Why are climate change economics and perfect green market economics incompatible?

Very contemporary question. Hope to learn from experts.I refer Jefrey Sachs 7 transformations to sustainable development as well as this video links. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=JsDOpCtsVX8

The science is well beyond focusing on climate change economics and market approaches. Alternatives which are far more encompassing:

1. Circular economy (Stahel and Reday-Mulvey, 1977/1981).

2. Deglobalization (Bello 2008).

3. Degrowth (Lefèvre 2004).

4. Doughnut economics (Raworth 2017) despite its focus on the heavily critiqued Planetary Boundaries framework.

5. Essential exponential (Bartlett 2004).

6. Overshoot / Homo colossus (Catton, Jr. 1982).

7. Steady state economy (Daly 1977).

Specific sustainability agendas:

1. https://doi.org/10.1108/DPM-02-2017-0043

2. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8959-2_2

3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.imic.2015.04.001

Proloy, what is your take on this specific question? Do you have a view?

Lucio

Ilan, Do you have a view on this question too? Please share it.

Lucio

Dear Lucio,

In my opinion, the economics of climate change and the economics of a perfect green market are reconcilable, but only in theory. I have described this in my articles. Unfortunately, from theory to reality is a very big gap in this field. For the time being, the process of carrying out a full pro-environmental transformation of the classic growth, brown, linear economy of excess to a sustainable, green, zero-carbon zero-growth and closed loop economy to create a zero-carbon economy, to halt the progressive process of global warming, to halt the over-consumption of natural resources, to halt the increase in environmental pollution is not possible with the current political, economic, financial, social, etc. realities. Therefore, in reality, the economics of climate change and the economics of a perfect green market are incompatible, despite the fact that it has been theoretically described how this can be achieved.

Thank you very much,

Best regards,

Dariusz

Dariusz, your statement "in my opinion, the economics of climate change and the economics of a perfect green market are reconcilable, but only in theory.", are you sure about this statement?...

Both models are different in theory, and both models fit the reality differently....

That is why the question is "Why are climate change economics and perfect green market economics incompatible?",,,,to uncover the differences....

Dariusz, in case you have not read it yet, this article has some good for thoughts consistent with this question, take a look at it when you have time,,,,

The Flipping of Traditional Economic Thinking: Contrasting the Working of Dwarf Green Market Thinking with that of Green Market Thinking to Highlight Main Differences and Implications

They are not. They are generally in Sync.

Emmanuel, thanks for commenting. Why do you think they are compatible or in sync?

Suggest the following paper:

Good Ali! Thank you for sharing material

The goal of this question is to exchange ideas directly, our own ideas, so we can defend them if needed.

Do you have a view on the answer to this specific question?

Respectfully yours;

Lucio

Climate change is broad, it encompasses more than Green market

So it's will be difficult for the two to go at the same level

Dear John, thank you for commenting.

Keep in mind, a climate change markets and the green market have a different structure and work differently, the knowledge base of one of them does not work in the other.

Think again and comment again.

Respectfully yours

Lucio

Dear friends, some of you may find some good food for thoughts in this article just published. Here sharing it in good faith.

Sustainability thoughts 139: How can the 2012 road to transition from environmental pollution based traditional economies to the environmentally clean economies that the world never built be pointed out?