Asked 12th Jul, 2022
Which is the hierarchy of evidence in social sciences and what are the methods used to assess its quality?
In the health science, the Hierarchy of evidence is very clear, and distinguish between the all types of evidence, is a sistematic process, with steps and methodologies that clarify the process. But, some times is necessary use evidence from another souerces like, social sciences, economics, education, etc. and in that cases, the quality of evidence is of importance to be used and how evaluated this is blurred , so i would know how this can be evaluated and how is it ranked
All Answers (1)
Cecilia Veas In the social sciences we do not have a so called 'hierarchy' of evidence. What we do have is a range of both quantitative and qualitative methods, each of which serves a purpose. Often several methods are used in order to raise validity. This is called 'triangulation'. There are many excellent social science studies that have used triangulation, by very respected academics. we regard different research methods as horses for courses, that is, each has a value and it depends on the nature of the research topic as to which method or methods are used. So mostly all are of equal value, although there is some dispute among academics as to whether quantitative data is superior to qualitative data.
Top contributors to discussions in this field
Similar questions and discussions
Is that possible to combine primary data and secondary data?
- Zakky Zamrudi
Is it possible to combine multiple source of data especially in social/business science. Given to measure the "knowledge sharing intention" as an independent variable (measured using likert scale) on academia performance (metrics taken from secondary source)?
Systematic Review question: Should I include Master's theses or/and Doctoral Dissertation in my qualitative systematic review?
- Farheen Meraj
A little dilemma here. My team and I are conducting a systematic review on the psychosocial needs of newcomers for integration into Canada. We will include qualitative work that would generate insights into the needs and barriers that various newcomers experience - using an intersectional lens. Where we are debating is the inclusion of dissertations.
I have come across some incredibly relevant dissertations and I feel that because of the rigorous process of checks and reviews they go through, they are as reliable as peer-reviewed articles (if not more). But -
1. What are the arguments against not including theses/dissertations at all, if any?
2. Do we include both Master's theses and doctoral dissertations or only the latter?
Your ideas and insights on this would be extremely valuable to our process. Let me know if you require more information on this.
What are the other tools for collecting data from a sample of customers other than the questionnaire?
- Mohammed Edan Alkhazraje
I need a new tool to collect data about the opinions of a sample of customers about a particular product. Need to hear your views and experiences
Statistical test for Likert-scale questionnaire with different participants?
- Dinara Talypova
Dear all! I'd like to ask for your advice regarding my survey analysis:
- I have the survey with 6 different scenarios. Each of them has the same questions inside.
- Initially, I planned to present all 6 scenarios to every participant (and collected like this some data, around 1/4 of the whole dataset); however, it was too demanding for people and many didn't finish the survey.
- So, I cut down the questionnaire to only 3 out of 6 scenarios that were presented to each participant randomly (so, every single person was presented with 3 randomly picked scenarios).
- I collected like this the rest 3/4 of my dataset
- All the questions were Likert-scale type
So, now I'm curious:
- In general, can I compare all 6 scenarios (I'm interested in differences in the answers depending on the scenario) by treating the data as a between-subject design (Mann-Whitney test / ind. samples t-test)?
- Can I still use the data where participants filled in all 6 scenarios and also treat them as if it was a between-subject design?
I appreciate your help!
Is World Scientific Publishing a reputed and reliable one?
- Md Abid Hasan
World Scientific Publishing Co Pte Ltd is a Singapore-based publishing company that has been in the business since 1981. They publish a lot of edited books each year. How well accepted are those books in academia? Are they peer-reviewed?
How to analyze 2 moderators?
- Sabin Stavarache
Greetings, I'm currently working on my Bachelor's project, and I was wondering how to conceptualize my 2 moderator design. Basically, what I wish to know, is how I'm supposed to consider the design when making the a priori sample size calculation and afterwards when I will do the actual statistical test.
So, should I do 2 separate tests with each moderator variable and see which is statistically viable? Or is there a more complex solution to mish-mash everything and get an output for the both moderators?
Also, when calculating the sample size in gpower, should I consider only one moderator test that is repeated with the same sample (as in, 3 total predictors and 1 tested), or both (4 predictors and 2 tested)?
Questionnaire design from two different set of populations?
- Asma Malik
I am planning to do a questionnaire study. My variables are
university performance (X)
lecturers contribution (Moderator)
1. For collecting lecturer contribution, my sample population are lecturers.
2. For collecting university performance, my sample population is university administration staff
3. For collecting students performance, my sample population are both lecturers and university administration staff
Please tell me should I design two separate questionnaires in one study. What can be the best way of designing this or these questionnaires? Please refer me to any research articles.
Thank you very much for your cooperation
Author Service Provider
- Zakky Zamrudi
Anyone experienced with the author service? related to this question i wonder?
- how it differs from official publisher author service (elsevier, emerald, etc) and the third party author service?
- does it assure or at least increase the acceptance possibilities?
What scientometric tools are existing to create general "scientific figures" for research and review papers (e.g., e!Sankey and VOSviewer)?
- Omid Sadeghian
There are some software tools to create general scientific figures, such as:
- VOSviewer graph
- Sankey diagram
- Venn diagram
- Gartner Hype cycle
What other scientometric tools do you know to create general "scientific figures"?
L'étude des conséquences de la réforme de la PAC est réalisée à partir de simulations concernant diverses exploitations-type de grande culture situées dans trois régions, Ile-de-France, Centre et Midi-Pyrénées. Dans chacune d'entre elles, on distingue un certain nombre de cas selon les tailles d'exploitation (superficie), les assolements pratiqués,...