
Cristina CorredorNational University of Distance Education | UNED · Logic
Cristina Corredor
PhD
About
27
Publications
3,379
Reads
How we measure 'reads'
A 'read' is counted each time someone views a publication summary (such as the title, abstract, and list of authors), clicks on a figure, or views or downloads the full-text. Learn more
77
Citations
Additional affiliations
February 2021 - present
Publications
Publications (27)
The aim of this paper is to explore the viability of accounting for presumptions as a subtype of verdictives, within the framework of the Austinian approach to speech acts. The available set of felicity conditions is examined and worked out, in order to try and account in particular for a main feature of presumptions, namely, their function in shif...
Discursive theories of justice have been questioned for putting forward high-level principles that should nevertheless play a role in practical discourses in which the justice of a claim is at stake. Here, I will critically examine and systematize the main tenets in Rawls’s and Habermas’s discursive theories, and will suggest that the principles of...
The aim of this paper is to study the role that dissent may have in public political deliberation in democratic societies. Out of argumentative settings, dissent would seem to have a disruptive effect. In my view, dissension effectively puts into question the political authority's hypothetical legitimacy. To the extent that this is so, acts of diss...
The aim of this paper is to offer an account of deliberative dialogues within the framework of an Austinian speech act theory. My analysis focuses on a characteristic aspect of deliberative dialogues, namely, turn-taking organization, with the aim of throwing some light on their interactional dynamics as a basis for collective action. The explorati...
In this essay, we aim to provide a comprehensive overview of the various stances in the contemporary debate on the sources of political normativity. Besides, we describe some consequences of this debate for several related areas of philosophical discussion. We believe this overview may help readers navigate and connect the numerous works within the...
What type of speech act is a norm of action, when the norm is agreed upon as the conclusion of an argumentative dialogue? My hypothesis is that, whenever a norm of action is the conclusion of an argument, it should be analyzed as the statement of a norm and thus as a verdictive speech act. If the context is appropriate, and the interlocutors are si...
"The aim of this contribution is to study three central revisions that Habermas has carried out in the course of developing his theory of communicative action, together with some of the criticisms raised by those revisions. A reflection is suggested concerning whether Habermas’ project of grounding a critical theory of society on communicative acti...
This paper endorses a view of argumentation and arguments that relates both to a special type of speech action, namely, the performance of speech acts of arguing. Its aim is to advance an analysis of those acts that takes into account two kinds of norms related to their correct performance, namely, felicity conditions and objective requirements rel...
DOI: http://doi.org/10.26333/sts.xxxiv2.04
Within the Gricean framework in pragmatics, communication is understood as an inferential activity. Other approaches to the study of linguistic communication have contended that language is argumentative in some essential sense. My aim is to study the question of whether and how the practices of inferring...
Goodwin and Innocenti (2016) have contended that giving reasons may be a form of
enactment, where a claim is supported by the very activity of making the claim. In my view,
the kind of interaction that these authors are considering should be analysed as a form of
advocacy, and therefore as an exercitive speech act. In this paper I will suggest that...
En las páginas introductorias del compendio de ensayos ¿Debemos querer decir lo que decimos? (primera edición), Stanley Cavell destaca su deuda con Thompson Clarke por haberle enseñado a entender la epistemología tradicional y, en particular, el escepticismo. Recuerda también que junto a Clarke impartió, entre 1959 y 1960, un seminario sobre las In...
The aim of this contribution is to study the role of argumentation within deliberation. With that aim in view, I will examine the Deliberation Dialogue Model set forth by McBurney, Hitchcock and Parsons (2017). Taking as a point of departure an interactional approach to speech acts, I will contend that the model presents some difficulties in accoun...
Goodwin and Innocenti (2016) have contended that giving reasons may be a form of enactment, where a claim is supported by the very activity of making the claim. In my view, the kind of interaction that these authors are considering should be analysed as a form of advocacy, and therefore as an exercitive speech act. In this paper I will suggest that...
In deliberation, the participants' goal is to reach a common conclusion on the best available course of action. The aim of this contribution is to study some deontic aspects that characterize deliberative dialogues as a dialogical (and dialectical) practice. In particular, my exploration is an attempt to consider the way in which deliberation dialo...
From 26th to 28th of April 2016, it took place in the University of Granada a conference on presumptions, presumptive inferences and burdens of proof that, joint with other ongoing initiatives, has contributed to renew the interest of the argumentation community in analysing these notions and the relationships between them. This special volume of A...
The aim of this paper is to examine some recent accounts of the semantics and pragmatics of pejorative names and suggest that a normative approach in line with interactional pragmatics can help provide a complete account of some phenomena related to their use. One seemingly common idea in the theoretical treatment of pejoratives is that they have,...
The aim of this contribution is to propose a natural implementation of the reflexive-referential theory
advanced by Perry 2001 that aims at accounting for the reflexive character of explicit performative utterances.
This is accomplished by introducing a reflexive-performative constraint on explicit performatives.
The article studies two specific forms of social interaction, linguistically mediated: promises and threats. Two pregnant theoretical accounts are to be considered here. Firstly, the analysis propounded within the framework of Game Theory, assuming an intentionalist account of human agency and an instrumentalist concept of rationality; and secondly...
A proof is given of Craig’s Interpolation Theorem for Church’s Pure Functional Calculus of second-order, which is provably complete w.r.t. the class of all secondary interpretations (a subclass of Henkin’s general interpretations). The search for the proof allows for a deeper analysis of interpolation within the framework of second-order formalisms...