Haque Mobassir Imtiyazul Haque Shaikh

Verified

Haque Mobassir verified their affiliation via an institutional email.

Learn more

Verified

Haque Mobassir verified their affiliation via an institutional email.

Learn more

• Master of Engineering
• Student of MBA in supply chain and logistics management at Edith Cowan University

This paper explores the theoretical construct of "WL," a hypothetical world governed entirely by randomness, devoid of compliance with established laws. In WL, randomness is not entirely without structure, and its governing principles introduce profound implications for dimensions, time, life, and permanence. By examining the interplay of randomness and time, this work challenges traditional notions of reality, causality, and existence.

Let me your thoughts on

This paper explores the theoretical construct of "WL," a hypothetical world governed entirely by randomness, devoid of compliance with established laws. In WL, randomness is not entirely without structure, and its governing principles introduce profound implications for dimensions, time, life, and permanence. By examining the interplay of randomness and time, this work challenges traditional notions of reality, causality, and existence.

This paper explores the concept that nothing in this world ever truly ends. Everything operates according to its nature, and upon completing the cycle of its nature, it undergoes transformation. Nature, as defined here, consists of both repetitive and non-repetitive behaviours of any existing entity in the universe, persisting until it undergoes an ultimate, irreversible transformation. This perspective is examined through examples of stars, Earth, and human existence. The idea of escaping these cycles through concepts such as parallel universes or time machines is challenged, asserting that such possibilities would disrupt the cosmic cycle and lead to its collapse.

The fundamental principle proposed in this paper is that nothing in the universe ever ends. Every entity follows its nature until it completes its cycle and transforms irreversibly. Nature is defined as the repetitive and non-repetitive behaviour of any existing entity in the universe, persisting until it undergoes an ultimate transformation. This study delves into examples of stars, Earth, and human existence to illustrate the continuity of existence and transformation.

From birth to death, a star maintains a consistent physical form, aging and expanding through ongoing reactions of gases within its core. The term "death" is misleading, as a star does not cease to exist. Instead, it undergoes an irreversible transformation through an explosion, breaking into its basic elements and compounds—the same initial matter of which it was composed.

These elements and compounds persist, taking on different roles within the ongoing cycle of the universe. While the star no longer exists as a singular entity, its essence continues to contribute to the cosmic process, demonstrating the continuity of existence through transformation.

Earth also follows a natural cycle, but its transformation differs from that of a star. Even when Earth reaches the limits of its nature, undergoing events like ice ages or the total extinction of life forms, it retains its physical integrity.

The Earth’s core nature is to sustain existence, and it continues to do so even as its external conditions change. Unlike stars, Earth does not undergo a complete physical transformation. Instead, it adapts while maintaining its fundamental role within the cosmic cycle.

Human existence is similarly bound to this principle of transformation. Different religious beliefs provide varied perspectives on this cycle:

In both perspectives, death is not an end but a transition to a new form or state, aligning with the universal principle of continuity and transformation.

The existence of parallel universes or time travel is irrelevant to this discussion. The critical argument is that nothing can escape its natural cycle. Concepts like time holes or time machines, which suggest the possibility of escape or alternate cycles, are fundamentally flawed.

If such escape mechanisms existed, entities could break free from their intrinsic nature, disrupting the natural cycle and causing the collapse of the cosmic system. The universe relies on the continuity of its cycles, and any breach of this order would destabilize its fundamental structure.

This paper argues that nothing in the universe ever truly ends. Existence is defined by cycles of nature, culminating in transformation rather than cessation. Stars explode and distribute their elements; Earth transforms but sustains its essence; and humans transition through various states, whether through reincarnation or an afterlife.

Escape from these cycles is neither possible nor desirable, as it would disrupt the balance and continuity of the cosmic system. The unbroken cycles of existence are the foundation of reality, emphasizing the importance of understanding transformation as a natural and essential process within the universe.

This paper explores the concept that nothing in this world ever truly ends. Everything operates according to its nature, and upon completing the cycle of its nature, it undergoes transformation. Nature, as defined here, consists of both repetitive and non-repetitive behaviours of any existing entity in the universe, persisting until it undergoes an ultimate, irreversible transformation. This perspective is examined through examples of stars, Earth, and human existence. The idea of escaping these cycles through concepts such as parallel universes or time machines is challenged, asserting that such possibilities would disrupt the cosmic cycle and lead to its collapse.

While genetic ancestry services like 23andMe offer some value in terms of tracing lineage and discovering potential health risks, they also come with considerable privacy risks. With the growing number of data privacy laws and the lack of comprehensive healthcare privacy protections, users need to weigh the benefits against the long-term potential risks. The current struggles of 23andMe demonstrate the instability that can affect these companies, making consumer data privacy an ongoing concern.

23andMe, once a pioneer in consumer genetic testing and ancestry tracing, is currently facing significant financial and structural challenges, casting doubt on its future stability. As the company restructures, cutting 40% of its workforce after a mass board resignation in September, its stock continues to plummet, raising both financial and privacy concerns among users. The question of what might happen to the sensitive genetic data of its 15 million users, especially if the company changes ownership, has heightened consumer anxiety. Here’s an in-depth look at the concerns and why potential users may want to be cautious before opting for such services.

1. Privacy Concerns and Weak Health Protections

Unlike traditional healthcare companies, consumer-based genetic testing services like 23andMe are not subject to stringent health privacy laws. As a result, users’ personal genetic data does not fall under the same legal protections afforded to medical records. This regulatory gap means that in the event of a sale or acquisition, a new owner could potentially access or even monetize this genetic data under the existing user agreements. Though the current policy requires users to opt in for data sharing, a transfer of ownership could lead to revised privacy policies, leaving sensitive data vulnerable.

2. Financial Instability and Potential Acquisition Risks

Given 23andMe’s precarious financial position, with substantial losses over the last two years and further quarterly declines, rumors of a potential acquisition are mounting. For users, this prospect raises serious questions: what happens to their genetic data if the company is sold? While CEO Anne Wojcicki has announced plans to take the company private and has ruled out third-party offers, there’s no guarantee that this stance will remain unchanged. If acquired, the company’s most valuable asset—its massive genetic database—could be used in ways beyond the original purpose, with consumers’ sensitive data potentially up for negotiation in such a deal.

3. Uncertain Data Protections and Ownership Concerns

Under the current user agreement, customers consent to 23andMe’s use of their DNA data, with 80% of users opting into the company’s research program. While the company states that this data is anonymized, privacy experts warn that anonymized genetic data can still be re-identified with advanced technology. Further, state privacy laws in at least 11 U.S. states require consumer consent for genetic data transfers. However, there are no federal protections in place, leaving privacy regulations largely dependent on individual state laws, which could create loopholes in the event of an acquisition.

4. Minimal Consumer Benefits for Privacy Trade-Off

Many consumers purchase genetic testing kits for a one-time ancestral insight, a convenience that is hardly worth the ongoing risks. Given the minimal benefit beyond curiosity about lineage, these services come at a high privacy cost. Personal genetic data can be revealing not just about an individual’s health predispositions, but about entire family histories and future generations, raising ethical concerns about the long-term consequences of sharing this data.

5. Data Deletion is Possible, But Cumbersome

Users concerned about the privacy of their genetic data do have the option to delete their accounts, which 23andMe states can be done through account settings. The deletion process involves submitting a request and confirming it via email, after which the company claims to destroy the user’s genetic sample and personal information. However, this option places the burden on the consumer to safeguard their data, and does not erase data that may already be anonymized and in use for research purposes.

While genetic ancestry services like 23andMe offer some value in terms of tracing lineage and discovering potential health risks, they also come with considerable privacy risks. With the growing number of data privacy laws and the lack of comprehensive healthcare privacy protections, users need to weigh the benefits against the long-term potential risks. The current struggles of 23andMe demonstrate the instability that can affect these companies, making consumer data privacy an ongoing concern.

For those who value privacy, the current state of 23andMe serves as a warning to consider whether the benefits of a genetic ancestry service are worth the potential risks to personal data. As privacy laws evolve and companies face economic challenges, consumer data may be one of the first assets on the negotiation table.

In this pre-print, I present my personal exploration of the definitions of "infinite" and "finite."

To gain a deeper understanding of the context, you can refer to my previous publications: • 1. Shaikh, H. M. I. H. (2023, November 1). "Hypothesis and Experiments: Quantum Roots: 'E' as the Common Origin of All Existence." [DOI Link](https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/976rp), DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.35936.25607

• 2. "The Essence of 'E': Unveiling the Infinitely Infinite" by Haque Mobassir Imtiyazul Haque Shaikh, published in the International Journal of Frontiers in Multidisciplinary Research (IJFMR), Volume 5, Issue 5, September-October 2023. [DOI Link](https://www.ijfmr.com/papers/2023/5/7494.pdf)

can someone guide me to the equation of SINGLE ATOM of any element? which equation that defines it's birth?

Thanks

I authored a paper titled

"The Essence of 'E': Revealing the Infinitely Infinite" in the IJFMR Volume 5, Issue 5, September-October 2023, authored by Haque Mobassir, Imtiyazul Haque, and Shaikh. The DOI is 10.36948/ijfmr.2023.v05i05.7494.

In this paper, I introduced the concept of 'E' as the fundamental reason for all existence. I am now sharing a preprint of an experimental hypothesis to explore some ideas mentioned in the aforementioned paper

1. "Finite and Infinite originate from a common source, 'E.'"

2. "E is significantly smaller and lighter than any of its creations."

I would appreciate your thoughts after reviewing the attachment