Question
Asked 24 March 2016
Feliciano Castaño Villar
Feliciano Castaño Villar

Why is it important to recognize the original authors citing them?

http://www.eticaacademica.unam.mx/infografia_numero4_10AgostoIMP.pdf
Thanks for your arguments.
Pdf
HTTP
Argumentation
Origin
Import

All Answers (2)

Miranda Yeoh
SEAMEO RECSAM
Dear Feliciano, it is certainly important to recognize the original authors for their intellectual contribution.  It is honest and courteous  to acknowledge their hard work and great contribution, and to cite them, and to build on their work.  It is truly to stand on the shoulders of giants.  Each one of us can only contribute a small finite portion to the store of knowledge.  I will feel more confident and comfortable to cite giants, because their great names make my small contribution more recognizable.
Cite
Feliciano Castaño Villar
Think that the contribution to the legacy of humanity and knowledge is individual is pathological, result of the neoliberal biopolitics. Quote is just for smalls, mediums and giants. Established the ranking is based on an order of colonial, patriarchal, elitist and neoliberal rules.
Thanks alot for your answer.
Cite

Similar questions and discussions

Is the Reviewing certificate is beneficial for getting Scholarhip?
Question
9 answers
  • Asked 3 March 2021
  • Muhammad Danish AliMuhammad Danish Ali
In 2020 I had completed My M.Phil. and due to corona lockdown, I can not get a visa from the embassy so I worked on different research projects and apply for reviewing the research papers. I have reviewed a paper in Polymer and received a certificate of reviewing. I am also looking for P.hD scholarship so please guide me can I add the information of all research projects and Reviewing certificate in my Curriculum Vitae as an experience? Is it beneficial for the Selection process?
Thanks, A lot for your Comment and precious time in advance.
R and KKNN help?
Question
Be the first to answer
  • Asked 23 April 2021
  • Yordan Estrada RodriguezYordan Estrada Rodriguez
Hello, I have a problem with KKNN training, here is my code, and the files are attached, the problem shows up when I try to create the confusionMatrix:
Error in! All.equal (nrow (data), ncol (data)): invalid type argument
Can any one help me?
library(kknn)
library(caret)
headers = c("col1", "col2", "col3", "col4", "col5", "col6", "col7", "type")
testData0<-read.table("ecoli-0-1-3-7_vs_2-6-5-1tst.csv", sep = ",", header = FALSE, dec = ".")
names(testData0) <- headers
#------------------original data---------------------------
trainData_org0<-read.table("ecoli-0-1-3-7_vs_2-6-5-1tra.csv", sep = ",", header = FALSE, dec = ".")
names(trainData_org0) <- headers
kknn_org0 <- train.kknn(type ~ ., data = trainData_org0, method="kknn")
testpred_org0 <- predict(kknn_org0, newdata = testData0[,-8])
accuracy_org0 <- mean(testData0$type == testpred_org0)
confusionMatrix_org0 <- confusionMatrix(table(testpred_org0, testData0$type ))
Is GPT-3 an AGI and why?
Question
4 answers
  • Asked 24 July 2021
  • Hasan ÇağatayHasan Çağatay
Even if this topic is quite speculative and there would not be many people defending GPT-3 is an AGI, I wonder what researchers' arguments are.
How do I fit a GLM in R given an ex-gaussian distribution of the dependent variable ?
Question
3 answers
  • Asked 28 December 2021
  • Gianluca SaettaGianluca Saetta
I'm trying to fit a glm in R
My code is the following:
glm(formula = DV ~ IV1between*IV2within, data = df).
The DV distribution (not the residual!) is approximately an ex-gaussian.
Which "family" argument should I use?
Any tips are welcome, thanks!
Can I find benchmark dataset that contain Web Access log server infected by HTTP Flooding attacks?
Question
4 answers
  • Asked 6 March 2022
  • Esraa Saleh AlomariEsraa Saleh Alomari
I mean the infected Web Access Logs is infected from Botnet-based DDoS attacks not any others.
What is the complete procedure of calculating effective mass of any material using CASTEP calculation?
Question
3 answers
  • Asked 21 September 2022
  • Md. Abdullah Al- MohimeenMd. Abdullah Al- Mohimeen
I have been trying to find out the effective mass using CASTEP & ORIGIN softwares for a long time. I followed a video in youtube. But the total procedure is not clear to me bcoz the language used in that video is not english. I am facing some other problems too but i cant get rid of them. Is there any tutorial or other videos or anyone who can help me regarding this problem. I would be grateful to him.
Riemann-Hypothesis a refutation
Discussion
50 replies
  • Asked 15 February 2023
  • Peter KeppPeter Kepp
All tests doing a proof for the Riemann-Hypothesis on the Zeta-Function must fail.
There are no zeros by the so called function of a complex argument.
A function on two different units f(x, y) only then has values for the third unit
`z´ [z = f(x, y)]
if the values variables `x´ and `y´ would be combined by an algebraic rule.
So it should be done for the complex argument, Riemann had used.
But there isn´t such a combination. So Riemann only did a `scaling´. Where both parts of the complex number stay separate.
The second part of the refutation comes by showing wrong expert opinion of mathematics. This is on the false use of `imaginary´ and `prefixed multiplication´.
Most of the journals nowadays reject the paper without review. The reasons appear grossly absurd. Please suggest some signal processing journals?
Question
3 answers
  • Asked 30 October 2023
  • Amit SinghalAmit Singhal
The most common reason is: "The content of the manuscript is not suitable for this journal (out of scope)", even though there may exist similar papers in the recent issues of that journal. Above all, the same journals may also assign similar papers to me as a reviewer.
Rather than getting to the basis of these arguments, I am simply looking for some signal processing or biomedical journals that may follow a more logical review process.
Please suggest some journals, if you may know.

Related Publications

The Performance of the HTTP Protocol over Wired-cum-Wireless LANs
Technical Report
Full-text available
  • Dec 2002
The work behind this report was an attempt to systematically study and analyze the performance of HTTP over a wired-cum-wireless network.
View
View
View
Got a technical question?
Get high-quality answers from experts.
Ask a question