
Saif Said- Jamia Millia Islamia
Saif Said
- Jamia Millia Islamia
About
8
Publications
2,748
Reads
How we measure 'reads'
A 'read' is counted each time someone views a publication summary (such as the title, abstract, and list of authors), clicks on a figure, or views or downloads the full-text. Learn more
155
Citations
Introduction
Skills and Expertise
Current institution
Publications
Publications (8)
The present study evaluates the water quality status of 6-km-long Kali River stretch that passes through the Aligarh district in Uttar Pradesh, India, by utilizing high-resolution IRS P6 LISS IV imagery. In situ river water samples collected at 40 random locations were analyzed for seven physicochemical and four heavy metal concentrations, and the...
Prioritization of potential regions that are severely threatened by soil erosion is a prerequisite for formulating and implementing conservation measures and management practices, particularly in fragile semiarid regions. The present study prioritized eight delineated Nagmati sub-watersheds located in the Kutch District of Gujarat State, India, bas...
This study deals with stochastic modeling of solar radiation in all sky conditions and presents an effort to predict and analyze the future trends of monthly insolation based on time series analysis. Multiplicative seasonal autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) model, using Box–Jenkins approach, has been utilized for simulating monthly a...
River Yamuna is the largest tributary of river Ganges and has been acclaimed as a heavenly waterway in Indian mythology. However, 22-km segment of river Yamuna passing through Delhi from downstream of Wazirabad barrage up to Okhla barrage is considered as the filthiest stretch having been rendered into a sewer drain. The present study employs high-...
Morphometric analysis of any watershed and its prioritization is one of the important aspects of planning for implementation of management programmes. Present study evaluates the quantitative morphometric characteristics of Nagmati River watershed in Kutch District of Gujarat by utilizing Cartosat-1 data (CartoDEM). In all 19 aerial and 6 linear mo...
The present article utilizes high resolution Geoeye 2 imagery for mapping and monitoring pollution concentrations of 22 km stretch of river Yamuna passing through Delhi state, by developing regression models between water quality parameters (WQP's) and the corresponding spectral reflectance values. Water samples collected from the sampling location...
Image fusion involves integration of the geometric details of a high-resolution panchromatic (PAN) image and the spectral information of a low resolution multispectral (XS) image which is useful for regional planning and large scale urban mapping. Present study compares the effectiveness of three image fusion techniques namely, Principal Component...
The spatiotemporal variation of surface soil moisture is a key subject variable need to be assessed accurately since it plays a crucial role in partitioning of rainfall into runoff and infiltration. Active microwave remote sensing has offered prominent potential towards accurate estimation of surface soil moisture. Present study utilizes ERS-2 SAR...
Questions
Question (1)
Hello everyone,
I would like to clear my query regarding selection of best fit model for water quality retrieval using statistical analysis.
I applied three techniques for their comparative analysis in estimation of water quality parameter i.e. multiple linear regression analysis (MLR), artificial neural networks (ANN) and gene expression programming (GEP).
Coefficient of determination R2 for calibration data between observed and estimated for each approach is as follows 0.95 (GEP), 0.96 (ANN) and 0.81 (MLR) and for validation data set 0.91 (GEP), 0.87 (ANN) and (0.67 (MLR) respectively. Here, it seems that GEP is estimating the values more accurately as compared to the other two approaches.
To further ascertain the goodness of fit, I tried to apply one way ANOVA post hoc: Tuckey's test to the results from three employed approaches and got the results as under
Group 1 Group 2 Critical p
ANN MLR 0.01667 0.920624 not significant
GEP MLR 0.025 0.935268 not significant
GEP ANN 0.05 0.986082 not significant
Can I ascertain from the above ANOVA Post hoc results that GEP is better than the rest? Else I have to do perform some other analysis…kindly suggest
Thanks