What kind of research methodology, the Hypotheses are non-applicable?

Why Is Research Methodology Important?

To conduct a bibliometric analysis for a review paper in economic or social science, it is crucial to select the appropriate structure to address the research question. Among the available options, determining the more accurate research framework or conceptual framework is essential for achieving the desired results.

bjtt

My research is about finding out what certain people think about a certain business model. My aim is to provide new information for the inventors of that model. Because of practical problems, I'm using a questionnaire instead of interviews. This questionnaire has close- and open-ended questions.

Even though I get both qualitative and quantitative data from my questionnaire, I still think the qualitative information is more important since the main research question is 'what do *** think about this ** model?'. 

Could someone please help me with this? None of the qualitative research designs sound right and if I use quantitative research design like survey design I'm afraid that is wrong because of the qualitative nature of this research..

Scientifically, physical objects (such as a clock) can undergo changes due to applied forces or relativistic effects.

However, abstract concepts—such as numbers, addition, dimensions, space, and time—are not physically alterable, as they are conceptual rather than material. This is a well-established scientific fact.

Despite this, the notion of curvature in spacetime has led to the misconception that spacetime itself is physical rather than abstract.

Since neither space nor time possesses physical properties, they cannot be subjects of direct experimentation. Instead, they serve as conceptual dimensions—a framework within which physical objects exist and can be measured.

Measurements in physics are always performed on physical entities, not on dimensions themselves. For example, in a coordinate system, dimensions such as x, y, z, and t are graphical representations—they do not measure space or time itself but rather the physical objects within them. Similarly, space and time, as dimensions, do not physically change—only objects within these dimensions undergo measurable transformations. These transformations are always physical (e.g., changes in material properties or energy states), whereas space and time remain conceptual constructs.

Thus, the idea of spacetime curvature is fundamentally flawed because only physical entities—such as electromagnetic fields, gravitational fields, or massive objects—can bend or curve. Space and time, being dimensions, do not possess length, height, or depth themselves; rather, they define the extent of objects that have these properties.

In mathematics and geometry, space and time are represented abstractly, but this does not imply they are physically capable of curvature.

If curvature exists, it must be a property of physical objects, such as mass-bearing structures or massless fields like electromagnetism or gravity—not of spacetime itself.

Do you acknowledge the key points I have stated above?

Please help me the PhD Questionaries about this Product Familiarity moderate effect on Cultural Dimensions and Product Evaluation in Japanese Product.