Alexander Ohnemus

https://ohnemusuniversity.wordpress.com/ · All

How plausibly could the entire multiverse have begun simultaneously? Why? How? My answer: Plausible beyond a reasonable doubt for now because our universe was created at one point and eventually, according to the Second Law of Thermodynamics , it will end(because all systems once warm tend to cool down). More specifically, according to the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics, our universe will cool down until it ends completely. And at the same time, the entire multiverse will end with it. Also, relativity and the multiverse justify each other because if all time is relative then all possibilities happening at once is a fitting explanation. The contradictions of all possibilities happening at once are settled by the explanation of parallel universes. Thus, expanding the concept of identity to all possibilities since the beginning of the multiverse, thereby adjusting the premises enough, thus no contradictions exist.

Should models of history that follow tradition, risk analysis, and skin in the game, be followed more than others? Why? How?

Since IQ is better at measuring intellectual disability than intelligence, what metric would most accurately measure intellects? Why? How?

Of course IQ should be replaced as a measurement of intelligence, and what specifically should be the measuring replacement?

How can we, the autistic population, be protected against the unfair moralisms used against us? My answer: Wider society, being less disabled, must recognize that autistics(including me) often act in ways we cannot control. We struggle with social cues. And sometimes we cannot help that we are sensitive on the receiving end yet socially inept on the giving end of social interactions, thus making us hypocrites beyond our own control. Plus our impaired judgment causes us to act in ways that get us yelled at yet, we have hearing sensitivity, thus we are in a constant quagmire so, we need inclusion and a safety net.

How plausibly did God create us in the multiverse(thus we have free will yet cannot surprise Him) and He is in the 4th Dimension? Why? How? My answer: Most parsimoniously, the rest of the essay is the annotation at the end.

Work Cited

Ohnemus , Alexander . “GAM- Theorem.” ResearchGate.net , Ohnemus University , dx.doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.32411.03363. Accessed 3 Dec. 2023.

‌

Brown. “The Fourth Dimension and the Bible.” Math.brown.edu, Brown.edu, www.math.brown.edu/tbanchof/Yale/project13/bible.htm#:~:text=The%20Bible%20also%20contains%20examples,possible%20via%20the%20Fourth%20Dimension. Accessed 3 Dec. 2023. “ The Bible also contains examples of appearances which also are easily explained with the use of the Fourth Dimension. Twice, Jesus entered the room of the disciples without using a door (John 20:19-23, 26-29). Entering a room through its walls is only possible via the Fourth Dimension”(Brown). Maybe the Bible should guide the creation of cosmology. The Bible is a set of survival heuristics. The Bible is written in metaphorical language. The Bible has a probability of being epistemologically literally true. Jesus may have had access to the Fourth Dimension. Jesus was and is the Son of God. The fourth dimension is part of modern cosmology. The Bible is a survival heuristic. Survival at the group, individual, and general level is the most rigorous definition of rationality. Thus yes, the Bible should inform modern day physics. .

‌

Hypothetically and heuristically, in even the most extreme policy disagreements(that are macro enough), is one better served avoiding direct argument(s) and instead influencing indirectly to make(and or prove beyond a reasonable doubt) the point? Why? How?

My answer: Yes because humans, for whatever reason, are, at least as a rule of thumb, bound to be less charismatic to their disagreers, especially as the issues get more contentious. Especially if the party about to argue truly desires something from the opposition.

Who agrees that the persuasive effectiveness of an argument is almost null because the loser of the argument wants to win? Why? How?

What is the preferred moral system for the South Park creators(Matt Stone and Trey Parker)?

Is someone who possesses the dominant genes possible to be artificial mutated to have the recessive equivalents? Why? How?

Are people with recessive traits less likely to be carriers of the corresponding dominant genes(to those recessive traits)? How? Why?

Given that consciousness is energy, if the concept of identity is expanded enough throughout physics, could the afterlife be charted? Why? How? Yes, because the concept of identity must be expanded to fit the law of identity, the law of no contradiction, and the law of the excluded middle. “laws of thought, traditionally, the three fundamental laws of logic: (1) the law of contradiction, (2) the law of excluded middle (or third), and (3) the principle of identity”( https://www.britannica.com/topic/laws-of-thought ) .

“Leonard Peikoff and David Harriman have denounced modern physics as incompatible with Objectivist metaphysics and epistemology. Physics, they say, must return to a Newtonian viewpoint; much of relativity theory must go, along with essentially all of quantum mechanics, string theory, and modern cosmology. In their insistence on justifications in terms of ‘physical nature,‘ they cling to a macroscopic worldview that doesn't work in the high-velocity arena of relativity or the subatomic level of quantum mechanics. It is suggested that the concept of identity be widened to accommodate the probabilistic nature of quantum phenomena”(Gibson 2013).

Warren C. Gibson. “Modern Physics versus Objectivism.” The Journal of Ayn Rand Studies, vol. 13, no. 2, 2013, pp. 140–59. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.5325/jaynrandstud.13.2.0140. Accessed 3 Dec. 2023.

How quickly could artificial intelligence translate the Bible to American English? Why? How?

Who else considers the Bible to be a source of metaphors, survival heuristics, and a possibility of partially being epistemologically literally true? Why? How?