Jack Kane

Jack Kane

About

19
Publications
8,319
Reads
How we measure 'reads'
A 'read' is counted each time someone views a publication summary (such as the title, abstract, and list of authors), clicks on a figure, or views or downloads the full-text. Learn more
876
Citations
Citations since 2017
16 Research Items
848 Citations
2017201820192020202120222023050100150200250
2017201820192020202120222023050100150200250
2017201820192020202120222023050100150200250
2017201820192020202120222023050100150200250

Publications

Publications (19)
Article
Full-text available
Purpose To assess the accuracy of intraocular lens (IOL) power formulas modified specifically for patients with keratoconus (Holladay 2 with keratoconus adjustment and Kane keratoconus formula) compared with normal IOL power formulas (Barrett Universal 2, Haigis, Hoffer Q, Holladay 1, Holladay 2, Kane, and SRK/T). Design Retrospective consecutive...
Article
Purpose To compare the accuracy of toric intraocular lens (IOL) power formulas (Abulafia-Koch, Barrett, EVO 2.0, the new Holladay 2 with total SIA, Kane and Næser-Savini) using a large database of toric IOL refractive outcomes. Design Retrospective consecutive case series. Participants 823 eyes of 823 patients who had a toric IOL inserted during...
Article
Purpose: To compare the accuracy of intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation formula predictions (Barrett Universal II, EVO 2.0, Haigis, Hill-RBF 2.0, Holladay 1, Holladay 2, Hoffer Q, Kane, Olsen and SRK/T) when using the Alcon SA60AT IOL of 30 or greater diopter (D) power. Setting: Kaiser Permanente, California, USA. Design: Multicenter retr...
Article
The refractive outcome of cataract surgery is influenced by the choice of IOL power formula and the accuracy of the various devices used to measure the eye (including intraoperative aberrometry). This review aimed to cover the breadth of literature over the previous 10 years focusing on 3 main questions: 1) What IOL power formulas are currently ava...
Article
Purpose: To assess the accuracy of the following intraocular lens (IOL) power formulas: Barrett True-K No History (BTKNH), Emmetropia Verifying Optical 2.0 Post Myopic LASIK/PRK (EVO 2.0), Haigis-L, American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery (ASCRS) average, and Shammas, designed for patients who have undergone previous myopic refractive...
Article
Full-text available
Purpose: To compare the refractive outcome prediction accuracy between conventional (CCS) and femtosecond laser assisted (FLACS) cataract surgery techniques using optimized lens constants for modern intraocular lens (IOL) formulas. Patients and methods: Our retrospective, comparative, interventional case series, compared data from 196 eyes under...
Article
Purpose To compare the accuracy of artificial intelligence formulas (Kane formula and Radial Basis Function [RBF] 2.0) and other formulas, including the original and modified Wang-Koch (MWK) adjustment formulas for Holladay 1 (H1-MWK) and SRK/T (SRK/T-WK and SRK/T-MWK), the Barrett Universal II (BUII), the emmetropia-verifying optical (EVO), and th...
Article
Full-text available
Purpose: To investigate the accuracy of intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation formulas using swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT). Methods: Eyes with biometry measurement by IOLMaster 700 (Carl Zeiss Meditec AG), uncomplicated phacoemulsification, and IOL implantation were enrolled in this retrospective study. Newly released art...
Article
Use of the flanged intrascleral haptic fixation technique for insertion of an intraocular lens in the setting of lost capsular support provides predictable refractive outcomes and is a promising alternative to anterior chamber intraocular lenses.
Article
Purpose To compare the accuracy of new/updated methods of IOL power calculation (Kane, Hill 2.0, Holladay 2 with new axial length adjustment) to that of established methods (Barrett Universal 2, Olsen, Haigis, Holladay 1, Hoffer Q and SRK/T). Setting Bristol Eye Hospital, University Hospitals Bristol NHS, Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK Design: ret...
Article
Full-text available
Objective To compare the accuracy of a new intraocular lens (IOL) power formula (Kane formula) with existing formulas using IOLMaster, predominantly model 3, biometry (measures variables axial length, keratometry and anterior chamber depth) and optimised lens constants. To compare the accuracy of three new or updated IOL power formulas (Kane, Hill-...
Article
Purpose: To evaluate the accuracy of 3 new methods for intraocular lens (IOL) power selection (Hill-Radial Basis Function [Hill-RBF] method, FullMonte method, and the Ladas Super Formula) compared with that of the Holladay 1 and Barrett Universal II formulas. Setting: Ophthalmology Department, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia. Design: Ret...
Article
Purpose: To assess the accuracy of 7 intraocular lens (IOL) power formulas (Barrett Universal II, Haigis, Hoffer Q, Holladay 1, Holladay 2, SRK/T, and T2) using IOLMaster biometry and optimized lens constants. Setting: Public hospital ophthalmology department. Design: Retrospective case series. Methods: Data from patients having uneventful c...
Article
Full-text available
Fingolimod is the first effective oral agent in widespread use for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (MS), but it can cause macular edema (ME) as an uncommon complication. ME may be mild and asymptomatic, but it can also produce visual impairment. The mechanism of fingolimod-associated ME (FAME) is thought to be through sphingosine-1-phosphate...

Network

Cited By