Koen A. Dijkstra

Koen A. Dijkstra
The Chinese University of Hong Kong | CUHK · Department of Marketing

PhD in Social psychology

About

15
Publications
4,504
Reads
How we measure 'reads'
A 'read' is counted each time someone views a publication summary (such as the title, abstract, and list of authors), clicks on a figure, or views or downloads the full-text. Learn more
92
Citations
Citations since 2016
10 Research Items
71 Citations
2016201720182019202020212022051015
2016201720182019202020212022051015
2016201720182019202020212022051015
2016201720182019202020212022051015
Additional affiliations
November 2017 - present
Independent researcher
Position
  • Researcher
October 2015 - October 2017
The Chinese University of Hong Kong
Position
  • Research Associate
September 2013 - March 2014
University of Leeds
Position
  • Lecturer

Publications

Publications (15)
Article
Full-text available
Continuing investing in a failing plan (i.e., the sunk-cost fallacy) is a common error that people are inclined to make when making decisions. It is impossible to get resources back that already have been invested. Hence, economic theory implies that decision makers’ decisions should only be guided by future gains and losses. According to the liter...
Data
SPSS Syntax Study 4. (SPS)
Data
SPSS Syntax Study 2. (SPS)
Data
SPSS Syntax Study 3. (SPS)
Data
SPSS Syntax Study 1. (SPS)
Article
Full-text available
Intuition is associated with a global processing style, whereas deliberation is associated with a local processing style. Drawing on previous research on the effects of decisional fit on the subjective value attached to chosen alternatives, we examined the possibility that a fit between processing style and decision mode results in greater subjecti...
Research
Full-text available
UNPUBLISHED MANUSCRIPT on moderating effects of processing style on judgmental anchoring
Article
Full-text available
In the present study, we provide direct evidence for effects of global versus local processing on responsiveness to and reliance on affective information in judgement and decision-making. Results of Experiments 1 and 2 showed an increased responsiveness to affective stimuli among participants in a global processing mode. Experiment 3 showed similar...
Article
Full-text available
What produces better judgments: deliberating or relying on intuition? Past research is inconclusive. We focus on the role of expertise to increase understanding of the effects of judgment mode. We propose a framework in which expertise depends on a person's experience with and knowledge about a domain. Individuals who are relatively experienced but...
Article
Full-text available
Decisions and judgments made after deliberation can differ from expert opinion and be more regretted over time than intuitive judgments and decisions. We investigated a possible underlying process of this phenomenon, namely global versus local processing style. We argue that deliberation induces a local processing style. This processing style narro...
Article
Full-text available
Vertrouwen op intuïtie kan leiden tot een beter oordeel dan het afwegen van voor- en nadelen, zo blijkt uit onderzoek van Koen Dijkstra. Hij laat zien dat de manier waarop mensen hun oordeel vormen effect heeft op de manier waarop ze informatie verwerken. De aandacht van mensen die hun oordeel beredeneren is gericht op details; ze baseren hun oorde...

Questions

Question (1)
Question
I have conducted a within-subjects bootstrap analysis using the MEMORE SPSS syntax by Amanda Montoya (see the ‘MEMORE for SPSS documentation’; http://afhayes.com/public/memore.pdf). When running the syntax I get p-values for Total effect and Direct effect of the model, but no p-value for the indirect effect.
I am not very experienced in running bootstrap analyses. Am I doing something wrong, or how do I get the p-value associated with the indirect effect of X on Y through M?
Many thanks!

Network

Cited By