Ilanit Simantov-Nachlieli

Ilanit Simantov-Nachlieli
  • PhD
  • Senior Researcher at Tel Aviv University

About

24
Publications
5,054
Reads
How we measure 'reads'
A 'read' is counted each time someone views a publication summary (such as the title, abstract, and list of authors), clicks on a figure, or views or downloads the full-text. Learn more
410
Citations
Introduction
I am currently a senior lecturer in the field of organizational behavior at the Coller School of Management, Tel Aviv University, Israel. I completed my PhD in Social Psychology at Tel Aviv University in 2016 and joined the Faculty of Management in 2019. My research interests include promoting pro-social behavior among parties to a conflict or negotiation, employee helping behaviors, trust, agency as a fundamental human need, pay transparency in organizations.
Current institution
Tel Aviv University
Current position
  • Senior Researcher

Publications

Publications (24)
Article
Despite the growing availability of algorithm-augmented work, algorithm aversion is prevalent among employees, hindering successful implementations of powerful artificial intelligence (AI) aids. Applying a social comparison perspective, this article examines the adverse effect of employees’ high performance ranking on their preimplementation attitu...
Article
Full-text available
Taking a follower’s perspective on leadership and contributing to the new research stream on behaviors conducive to its emergence, we examined how distinct types of instrumental (task focused) helping—autonomy- versus dependency-helping—affected recipients’ support for their helpers’ leadership. Based on the literature on employees’ needs for auton...
Article
Reputations play a pivotal role in everyday life, and having a good reputation is deemed a highly valuable currency in the social world. While much of the reputation literature insufficiently distinguishes between varying types of good (or “cooperative”) reputations – e.g., sociable versus honest, here we review recent research pointing to their di...
Article
Full-text available
Grounded on uncertainty management theory, the current research examines the role of employee justice perceptions in explaining the distinct effects of two forms of pay transparency—process versus outcome pay transparency—on counterproductive workplace behavior (CWB). Study 1, a field study of 321 employees, revealed that process pay transparency i...
Article
Building upon the ability, benevolence, and integrity model of trustworthiness, we examine the impact of three corresponding, commendable negotiator reputations– proficient, friendly, and honest– on deception in negotiation. We primarily differentiate between honest and friendly reputations, which are both seemingly cooperative and often tangled in...
Article
Competitive victimhood denotes group members' efforts to establish that their ingroup has suffered greater injustice than an adversarial outgroup. Previous research in contexts of structural inequality has stressed the role of the need to defend the ingroup's moral identity, rather than the need for power, in leading advantaged and disadvantaged gr...
Article
Full-text available
Guided by the needs-based model, we explored how individual differences in system justification predict group-members' needs in response to information about group-based disparities. Across two studies (N = 819), we found that among disadvantaged-group members (LGBTIQ* individuals/women) system justification was negatively related to need for power...
Preprint
Guided by the needs-based model, we explored how individual differences in system justification predict group members’ needs in response to information about group-based disparities. Across two studies (N=819), we found that among disadvantaged-group members (LGBTIQ* individuals/women) system justification was negatively related to need for power....
Article
Full-text available
Members of conflicting groups are motivated to restore their ingroup's agency, leading to anti-social tendencies against the outgroup. The present research tested the hypothesis that affirming conflicting groups' agency would increase their members' mutual pro-sociality. The effectiveness of agency-affirmation was demonstrated in three contexts of...
Chapter
Groups involved in conflicts characterised by mutual transgressions experience threats to both their agency (i.e. the ability to influence and exert control over outcomes) and moral image. However, the motivation of conflicting group members to restore their agency translates into greater vengeful, antisocial behaviour against their outgroup, where...
Article
Conflicting parties experience threats to both their agency and morality, but the experience of agency-threat exerts more influence on their behavior, leading to relationship-destructive tendencies. Whereas high-commitment relationships facilitate constructive tendencies despite the conflict, we theorized that in low-commitment relationships, affir...
Article
Based on recent extensions of the needs-based model of reconciliation, we argue that in conflicts characterized by mutual transgressions, such as the Israeli– Palestinian conflict, group members prioritize their agency-related over morality-related needs. Optimistically, however, two studies conducted among Israeli Jews (Study 1) and West Bank Pale...
Chapter
According to Bar-Tal’s theorizing (Bar-Tal, Am Behav Sci 50:1430–1453, 2007; Bar-Tal, Intractable conflicts: Psychological foundations and dynamics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013) societies involved in intractable conflicts develop a collective fear orientation which becomes embedded in these societies’ ethos. Due to this basic orient...
Article
Members of conflicting groups often engage in ‘competitive victimhood’, that is, they are motivated to gain acknowledgment that their ingroup is the conflict’s ‘true’ victim. The present study found that compared with a control group, Israeli Jews and Palestinians reassured that their ingroup had won the victim status showed increased willingness t...
Article
Members of conflicting groups often engage in ‘competitive victimhood’, that is, they are motivated to gain acknowledgment that their ingroup is the conflict’s ‘true’ victim. The present study found that compared with a control group, Israeli Jews and Palestinians reassured that their ingroup had won the victim status showed increased willingness t...
Article
Full-text available
This research examined the effects of structural conditions on perceptions of and responses to an apology offered by an advantaged majority group to a disadvantaged minority group. We used the dramatic regional changes of the Arab Spring to manipulate the instability of status relations between Israeli Arabs and Jews. In two studies, we found that...
Article
Full-text available
Victimized versus perpetrating individuals or groups are known to experience enhanced needs for empowerment or acceptance, respectively. The present research examined the emotional needs and consequent anti- and prosocial behaviors (e.g., vengefulness vs. helpfulness) of individuals or groups serving both as victims and perpetrators simultaneously...
Article
Full-text available
Previous theories concerning the “Big Two” dimensions have focused on people’s perceptions and judgments of various social targets. The research presented in this article extends current theorizing by shedding light on how the targets of these judgments respond, in terms of motivational outcomes, to being perceived as high or lowon agency or commun...

Network

Cited By