About
8
Publications
29,317
Reads
How we measure 'reads'
A 'read' is counted each time someone views a publication summary (such as the title, abstract, and list of authors), clicks on a figure, or views or downloads the full-text. Learn more
17
Citations
Introduction
Current institution
NAC Geographic Products Inc.
Publications
Publications (8)
The specifications of Natural Area Coding System which is a geocode system to efficiently represent locations, areas and 3D regions on the earth, in the earth and the space for various location based products and services such as car navigation systems, geographic information systems, local and global postal services, emergency services, management...
The mistake of special relativity is obvious: in a real clock, time is determined by a fixed period which is the same observed from all reference frames, while in special relativity, time is determined by Lorentz Transformation which is different observed from different reference frame; they are two different variables but Einstein simply equates t...
The mistake of special relativity is obvious: in a real clock, the elapsed time is determined by a fixed period which is the same observed from different reference frames, while in special relativity, time is determined by a variable period which as an interval of time is different observed from different reference frames; they are totally differen...
This paper finds that the time of the special theory of relativity (STR) is no longer the physical time measured by physical clocks. In fact, a clock can never measure time directly; it can only record the status of a physical process during a period of time, such as the number of cycles of an oscillatory mechanism, which is the product of time and...
![Fig.1 Fizeau's Experiment Setup [9]](profile/Xinhang-Shen/publication/297528348/figure/fig1/AS:389123476082691@1469785674275/Fizeaus-Experiment-Setup-9_Q320.jpg)
A critical error is found in the Special Theory of Relativity (STR): mixing up the concepts of the STR abstract time of a reference frame and the displayed time of a physical clock, which leads to use the properties of the abstract time to predict time dilation on physical clocks and all other physical processes. Actually, a clock can never directl...
Accurate prediction of tube surface temperature is important for determining whether accelerated superheater corrosion will occur in kraft recovery boilers. A heat transfer model, which combines an iterative numerical solution scheme with a more realistic flue gas flow field obtained from the CFD code FLUENT, has been developed to predict the tube,...
Accurate prediction of tube surface temperature is important for determining whether accelerated superheater corrosion will occur in kraft recovery boilers. A heat transfer model, which combines an iterative numerical solution scheme with a more realistic flue-gas flow field obtained from a CFD code FLUENT, has been developed to predict the tube, s...
Flue gas flow through the upper furnace of a kraft recovery boiler has been numerically simulated to examine the sensitivity of the velocity and the temperature distributions to common modelling assumptions. The simulated results agree well with field temperature results and show a severely channelled flow with a large recirculation zone above the...
Questions
Questions (7)
In special relativity, people always say that a moving clock ticks more slowly than a stationary clock which seems vague: does the frequency of a moving clock become lower than that of the stationary clock or its period become shorter than that of the stationary clock?
Current mainstream physicists think that the traveling twin will be younger than the twin staying on the earth because Lorentz Transformation tells them that the time of the moving frame becomes shorter than the time of the stationary frame.
But they forget the effect of aging rate. The biological age of a person is not a simple count of the elapsed time but the product of the elapsed time and the aging rate. Yes, Lorentz Transformation indeed tells us that the time of the moving frame becomes shorter than the time of the stationary frame, but it also tells us that the aging rate of the moving frame becomes faster than the aging rate of the stationary frame. The relativistic effects of the elapsed time and the aging rate of the moving frame cancel each other in the product to make the biological age of the traveling twin always the same as that of the stationary twin. That is, relativistic effect won't make the traveling twin younger than the twin staying on the earth.
Similarly, a clock uses its recorded number of cycles of its periodical process to calculate the elapsed physical time. In special relativity, the number of cycles is the product of relativistic time and frequency. Lorentz Transformation not only shows that the relativistic time of the moving frame becomes shorter than the relativistic time of the stationary frame but also tells us that the frequency of the moving clock becomes faster than the frequency of the stationary clock. The relativistic effects of the relativistic time and the frequency of the moving frame cancel each other in the product to make the physical time of the moving frame always the same as that of the stationary clock. That is, in special relativity, physical time shown on clocks is still absolute and independent of the reference frame. That means, relativistic time is not the physical time shown on clocks but a mathematical variable without physical meaning. Thus special relativity is wrong, and so are all other relativistic spacetime based physics theories.
Is there anything wrong in my reasoning?
