Rahma Abdelraouf

Independent Researcher

How can humans commit such massive and horrifying wars to the extent that millions of people die without exaggeration? No matter how aggressive or selfish humans can be, this does not justify such horrific acts. Not only do tens of thousands of people die, but they also often die in brutal ways, as seen in events like Hiroshima or what continues to happen today in Gaza.

Even if humans have sadistic or aggressive tendencies, such actions seem illogical for beings like us. I believe this phenomenon goes deeper than we can perceive. For instance, animals, while possessing a level of consciousness (albeit not as advanced as humans), do not commit atrocities on this scale.

In nature, stronger animals may prey on weaker ones, driven by survival instincts. Some animals even fight within their o

wn species, but not in the same catastrophic way humans do.

Humans, too, have survival instincts that drive them to act against external threats. Could it be that because humans are considered the dominant species on this planet, with little external threats to their survival, they redirect this aggression and survival instinct toward their own kind? Is it possible that this phenomenon is connected to a universal or natural principle where there must always be a higher power or a looming threat for balance?

I have an idea related to Reconfigurable Intelligent Surfaces In RIS technology, waves are reflected. Can we do the opposite? I mean that we collect or attract these waves instead of reflecting them. This will benefit us in many things. It depends on Snell’s law of light reflection, but it is possible to do the opposite through a smart lens to collect light waves if we want to preserve information. Important and confidential. For example, we can use this lens and then use systems for converting signals and converting them into electrical ones and encrypting them. This is more similar to the way RIS works in terms of the working principle, meaning this smart surface consists of groups of parts of small cells through which we control the reflection of waves. This smart lens is the same thing if When we do it, we will use a technology like this, and it is not like a receiver that receives waves. It will be like that, but it will be in a different way because it will collect all the waves, not just pick up a signal, for example, or just receive it. Am I thinking correctly ? and should I continue working on this idea?

I have an idea related to Reconfigurable Intelligent Surfaces In RIS technology, waves are reflected. Can we do the opposite? I mean that we collect or attract these waves instead of reflecting them. This will benefit us in many things. It depends on Snell’s law of light reflection, but it is possible to do the opposite through a smart lens to collect light waves if we want to preserve information. Important and confidential. For example, we can use this lens and then use systems for converting signals and converting them into electrical ones and encrypting them. This is more similar to the way RIS works in terms of the working principle, meaning this smart surface consists of groups of parts of small cells through which we control the reflection of waves. This smart lens is the same thing if When we do it, we will use a technology like this, and it is not like a receiver that receives waves. It will be like that, but it will be in a different way because it will collect all the waves, not just pick up a signal, for example, or just receive it. Am I thinking correctly ? and should I continue working on this idea?

Can we consider consciousness as a type of energy that supplies the brain with energy, given that the brain has very high resistance, up to 60 ohms, and in order to generate small currents within the brain, we would need a very high voltage? Additionally, Newton's first law states that an object at rest remains at rest unless acted upon by an external force. Is it possible that consciousness could be a source of energy for the brain? Could this be a valid possibility?

If consciousness is simulated, such as simulating a neuron, will there be conscious artificial intelligence, certainly not like human consciousness, but conscious in another way?

I have an idea to explain consciousness. About 8 years ago, Professor Donald Hoffman asked a very important question to help us understand consciousness. He asked, "How is it possible for calcium and potassium ions that enter and exit through neuronal membranes to give rise to our conscious experience of, for example, the color green, or a smell, or a sound?"

So, my idea that answers this question is that the color green, for example, has a specific frequency associated with it, and the same goes for the color red or any other stimuli around us. When these frequencies enter the brain, they can be considered as inputs.

The frequency of the color green, for example, has a specific code or pattern in the brain. This code represents the way that nerve cells communicate with each other through the exchange of calcium and potassium ions across neuronal membranes.

We can call this process that occurs in the brain "processing," and the brain, because it translates these frequencies, can be thought of as a compiler in a computer.

A compiler takes human-readable code and converts it into machine-readable code, known as machine language.

Then, somehow, our conscious experience of the color green emerges.

We can consider the formation of conscious experiences as outputs.

To me, this topic feels similar to programming. In programming, we have outputs, compilers, processing, and inputs. So, could it be possible that the brain is programmed to understand all these frequencies, decode their patterns, and create consciousness? I'm not saying that we are programmers, but rather, it's the brain itself.

What I'm trying to say is that everything in the universe has its own frequency and its own specific code. The brain decodes these codes through the electrical activity that occurs with the entry and exit of ions across neuronal membranes, and then consciousness is formed.

Is it possible that this could be true?

I have an idea that explains consciousness. About 8 years ago, Professor Donald Hoffman asked a very important question to help us understand consciousness. He asked, "How is it possible for calcium and potassium ions that enter and exit through neuronal membranes to give rise to our conscious experience of, for example, the color green, or a smell, or a sound?"

So, my idea that answers this question is that the color green, for example, has a specific frequency associated with it, and the same goes for the color red or any other stimuli around us. When these frequencies enter the brain, they can be considered as inputs.

The frequency of the color green,

for example, has a specific code or pattern in the brain. This code represents the way that nerve cells communicate with each other through the exchange of calcium and potassium ions across neuronal membranes.

We can call this process that occurs in the brain "processing," and the brain, because it translates these frequencies, can be thought of as a compiler in a computer.

A compiler takes human-readable code and converts it into machine-readable code, known as machine language.

Then, somehow, our conscious experience of the color green emerges.

We can consider the formation of conscious experiences as outputs.

To me, this topic feels similar to programming. In programming, we have outputs, compilers, processing, and inputs. So, could it be possible that the brain is programmed to understand all these frequencies, decode their patterns, and create consciousness? I'm not saying that we are

programmers, but rather, it's the brain itself.

What I'm trying to say is that everything in the universe has its own frequency and its own specific code.

The brain decodes these codes through the electrical activity that occurs with the entry and exit of ions across neuronal membranes, and then consciousness is formed.

Is it possible that this could be true?

"I believe that we can prove this through experiments on animals."

Is it possible to publish research on an idea to develop artificial intelligence, or should a model be made first for this idea?