Coastal zones all over the world are part of a unique and sensitive environment that is the stage of a
myriad of uses – and therefore confl icts – which can be brought into pacifi c coexistence through a very
slow but dynamic and articulated process of decision-making called Integrated Coastal Zone Management1.
The Mediterranean, for centuries celebrated as the cradle of western civilisation, has one of the
most threatened coastlines in the world, and because of its physical peculiarities and the contrasting
socio-economic realities of its bordering countries it must undergo vital management challenges regarding
the impacts over natural resources and the eff ects of coastal urbanisation (Hinrichsen, 1998).
In fact, two related aspects of the developed, often urbanised, Mediterranean coasts draw the immediate
attention of non-Mediterranean visitors: the economic value of the sandy stretch that we,
as scientists or tourists, call the beach, and how strenuously this is being defended from events that
in many other places of the world are just part of a balance that is allowed to proceed naturally. It is a
fact that the management of such Mediterranean beaches is of key importance because of the threat
they bear, the highly-priced uses they host and what such a value may represent to local, regional and
national economies. This confl ict gives birth to a signifi cant line of research and specifi c policies on
beach defence and its optimisation in terms of time and costs - beach monitoring and defence strategies
imply high investments and have specifi c timings according to the type of environment and the
scope of monitoring.The planning and management of the coastal zone requires therefore an accurate and updated knowledge
of the processes in act, and in particular of those responsible for changes to beach morphology.
Shoreline evolution determines the shape and extension of the emerged beach – the part of the territory
with the highest economic value – and therefore must be studied in detail by those in charge
of planning and managing the diff erent uses that are made of this part of the territory. Such is a focus
of beach management as an important component of the broader coastal zone management: as
beaches bear (and cause) eff ects that are produced (and felt) in adjacent environments, beach management
is actually one “slice” of coastal management, and therefore in defi ning the most eff ective
policies for the management of the beach it is necessary to frame it within the macro-scale of coastal
management and sustainable use of the coastal zone.
The coastal zone subject to management can be understood as a transition space between the sea
and the adjacent land, which stretches alongshore across diff erent countries. Because of its nature
many of the coastal issues that countries must face are of international scope, and the eff ects that
coastal uses will have on nearby countries must be considered when planning them (Clark, 1998).
The Mediterranean sea, due to its geographical enclosure and socio-political peculiarities, represents
a particular case where the already “hard-to-defi ne” boundaries of the coastal zone show a special blur:if the marine environment, shorelines and coastal zones are part of a cross and longshore “continuum”,
calling for integration also at the international level, here neighbouring countries that share such a
particularly and tightly connected environment must depend deeply on transboundary policies in
order to reach a coherent and eff ective approach to coastal management.
Coastal management and planning at international scale is in fact highly strategic and focuses on
developing broad strategies and action plans to ensure common eff orts between coastal nations, including
programmes that are developed between groups of countries (Kay and Alder, 1999). The sustainable
development of the Mediterranean coastal zone is a transnational issue, and therefore programmes
that can sustain public policies on solving confl icts over the beach – and reach real change
as eff ects – tend to be more eff ective if they involve diff erent neighbouring countries.
In this context, methodologies for surveying, data processing and analysis of trends in act must take
into consideration all new technologies available in order to increase accuracy and cost/benefi t ratio
of operative monitoring activities. Certifi ed and shared techniques are necessary for creating regional,
national and international scenarios that are capable of dealing with diff erent realities. Such a confrontation,
if using homogeneous data, allows not only to evaluate the eff ect that diff erent natural
and anthropogenic processes have on diff erent realities but also to analyse the need for intervention
(normative or structural) in order to plan the available resources – being aware though that the priority
for interventions should not be based on physical data only.
Statistics that refer to coastal evolution processes, realised at national (e.g. for Italy - GNRSC, 2006), continental
(e.g. for Europe – EUROSION, 2004) or global (e.g. for worldwide coasts - Bird, 1996), present
data that are obtained with criteria and methodologies that are extremely diverse, elaborated in different
forms and often with diff erent scopes. Among the most relevant diff erences, we can point those
that refer to time intervals, survey scales and accuracy on the positioning of the shoreline. The “perception”
of how severe the phenomenon is can be highly subjective, and often infl uenced by local realities
– minimal shoreline retreat (that could be maybe due to nearly annual oscillations) can be considered
as being relevant and therefore noted wherever the general trend shows equilibrium or accretion. On
the other hand, in regions that are characterised by shoreline retreat of some tens of metres per year,
erosive processes of small proportions can be underestimated. In such evaluations, the economic
value of the beach has an important weight, and limited erosion of beaches that are heavily used by
the tourist industry will receive higher attention if compared to consistent shoreline retreat in coasts
that undergo lower anthropogenic impact.
The need for developing and validating new monitoring techniques, and sharing them among countries
that border the Mediterranean - where similar environmental characteristics allow an easier
standardisation of the methodologies - had already been identifi ed by the Regions who proposed
Interreg III B Medocc Beachmed (2002 – 2004), and such approach had been developed during that
project (Beachmed, 2005). The results obtained, together with the continuing technological evolution
in this sector, and the need to target other competent authorities, have led Regions to propose the
new Interreg III C Regional Framework Operation Beachmed-e2 where a signifi cant part of the budget
was dedicated to this aspect, calling for the proposal of OpTIMAL.
Beachmed-e concentrated on the strategic management of beach protection for the sustainable development
of the Mediterranean coastal zone, and included diff erent 8 regions from 4 Mediterranean
countries as offi cial partners, having had participants from many other regions as observers. OpTIMAL,
one of the nine Beachmed-e subprojects, aimed at the optimisation of beach monitoring, and had the
participation of 10 institutes representing all those 8 regions. Each of them had to face the same problem
of dealing with the reality - and complexity - of beach erosion within a diff erent technical, social,
cultural, administrative, legal and economical context. In spite of that, methodologies applied during
this project at diff erent sites have shown similar results regarding their accuracy, and this increases our
hope to analyse the Mediterranean coasts in a more homogenous way in order to obtain eff ectively
comparable results in the near future.
References
Beachmed (2005) - Le projet Beachmed : Récupération environnementale et entretien des littoraux en érosion
avec l’utilisation des dépôts sablonneux marins (Convention 2002-01-4.3-I-028) - 3ème cahier
technique (phase C). Roma, 324 pp.
Bird E.C.F. (1996) - Beach management. Wiley and Sons, Chichester, 292 pp.
Cicin-Sain B. and Knecht R.W. (1998) - Integrated coastal and ocean management: concepts and practices.
Island Press. Washington D.C. 517 pp.
Clark J. (1998) - Coastal seas: the conservation challenge. Blackwell Science. Oxford. 134 pp.
EUROSION (2004) - Living with coastal erosion in Europe: Sediment and Space for Sustainability. European
Commission, pp. 38.
GNRAC (2006) - Lo stato dei litorali italiani. Studi costieri, 10: 1-174.
Hinrichsen D. (1998) - Coastal waters of the world: trends, threats and strategies. Island Press. Washington
D.C. 276 pp.
Kay R. and Alder J. (1999) - Coastal planning and management. E&FN Spon. London. 375 pp.