Javier Luis López

Advanced Ignition SL

Due to the shifting ocean currents, the planet could be thrown off balance, altering the angle of rotation, and even causing the axis to shift, plunging us into chaos. In reality, it doesn't take much energy to achieve this. Indeed, it is known that the magnetic north has shifted, and possibly with it, the geographic north. If this is the case, the risk of climate change is far greater than we ever anticipated.

I think it should be studied. To make more dramatic and center attention, I have draw a picture where the North pole is located close to Monaco

Wind turbines extract a lot of energy, about 30-35%, that passes through.

Now they are building a lot of them, more and more powerful.

Change wind trajectory is easy, if a lot of obstacles is in its trajectory, it goes to upper layer

Stop wind rises A LOT temperatures, as happens in cities with tall buildings

Wind also decrease water temperature when passing over it. In Malaga now the sea water temperture in August reach 30ºC, that is more than 10º over previous years and wind do not refresh at night

And at last, wind distributes the temperature avoiding large differences

The breakdown voltage is defined by the Paschen equation and graph.

The ionization percentage is defined by the Saha equation (and other mechanisms).

However, the Paschen theory only works up to 1400ºC, as beyond that point, the gas gets ionized, and the breakdown voltage is reduced.

On the other hand, I suppose that the Saha equation provides the percentage of ionization, which should be higher if the plasma is subjected to a high voltage.

Is there a formula that describes the dependence of breakdown voltage on temperature?

Is there a formula that provides the percentage of ionization of plasma subjected to a high DC voltage?

In the discharge through a low pressure plasma, when reaching a limit of the current it can be stopped because all electrons goes to an electrode and the ions to the opposite.

What is the pressure limit?

In the following link, it started the discussion in an Spanish forum:

This is the proposed experiment. It can be seen that it is easy to build, as shown in the attached image.

Basically, it consists of a comparison using two electroscopes to separate the two metal plates by the exact same degrees. The purpose is to determine if the same voltage but with opposite signs is required to calculate the total electric voltage of the entire Earth.

We can then calculate the Earth's charge, Q, using the formula Q = C * V, where C represents the Earth's capacitance given by 4piEo*r. Here, r denotes the Earth's radius, which is 6371 km. Therefore, we obtain a value of 709 microfarads.

I must measure temperature and ion density of 3-10eV plasma of hydrogen and boron at 5-50 pascals

As long as there are magnetic and electric fields, I can not install sensors inside

The first ionization energy of Hydrogen and Boron are 13.9eV and 8.3eV that corresponds to 91nm and 149nm, but there are no sensors for that frequencies

Accordingly Wikipedia, books, and papers the magnetic pressure is B^2/2mu.

I think it is wrong, because not take into account the plasma speed.

We could obtain it for almost static magnetic field formula of movement of particles in a magnetic field, that happens usually if the magnetic field is under 10khz:

(H is the height of the plasma column, as lower height, more pressure)

It seems that it is a forbidden question

Accordingly Stefan Boltzman equation, plasma radiation is 5.6704e-8*T^4 in Watts/m2

So if we have a plasma temperature of 150 million kelvin, we have radiation of 3e25 watts/m2, which must be more than the power of the whole world.

So perhaps if the density is very low, and plasma is magnetized the radiation is lower.

Does anybody have real data on plasma radiation?