University of Baghdad
Question
Asked 26 April 2022
What statistical tool fits this research design?
Hi, I have an assignment using a 5-point Likert scale (about frequency) to test the frequency of self reported inner speech and wether it correlates with language proficiency (I’ll use language test scores for that). I have no background in statistics and I’ve never done this sort of thing before. How can I analyze and interpret my data, and what tests do I need to use? My sample size isn’t big, it’s rather small. I googled it but all the stuff I read presume I have background knowledge, and I don’t.
Most recent answer
اذا كانت البيانات الخام هي اسمية يجب تحويللها الى ارقام او اعداد لكي يتم معرفة نوع الاداوت الاحصائية اذا كانت تريد معرفة الفروق استخدام معادلة t-teast واستخدام معادلة ليفين لاختبار التجانس
1 Recommendation
All Answers (4)
Multimedia University
Hi! I also agree with David. Usually it depends on your research objectives. Thanks
1 Recommendation
Rajagiri College of Social Sciences (Autonomous)
check whether this would help you or not.
1 Recommendation
Similar questions and discussions
How to get SPSS Statistical apps for free of cost?
Munshi Mohammad Kutub Uddin
SPSS Statistical apps is very important to analysis high volume data.
if anybody collected it please give me to my email kutubuddin.ag@gmail.com
Would you like to please, endorse my Theory of Universality to arXiv.org?
Kasibhatla Surya Narayana
(Narayana Kasibhatla should forward this email to someone who's
registered as an endorser for the physics.gen-ph (General Physics)
subject class of arXiv.)
Narayana Kasibhatla requests your endorsement to submit an article to
the physics.gen-ph section of arXiv. To tell us that you would (or would
not) like to endorse this person, please visit the following URL:
https://arxiv.org/auth/endorse?x=A43TG6
If that URL does not work for you, please visit
http://arxiv.org/auth/endorse.php
and enter the following six-digit alphanumeric string:
Endorsement Code: A43TG6
The link to my Theory:
Related Publications
We argue that making accept/reject decisions on scientific hypotheses, including a recent call for changing the canonical alpha level from p = .05 to .005, is deleterious for the finding of new discoveries and the progress of science. Given that blanket and variable alpha levels both are problematic, it is sensible to dispense with significance tes...
We argue that making accept/reject decisions on scientific hypotheses, including a recent call for changing the canonical alpha level from p = .05 to .005, is deleterious for the finding of new discoveries and the progress of science. Given that blanket and variable alpha levels both are problematic, it is sensible to dispense with significance tes...
We argue that making accept/reject decisions on scientific hypotheses, including a recent call for changing the canonical alpha level from p = 0.05 to p = 0.005, is deleterious for the finding of new discoveries and the progress of science. Given that blanket and variable alpha levels both are problematic, it is sensible to dispense
with significance...