
Bernardo AndradeAugsburg University · Department of Religion and Philosophy
Bernardo Andrade
Doctor of Philosophy
About
5
Publications
504
Reads
How we measure 'reads'
A 'read' is counted each time someone views a publication summary (such as the title, abstract, and list of authors), clicks on a figure, or views or downloads the full-text. Learn more
3
Citations
Introduction
I am an Assistant Professor of Philosophy at Augsburg University, in Minneapolis. I have recently received a Ph.D. in Philosophy from Emory University with a dissertation on Levinas's concept of diachrony.
Besides my work on 20th-century Continental philosophy and ethics, I also write and teach on the broader history of philosophy, with an emphasis on Ancient Philosophy.
Skills and Expertise
Additional affiliations
February 2022 - May 2022
Education
August 2018 - June 2024
August 2018 - June 2021
September 2014 - May 2018
Publications
Publications (5)
In this paper, I argue that Plotinus's critique of divine deliberation in Ennead 6.7 does not seek to banish teleology altogether from his philosophy of nature. Rather, his critique aims to situate teleology within his own metaphysical system so as to reconcile it with the basic principles governing the intelligible universe. In this sense, Plotinu...
In this paper, I argue that Plotinus does not limit the sphere of free human agency simply to intellectual contemplation, but rather extends it all the way to human praxis. Plotinus’s goal in the first six chapters of Ennead 6.8 is, accordingly, to demarcate the space of freedom within human practical actions. He ultimately concludes that our exter...
Departing from Anderson’s (2016) suggestion that there are three communities in Peirce’s thought corresponding to his three normative sciences of logic, ethics, and esthetics, I argue that these communities partake in a relationship of dependence similar to that found among the normative sciences. In this way, just as logic relies on ethics which r...
In this paper I argue that, to conceive transcendence, Levinas retrieves the Platonic concept of “separation” and deploys it in three ways: metaphysically, semantically, and affectively. Levinas finds in the interaction between being and the Good beyond being of Republic VI 509b a certain “formal structure of transcendence”—one in which a term is c...
Departing from Anderson's (2016) suggestion that there are three communities in Peirce's thought corresponding to his three normative sciences of logic, ethics, and esthetics, I argue that these communities partake in a relationship of dependence similar to that found among the normative sciences. In this way, just as logic relies on ethics which r...