. UNIVERSITAS GADJAH MADA, YOGYAKARTA, Indonesia
Citing Rossolatos, George (2013k). A methodological framework for projecting brand equity: Putting back the imaginary into brand knowledge structures. Sign Systems Studies 42(1): 98-136.
47. Gabriela Alejandra Guerrero Perez (2016).
Análisis histórico y actual de la imagen publicitaria en músicos que forman parte de la cultura pop
Universita de Las Americas, Ecuador
PhDthesis.
Citing Rossolatos, George. 2012. “Applying Structuralist Semiotics to Brand Image Research.” The Public Journal of Semiotics 4 (1): 25–82.
48. Vasile HODOROGEA (2016). Values and their communication
in the advertising discourse of FMCG’s. CULTURES DE LA COMMUNICATION, 1/2016
Citing Rossolatos, George (2013m). On the textual economy of brand equity: Accounting semiotically for the difference between axiology and linguistic value. Proceedings of the 11th Annual International Conference on Marketing, Athens, Greece, 1-4 July.
49. Sharifa Khalid Masorong (2015). Cultural Colors Used By Maranaos And Tausugs As Reflections Of Their Characteristics And Behaviors. JOURNAL OF INTERDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH
Citing
Rossolatos, George (2015a). Semiotics of Popular Culture. Kassel: Kassel University Press
Rossolatos, George. 2012).Applying Structuralist Semiotics to Brand Image Research.” The Public Journal of Semiotics 4 (1): 25–82.
50. STEPHANIE L. WIDEMAN (2017). PATHETIC POLITICS: AN ANALYSIS OF EMOTION AND EMBODIMENT IN FIRST LADY RHETORIC. pHd DISSERTATION, Graduate School of Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan.
Citing Rossolatos, George (2014b). On the pathology of the enthymeme: Accounting for hidden visual premises in advertising discourse. Signs and Society 2(1): 1-27.
51. 6TH CRITICAL APPROACHES TO DISCOURSE ANALYSIS ACROSS DISCIPLINES CONFERENCE
CADAAD 2016
Citing Rossolatos, George (ed. and co-author) (2015b). Handbook of Brand Semiotics. Kassel: Kassel University Press.
52. PROCEEDINGS OF THE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON TOURISM (ICOT2014)
Tradition Meets Modernity:
Time for a Rethink of Policies,
Planning and Development Initiatives
Dalian, China 25-28 June 2014
Citing Rossolatos, George. 2012. “Applying Structuralist Semiotics to Brand Image Research.” The Public Journal of Semiotics 4 (1): 25–82.
53. Evinc Dogan, Goran Petkovic (2016). Nation Branding in A Transnational Marketing Context: Serbia’s Brand Positioning Through Food and Wine. Transnational Marketing Journal 4 (2), 84 – 99.
Rossolatos, G. (2012). “From Code to Super-Signs: For a Semiotics of Brand Equity”,
Semiofest 2012, London. [Online] Available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2062654
(Accessed: 12 August 2015).
54. Inmaculada Acal Diaz (2015). Analisis Documental de Contenido de los documentos publicitarios en imagen fija: Propuesta Metodologica. PhD Thesis Universidad de Granada, Spain.
Citing Rossolatos, George (2014a). Exploring the rhetorical semiotic brand image structure of ad films with multivariate mapping techniques. Semiotica Vol.200: 335-358.
55. Ana Maria Rodriguez (2017).Interpretacion biblica en comunidades de fe virtuales/Biblical Interpretation in Virtual Faith Communities.
Citing Rossolatos, George (2015c). The ice-bucket challenge: The legitimacy of the memetic mode of cultural reproduction is the message. Signs & Society 3(1): 132-152.
56. Dina Shirley Gomez Lozano & Leticia Tian Zhang (2018). Representacion de la mujer y poder persuasivo en las tarjetas de masaje oriental. Discurso & Sociedad, Vol. 1(1), 2018, 29-5
Citing Rossolatos, George (ed. and co-author) (2015b). Handbook of Brand Semiotics. Kassel: Kassel University Press.
57. Siva M. Kumar & K. R. Jayasimha (2018). Brand verbs: brand synonymity and brand leadership. Journal of Brand Management (May).
Citing Rossolatos, George (2013q). Brand equity planning with structuralist rhetorical semiotics: A conceptual framework. The Qualitative Report 18(90): 1-20.
58. Hajdas, Monika (2017). Influence of the residual code of masculinity on brand-related effects. Marketing
I Zarzadzanie, 1 (47), 197–207.
Citing Rossolatos, George (2013q). Brand equity planning with structuralist rhetorical semiotics: A conceptual framework. The Qualitative Report 18(90): 1-20.
59. Kirsten Hardie (2014). Fictitious People As Food Brand Icons: Their Role And Visual Representation In
Contemporary International Food Packaging.PhD thesis,University of Brighton UK.
Citing Rossolatos, George (2013b). Repressenting the manimal: A semiotic/psychoanalytic approach to the strategic importance of anthropomorphism in branding. Proceedings of the 12
International Marketing Trends Conference, Paris, France, 17-19 January
60. Kyle Chapman (2016). Digital Activism: How Social Media Prevalence has Impacted Modern Activism. Thesis,University of Washington.
Citing Rossolatos, George (2015c). The ice-bucket challenge: The legitimacy of the memetic mode of cultural reproduction is the message. Signs & Society 3(1): 132-152.
 
George Rossolatos
added a research item
Amidst the constantly augmenting gastronomic capital of celebrity chefs, this study scrutinizes from a critical discourse analytic angle how Jamie Oliver has managed to carve a global brand identity through a process that is termed (dis)placed branding. A roadmap is furnished as to how Italy as place brand and Italianness are discursively articulated, (dis)placed and appropriated in Jamie Oliver’s travelogues which are reflected in his global brand identity. By enriching the CDA methodological toolbox with a deconstructive reading strategy, it is shown that Oliver’s celebrity equity ultimately boils down to supplementing the localized meaning of place of origin with a simulacral, hyperreal place of origin. In this manner, the celebrity’s recipes become more original than the original or doubly original. The (dis)placed branding process that is outlined in the face of Oliver’s global branding strategy is critically discussed with reference to the employed discursive strategies, lexicogrammatical and multimodal choices. Keywords: Jamie Oliver, place branding, celebrity branding, personal branding, critical discourse analysis, deconstruction
George Rossolatos
added an update
Review of Camiciottoli, Belinda Crawford, Silvia Ranfagni and Simone Guercini (2014). Exploring brand associations: an innovative methodological approach. European Journal of Marketing 48(5/6), 1092-1112.
I would like to thank you for your kind invitation to review this paper that was published in the Journal of Marketing in 2014. The review deploys according to the following expository path: I begin by summarizing the aims of this paper and the methodological steps that were followed in order to address these aims. Then I dwell on some of the findings with a view to critically discussing interpretive challenges. Finally, I provide arguments as to the benefits of integrating a linguistic analysis within a broader multimodal canvass by drawing on my multimodal brand rhetorical semiotic research.
The study is anchored in the brand image/brand equity research stream(s) and follows largely Keller’s conceptual model of brand knowledge structure, while taking account of a portion of the relevant literature on brand associations (cf. Rossolatos 2013a). In line with Keller’s model, the study seeks to extrapolate consumer associations by drawing on adjectives that are embedded in consumer comments in fashion blogs. Then, by following the same analytical/interpretive route, the study focuses on adjectives employed in popular fashion brands’ promotional discourse. The synthesis phase consists in comparing and contrasting consumer associations (received brand image) with the brand associations projected by the involved fashion brands (projected brand image), with a view to gauging the extent to which the latter is congruous with the former. Three research questions guide the design and implementation of the study, viz.
RQ1. How can consumer brand associations be identified in online communities?
RQ2. How can the degree of brand association matching be determined and
measured?
RQ3. What kind of themes emerge from brand association matching and what are
the implications for brand strategy?
All research questions were addressed by drawing on standard lexicogrammatical analysis methods amply employed in linguistics, such as the calculation of the frequency of incidence of certain words or grammatical categories in a corpus with the aid of a CAQDAS (e.g. Leximancer, NVivo, Atlas.ti), the comparison of findings with an established benchmark (e.g. the LOEB corpus) and the quest for collocation structures with the aid of a concordancing software (e.g. Wordsmith).
The first research question was addressed by collecting blog posts that contained comments about the three focal brands of this research (Valentino, Dolce & Gabbana, Armani), and then segmenting the adjectives intro three lists (one per brand). Although it is impossible to include in any single research paper all of the details that pertain to each phase of a research design due to space limitations, I think that in this case an explicit mention of the time-period spanned by the selected data is a ‘must-have’, in order to avoid discrepancies with the brands’ projected image. For example, if the attributes of product line X from fashion brand Y dominated its promotional discourse in time G, then a comparison with consumer associations would be realiably feasible only against the background of the same period. Otherwise, consumer associations might be reflective of or positively skewed towards other product lines with, perhaps, different tangible and intangible attributes.
Then, the blog posts were subjected to a linguistic analysis with the aid of the WMatrix software that resulted primarily in the identification of key adjectives that was followed by their classification into the two major image-related categories posited by Keller, viz. product and non-product related attributes, with the addition of a third category ‘designer identity’, defined in Table II as “comments relating to the fashion designers associated with the brand”. At this juncture, for the sake of parsimony, as weIl as in order to maintain maximum coherence with the utilized perspective (i.e. Keller’s), I would tend to subsume designer identity under intangible (non-product related) associations, given that according to the brand knowledge model (Keller 1998: 94, cited in Rossolatos 2014d: 25) brand personality (in this context including a designer’s persona and lifestyle) falls under non-product related associations. The same holds for strong brand owner personalities that reflect indirectly on brand image, e.g. Branson’s on Virgin products/services or popular singers’ apparel & accessories product lines where a significant driver behind brand purchase rests with associations pertaining to the popular persona.
Most importantly, though, and I believe there is merit from a methodological point of view in dwelling on these two points, it should be noted that less visible interpretive constraints may inhere in (i) the extrapolation of salient associations based on the comparison of the relative incidence of adjectives in the selected corpus vis-à-vis the LOEB corpus (ii) subsequently, positing the resulting frequencies as analytical ground for extrapolating core and peripheral associations.
As regards (i), although significantly high LL values may indicate a more category-specific incidence of specific adjectives versus spoken English in general, this is little informative in terms of a brand-specific distribution. In other words, it would be more meaningful if the adjectives were benchmarked against a product-category specific norm, rather than spoken English in general (which is in line with standard norm generation procedures in quantitative brand image studies). This would allow for gauging areas of differential positioning, based on at least the strength and the uniqueness of associations (if not of their favorability) which constitute key equity dimensions, according to Keller (and I will return to this point in due course).
As regards (ii), there is one significantly problematic aspect in relying on blog comments for gauging at large brand image associations, viz. the variability of main topics in the light of which a thread of comments deploys. For example, if a significant proportion of comments stems from impressions about a recent fashion show or the release of a new product line, the ensuing associations will be tied up with more situation-specific image elements, perhaps skewed towards more peripheral associations, and not necessarily with associations about the fashion houses/brands in total. Although the methodological route is interesting and certainly sound, the lack of control on behalf of the researcher in terms of the communicative context wherein data collection is embedded poses validity constraints. These issues are controlled in F2F or phone studies as the interviewer has full control over the flow of the questionnaire, as well as the context where image related questions are posed. For example, in a traditional image/equity study (based on my experience), the researcher will ask: “and now I will read out to you a list of traits that other consumers have attributed to brand X and I would like you to tell me if you agree or not with each of these statements concerning brand X,Y,Z” (and similar formulations if an interval scale is employed instead of a nominal one). Furthermore, in qual image-related studies, and in the context of focus-groups, consumers will be probed to engage in situ in a mapping exercise concerning how closely a set of brands are associated with attributes on various axes. In both settings, no specific context is presupposed for eliciting associations, as against the blog comments which may have emerged in the face of very specific marketing activities (new launches, fashion shows, publicity etc.). In fact, as attested by the examples offered in Table II, the adjectives from which the associations are inferred do stem from specific marketing activities. Therefore, the aspect of communicative context in the case of blog comments must be accounted for prior to inferring that a specific adjective is reflective of a brand association regardless of the situation that triggered its emergence. This is a broader issue in the brand image related literature and should not be taken as applying specifically to this data collection predicament, as, by the same token, positive perceptions about a brand are likely to be boosted (positively skewed), for example, in the face of a recently launched campaign. This may distort findings, such as “however, these themes that were promoted by the companies in their communications did not emerge in the adjectives used by bloggers to characterize the brands and therefore may not be components of their brand knowledge (Esch et al., 2006)” (p.1103) which may be reflective not of the centrality of associations, but of their relevance to context-specific, situational themes that triggered them.
In order to ensure maximum contextual semantic consistency in the identified adjectives, the authors proceeded with the additional step of a concordancing analysis (Figure 2) which is quite demanding in terms of analytical resources, yet essential in order to determine areas of quasi or para-synonymy that is likely to inflate the relative incidence of certain adjectives. It should be noted in passing that this is a key analytical step in online netnographic research that sets it apart from commercial practices that rely on automatic procedures of keyword generation as a ‘viable’ proxy to sentiment analysis (also known as ‘bag of words’), rather than a nuanced exploration of valences as afforded through a manual concordancing exercise. However, concordancing is of limited import in multimodal analyses of texts where the meaning of sentences and words is not necessarily dependent on the immediate co-text of a word (i.e. 3-5 words immediately before and after a keyword), but on the wider semantic contours of a text that may stretch from a paragraph to a period to an entire book or film (and the analysis may be further complicated infinitely on inter-textual, inter-medial and multimodal grounds). This is further complicated by pragmatic considerations and the intention of situated interlocutors in a communicative predicament, their level of acquaintance, but also by idiolectal aspects of brand languages (cf. Rossolatos 2014d) where the meaning of words (and signs inscribed in modes other than the lexical) do not necessarily align with the widely recognizable semantics of a ‘natural language’. This is an important aspect that sets apart (but also reunites on a more advanced synthetic level) a linguistic from a multimodal semiotic analysis, the latter being particularly apt for languages, such as those of brands, that rely ever more intensively on visual, sonic, kinetic, haptic signs (cf. Rossolatos 2015), but also on modes of rhetorical configuration as relata among signs (cf. Rossolatos 2013d,g,h; 2014a; 2016a,b).
In the context of this study that focuses on lexical signs, the analysis and interpretation would have benefited considerably from a more extensive discussion of (i) whether the identified adjectives were positively or negatively valenced (which does not occur automatically, but depends on both lexicogrammatical co-text and communicative con-text) (ii) explaining in greater detail how quasi- or para-synonymies were identified and treated, as this analysis exerts a direct influence both on the distribution of keywords, as well as on their thematic clustering.
As regards the thematic clustering of adjectives (brand association themes), although a qualitative interpretive route was followed in this instance, a factor analysis would have contributed gravely in the identification of overriding themes (cf. Rossolatos 2014a). Interestingly, and in the vein of the wider inter-disciplinary research design, the authors undertook a dual coding procedure and included an inter-rater reliability score in a content analytic vein, in contrast to standard linguistic analyses that tend to follow the same analytical path, albeit by a single researcher. This is an area that points not only to how marketing (and media) research may benefit from analytical procedures in linguistics (and in multimodal semiotics at large), but also, the other way round, how the reliability of single-authored linguistic analyses of texts (from news stories, to promotional discourses to parliamentary debate transcripts) may benefit by the time-hallowed practice of content analysis (cf. Rossolatos 2013b, 2014a).
Finally, the same procedure that was followed in analyzing consumer blog data, was subsequently applied in the context of brands’ promotional discourse, prior to addressing the second research question. By comparing the relative distribution of the identified associations (adjectival keywords) between the two sub-corpora the authors answered the relevant question in terms of the similarity in the distribution pattern of keywords. “This quantitative analysis revealed substantial alignment for all three brands, with percentages of exact match of roughly 50 per cent” (P.1104). Although the intention behind this analysis is clear, the adopted analytical route is ultimately suggestive of this study’s being more akin to a descriptive brand image study, rather than a brand equity oriented one. The crucial difference between a descriptive image study and an equity one, at least based on Keller’s perspective, consists in the former being (conceptually) augmented by the dimensions of uniqueness, strength, favorability. Moreover, this analysis should be conducted strictly within an intra-categorical framework, otherwise it is impossible to gauge areas and opportunities for differential positioning. An example of such an analysis that takes into account multimodal signs (at least verbal and visual), their modes of rhetorical configuration, from a diachronic point of view, while taking into account intra-categorical dynamics, and hence the co-variation patterns in a data-set (that is not accounted for by a simple frequency distribution), may be found in Rossolatos (2014a,d). Although this analysis is situated in the projected equity territory (a significantly under-researched area), the envisioned ‘matching’ analysis by the authors of this paper, as explicitly outlined in the Areas for Future Research in Rossolatos (2014d), may be attained by conducting the same analytics among data from the successive waves of an equity tracking survey. Although it is rather rare in academic research to draw on data from tracking surveys (due to resources), I can verify the feasibility of this project and methodology based on my practitioner’s experience that involves the design, implementation and constant reporting of research findings from Fortune 100 brands. Again, the orientation of this study by far exceeds simple brand associations studies that employ analytics such as SEM as ‘predictive’ of the relational pathways between a set of associations and behavioral/attitudinal outcomes/metrics (involving scales such as likeability, intention-to-buy, recommend etc.).
All in all, this is an interesting study in a broader inter-disciplinary stream between linguistics, semiotics and branding research that is very promising, especially as regards the import of modes other than verbal in the formation of brand meaning (along both projected and received ends of a brand meaning continuum which are inter-dependent, yet, for analytical purposes as stressed by Eco, capable of being scrutinized in isolation), rhetorical modes of textual configuration (since branding discourse is particularly tropical) and ways of gauging whether and how a projected brand image is adequately reflected in consumer associations. This challenge becomes increasingly compelling in the co-creative milieu of the social media, as noted repeatedly by Keller, where brand owners are constantly looking for opportunities for turning the risk of loss of control of brand meaning due to increasing consumer empowerment to an opportunity of creatively ‘listening’ to consumer feedback and integrating it adequately in a brand’s dynamically mutating DNA.
References
Rossolatos, George (2016b). What’s in a thang? On Miley Cyrus’s dance spectacle as multimodal semiotic structure and latent brand axiology (under review). previewable at
Rossolatos, George (2016a). A multimodal discourse analytic approach to the articulation of
Martini’s “desire” positioning in filmic product placement. Social Semiotics 27(2): 211-226.
Rossolatos, George (2015). Taking the “multimodal turn” in interpreting consumption
experiences. Consumption, Markets & Culture 18(5): 427-446.
Rossolatos, George (2014d). Brand Equity Planning with Structuralist Rhetorical Semiotics. Kassel: Kassel University Press.
Rossolatos, George (2014c). Conducting multimodal rhetorical analysis of TV ads with Atlas.ti 7. Multimodal Communication 3(1): 51-84.
Rossolatos, George (2014b). Building strong brands with structuralist rhetorical semiotics: A step-by-step exposition of the methodological framework of the brand trajectory of signification. 12th International Association for Semiotic Studies World Congress, Sofia, Bulgaria, 16-20 September.
Rossolatos, George (2014a). Exploring the rhetorical semiotic brand image structure of ad films with multivariate mapping techniques. Semiotica Vol.200: 335-358.
Rossolatos, George (2013h). //rhetor.dixit//: Understanding Ad Texts’ Rhetorical Structure for
Differential Figurative Advantage. Amazon Press.
Rossolatos, George (2013g). A methodological framework for conducting multimodal rhetorical analyses of advertising films with ATLAS.ti. In Atlas.ti User Conference 2013: Fostering Dialog on Qualitative Methods, Susanne Friese and Thomas Ringmayr (eds.), Berlin, Germany: Berlin Technical University Press. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2315566
Rossolatos, George (2013f). Brand equity planning with structuralist rhetorical semiotics: A conceptual framework. The Qualitative Report 18(90): 1-20.
Rossolatos, George (2013e). On the textual economy of brand equity: Accounting semiotically for the difference between axiology and linguistic value. Proceedings of the 11th Annual International Conference on Marketing, Athens, Greece, 1-4 July.
Rossolatos, George (2013d). An anatomy of the multimodal rhetorical landscape of the world’s most valuable brands. International Journal of Marketing Semiotics Vol.I: 73-125.
Rossolatos, George (2013c). A methodological framework for projecting brand equity: Putting
back the imaginary into brand knowledge structures. Sign Systems Studies 42(1): 98-136.
Rossolatos, George (2013b). Interpreting ads with semiotic content analysis. Paper presented at Semiofest, Barcelona, Spain, 31 May 2013.
_Semiofest_31_May_2013
Rossolatos, George (2013a). Brand equity planning with structuralist operations and operations of rhetorical transformation. Kodikas: Ars Semeiotica 35(1): 153-168.
 
George Rossolatos
added an update
The value of empirical generalizations in marketing
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science
January 2018, Volume 46, Issue 1, pp 6–8
I don't think anyone would object to the usefulness of generalizable findings, however I believe this paper confuses generalizability with normativity (i.e. producing normative data for benchmarking purposes). Generalizability may be inferred only in instances of having employed samples that are representative of a given population. Normativity does not necessarily imply that generalizability was sought in one or more studies. One might as well seek to produce normative data from, say, ad pre-tests that have been conducted narrowly among convenience samples of non-brand users. Although the bulk of my current research is qual and mixed methods oriented, I come from a quant background where the production of normative data through meta-analyses was standard practice. Especially in ad pre/post tests such comparisons are mandatory, as, otherwise, there is no way of gauging whether a likeability or an intention-to-buy score, for example, is higher or lower than expected. However, even within the more narrowly demarcated normativity territory, this paper is not clear as to whether the normative data were produced from studies that adopted identical or varying sampling frames. Based on my extensive engagement with the quant mktng literature I would tend to assume that such frames and the adopted methodologies in general were not identical, so the value of the produced normative data is still questionable. We only produced normative data from studies where exactly the same methodology had been invariably applied (which is standard practice in quant research agencies). Last, but not least, this paper seems to be assuming that ad effectiveness may be gauged simply by using as input variable ad expenditure which is far from the complexity of input variables used in seminal longitudinal studies such as those of J.P.Jones' in When ads work. Even in such studies where elasticities may be confidently produced with robust designs, making generalizations across product categories is a precarious enterprise. But the ultimate battle-ground, to my knowledge, rests with balancing qual textual data pertaining to message strategy and execution with hard metrics such as SOS, SOV etc. This is why in my brand equity methodology I turned towards brand textuality and a structuralist rhetorical paradigm, that is after having been reviewing quant models over 15 years.
Rossolatos, George (2014). Brand Equity Planning with Structuralist Rhetorical Semiotics. Kassel: Kassel University Press.
Complimentary download link
 
George Rossolatos
added an update
I recently read in the Special Issue on the Semiotics of Print Advertising and Branding (eds. Torkild Thellefsen and Bent Sørensen), published in the International Journal of Semiotics and Visual Rhetoric (IJSVR) that I have been influenced by Greimas in my textual semiotic brand equity model. First and foremost, I would like to thank the editors for their acknowledgment. Then, I think it merits clarifying that I am not following either Greimas or Floch in many and quite central for traditional structuralist semiotic respects, as extensively argued in my book Brand Equity Planning with Structuralist Rhetorical Semiotics
downloadable @ http://bit.ly/1hEcuq1
and in various lectures where I had the opportunity to present the model thus far. Furthermore, it must be clarified that my primary field of application and at the same time methodological advancement (over and above the conceptual part) was TV advertising, rather than print, with the employment of CAQDAS. Indicatively I am attaching a slide that summarizes the areas of deviation from and enrichment of the Greimasian trajectory from the lecture I delivered at the New Bulgarian University in 2014 (the full presentation is available @ http://www.mediafire.com/file/6nvhqnjt1e8uiuk/rossolatos_nbu_seminar_equity_semiotics.pdf ). But what must be highlighted above all is the reluctance on behalf of journals such as the Journal of Product & Brand Management to recognize brand textuality approaches, and even more so models that draw on semiotic perspectives. It came as a shocking surprise to discover that the special issue launched in 2017 was characterized by an utter lack of innovation in terms of conceptual approaches to brand equity, save for a regurgitation of models formulated more than 2 decades ago. Moreover, the same macro- attitude is adopted while operationalizing equity in terms of consumer behavior variables, while in actuality research has progressed towards micro- territories that may be addressed only by applied linguistics (in broad terms, including semiotics).
 
George Rossolatos
added an update
March 2014
AbstractUser-generated advertising (UGA) has been booming over the past few years as marketers have been actively seeking to enhance consumer engagement. Yet, our understanding of the implications, the importance and the potential of UGA from a cultural branding point of view remains as yet limited. This study furnishes the conceptual model of consumer cultural engagement in order to appreciate in a more nuanced manner than afforded by consumer sentiment analyses how UGA contributes in fleshing out co-creatively a brand vision. To this end, a sociosemiotic approach is pursued by dimensionalizing the cultural resources employed in UGA along the interlocking layers of text/register/domain in a cline of instantiation. The conceptual model is exemplified by recourse to a UGA corpus from the 10th and final wave of Doritos’ Crash the Super Bowl promo mechanism, undergirded by a mixed methods research design that features a grounded theoretical procedure, facilitated by quantitative analyses. Keywords: social media, user-generated advertising, cultural branding, brand communications, social semiotics, grounded theory
 
George Rossolatos
added 7 research items
The primary aim of the seminar on Brand Semiotics is to acquaint academic researchers in the wider semiotic discipline with existing conceptual models and research methods in brand semiotics and in branding research with an intent on demonstrating how semiotic constructs may be fruitfully applied in building strong brands. The seminar is of inter-disciplinary orientation, spanning both semiotics and marketing disciplines, while highlighting how semiotics may provide answers to aspects of the research agenda in branding from a marketing point of view. Furthermore, the seminar aims at stimulating discussion about how semiotics has been applied thus far in branding research, but also about the research opportunities that lie ahead.
Building strong brands with structuralist rhetorical semiotics: A stepby- step exposition of the methodological framework of the brand trajectory of signification. 12th International Association for Semiotic Studies World Congress, Sofia, Bulgaria, 16-20 September 2014
The theory of counterfactuals has been widely applied in economic1 and management sciences, including marketing.2Among the various facets of the counterfactuals literature that have been addressed by branches of philosophy and linguistics, such as philosophy of language, logical semantics, linguistic semantics, modal fictionalism, pragmatics, I am focusing on the specific topic of possible worlds. In particular, by drawing on semantics, textual semiotics and rhetoric, I am addressing how fictive elements, embedded in a fabular world and once conceived of as counterfactual, achieve to be actualized in advertising discourse as part of our cultural world. By adopting Eco’s fundamental premise that our world is first and foremost culturally constituted, and by recruiting rhetoric as an essential complement of a hybrid semantic/textual semiotic approach, I venture into the fantasy island of cinematic and literary fiction, only to show that this and other possible worlds are not that far apart. The managerial applications for brand genealogists, but also in terms of developing advertising texts by drawing on a combinatorial logic of properties and individuals from fictive worlds, are highlighted as an addendum to the practical implications of philosophical and semiotic theory.
George Rossolatos
added an update
The Handbook of Brand Semiotics furnishes a
compass for the perplexed, a set of anchors for the
inquisitive and a solid corpus for scholars, while
highlighting the conceptual richness and methodological
diversity of semiotic perspectives.
Written by a team of expert scholars in various
semiotics and branding related fields, including
John A. Bateman, David Machin, Xavier Ruiz Collantes,
Kay L. O’Halloran, Dario Mangano, George Rossolatos,
Mercè Oliva, Per Ledin, Gianfranco Marrone, Francesco
Mangiapane, Jennie Mazur, Carlos Scolari, Ilaria
Ventura, and edited by George Rossolatos, Chief Editor
of the International Journal of Marketing Semiotics,
the Handbook is intended as a point of reference
for researchers who wish to enter the ‘House of Brand
Semiotics’ and explore its marvels.
The Handbook of Brand Semiotics, actively geared
towards an inter-disciplinary dialogue between perspectives
from the marketing and semiotics literatures,
features the state-of-the-art, but also
offers directions for future research in key streams.
 
George Rossolatos
added 46 research items
Purpose – This paper scrutinizes how Miley Cyrus’s brand values are projected through the multimodal semiotic structure of the live performance of the song “Do my thang” (from the Bangerz album [2013]). Design/methodology/approach – Sociosemiotic conceptual framework in conjunction with an interpretive videographic method of analysis, facilitated by the multimodal qualitative discourse analytic software Atlas.ti. Findings – It is shown how a brand image is enscripted in Cyrus’s spectacle as ‘script within script’, in various modes (other than the verbal and sonic ones that are defining of the recorded song), and in the interaction among modes, with an emphasis on the dance mode (as composite mode made up of the kinetic and haptic ones). Furthermore, it is shown how Cyrus construes an imaginary, neo-burlesque brand space of hyperdifferentiation, narcissistic play and polymorphous sexuality that she and her dancing crew project onto an evoked audience. Practical implications – Attending to structural couplings between signs and modes in the context of bespoke artists’ brand languages constitutes a priority for managing an artist as brand, and, concomitantly, for safeguarding relevance for a fandom. A multimodal reading grid is offered to this end. Originality/value – From a branding point of view, this study constitutes the first one that theorizes the live show spectacle as the manifest discourse whereupon brand image and brand values are edified, with an emphasis on the dance mode, over and above the verbal/ visual modes that dominate the advertising/branding literatures. Keywords: artist branding, live show, sociosemiotics, multimodal semiotic analysis, atlas.ti preview @ https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2877042
Semiotics has been making progressively inroads into marketing research over the past thirty years. Despite the amply demonstrated conceptual appeal and empirical pertinence of semiotic perspectives in various marketing research streams, spanning consumer research, brand communications, branding and consumer cultural studies, there has been a marked deficit in terms of consolidating semiotic brand-related research under a coherent disciplinary umbrella with identifiable boundaries and research agenda. The Handbook of Brand Semiotics furnishes a compass for the perplexed, a set of anchors for the inquisitive and a solid corpus for scholars, while highlighting the conceptual richness and methodological diversity of semiotic perspectives. Written by a team of expert scholars in various semiotics and branding related fields, such as John A. Bateman, David Machin, Xavier Ruiz Collantes, Kay L. O’Halloran, Dario Mangano, George Rossolatos, Merce Oliva, Per Ledin, Gianfranco Marrone, Francesco Mangiapane, Jennie Mazur, Carlos Scolari, Ilaria Ventura, and edited by George Rossolatos, Chief Editor of the International Journal of Marketing Semiotics, the Handbook is intended as a point of reference for researchers who wish to enter the ‘House of Brand Semiotics’ and explore its marvels. The Handbook of Brand Semiotics, actively geared towards an inter-disciplinary dialogue between perspectives from marketing and semiotics, features the state-of-the-art, but also offers directions for future research in key streams, such as: • Analyzing and designing brand language across media • Brand image, brand symbols, brand icons vs. iconicity • The contribution of semiotics to transmedia storytelling • Narrativity and rhetorical approaches to branding • Semiotic roadmap for designing brand identity • Semiotic roadmap for designing logos and packaging • Comparative readings of structuralist, Peircean and sociosemiotic approaches to brandcomms • Sociosemiotic accounts of building brand identity online • Multimodality and Multimodal critical discourse analysis • Challenging the omnipotence of cognitivism in brand- related research • Semiotics and (inter)cultural branding • Brand equity semiotics You may download the full ebook version @ http://www.mediafire.com/view/ys32yw23l6hy8gn/handbook_of_brand_semiotics.pdf http://ijmarketingsemiotics.com/handbook-of-brand-semiotics/ http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2681179 http://www.academia.edu/9910895/Handbook_of_Brand_Semiotics_ed._and_co-author_Kassel_Kassel_University_Press_2015
The aim of this paper is twice foundational. First, it aims at providing a sketchmap for a semiotically informed model of cultural branding that is currently lacking and second to identify how this model could be fruitfully applied for managing a brand’s share of cultural representations, over and above its market share, as well as the textual sources of a brand language as (inter)textual formation. The propounded cultural branding model of the brandosphere is of inter-disciplinary orientation, spanning the relevant marketing and semiotic literatures, with an emphasis on Lotman’s cultural/textual semiotics and social media, with an added focus on user-generated advertising (henceforth denoted as UGA). The brandosphere is envisioned as a marketing semiotic contester to the almost monopolizing cultural branding model of Douglas Holt (2004) in an attempt to demonstrate that marketing semiotics may constitute a standalone discipline that is capable of addressing, both conceptually and methodologically, various marketing-related research areas, rather than an ornamental add-on to consumer research.