Question
Asked 2 August 2018

Why is the volume of water increasing when it is freezing?

Why is the volume of water increasing when it is freezing?

All Answers (3)

J. M. Koli
Dr. Balasaheb Sawant Konkan Krishi Vidyapeeth
Most liquids have a quite simple behavior when they are cooled (at a fixed pressure): they shrink. The liquid contract as it is cooled; because the molecules are moving slower they are less able to overcome the attractive inter-molecular forces drawing them closer to each other. Then the freezing temperature is reached, and the substance solidifies, which causes it to contract some more because crystalline solids are usually tightly packed. Water is one of the few exceptions to this behavior. When liquid water is cooled, it contracts like one would expect until a temperature of approximately 4 degrees Celsius is reached. After that, it expands slightly until it reaches the freezing point, and then when it freezes it expands by approximately 9%. This unusual behavior has its origin in the structure of the water molecule. There is a strong tendency to form a network of hydrogen bonds, where each hydrogen atom is in a line between two oxygen atoms. This hydrogen bonding tendency gets stronger as the temperature gets lower (because there is less thermal energy to shake the hydrogen bonds out of position). The ice structure is completely hydrogen bonded, and these bonds force the crystalline structure to be very "open"
1 Recommendation
Onyeka Stanislaus Okwundu
Nigerian Young Researchers Academy (NYRA)
The expansion of water is scientifically anomalous (abnormal) but to answer this, "Why is the volume of water increasing when it is freezing?", I would refer you to mother nature. Nature created water for several reasons which majorly include habitation of aquatic lives (fishes and co.).
As natural habitat, water should offer conducive conditions for survival of aquatic organisms. At the temperature range of the anomalous expansion, on cooling, water expands, decreases in density and floats (over the warmer, less dense layers). This segregation of layers of different temperature and density is possible because water is a poor conductor of heat. As a result, at the anomalous temperature range, the upper layer of water is cooler than the bottom. This makes it naturally possible and easy for living organisms to survive at extremely low temperature. Cooling of a lake (or every other natural water habitat) is effected from the upper water surface and the surface layer may get frozen and sub-cooled without significantly affecting the bottom water layers because heat transfer by convection (due to density differences of water molecules or layers) is zero and transfer by conduction is very poor. This means that it is virtually impossible for a lake to freeze solid. No matter how cold it is, there will always be water at the bottom of a frozen lake, at a temperature close to 4°C where life can be sustained.
If the ultimate reason had to do with molecular structure of water and inter-molecular H-bonding then, why is this behavior restricted to temperature < 4 deg. C? That would refer you back to nature.
Kind regards.
Krishan Kumar
Rajiv Gandhi University
Water molecule is held together by hydrogen bonds H-O-H. Also, water is a polar molecule and when the temperature decreases, these bonds align is such a way that the volume of the water get increases when frozen.
2 Recommendations

Similar questions and discussions

Origin of Life Theories: Can we Gauge their Quality?
Discussion
9 replies
  • Leonard TimmonsLeonard Timmons
There are at least a hundred definitions of life and the number is not decreasing. A large number of people feel free to try their hand at defining life. The author can use his definition to put everything he knows is alive in the proper bucket while letting everything else take care of itself. Some authors realize that a definition is of little use without an underlying theory of what life is (TOWLI). They realize that when a definition of life is not produced by an underlying theory, it is frequently a fancy way for the author to say that he knows life when he sees it.
I've considered this situation for some time and have come to realize that I have no idea what the Astrobiology/Origin of Life community's metric for functionality in a theory of life, or a definition of life, is. From my perspective, any such theory should be similar to theories that characterize other physical phenomena. Theories of life should range from "fully functional" to "completely fanciful". Here's what I think a fully functional theory of life should do:
1) The theory should assert and justify that life is a certain kind of thing. The assertion must be that it arises from one, or a combination of, the laws of physics, thermodynamics, chemistry, mathematics, information theory, or other testable characteristic of a system that displays living behavior.
2) The theory should assert and justify that there are characteristics that make a thing "alive" and it should present the simplest living thing that contains those characteristics, thereby mapping the boundary between "alive" and "not alive."
3) The theory should assert and justify that living things that exhibit characteristics with certain "high" values are more ideal living things and those that exhibit characteristics with certain "low" values are less ideal living things.
4) The theory should assert and justify that it applies to life on the largest and the smallest of scales.
5) The theory should assert and explain how it can derive the precursors to metabolism, the electron transport chain, cellular membranes, cell walls, information storage, and information translation, among other characteristics that are generally recognized as being necessary for life as we know it, given the conditions under which life as we know it could emerge.
6) The theory should assert that its predictions are testable.
7) The theory should assert that it applies to life composed of materials alien to life as we know it as well as under conditions alien to life as we know it.
When we figure out what this thing called "life" actually is, it should satisfy all of these requirements. Maybe more. Is it possible to apply this scale, or maybe a modified version of it, to the extant theories and definitions of life so that we can dispense with those that will never do any of these things?
-leonard

Related Publications

Article
shows that the hot tearing tendency exists in a narrow temperature range and is primarily effected by the heterogeneous freezing point of the metal.
Got a technical question?
Get high-quality answers from experts.