
Martin Černý- Master of Science
- PhD Student at Masaryk University
Martin Černý
- Master of Science
- PhD Student at Masaryk University
Researcher and PhD student at CEITEC MU/NCBR M, in the Protein Structure and Dynamics group of prof. Lukáš Žídek, PhD.
About
7
Publications
4,081
Reads
How we measure 'reads'
A 'read' is counted each time someone views a publication summary (such as the title, abstract, and list of authors), clicks on a figure, or views or downloads the full-text. Learn more
83
Citations
Introduction
Protein Structure and Dynamics of Cellular Transcriptional Machinery
Current institution
Additional affiliations
Education
September 2015 - June 2018
Publications
Publications (7)
Bacterial transcription regulation is critical for adaptation and survival. CarD is an essential transcription factor in mycobacteria involved in regulation of gene expression. We searched for CarD interaction partners in the model organism Mycobacterium smegmatis and identified two proteins: ApeB (MSMEG_5828) and an uncharacterized protein, which...
In mycobacteria, σA is the primary sigma factor. This essential protein binds to RNA polymerase (RNAP) and mediates transcription initiation of housekeeping genes. Our knowledge about this factor in mycobacteria is limited. Here, we performed an unbiased search for interacting partners of Mycobacterium smegmatis σA. The search revealed a number of...
Securing new sources of renewable energy and achieving national self-sufficiency in natural gas have become increasingly important in recent times. The study described in this paper focuses on three geologically diverse underground gas reservoirs (UGS) that are the natural habitat of methane-producing archaea, as well as other microorganisms with w...
The monitoring of trace metals in microbial cells is relevant for diagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB) represent an important factor in the IBD development. The content of trace metals in bacterial cells may reflect the functioning of the enzyme systems and the environmental impact on the occurrence of SRB....
Background: Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs) are multifactorial illnesses of the intestine, to which microorganisms are contributing. Among the contributing microorganisms, sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB) are suggested to be involved in the process of bowel inflammation due to the production of hydrogen sulfide (H2S) by dissimilatory sulfate redu...
With growing demand for clean and cheap energy resources, biogas production is emerging as an ideal solution, as it provides relatively cheap and clean energy, while also tackling the problematic production of excessive organic waste from crops and animal agriculture. Behind this process stands a variety of anaerobic microorganisms, which turn orga...
Questions
Questions (5)
Dear colleagues,
I recently jumped in this field and I was trying to recreate a study, using absolute qPCR quantification for comparison between the abundance of certain bacterial specie in two groups of samples. After optimization of my protocol, I ran 2-step qPCR on 96-well plates with samples in triplicates and I ran the reaction three times in order to get the variance.
I am going for absolute quantification, with a standard curve with Ef ranging from 1,979 to 1,891 (98,95 to 94,5 %) with LunaMix from NEB. However, even though I used the same protocol, my values have a big variance between the plates. I would like to normalize them to use them in the same data set in order to have a more robust analysis. The ratio between the diseased and healthy group (16/8 at each 95well plate) is the same at each plate.
Is there a way to normalize the data in order to use them in one dataset? Also, if you are just looking, it is necessary to have more than 1 reaction apart from technical replicates?
I will much appreciate your help.
Sincerely, Martin
Dear fellow researchers,
I have stumbled upon a rather trivial thing during writing down my thesis. I have obtained several strains from DSMZ which provides a rather wide list of cultivation media, which fits most of the growth parameters of their provided strains. The DSMZ admits that cultivation in these media ensures growth and as such, the media recipes are freely accessible from the internet. During my studies, I have slightly adjusted the given media, but I want to properly cite them.
I know, this might be trivial, but I want to ensure that I credit everybody for their work.
All that is at their page, is the following " © 2017 DSMZ GmbH - All rights reserved " at the end of each medium.
My suggestion is that the medium should be cited as follows:
...the cultivation of the pure strain was undergone in the medium ABC derived from medium 823 (823. HALOBACULUM GOMORRENSE MEDIUM, © 2007 DSMZ GmbH)...
or perhaps...
...in the medium ABC derived from medium 823 (© 2007 DSMZ GmbH)...
I would be thankful for any replies, suggestions or experiences regarding this problem.
Have a nice day fellow scientists,
Since me and my supervisor weren´t able to determine what is going on with my media, I am seeking help among more experienced and skilled. I will be thankful for every kind of help, which may give me a bit of insight on where I was doing mistakes.
I will have various questions with photos which may help with description of my problems. I am really sorry for my grammar as my language skills are not as advanced as they should be.
First, the media no 119a (DSMZ http://www.dsmz.de/microorganisms/medium/pdf/DSMZ_Medium119.pdf)
I am having this problems for about the month and half, since the winter begun. We are maintaining 21 degrees of Celsius in laboratory, so this may not play role. Whenever I am working with my cultures, I am working in the laminar box or outside, always with the burner working nearby.
- I am preparing this medium as described in the link up to 1 L of volume to the sterilized Schott bottle while gassing the liquid with N2/CO2 whole time. After the first process, I added the reducing agents - L-cysteine and H2S, with pH maintained around pH = 7,05 and redox potential of -300 mV. The medium was able to sustain this condition for whole month as part of the test. The resazurin solution was used as anoxic indicator.
- After the preparation I dispense medium into 150 mL serum bottles, also sterilized prior to the use. The volume of the media inside is approximately 20 mL and all actions are accompanied with gassing by N2/CO2. The atmosphere in the serum vial is then flushed and exchanged for H2/CO2 (5:95), closed with the butyl rubber stopper and sealed with aluminium caps. In this condition I store them in the dark at laboratory temperature.
- After a day I observed that almost 60% of my media turned whitish or pinkish with white haze and white spongy-like precipitation. Others seemed ok. The pH dropped to 5,8 - 6,2 and ε renged from -30 mV to 20 mV. Also a distinct acidic smell appeared when I opened the vials. (Picture 1 and 2)
I´ve never witnessed this condition before, since I am preparing the medium, so I don´t know what may be going on.
Also, after inoculating the vials with my cultures, the medium turned white after 15 minutes, with precipitation containing what I believe are lysed cells, since I was unable to see any living cells on the native preparate, nor on the Gram. (I was working with DSMZ cultures of Methanobrevibacter smithii and Methanospirillum hungatei, inoculating 1 mL via pregassed syringes.)
This weekend I was working on the medium again, but we had different (smaller Volume) gas bomb containing the H2/CO2 (5:95). The number of failed media went bellow 20% but there are some with the whitish haze.
So my hypothesis is, that since I can´t afford the oxygen scrubber, it might be contaminated by the oxygen or something, since the problem introduced after the bomb was low and started running out. But I am not sure, because I´ve never had such problem before, working with anaerobic media.
Another topic is cultivation of the anaerobes themselves.
I wanted to ask what are the most frequent anaerobic or facultative anaerobic contaminants during the work with anaerobes. Since I am unable to isolate and sequenate the samples at the moment due to the finances, the information would come in handy.
I was working with rather-pure cultures with possible minor contaminations. I processed the cultures with antibiotics (Vancomycin+Clindamycin) and ended with what u can see in the picture no. 3.
The picture is 1 mL filtrate stained with DAPI seem to contain the Methanospirillum itself with something representing round cells, sometimes forming pairs. I am unable to recognize the source, or the contaminant itself which may be some kind of methanogen as well.
Are there any handy and fast techniques to prevent it, or to identify the methanogens (I assume I may use the fluorescence microscopy by Doddema and Voegels 1978) which I may use in the laboratory.
Thank you very much for your help and time, I will be grateful for anything.
Martin Černý
Bc. student at the University of Masaryk
Good day,
Does anybody know, where can I get a peak into this publication? I found, that the Sydney library has those, but they are unable to share it via librarian sharing program.
Is there any other chance, where can I get this manual?
Anaerobe laboratory manual : by the staff of the Anaerobe Laboratory, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University ... / 4 th ed. by Lillian V. Holdeman and W.E.C. Moore. 1977
Thank you very much for your help.
Hello,
I am currently testing various methanogenic mediums for growth of methanogenic archaea, but the MM medium keeps failing to create a blackish sediment of Na2S in the solution after the preparations. Instead it creates milk-like haze in the solution with white precipitation on the base.
I am preparing medium in the flask under anoxic condition of CO2/H2 (g) atmosphere with the N2 (g) atmosphere of the other solution.
I have checked the temperature of the solution prior to adition of Na2S if it was cool enough, I have tackled the pH with 0,1 M NaOH solution, or I left it unchanged and I´ve regulated it after completing it.
I´ve been working on the MM medium for some time and I´ve never been adjusting pH or watched the temperature of the solution. I also made a new solution of Na2S and managed to get a new, pure substance, but nothing has changed.
Dis somebody have this issue with MM medium preparation? If yes, please, help me with this step, thus I can continue in use of this medium for cultivation.