
Andrea Ossicini- PhD in Mathematics and Engineering
- Researcher at My home
Andrea Ossicini
- PhD in Mathematics and Engineering
- Researcher at My home
Research in the field of Higher Analysis and Classical and Analytical Theory of Numbers.
About
78
Publications
18,085
Reads
How we measure 'reads'
A 'read' is counted each time someone views a publication summary (such as the title, abstract, and list of authors), clicks on a figure, or views or downloads the full-text. Learn more
59
Citations
Introduction
Andrea Ossicini graduated in Mathematics with "110 cum laude", at the Institute of Mathematics, “G. Castelnuovo “, of University of Rome, “ La Sapienza “.
After graduating, he began a brilliant career in Computer Science and worked as a Manager with several companies, dealing with Electronic Information Systems.
His preferred Mathematician is Leonhard Euler, whom he obstinately studied for many years.
Today he is a researcher in the Fields of Number Theory and Complex Analysis.
Current institution
My home
Current position
- Researcher
Publications
Publications (78)
In this work, I provide a new rephrasing of Fermat's Last Theorem, based on an earlier work by Euler on the ternary quadratic forms. Effectively, Fermat's Last Theorem can be derived from an appropriate use of the concordant forms of Euler and from an equivalent ternary quadratic homogeneous Diophantine equation able to accommodate a solution of Fe...
In this work, I provide a new rephrasing of Fermat's Last Theorem, based on an earlier work by Euler on the ternary quadratic forms. Effectively, Fermat's Last Theorem can be derived from an appropriate use of the concordant forms of Euler and from an equivalent ternary quadratic homogeneous Diophantine equation able to accommodate a solution of Fe...
The Mathematics Editorial Office retracts the article entitled “On the Nature of Some Euler’s Double Equations Equivalent to Fermat’s Last Theorem [...]
An Additional Remarks on a Reformulation of Fermat's Lat Theorem
Update of Paper "On the Nature of Some Euler’s Double Equations Equivalent
to Fermat’s Last Theorem"
In relation to the Expression of Concern published on May 29, 2024 by MDPI, see the paper "On the Nature of Some Euler's Double Equations Equivalent to Fermat's Last Theorem" the author (Andrea Ossicini) provided an update of his paper to adequately respond to the various objections, unfortunately (let's say incorrectly)it was not even considered.
1. The proof Ossicini's proof is based on a reductio ad absurdum.
This study provides a new rephrasing of Fermat's theorem, based on
Euler's earlier work on ternary quadratic forms, which in an indirect way provides a new proof of the Last Theorem
1. The proof Ossicini's proof is based on a reductio ad absurdum.
This study provides a new rephrasing of Fermat's theorem, based on
Euler's earlier work on ternary quadratic forms, which in an indirect way provides a new proof of the Last Theorem.
This work illustrates how determine the value of the parameter Q, present in the double Euler equations. classification : 11D41 (primary), 11G05 (secondary).
This work comment two papers: the first published in 2022 and entitled "On the nature of some Euler's double equations equivalent to Fermat's last theorem" provides a proof through the so-called discordant forms of appropriate Euler's double equations, which could have entered in a not very narrow margin and the second instead published in 2024 and...
"a remarkable integration between Fermat’s equation and Euler’s double equations".
This work illustrates how determine the value of the parameter Q, present in the double Euler equations. classification : 11D41 (primary), 11G05 (secondary).
In this work I demonstrate that a possible origin of the Frey elliptic
curve derives from an appropriate use of the double equations of Diophantus-Fermat and from an isomorphism: a birational application between the double equations and an elliptic curve.
From this origin I deduce a Fundamental Theorem which allows an exact reformulation of Fermat’...
In this work, I provide a new rephrasing of Fermat’s Last Theorem, based on an earlier work by Euler on the ternary quadratic forms.
385 (1637-2022) years later, Fermat's proof of his last theorem has finally been
rediscovered.
In this work, I provide a new rephrasing of Fermat’s Last Theorem, based on an earlier work by Euler on the ternary quadratic forms. Effectively, Fermat’s Last Theorem can be derived
from an appropriate use of the concordant forms of Euler and from an equivalent ternary quadratic homogeneous Diophantine equation able to accommodate a solution of Fe...
A wonderful Diophantine Equation that represents a remarkable integration between Fermat’s equation and Euler’s double equations.
A perfect reformulation of Fermat's Last Theorem
The equation (4), in tis paper, represents a extraordinary and "wonderful" integration between the equation of Fermat and Euler's double equations for the definition of one homogeneous quaternary Diophantus equation of the second degree not solvable in whole numbers.
The Fundamental Theorem and a Conjecture !!!
In this work, I provide a new rephrasing of Fermat’s Last Theorem, based on an earlier work by Euler on the ternary quadratic forms. Effectively, Fermat’s Last Theorem can be derived from an appropriate use of the concordant forms of Euler and from an equivalent ternary quadratic homogeneous Diophantine equation able to accommodate a solution of Fe...
In this work, I provide a new rephrasing of Fermat’s Last Theorem, based on an earlier work by Euler on the ternary quadratic forms. Effectively, Fermat’s Last Theorem can be derived from an appropriate use of the concordant forms of Euler and from an equivalent ternary quadratic homogeneous Diophantine equation able to accommodate a solution of Fe...
su Internet ..
https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/10/23/4471/htm Articolo su Intennet
https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/10/23/4471 Abstract su Internet
In this work, I provide a new rephrasing of Fermat’s Last Theorem, based on an earlier work by Euler on the ternary quadratic forms. Effectively, Fermat’s Last Theorem can be derived from an appropriate use of the concordant forms of Euler and from an equivalent ternary quadratic homogeneous Diophantine equation able to accommodate a solution of Fe...
In this work, I provide a new rephrasing of Fermat’s Last Theorem, based on an earlier work by Euler on the ternary quadratic forms. Effectively, Fermat’s Last Theorem can be derived from an appropriate use of the concordant forms of Euler and from an equivalent ternary quadratic homogeneous Diophantine equation able to accommodate a solution of Fe...
In this work, I provide a new rephrasing of Fermat’s Last Theorem, based on an earlier work by Euler on the ternary quadratic forms. Effectively, Fermat’s Last Theorem can be derived from an appropriate use of the concordant forms of Euler and from an equivalent ternary quadratic homogeneous Diophantine equation able to accommodate a solution of Fe...
However, we did not succeed, as in the "proof a' la Fermat ", documented
and justified in this note to establish in more absolute way the non-existence
of the Diophantine equation, ternary and homogeneous of the second degree,
capable of accommodating one possible integer solution of Fermat's equation,
but we have stated an equivalent Theorem, at l...
A third elementary proof of Fermat's Last Theorem
A Proof of non-existence of the second degree Dio-phantine equation, which includes a solution of Fermat's equation X^n+Y^n=Z^n.
The following appendix completes the definition of the integer parameter "h" in my elementary proof of Fermat's Last Theorem.
In this work I demonstrate that a possible origin of the Frey elliptic curve derives from an appropriate use of the double equations of Diophantus-Fermat and from an isomorphism: a birational application between the double equations and an elliptic curve. From this origin I deduce a Fundamental Theorem which allows an exact refor-mulation of Fermat...
Logic of Paper "The Diophantus's double equations equivalent to Frey's curve"
The following work furnishes a ”direct” proof of the so-called
”Fermat’s Last Theorem”, by using elementary techniques, related perhaps to thehistorical period going up to the 18th century. As we well know, Fermat’s LastTheorem was demonstrated in 1995 by the English mathematician A. Wiles, with the contribution of R. Taylor, through a ”reductio ad...
Abstract. This paper treats about one of the most remarkable achievements
by Riemann, that is the symmetric form of the functional equation for ζ(s).
Riemann provides two different proofs of this. We present here, after showing the
first one, a new, simple and direct proof of the symmetric form of the functional
equation for both the Eulerian Zeta...
The goal of this manuscript to make clear what Fermat had in mind. By the use of the concordant forms of Euler and a homogeneous ternary quadratic Diophantine equation is certainly possible, also through methods known and discovered by Fermat,to solve its extraordinary Last Theorem.
This work contains two papers: the first entitled "On the nature of some Euler's double equations equivalent to of Fermat's last theorem" presents a marvellous proof through the so-called discordant forms of appropriate Euler's double equations, which
could have entered in a not very narrow margin, i.e. in only a few pages (less than 14).
The secon...
This work contains two papers: the first published in 2022 and entitled ”On the nature of some Euler’s double equations equivalent to Fermat’s last theorem” provides a marvellous proof through the so-called discordant forms of appropriate Euler’s double equations, which could have entered in a not very narrow margin and the second instead published...
This paper treats about one of the most remarkable achievements by
Riemann, that is the symmetric form of the functional equation for ζ(s).
We present here, after showing the first proof of Riemann, a new, simple
and direct proof of the symmetric form of the functional equation for both
the Eulerian Zeta function and the alternating Zeta function,...
This paper treats about one of the most remarkable achievements by Riemann, that is the symmetric form of the functional equation for ζ(s). Riemann provides two different proofs of this. We present here, after showing the first one, a new, simple and direct proof of the symmetric form of the functional equation for both the Eulerian Zeta function a...
For the first two Parts see [ibid. 27, 63–90 (2005; Zbl 1265.33010)] and [ibid. 29, 141–150 (2006; Zbl 1265.33011)].
In this paper we present a simple method for deriving an alternative form of the functional equation for Riemann's Zeta function. The connections between some functional equations obtained implicitly by Leonhard Euler in his work "Remarques sur un beau rapport entre les series des puissances tant directes que reciproques" in Memoires de l'Academie...
Nuovi Teoremi sui numeri primi e sui numeri naturali " Proposizione 1 1: ogni numero primo > 2 si può partizionare in un unico modo nella differenza di due quadrati di naturali. (1) () () m = m + 1 2 2 m-1 2 2 = m 1 con m = 2n + 1 ⎡ ⎣ ⎢ ⎤ ⎦ ⎥ − ⎡ ⎣ ⎢ ⎤ ⎦ ⎥ ⋅ ∈ N N La dimostrazione è conseguenza della (1) e del Teorema fondamentale dell'Aritmetica....
The purpose of the work is to furnish a complete study of a discrete and special function, discovered by the author and named with the Arabian letter "SHIN" {The letter SHIN is the thirteenth letter of the Arabian alphabet}. It includes three other papers, published in the International journal "Kragujevac Journal of Mathematics". The methods, the...
We describe a method for estimating the special function , in the complex cut plane A = C\ (−∞, 0], with a Stieltjes transform, which implies that the function is logarithmically completely monotonic. To be complete, we find a nearly exact integral representation. At the end, we also establish that 1/ (x) is a complete Bernstein function and we giv...
This Paper (one first and draft version) contains some small imperfections,
one its correct and definitive version has been already submitted to one
prestigious review of mathematics.
More precisely "the Special Function SHIN, II" will be published in the
"Kragujevac Journal of Mathematics, 29 (2006) ".
The purpose of the work is to furnish a complete study of a discrete and special function, discovered by the author and named with the Arabian letter "SHIN" {The letter SHIN is the thirteenth letter of the Arabian alphabet}. It includes three other papers, published in the International journal "Kragujevac Journal of Mathematics". The methods, the...
We prove the following exact symbolic formula of the special function Ä, in the entire s-complex plane with the negative real axis (including the origin) removed, with a double Laplace transform: Ä (s) = Lf 2 ¢ - (t) + Lf 1 2…i¢( Ä (t ¢ e ¡i…) ¡ Ä (t ¢ e i…))g g where - (t) stands for the distribution of Dirac and e represents the Euler's number.
Questions
Questions (13)
Fermat and his genius !!!
Below it is rework of the chapter “The Prize” from Simon Singh's book “ Fermat’s Last Theorem: The story of a riddle that confounded the world's greatest minds for 358 years” :
<<Fermat wrote that his proof would not fit into the margin of his copy of Arithmetica, and Wiles’s 100 pages of dense mathematics certainly fulfils this criterion, but surely the Frenchman did not invent modular forms, the Taniyama-Shimura conjecture, Galois Groups and the Kolyvagin-Flach method centuries before anyone else.
If Fermat did not have Wiles’s proof then what did he have?
Mathematicians are divided into two camps:
The sceptics believe that Fermat’s Last Theorem was the result of a rare moment of weakness by the 17th-century genius.
They claim that although Fermat wrote, ”I have discovered a truly marvellous proof”, he had in fact found only a flawed proof.
Other mathematicians, the romantic optimists, believe that Fermat may have had a genuine proof.
Whatever this proof might have been, it would have been based on 17th-century techniques, and would have involved an argument so cunning that it has eluded everybody.
Indeed, there are plenty of mathematicians who believe that they can still achieve fame and glory by discovering Fermat’s original proof.
In my case it is pure passion for the Mathematics and the desire to do justice to Fermat and his genius !!! >>
For this reason I recommend carefully reading the following document entitled "Fundamental elements of a proof” relating to the recently elementary proof of Fermat Last Theorem has been given by Andrea Ossicini.
This articles, entitled "On the Nature of Some Euler's Double Equations Equivalent to Fermat's Last Theorem" effectively provide a reformulation of Fermat's Last Theorem and has been published in 2022 in the journal "Mathematics" by publisher MDPI (Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute).
The Journal "Mathematics" is indexed in SCOPUS. Impact factor 2.4. It is quoted with a journal rank: JCR - Q1 (Mathematics) / CiteScore 3.5 - Q1 (General Mathematics).
Ossicini's article is indicated by Mathematics as "Feature Paper".
This label is used to represent the most advanced investigations which can have a significant impact in the field.
A Feature Paper should be an original contribution that involves several techniques or approaches, provides an outlook for future research directions and describes possible research applications.
Feature papers are submitted upon individual invitation or recommendation by the scientific editors and must receive positive feedback from the reviewer.
Fermat and his genius !!!
Below it is rework of the chapter “The Prize” from Simon Singh's book “ Fermat’s Last Theorem: The story of a riddle that confounded the world's greatest minds for 358 years” :
<<Fermat wrote that his proof would not fit into the margin of his copy of Arithmetica, and Wiles’s 100 pages of dense mathematics certainly fulfils this criterion, but surely the Frenchman did not invent modular forms, the Taniyama-Shimura conjecture, Galois Groups and the Kolyvagin-Flach method centuries before anyone else.
If Fermat did not have Wiles’s proof then what did he have?
Mathematicians are divided into two camps:
The sceptics believe that Fermat’s Last Theorem was the result of a rare moment of weakness by the 17th-century genius.
They claim that although Fermat wrote, ”I have discovered a truly marvellous proof”, he had in fact found only a flawed proof.
Other mathematicians, the romantic optimists, believe that Fermat may have had a genuine proof.
Whatever this proof might have been, it would have been based on 17th-century techniques, and would have involved an argument so cunning that it has eluded everybody.
Indeed, there are plenty of mathematicians who believe that they can still achieve fame and glory by discovering Fermat’s original proof.
In my case it is pure passion for the Mathematics and the desire to do justice to Fermat and his genius !!! >>
For this reason I recommend carefully reading the following document entitled "Fundamental elements of a proof” relating to the recently elementary proof of Fermat Last Theorem has been given by Andrea Ossicini.
This articles, entitled "On the Nature of Some Euler's Double Equations Equivalent to Fermat's Last Theorem" effectively provide a reformulation of Fermat's Last Theorem and has been published in 2022 in the journal "Mathematics" by publisher MDPI (Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute).
The Journal "Mathematics" is indexed in SCOPUS. Impact factor 2.4. It is quoted with a journal rank: JCR - Q1 (Mathematics) / CiteScore 3.5 - Q1 (General Mathematics).
Ossicini's article is indicated by Mathematics as "Feature Paper".
This label is used to represent the most advanced investigations which can have a significant impact in the field.
A Feature Paper should be an original contribution that involves several techniques or approaches, provides an outlook for future research directions and describes possible research applications.
Fermat and his genius !!!
Below it is rework of the chapter “The Prize” from Simon Singh's book “ Fermat’s Last Theorem: The story of a riddle that confounded the world's greatest minds for 358 years” :
<<Fermat wrote that his proof would not fit into the margin of his copy of Arithmetica, and Wiles’s 100 pages of dense mathematics certainly fulfils this criterion, but surely the Frenchman did not invent modular forms, the Taniyama-Shimura conjecture, Galois Groups and the Kolyvagin-Flach method centuries before anyone else.
If Fermat did not have Wiles’s proof then what did he have?
Mathematicians are divided into two camps:
The sceptics believe that Fermat’s Last Theorem was the result of a rare moment of weakness by the 17th-century genius.
They claim that although Fermat wrote, ”I have discovered a truly marvellous proof”, he had in fact found only a flawed proof.
Other mathematicians, the romantic optimists, believe that Fermat may have had a genuine proof.
Whatever this proof might have been, it would have been based on 17th-century techniques, and would have involved an argument so cunning that it has eluded everybody.
Indeed, there are plenty of mathematicians who believe that they can still achieve fame and glory by discovering Fermat’s original proof.
In my case it is pure passion for the Mathematics and the desire to do justice to Fermat and his genius !!! >>
For this reason I recommend carefully reading the following document entitled "Fundamental elements of a proof” relating to the recently elementary proof of Fermat Last Theorem has been given by Andrea Ossicini.
This articles, entitled "On the Nature of Some Euler's Double Equations Equivalent to Fermat's Last Theorem" effectively provide a reformulation of Fermat's Last Theorem and has been published in 2022 in the journal "Mathematics" by publisher MDPI (Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute).
The Journal "Mathematics" is indexed in SCOPUS. Impact factor 2.4. It is quoted with a journal rank: JCR - Q1 (Mathematics) / CiteScore 3.5 - Q1 (General Mathematics).
Ossicini's article is indicated by Mathematics as "Feature Paper".
This label is used to represent the most advanced investigations which can have a significant impact in the field.
A Feature Paper should be an original contribution that involves several techniques or approaches, provides an outlook for future research directions and describes possible research applications.
Feature papers are submitted upon individual invitation or recommendation by the scientific editors and must receive positive feedback from the reviewers.
Dear Researchers, having received some comments on the fact of using only two values to determine the rational parameter that allows my proof of Fermat's Last Theorem in the article "On the Nature of Some Euler's Double Equations Equivalent to Fermat's Last Theorem, in Mathematics, 10-23, (2022), pp. 1-12.
Free access https//www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/10/23/4471. "
I have prepared this document which definitively closes the discussion on the validity of my elementary proof.
Best Regards
Andrea Ossicini
A much shorter proof of Fermat's Last Theorem is possible now that 385 years have passed ?
I think yes.
https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/10/23/4471/htm Articolo su Intennet
https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/10/23/4471 Abstract su Internet
Andrea Ossicini
A careful reading of the attached article is sufficient:
Deleted research item The research item mentioned here has been deleted