Mohammed Nooraldeen Al-QattanUniversity of Science Malaysia | USM · Centre for Drugs Research (CDR)
Mohammed Nooraldeen Al-Qattan
Ph.D. (Computer-Aided Drug Design)
About
10
Publications
27,081
Reads
How we measure 'reads'
A 'read' is counted each time someone views a publication summary (such as the title, abstract, and list of authors), clicks on a figure, or views or downloads the full-text. Learn more
175
Citations
Introduction
I am interested in computational simulation of GPCR mechanism of activity, and designing ligands for active and allosteric sites
I am using neural networks in reproducing correlations instead of regression analyses.
I did work on genetic cloning, protein expression, enzyme kinetics and protein crystallization followed by X-ray crystallography for Plasmodium falciparum Glutathione-S-Transferase.
Additional affiliations
October 2019 - present
Al-Noor University College - Iraq
Position
- Professor (Assistant)
Description
- teaching: physical pharmacy (theory) organic chemistry I
Publications
Publications (10)
Context:
Modulation of disease progression is frequently started by identifying biochemical pathway catalyzed by biomolecule that is prone to inhibition by small molecular weight ligands. Such ligands (leads) can be obtained from natural resources or synthetic libraries. However, de novo design based on fragments assembly and optimization is showi...
In the context of drug design and development, phytochemical and synthetic libraries are starting places for searching leads. However, knowing crystal structure of receptor may help scratching molecules that complements available interaction sites using de novo molecular design approaches. This research describes the implementation of genetic algor...
Manipulating intracellular signals by interaction with transmembranal G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) is the way of action of more than 30% of available medicines. Designing molecules against GPCRs is most challenging due to their flexible binding orthosteric and allosteric pockets, a property that lead to different mode and extent of activatio...
Modulation of disease progression is frequently started by identifying biochemical pathway catalyzed by biomolecule that is prone to inhibition by small molecular weight ligands. Such ligands (leads) can be obtained from natural resources or synthetic libraries. However de novo design based on fragments assembly and optimization is showing increasi...
Modulating cellular processes through extracellular chemical stimuli is medicinally an attractive approach to control disease conditions. GPCRs are the most important group of transmembranal receptors that produce different patterns of activations using intracellular mediators (such as G-proteins and Beta-arrestins). Adenosine receptors (ARs) belon...
The carbon nanotube (CNT)-based target-specific delivery of drugs, or other molecular cargo, has emerged as one of the most promising biomedical applications of nanotechnology. To achieve efficient CNT-based drug delivery, the interactions between the drug, CNT and biomolecular target need to be properly optimized. Recent advances in the computer-a...
Background:
Glutathione-s-transferases (GSTs) are enzymes that principally catalyze the conjugation of electrophilic compounds to the endogenous nucleophilic glutathione substrate, besides, they have other non-catalytic functions. The Plasmodium falciparum genome encodes a single isoform of GST (PfGST) which is involved in buffering the toxic heme...
A molecular docking tool of AutoDock3.05 was evaluated for its ability to reproduce experimentally determined affinities of various sialic acid analogues toward hemagglutinin of influenza A virus. With the exception of those with a C6-modified glycerol side chain, the experimental binding affinities of most sialic acid analogues (C2, C4 and C5-subs...
In this study fragment-based drug design is combined with molecular docking simulation technique, to design databases of virtual sialic acid (SA) analogues with new substitutions at C2, C5 and C6 positions of SA scaffold. Using spaces occupied by C2, C5 and C6 natural moieties of SA when bound to hemagglutinin (HA) crystallographic structure, new f...
Questions
Questions (6)
Alsallam alaykom. I am using rdkit and py3dmol in pycharm, where I faced problem in making drawings visible.
it gives me for rdkit drawings:
<IPython.core.display.Image object>
and for py3dmol drawings gives nothing.
In jupyter everthing is going OK
the full code is provided below
import py3Dmol
import copy
from rdkit import Chem
from rdkit.Chem import Draw
from rdkit.Chem.Draw import IPythonConsole
from rdkit.Chem import AllChem
from rdkit.Chem import rdBase
from rdkit.Chem import rdMolAlign
from rdkit.Chem import rdMolDescriptors
import numpy as np
import streamlit as st
p=AllChem.ETKDGv3()
p.verbose=True
mols=[m for m in Chem.SDMolSupplier('cdk2.sdf') if m !=None] [:2]
for mol in mols:
mol.RemoveAllConformers()
hmols_1=[Chem.AddHs(m) for m in mols]
hmols_2=copy.deepcopy(hmols_1)
#generate 100 conformers per molcule
for mol in hmols_1:
AllChem.EmbedMultipleConfs(mol,100,p)
for mol in hmols_2:
AllChem.EmbedMultipleConfs(mol,100,p)
writer=Chem.SDWriter('hmols_1.sdf')
for mol in hmols_1:
writer.write(mol)
#import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
#import PIL as pl
#Draw.MolsToGridImage(mols)
#fig.show()
#from IPython.display import display, Image
Draw.MolsToGridImage(mols)
#IPythonConsole.display.display(fig)
#fig.show()
#.MolsToGridImage(mols)
#st.image(Draw._drawerToImage().show())
# %%
### assignign force field scores
crippen_contribs=[rdMolDescriptors._CalcCrippenContribs(mol) for mol in hmols_1]
crippen_ref_contrib=crippen_contribs[0]
crippen_prob_contribs=crippen_contribs[1:]
ref_mol1=hmols_1[0]
prob_mols_1=hmols_1[1:]
mmff_params=[AllChem.MMFFGetMoleculeProperties(mol) for mol in hmols_2]
mmff_ref_param=mmff_params[0]
mmff_prob_params=mmff_params[1:]
ref_mol2=hmols_2[0]
prob_mols_2=hmols_2[1:]
# %%
## allign using forcefield
p_crippen=py3Dmol.view(width=600, height=400)
p_crippen.addModel(Chem.MolToMolBlock(ref_mol1),'sdf')
crippen_score=[]
for idx, mol in enumerate(prob_mols_1):
tempscore=[]
for cid in range (100):
crippenO3A=rdMolAlign.GetCrippenO3A(mol,ref_mol1,crippen_prob_contribs[idx],crippen_ref_contrib,cid,0)
crippenO3A.Align()
tempscore.append(crippenO3A.Score())
best=np.argmax(tempscore)
p_crippen.addModel (Chem.MolToMolBlock(mol,confId=int(best)),'sdf')
crippen_score.append(tempscore[best])
#p_crippen.setStyle({'stick': {}})
p_crippen.render()
p_crippen
p_crippen.show()
How to do conformational search before DFT calculations in Gaussian WITHOUT using gmmx add-on.
I have tried using spartan and pcmodel but the conformation obtained cannot be used directly in DFT calculation; it gives error "no special actions if energy rises".
therefore, I tried using PM6 and AM1 semi-emiprical calculations before doing DFT but also gave errors "restarting incremental Fock formation" and "AX will form 1A0 Fock derivatives at one time"
I have problem with simulating pr-lig complex where ligand has halogens like Cl or Br.
by preparing itp files using CgenFF server or Charmm-gui , i get an atom type LP1 and LP2 connected to the halgen. which makes me suspicious about the result.
Should I keep or remove those strange atoms (LP1 and LP2) ?
should I use another way to prepare the itp files ?
I have 144 diffraction images for a crystal of high mosaicity about 2 and low resolution about 3.14.
the crystal has been prepared and soaked with ligand. I would like to solve the crystal structure looking merely for a substrate binding site.
I tried using IMosflm, however the results of integration showed that all reflections are partial and there is no full reflection at all.
Then I used scala from CCP4 to do 2D integration for partial reflections, then check the density map using molecular replacement (protein has been deposited in PDB) with Phoenix. I can Max have LLG 900 and TFZ of 11. I can only recognize coarse features like helices, however the map is not clear for many side chains as well as at the binding site.
Any suggestion to improve the results using parameters adjustment of iMosflm, Scala, Phoenix MR. OR even new suggested software.
I appreciate any suggestion.
thanks
Although it is familiar in molecular biology, I could not found it in literature.
Using QM/MM is known to stimulate bond formation and breaking, however, how to drag this reaction to take place in AMBER.
If I am to use the simplified bond formation and breaking force field (Reaxff), how to incorporate it into Amber?