Why don't you have 'Architecture" as a discipline in your classifications?

I have been reading a lot of research considering a more-than-human approach to geographical phenomena. However, I did not come across any actual definition of "more-than-human" - nor have I been able to find one in research. Does anyone have a good reference defining more-than-human? I wonder to what extent scholars consider the expression "more-than-human" to be different from the joint binary "human/non-human".

These two concepts seem to be used together in different scenarios, with different relationships indicated; such as "platforms as “data infrastructures that facilitate, aggregate, monetize and govern interactions between end-users and content and service providers” (Poell et al., 2021, p. 5)", whereas infrastructuration of platforms by J.-C. Plantin.

How are these two concepts defined in the literature? and any more lit that puts these two concepts together?

Hello to all dear friends!

Can you introduce suitable sources for studying the topics of urban segregation, inclusive city and informal settlement?

Thank you for your help

I would like to calculate the emission rates of PM, PM10 and PM2.5 for the final grinding process of cement production using emission rates. Is there a source I can be able to get the emission rates of the above pollutants?

I have a question concerning how to classify this research approach. Let me give you the context:

A couple of colleagues and I found that a particular topic was showing itself to be particular tricky to teach in a classroom environment, thus we spent last year collecting literature on the topic and end up developing a theoretical framework for how to address the issue. We now plan to test our framework by implementing it in an undergrad classroom course that one of us is teaching.

Now here is the thing, we come from a social science background, and we intend to initially approach this effort qualitatively (through observation and semi structured interviews with participants). Thus, my initial reaction would be, from a methodological standpoint, to maybe call this a case study (see Yin, Merriam, Stake, etc.). However, considering that the person implementing the framework (and teaching the course) is also one of the researchers who developed it, can this still be called a case study? Or should it be considered something else? I've heard people suggest Action Research, Participatory Research, or event "a participant observer Case Study" but I'm not quite sure if this is quite it as well.

Any help would be appreciated, thank you.

Obs.: we are well aware of potential bias, and depending on the results of this first phase we then might, later on, run this again, this time as a more controlled experiment, comparing the framework version classroom outcomes’, against the ones from a "non-framework" one.

How can PhD candidates keep themselves motivated at a high level during a PhD journey and complete their PhD on time?