# Suresh WanayalaegeLanka E-World Technologies · Analysis & Research

Suresh Wanayalaege

Verifying the origin/formation of the universe by making a binary equation and verifying it using science and Buddhism.

## About

2

Publications

5,811

Reads

**How we measure 'reads'**

A 'read' is counted each time someone views a publication summary (such as the title, abstract, and list of authors), clicks on a figure, or views or downloads the full-text. Learn more

0

Citations

Introduction

I'm researching about mathematical interactions of dimensional symmetries and fundamental technical aspects of the universe. I made a sort of binary mathematical equation that almost shows the process in elementary particles, the origin of elementary particles, atomic structure, etc. The results in the calculation can be used to predict and discover hidden fundamental elements and interactions in the universe. Also, it shows fundamental structures in the universe. I started the research in 2017.

## Publications

Publications (2)

It's about a new type of mathematical discovery about the origin/existence of the universe. I have used modern scientific discoveries (E.g., quantum mechanics) and explanations about fundamental elements (quantum physics) in Buddhism to verify it. I researched about zero (0) to find the universe's origin. If zero is fundamental, then the continuati...

This is a new type of mathematical explanation which was developed to calculate the origin of the first Universe—as a theory of mathematical symmetries, or as symmetric laws in nature—using the most fundamental laws in the earliest possible universe which was infinitely nothing for a relatively infinite moment until the symmetric laws made the dime...

## Questions

Questions (11)

If the total mass is interdependent, then does the total mass contain both matter and antimatter masses like this:

Mass = Matter × Antimatter.

E.g. (hypothetical),

The Proton's mass == Antimatter(59×31×31×3×3) × Matter(59×31) × 1.005303472855531 eV/c^2?

The Down Quark’s mass == Matter(59×31×31×3×3×3) × Antimatter(3) × 1.023381212332223 eV/c^2?

The Up Quark’s mass == Antimatter(59×31×31×3×3×2) × Matter(2) × 1.077816383200958 eV/c^2?

The Electron’s mass == Matter(59×31×31×3×3) × Antimatter(1) × 1.001387338009097 eV/c^2?

Proton’s Charge = 2×(An(59×31×31×3×3×2)×M(2)) - M(59×31×31×3×3×3)×An(3) = An(59×31×31×3×3×1)×M(1)

But electrons don’t need extra matter or antimatter to be balanced. Therefore, only protons could have a Charge.

The Muon’s mass == Matter(59×59×31×31×31) × Antimatter(1) × 1.01886073187205 eV/c^2?

The Tau’s mass == Matter(59×59×59×31×31×3×3) × Antimatter(1) × 1.000302326214752 eV/c^2?

The Strange Quark’s mass == Matter(59×59×31×31×3×3) × Antimatter(3) × 1.051798216785732 eV/c^2?

The Bottom Quark’s mass == Matter(59×59×59×31×31×(3 + 4)) × Antimatter(3) × 1.008503859194067 eV/c^2?

The Charm Quark’s mass == Antimatter(59×59×31×31×31×3×2) × Matter(2) × 1.024565750222095 eV/c^2?

The Top Quark’s mass == Antimatter(59×59×59×31×31×31×2×(3 + 4)) × Matter(2) × 1.008426030527669 eV/c^2?

If 1 eV/c^2 contains a structure with smaller units, then it would be like this:

1 eV/c^2 = Matter(59×31×31×3×3) × Antimatter(59×31) × asymmetry? It has masses like this 1/933322239 eV/c^2.

Hypothetical extraordinary correlation #1:

The particular mass of Down Quark and Up Quark could emerge while the structure of the Gluon field becomes geometrically symmetric when it decays into a Proton, making the strongly stable Proton.

Proton's hypothetical structure == 3481 × 31^2 × 31 × 9 × 1.005303472855531 eV/c^2.

Down Quark's hypothetical structure == 59 × 31^2 × 9 × 9 × 1.023381212332223 eV/c^2.

Hypothetical extraordinary correlation #2:

The mass of the Helium nucleus == 59×59×31×31×31×3×3×4×1.005996337712896 == 3755675017.36 eV/c^2

The asymmetry in the Helium nucleus = 1.005996337712896 - 1 == 0.0059963377128957

The mass of the final atomic symmetry == 1/0.0059963377128957 == 166.7684589961309 == Nearly, 167 amu.

Atom-65 Terbium's mass == 158.9254 amu, Melting point == 1629 K, Boiling point == 3396 K

Atom-66 Dysprosium's mass == 162.50 amu, Melting point == 1680 K, Boiling point == 2840 K

Atom-67 Holmium's mass == 164.9304 amu, Melting point == 1734 K, Boiling point == 2873 K

Atom-68 Erbium's mass == 167.26 amu, Melting point == 1802 K, Boiling point == 3141 K (It is stable at 167 amu)

Atom-69 Thulium's mass == 168.9342 amu, Melting point == 1818 K, Boiling point == 2223 K

Atom-70 Ytterbium's mass == 173.04 amu, Melting point == 1097 K, Boiling point == 1469 K

Probaby, most masses of quantum objects (standard elementary particles) have a relationship to each other because their masses have a strong relationship to a very few similar numbers. E.g., 59, 31, 3.

The W Boson’s mass == 59×59×31×31×31×31×(3 + 2)×(3 + 2)×1.000094376386809 == 80377000000 eV/c^2.

The Z Boson’s mass == 59×59×31×31×31×31×(3 + 1)×(3 + 4)×1.013040843642746 == 91187600000 eV/c^2.

The Neutron's mass == 59×59×31×31×31×3×3×1.00668920257026 == 939565420.52 eV/c^2.

The Proton's mass == 59×59×31×31×31×3×3×1.005303472855531 == 938272088.16 eV/c^2.

The mass of gluons without the fluctuations like quarks = 59×59×31×31×31×3×3×1 = 933322239 eV/c^2.?

Photons have many different masses, including very low-energy masses. The mass of a photon == 31×a/b eV/c^2.?

The Higgs Boson's mass == 59×59×59×31×31×3×3×3×(3+2)×(3+14)×1.000404952049279 == 125100000000

eV/c^2 or 59×31×31×31×31×3×3×3×(3+1)×(3+7) == 58846758120 eV/c^2 (The hypothetical mass of a matter or antimatter Higgs super-fermion that has an undetectable -1-x Charge or +1+x Charge while x>0.) or 59×59×59×31×31×3×3×2.34754606458332×30 == 125100000000 eV/c^2.?

Perhaps, the Higgs Boson decays into matter and antimatter Higgs super-fermions and a photon, before it decays into fermions. Presumably, more groups of elementary particles exist with relatively undetectable Charges.

Likely, there is a fundamental building block with 31 points of existence. Perhaps, they emerged from 32 or 33 fundamental structures like 31 points of existence with a lost point or lost points of existence due to a delayed breaking point (like Bhavanga Upaccheda) and interactions. Most likely, a structure with connected 31 or 32 points of existence can connect with another similar structure by sharing their points of existence with each other like this:

((32 or 31) + (-32 or -31) == 29+((1-1)+(1-1)+(1-1) or (1-1)+(1-1))-29 == 29+(x+y+z or y+z)-29. If x+y+z=3a or y+z=2a, and a=0, then 29+(3a or 2a)-29 == 29+(3x0 or 2x0)-29 == 59 points of existence with 3 or 2 potential gaps == 59×(built-in 3-3 or 2-2 symbolic gap) == 59(3/3 or 2/2 potentiality).

Arguably, 31 planes of existence could emerge if they depend on 31 types of possible connections between two connected fundamental streams of existence. If the three neutral gaps ((1-1)+(1-1)+(1-1)) between the connected two streams of existence became a reason to originate a plane of existence like the third plane of existence, then two neutral gaps between two connected streams of existence (61(built-in 2-2 symbolic gap)) could create the second plane of existence. Similarly, four neutral gaps between two connected streams of existence (57(built-in 4-4 symbolic gap)) could create the fourth plane of existence, and so on.

Research:

Preprint Verifying The Origin Of Everything

Space could exist before the Big Bang. And therefore, the matter could move into space, and space could come into matter areas. Seemingly, the concept of Dark Energy is a scientific lie because it hides (is being used to hide) the existence of the universe before the Big Bang.

If the center of the universe should have a higher density, and matter moves away from the center of the universe, then a Big Bounce would make the required density at the center again as a cyclic process. Seemingly, space causes to continue that process somehow. And there is nothing else that really exists called Dark ENERGY. The density of the space beyond the island universe and inside the island universe is different because there was space beyond the island universe before the Big Bang. Therefore, the galaxies have to move away from each other to balance the density between those areas. Using the word Energy to explain that process is misleading and ignores the fact that Big Bang didn't create all the space. And most people ignore the fact that the universe is gaining space from somewhere. So, using a name like Dark Space to mention the growth of space in the observable universe is better than calling it Dark Energy.