Mohamed Fayad

• PhD
• Full Professor at SJSU Founder and CEO at AITG, Aeeh Press, and i-SOLE at AITG Inc Aeeh Press Inc i-SOLE inc SJSU

What is the existing concepts’ classification-Part-01?

What is the existing concepts’ classification-Part-01?

Art of Abstraction of Unified Word and its Concepts (Views, Masks, and Instances): Introduction We discovered over 50 discoveries, 300 innovations, and 100 cognitive knowledge, which generated over 450 questions per unified word to be answered. Every field of Knowledge depends on ABSTRACTIONS. Unfortunately, current abstractors could be doing better regarding the abstraction process and the type of abstractions because they are based mainly on tangibility and ignore other more essential conceptions. Fayad's Art of Abstraction (FAA) supports abstracting over 50 discoveries per word (Noun and noun phrase), 300 innovations, the generation of more than 100 cognitive knowledge, and Great value to the natural languages. The FAA can be used in both application and system developments. As a unique system, every word has more than 50 discoveries, including functional requirements, special non-functional requirements, stable and Unified design, contexts, challenges, constraints, applicability, measurability, and more. FAA led to unified, stable discoveries and included unlimited advantages. 1. Understand and appreciate our natural languages 2. The future of technology depends on these discoveries. 3. Unification of unified domain or unified word analysis of any field of Knowledge 4. Know how to generate stable and unified requirements and the ultimate design of any system. 5. Knowledge Unification 7. Limit and control maintenance problems 8. Explore and create a massive number of new systems 9. Generate better methodologies for developing unified and stable systems 10. Stop reinventing the wheels 11. Develop and executable self-manageable, self-adaptable, self, extendable, and self-configurable systems with unlimited applicability, reuse, and many more.

1. Our proposal aims to develop Adaptive Learning Units (ALUs) for a Unified Software Engineering Course, emphasizing Knowledge Patterns. We provide maps that outline a clear and concise path through the course content, including quizzes, exams, exercises, assignments, team projects, reading materials, and notes for each ALU. Although each course and map has a unique proposal, our primary focus remains on the Unified Software Engineering Course.

2. We are confident that our approach will yield the best results for your lifelong learning goals, ethics, knowledge, and applicability. Our expertise is unparalleled, and we are the best choice to guide you on this journey of learning and growth. Trust us, and let's get started today.

3. Our maps will highlight the "what" and "how-to" of the course, and we are confident that our approach will be effective and beneficial. We understand that different classes and maps require various proposals, but our focus in this lecture is the Unified Software Engineering Course.

4. We are excited about this proposal's possibilities and look forward to partnering with you on this exciting journey of learning and growth.

1. Software Stability Model (SSM) / Concurrent Software Engineering Model (CSEM)

2. Fayad's Art of Abstraction (FAA)

3. Unified Functional and Non-Functional Requirements

4. Unified and Ultimate Design

5. Unified Software Architecture on-Demand

6. Unified Immune Testing Environment

7. Unified Domain Analysis: Knowledge Map (UDA-KM)**

(a) Stable Analysis Patterns (SAPs)

(b) Stable Design Patterns (SDPs)

(c) Stable Architecture Patterns (SArchPs)

(d) Algorithms

(e) Unified Non-Functional Requirements

(f) Unified Domain Standard (UDS)

(g) Fayad's Unified Software Engines (FUSE)

(h) Unified Software Engineering Reuse (USER)

(i) Unified Word/Unified Domain Dictionary

(j) Industrial Objects (IOs) or Application Objects (AOs) Dictionary (Concepts)

1. Unified Word (UW)

2. Unified Word Engineering (UWE)

3. Fayad's Unified Modeling Language (F-UML)

4. Unified Software Project Management (USPM)

5. Unified Data Visualization Engine (UDVE)

6. Unified Business Rules (UBRs)

Any WORD or Domain Knowledge is an Art, Science, and Engineering.

Where any WORD (noun or noun phrase) and domain (any discipline) are used.

Rules

Rule One: Any WORD/Domain Contains

Morals/Ethics (60%),

Knowledge/Culture (30%),

and Work/Applications (10%).

Rule Two: Any WORD/Domain is an Art, Science, and Engineering Where Rule One matches Rule Two

Rule Three, the Art of Abstraction, is a Software Stability Model that achieves any WORD/Domain Knowledge and Unified and Stable Linguistic Engineering where Rule Three matches Rule One and Rule Two.

EXPLANATION (WORD/Domain).

(WORD/Domain). WORD Knowledge has more than 50 DISCOVERIES, 300 Innovations, and 100 Cognitive Information

In addition, Domain Knowledge has ten significant outcomes and innovations that will create ten tremendous contributions to human Knowledge, AND HERE A FEW OF THEM.

(1) Fayad's Art of Abstraction (FAA) (ART)

(2) Fayad's Software Stable Model (Fayad's SSM) or Concurrent Software Development Model (USDM) (ENGINEERING)

(3) Fayad's Unified Linguistic Engineering (Fayad's ULE) (SCIENCE)

Please see the details of the 9th Global Webinar here:

Fayad's Critical Look @ Existing SWE: Problems and Solutions

Is Software Engineering an Art, Science, and Engineering? Major Problematic Issues?

Part Two

OBJECTIVES

PROBLEMATIC CITATION (1 To 4)

CITATIONS' PROBLEMS (1 & 2)

CITATIONS' PROBLEMS (1 TO 8)

THE BIG QUESTION

CONCLUSION

DISCUSSION

PROBLEMATIC CITATION (1) In

Yingxu Wang. "Software Engineering Foundations: A Software Science

Perspective" Auerbach Publications, 8 August 2007 (1444 pages)." Wang

said that "Software engineering is an ideal testbed for existing theories

and methodologies in disciplines mentioned above in the book, from mathematics.

To cognitive informatics and from Science to sociology for two reasons:

(1) Software engineering is the latest and the

most complicated engineering branch that humankind has ever experienced, and

(2) Software engineering is a transdisciplinary field with a theoretical foundation and empirical applications. Excellent, the book treated software engineering as a science.

PROBLEMATIC CITATION (2) In the

gang of four (GoF) Book Erich Gamma, Richard Helm, Ralph Johnson, et al.

"Design Patterns: Elements of Reusable Object-Oriented Software,"

Addison-Wesley Professional, October 1994, and another huge number of

traditional analysis and design patterns books are programming languages where

they claim that Patterns are micro-architecture. Question: Where are the macro

and mini architectures?

PLEASE WATCH THE REST OF THE VIDEO

"السواد الأعظم من الكلمات التي لها بداية ونهاية لها هدف واحد، وبعض الكلمات لها هدفان، والنادر منها له ثلاثة أهداف"

يا للأسف، أي كلمة لها أهداف كثيرة، وكلها ناقصة او سلبية، أو لا تمثل الكلمة في أي شيء

هل تعرف ان أي صلاة لها هدف واحد فقط؟ ما هو؟

هل تعرف أن أي مشروع له هدف واحد فقط؟ ما هو؟

هل تعرف أن أي مناظرة لها هدف واحد فقط؟ ما هو؟

هل تعرف أن أي حساب له هدف واحد فقط؟ ما هو؟

هل تعرف أن أي ضرر له هدف واحد فقط؟ ما هو؟

هل تعرف أن أي دور له هدف واحد فقط؟ ما هو؟

هل تعرف أن أي رزق له هدفان فقط؟ ما هو؟

هل تعرف أن أي انسان له هدفان فقط؟ ما هو؟

هل تعرف أن أي خريطة له ثلاث اهداف فقط؟ ما هو؟

Invitations are extended to several companies to partner with us and as many professionals and academies to be part of this project, to provide endorsement and support letters for this project to be done.

In this Project, we will answer several important and challenging questions.

1) Are existing Human Rights rules and organizations effective? The answer is no.

2) Can HRs-FUSE exist without software development (SWD)?

The answer HRs-FUSE cannot exist without SWD.

3) Is it possible to build HRs-FUSE as an intelligent, unified multi-purpose social network engine that provides many ways for any party to report a complaint for one or more reasons with evidence? The answer is yes.

4) Can the HRs-FUSE overcome human rights challenges and the knowledge, capacity, commitment, and security gaps? The answer is yes.

5) Can the HRs-FUSE temporal and spatial analysis provinces of this complaint using Smart and Unified Content Mining, Unified Deep Learning, and Stable Visualization Techniques to look for any violation of human rights rules? The answer is yes

6) The HRs-FUSE is architected and designed to make it highly adaptable; separating concerns between functionality is exceptionally well done. All of this is possible since it builds on the foundation of the Software Stability Model (SSM). In addition, the HRs-FUSE design brings several added values, such as longevity, high investment returns, configurable, customizability, and much more.

Human Rights Fayad’s Unified Software Engine (HRs-FUSE) is an innovative, unified multi-purpose social network engine that

· Provides many ways for any party (Any Human) and (Any Organization, Any Country, and Any Political Party) and for any actor (Person, HW, SW, and Creature) to verify, utilize, collect, and analyze

· Reports a complaint for one or more reasons with evidence.

The HR-FUSE uses:

a) Data Visualization (DV-FUSE) that is Temporal and spatial analysis provinces of this complaint using Smart,

b) Content Mining (CM-FUSE),

c) Deep Learning (DL-FUSE), and to look for any violation of human rights rules.

The engine keeps track of different types of violations and categorizes and records the violation in many different logs, generating many different reports. The engine provides many different supports to their parties (users), such as advice on what to do, notifications of the responsible and authorized parties, consulting, and legal guidelines and actions.

The HRs-FUSE provides.

1) Complaint management:

2) Reason and evidence analysis,

3) True violation discovery and severity assessment,

4) Human right violation early warning and preventive measures,

5) human rights monitoring,

6) Risk identification, analysis, and assessment,

7) Solution scenarios generation, illustrate scenarios with different actors and parties and simulate their roles in any human rights violations,

8) Generate all the data needed to be analyzed, visualized, and animated and can be utilized in unlimited human rights violations at all levels worldwide.

The HRs-USE covers a large number of aspects or mechanisms focused on:

(1) Geographic aspects (combination of spatial data and temporal data), combined political and economic dimensions, right-based approaches, human rights violation dynamism, structural root causes of human rights violations,

(2) Understanding the roots of human rights violations, human security, and human rights, event data analysis (qualitative and qualitative), devising evidence-based peacebuilding and strategies, aid fostering long-term reconciliation and recovery, and others.

The HRs-FUSE generates enormous volumes of different types of data-driven from the aspects and mechanisms, such as spatial, temporal, views, analytical, political, economic, event-driven, behavioral, stack-holder data, and historical data. For example, Spatial data is the data or information that identifies or detects the geographic locations of various features and boundaries where human rights violation exists. Data can also be temporal because it is valid only for a certain extent and has an expiry date and time. Currently, most of the research on data mining in geospatial data takes the static view of geospatial phenomena, which only captures one aspect of data, i.e., spatiality.

The HRs-FUSE extracts cull knowledge and skills from spatiotemporal data that will help us better predict spatial processes or events over time. The HRs-Engine also extracts other data, such as stakeholder behavior data, economic data, and political data will shed an understanding of the conflict situation and predicate possible resolutions.

To formulate a large-scale prototype, including its Knowledge Map and Architecture for the proposed system.

The core knowledge forms an engine called ‘HRs-FUSE that can be extended, adapted to different needs, and customized.

Furthermore, HRs-FUSE has many additional properties, such as

(a) Runs online all the time like search engines,

(b) Provides unlimited spatial, temporal, and spatiotemporal applications,

(c) Has unlimited capabilities, such as algorithms and mechanism,

(d) Does not require prior investment needed,

(e) Has provisions of high security and privacy,

(f) Handles unlimited number of Users/Usages,

(g) Limits cost per usage (Royalty, Subscriptions, and Memberships),

(h) Handles unlimited number of applications (RUNS) in the same time,

(i) Shows a level of needs and demand for a giving technology (Evaluation of Technology),

(j) Available all the time for usage online ranges from single users (individuals) and large enterprises,

(k) Has no maintenance and license fees – no prior fees for using the engine,

(l) Runs multiple algorithms on a complex aspects’ dataset and provide comparative results,

(m) Easy to adapt, customize, extend with many different kernels, such as visualization, animation, unified deep learning, etc, and

(n) collect unlimited types of data and contents including live data on the spot, such as videos, pictures, environmental conditions, recordings, and others

To develop an accessible, web-based portal/interface to HRs-FUSE, a single-entry interface.

It takes Any Log or Any Content (such as a. file), which contains different types of human rights violations data and contents to be mined, analyzed, assessed, visualized, and animated and shows one or more logs that contain the data results.

In addition, the web-based provides hidden pages that will track and show several trends about the number of users, number of members, number of subscribers, and number of daily, weekly, and monthly transactions, with meaningful curves. Also, the use of mechanisms’ frequency and durations as bases to compare different mechanisms to find:

Aspects, mechanisms’ findings, and suggested actions to be taken – Use tables and curves to compare the frequency and duration of all the mechanisms and to compare data results and show the similarities and differences of using different aspects and mechanisms.

Collect and document the HRs-FUSE core knowledge (analysis, design, architectural) patterns. We plan to collect, analyze, and document all the stable core knowledge patterns of the entire knowledge map based on software stability and new linguistic Engineering innovation.

This Project aims to develop an intelligent, timeless, stable, and open unified architecture for a multi-purpose human rights violations (data and contents) management engine, where both unified and stable classes (aspects), and application classes are developed based on separately. Furthermore, their composition is formally supported to ensure correctness. This separation of concerns allows for reusability and enables the building of software systems for HRs-FUSE that are stable, reusable, adaptable, and extendable.

Invitations are extended to several companies to partner with us and as many professionals and academies to be part of this project, to provide endorsement and support letters for this project to be done.

The saying “the right person in the right place” is considered the biggest deception in all scientific, humanitarian, and religious fields throughout the world in general, and in Egypt and the Arab countries in particular.

I suggest replacing it with the appropriate role in the appropriate place not only for the person but also for legal parties and industries, such as projects, senior positions, innovations, leaders of countries, famous personalities, thinkers, philosophers, clerics, etc., even in designs and systems engineering.

this saying and its application against all divine and man-made religions. How? And why?

Applying God’s law on earth.

One of the most important roles of man (human rights) in life is to implement what God has revealed to His prophets and messengers of laws and rulings that are suitable for application in every time and place. One of his duties is also to ensure their application and care by establishing limits, spreading virtues, and enjoining with good and forbidding evil. Religions (Judaism, Christianity, Islam) as religions contributed to establishing awareness of human freedom and his right to a free and dignified life, and liberating him from all restrictions, as these religions with a single source made man the orbit of the universe and the focus of honor in his human capacity. Consider the words of God Almighty: (We created man in the best of manners * then We returned him to the lowest of the low) and His saying:) (So, he inspired her with her immorality and piety) And I do not absolve myself. Indeed, the soul is inclined to do evil unless my Lord has mercy. Indeed, my Lord is Forgiving, Most Merciful (53)) Great verses. These great verses describe good and evil and represent the roles that the soul plays and that man plays.

Therefore, the roles that you play or represent are very important and forget your personality anywhere: in your home. In religions, and in all fields, roles are part of the system.

Unfortunately, most humans master evil roles in different ways through their actions and we will present those roles and their execution through heritage, history, science, and knowledge.

The good roles are not well known by most people, and we will make every effort to draw them and clarify their application from the sources of heavenly sciences and beliefs, and the reasons for our failure to know them, not for criticism, but for treatment and return to the good roles and distance from satanic and evil roles.

We will reveal evil roles and show how to perform good roles with examples and evidence, and we will allow you to participate in many discussions, dialogues, and live broadcasts, God willing.

What is Fayad's Unified Software Engine (FUSE)?

A fuse is a standard device found in any electrical system. Examples include a home, an automobile, a power tool, and many more. The fuse itself is standard and comes in a relatively small number of variants about the required application and the amperage or load the fuse is expected to carry. For a particular application and load, fuses are typically interchangeable. If the FUSE fails, the circuit is open and will not conduct electricity. Plug in a new fuse, and the circuit is complete and resumes operation.

These software programs have insidious problems, such as Lack of reliability; Lack of stability/unstable; Excessively costly (billions) to build, purchase and operate; Brittle; Software projects that continue to fail at an alarming rate; hardware dependency; maintenance nightmare; etc.

The Ultimate Alternative is Fayad's Unified Software Engine (FUSE).

1) Capture the art, science, and engineering of the engine.

2) Capture and develop the engine's unified and stable functional and non-functional requirements.

3) Develop the ultimate design and unified software architecture on-demand of the engine;

4) The new and improved next generation of solutions.

5) Built on any common core infrastructure, e.g., SaaS infrastructures.

6) Facilitate on-demand, highly reusable architectures and applications with rapid times and open space to the market, starting from requirements to final product delivery.

7) Incorporating qualities such as scalability, adaptability, maintainability, unlimited reuse, and applicability, and many more.

8) Stop building instance-oriented systems and reinventing the wheels; 9) Prevent hardware dependencies, etc.

Our motivations are to:

1) Highlight all existing problems and pitfalls of existing software engineering aspects (more than 60 sub-aspects).

2). Address and discuss a critical look at each existing software engineering aspect, such as methodologies, modeling, domain analysis, functional and non-functional requirements, software design, software architecture, economics, research, teaching, etc.

3) Point out the many nonsense issues of existing software engineering in each aspect

4) Research and state that existing software engineering is limited to programming and business as usual.

5) Address and apply discoveries and innovations in each aspect of software engineering and establish an actual stable and unification software engineering (USWE)

6) Submit funded research proposals for each aspect listed in 1) to 5)

7) Seeking Letters of support and endorsements from Software Engineering Leaders, well-known academics, practitioners, Professionals, and Companies in Software Industries.

The goals are to:

1) True unification of Software Engineering

2) Software Engineering in all aspects

Many software engineering practitioners and academics are presenting many false claims about SWE. All that they see and know is the programming aspects of software engineering, and they are missing the essential stages of SWE:

What? No one knows the “What” and how to specify the “What.”

1) The Problem Space (Analysis) – Understanding the problem and representing the “WHAT.”

We discuss “the functional and non-functional requirements, the responsibility, the collaboration of the classes, and the testing aspects within the modeling aspects of these problem properties.” Unfortunately, this Problem Space is ignored in teaching, training, research, and practice. Do you know why? Because no one knows how to specify it.

“How-To”?

2) The Solution Space (Design, Architecture, Coding) – Creativity is the solution and represents the “HOW-TO.” This phase has many problems: Many solutions would lead to different modeling techniques.

3) The majority of research in SWE IS USELESS. Examples are all over the solution space, with many different modeling and architecture techniques and too many other tools and languages. So look at this statement carefully – evidence exists to show the misunderstanding of the Problem Space; the outcome of the Solution Space is one of the following alternatives:

a) Useless Development and cancelation of the Development – Billions of $s and

b) Software systems have maintenance nightmares, which cause a lot of system failures and cancellations after 5 to 6 years.

Unfortunately, in practice, coding represents 95% of the software development of any system.

(Use Aspects)

In this work, we will examine and critically look at the many issues and provide solutions to them: SWE Research Issues, Economic Issues, Teaching and Training aspects, Modeling Issues, Development Issues, Software Methodology Issues, Software Aspects, critical current research on SWE, etc. Research agencies and organizations, societies, and associations of magazines, journals, media, conferences, and Professional Societies do not promote innovations in SWE. Why? All the editorial boards and conferences’ committees meet the following quotes: “The one who lacks the thing cannot give it to others” and “Collective fear stimulates herd instinct and tends to produce ferocity toward those who are not regarded as members of the herd.” ― Bertrand Ruse.

Invitations are extended to as many professionals and academies as possible to present specific issues and solutions or participate in panels / Discussion Groups on Fayad’s Critical issues on SWE.

Major Findings

1) Large categorial list of critical issues in SWE, such as SWE lifecycle & Methodologies, SWE Research, SWE Teaching, SWE Economics, SWE Innovations, Domain Analysis, SWE Modeling, SWE Courses, SWE Books, SWE Projects, SWE Systems, and SWE Applications, SWE Quality Factors (Applications), Artificial Intelligence, and Smart Systems, SWE Standards, Software science, etc.

2) Innovative solutions are provided for each issue.

https://youtu.be/aaY7RcFYSeE