Can you share the proposal of your project?

I am looking for a brief, online form of CR that can be used as self-help or guided self-help. Can anyone help please? We are planning a pilot trial to see the effect of CR combined with CBTp Guided Self-help, that we recently tested in a feasibility study- 

Good to have an agreement on ubiquity of 1/f scaling, I also am of the opinion experimental control is essential (see Hasselman, 2013). I would add that direct confrontation of theoretical predictions is crucial as well:

"In order to advance scientific knowledge about scaling phenomena in living systems a program of strong inference that aims to produce closed theories of principles is needed. In order to reach this goal, empirical inquiries need to go beyond describing scaling phenomena in different populations in the context of impaired performance or pathology (e.g., Goldberger et al., 2002; Gilden and Hancock, 2007; West, 2010; Wijnants et al., 2012a). Several recent studies reveal scaling phenomena can be brought under experimental control, which is essential for a program of strong inference (e.g., Kello et al., 2007; Wijnants et al., 2009; Van Orden et al., 2010; Correll, 2011; Holden et al., 2011; Kuznetsov et al., 2011; Stephen et al., 2012). The diverging theoretical predictions examined in most studies reveal that the observed waveforms are more likely to originate from interaction-dominant complexity than from component-dominant mechanics (also see Turvey, 2007; Kello et al., 2010; Diniz et al., 2011)."

Is there an actual proof that visual-spatial cues enhance early or late visual processing (as compared to uncued visual processing)?

Without saying that what is implied by this question is "true", we know that when it comes to response times (RT), peripheral (or exogenous) and central (or endogenous) cues will have a different impact (e.g., Doallo et al., 2004). However, I struggle to find any event-related potentials (ERP) study that demonstrates an enhancement of perceptual processes following a cue (preferably peripheral) when compared to "self-generated", or spontaneous, gazes (i.e., overt spatial attention).

For instance, say that you have to look out for forest fires all day long. You will probably end up doing something else to fight boredom, and hence end up looking for possible smoke from time to time.

Now the question is: Will you be able to report^(RT) a smoke faster if you are spatially cued because the cue allowed you to perceive^(ERP) it faster?

To summarize:

Endogenous Cue – Spontaneous = ?

Exogenous Cue – Endogenous Cue = ?

Exogenous Cue – Spontaneous = ?