Roman Baudrimont

Entro-π Fluid Group · Entro-π Fluid Group

Hi everyone,

Who can help me to endorse me in Arxiv for General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology ?

Thank you

------------------

(Roman Baudrimont should forward this email to someone who's registered as an endorser for the gr-qc (General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology) archive of arXiv.)

Roman Baudrimont requests your endorsement to submit an article to the gr-qc section of arXiv. To tell us that you would (or would not) like to endorse this person, please visit the following URL:

If that URL does not work for you, please visit

and enter the following six-digit alphanumeric string:

Endorsement Code: DSTOYF

---------------------------

(Roman Baudrimont should forward this email to someone who's registered as an endorser for the physics.flu-dyn (Fluid Dynamics) subject class of arXiv.)

Roman Baudrimont requests your endorsement to submit an article to the physics.flu-dyn section of arXiv. To tell us that you would (or would not) like to endorse this person, please visit the following URL:

If that URL does not work for you, please visit

and enter the following six-digit alphanumeric string:

Endorsement Code: AISXJS

Hello,

I received an email from Science Domaine to review a scientific article published in peer review in the following journal: "International Astronomy and Astrophysics Research Journal".

Peer Review link Science Domaine: http://www.sciencedomain.org/page/peer-review-report-submission-deadline#Peer%20review%20deadline

Journal source of the article: https://www.journaliaarj.com/index.php/IAARJ/about

After doing my job as a reviewer, I received this certificate.

My question is this: is it a fake? Can we trust it?

thank you for your reply

Hello,

I would like to publish quickly and at no cost two scientific articles that I wrote, here below:

Which review do you recommend?

Thank you for your answers

Regards,

I receive several mail from "American Journal of Modern Physics" which invites me to publish my articles on their scientific review.

Are they serious?

Can we trust them?

Best regards,

BAUDRIMONT Roman

The link : https://trustmyscience.com/emergence-ordre-quantique-temporel/

Everything is written in the question.

Can we be an amateur researcher? If yes, how ?

Foreword

I would like to make it clear to the directors of the group that this subject, despite being taboo, is perfectly in order with respect to the charter. I beg you to read at least the introduction to understand that this topo is perfectly integrated into the group's themes and is purely objective.

Introduction - definition

A scientist or researcher, is a person who applies scientific methodology by publishing quality scientific articles in a peer-reviewed journal.

In a simpler way: a researcher who does not publish in a magazine is like a guitarist without a guitar. Eh yes !

I admit that it is a little more complicated than that. A researcher can also make quality articles by publishing preprinting (or preprint) on serious archive sites (www.preprints.org, led by MDPI, HAL, Arxiv) ...

Short. In any case, it is quite possible for an amateur to submit his paper to a peer review. If the article is accepted, it's in the pocket!

Say that, it sounds simple, except that in fact, it is extremely complicated. And I will explain why.

I. It takes scientific knowledge!

Yes ! A researcher who has a doctorate will obviously have more knowledge than an amateur without a degree!

So there is first a lot of personal work if you want to acquire this knowledge without a doctorate, and it will be very complicated!

The first step is to find courses available with certificate of achievement or certification allowing you to obtain knowledge up to the masters. For this, there are distance courses such as MOOC, obviously the CNED, as well as all online courses (eg "general relativity 2013-2014" for students of Master I and II etc.). Most "good" courses are in English, either in MOOC or PDF. Obviously, if you have enough money, the must are the physics textbooks and books written by researchers.

Just that, it's already a huge amount of work (personally that's what I do in addition to my full-time job).

II. Created its research base and accepted the return of other scientists

It's also a complicated step.

It is necessary to find in which field is your research (Quantum gravity, study of the black holes, etc.) Once found, it is necessary to develop its research BUT respecting the scientific methodology. There is a simple way to verify that it is respected by answering these two questions: is my theory experimental? Is it falsifiable? If yes, continue, if not ... Start again from the beginning 😝

Then, it is necessary - and it is primordial - created its scientific network. For this, a registration to Academia.edu and Research Gate will be essential! Publish your articles (preprint) on it to have a return of the researchers. That's how I did it, and that more or less well-known scientists (like Samuel Braustein, Frank Delplace, Evgeni B Starikov, Jean Pierre Petit, etc.) followed and commented on my work.

Your article will be updated and soon ready for the final stage ...

III. Publication in a magazine

I think it's the most complicated, long and expensive, but of titanic importance: publish in a peer-reviewed journal.

For an affiliated researcher, it's quite simple: he already knows the scientific world, the costs of publication can be supported - partially or completely - by his institution etc.

The amateur who does not know the scientific world is empty lost. So here are some key points to know. First, if you want your article to be cost-effective read, you have to publish in Open Access. This is the most expensive, but it prevents your readers from paying to access your article. The second thing to know is that the publication in Open Access is all the more expensive as the journal is recognized; the fees can go from 0 € up to, 1000 € see 1500 €! And since you are not affiliated with any academy, it is up to you to tap into your own monetary resources.

Once you know what you want (review with paid access, open access, no charge or with etc.) you have to find the magazine that corresponds to the research areas of your article (condensed matter, quantum gravity, general Physics etc.). )

Once found, you must read the format required by the journal (LaTeX, Microsoft World, figure, references, fonts etc.).

Once the layout is ready, put your publication online. To get your answer, it will be necessary to be armed with patience: it can put 15 days / 1 month to the shortest, until more than 1 years! The answer you will get can be: accepted, accepted with modification, accepted if important changes are made, refused. If your article is refused .... Well read again from the beginning 😝

Then, it is necessary - and it is primordial - created its scientific network. For this, a registration to Academia.edu and Research Gate will be essential! Publish your articles (preprint) on it to have a return of the researchers. That's how I did it, and that more or less well-known scientists (like Samuel Braustein, Frank Delplace, Evgeni B Starikov, Jean Pierre Petit, etc.) followed and commented on my work.

Your article will be updated and soon ready for the final stage ...

III. Publication in a magazine

I think it's the most complicated, long and expensive, but of titanic importance: publish in a peer-reviewed journal.

For an affiliated researcher, it's quite simple: he already knows the scientific world, the costs of publication can be supported - partially or completely - by his institution etc.

The amateur who does not know the scientific world is empty lost. So here are some key points to know. First, if you want your article to be cost-effective read, you have to publish in Open Access. This is the most expensive, but it prevents your readers from paying to access your article. The second thing to know is that the publication in Open Access is all the more expensive as the journal is recognized; the fees can go from 0 € up to, 1000 € see 1500 €! And since you are not affiliated with any academy, it is up to you to tap into your own monetary resources.

Once you know what you want (review with paid access, open access, no charge or with etc.) you have to find the magazine that corresponds to the research areas of your article (condensed matter, quantum gravity, general Physics etc.). )

Once found, you must read the format required by the journal (LaTeX, Microsoft World, figure, references, fonts etc.).

Once the layout is ready, put your publication online. To get your answer, it will be necessary to be armed with patience: it can put 15 days / 1 month to the shortest, until more than 1 years! The answer you will get can be: accepted, accepted with modification, accepted if important changes are made, refused. If your article is refused .... Well read again from the beginning 😝

Conclusion

Well everything is possible! An amateur can succeed (Marie Ampère, Bill Gates, Faraday) are self-taught who have succeeded while some scientists graduates are not considered as scientists by the community (Nassim Haramain, Brother Bogdanov etc.)

In the end, an amateur can succeed, but it will take patience and a lot of work to become a researcher! If you do not fear the academic world, go for it! If you are a bit like me ... Well, you say it's possible!

PS: in addition to my BTS accounting, I worked in science self-taught for 5 years, and I was able to develop my theory and have exchanges with many scientists. I am currently an assistant researcher in a research group called Bijective Physics Group and I work full time as an accountant. At the age of 20, I have only published preprint, but as soon as possible - and this is my goal - I intend to submit my research in a peer-reviewed journal.

Like what, everything is possible!

Imagine the curved space-time, and imagine a body, any one. This exerts a pressure P on this surface. By already knowing the curvature of the surface caused by the body, as well as the pressure of the body exerted on this surface.

How to calculate the height / or depth of the curved surface?

Entropic Gravity and the Space-Time Fluid (PowerPoint PPTX) :

Entropic Gravity and the Space-Time Fluid (PDF version) :

Warning!

It is recommended to read the PPTX file first. The PDF version has been edited for people who can not read this type of file (but normally, it works, be it Word, open office etc ...)

The question of quantum gravity has become a central subject of science.

In this paper, I explain how quantum gravity can be achieved, combining the theory of gravity as an entropic force and the theory of fluid space-time.

In your opinion, can space-time be a fluid? Can gravity be an entropic force?

Indeed, if we take into account the information of Wikipedia, we learn this:

"It was established in April 2003 and its subject matter almost immediately dismissed in The Lancet Neurology as" wild invention "and" claptrap ". It is an abstracted and indexed in the Science Citation Index Expanded"

[...]

NeuroQuantology has been listed as "Level 0" since 2008, which means that it is not considered scientific and therefore does not fulfill the requirements of the journal.

[...]

Neither the Editorial Board or Advisory Board at NeuroQuantology contains the following working scientists in the fields of quantum physics or neurology. "

In fact, the journals guide does not mention any information about it, and says "This journal is included in the JournalGuide whitelist of reputable titles":

HOWEVER, according to this source, he has an ISSN:

I would like to know if this journal is reliable.

Thank you for your reposnes

English :

French :

I recently made a calculation to obtain the pressure that an electron can exert based on the Klein-Gordon equation and the linear approximation (or weak field approximation) of the Einstein equation.

After doing this calculation, I found a value of 10 ^ 67 Pascal for the electron.

Can this be coherent?

Thank you for your answers