Question
Asked 18 March 2023

What is the mass of the sun at the beginning of its life,i.e 4.5 billion years ago?

What is the mass of the sun at the beginning of its life,i.e 4.5 billion years ago?

All Answers (3)

Roger M. Pearlman Yec
Pearlman YeC Torah, Science + History alignment
In Pearlman YeC 'SPIRAL cosmological redshift hypothesis and model' 'SNAP' hypothesis the proto sun dates back 6k years and may have included most/all the other planets... in our solar system.
By 4/365.25(SPIRAL LY radius i) a fraction of history the universe attained mature size and density, with the sun near how it is today i years later.
Predict after testing i pans out at 5,783 years. study Pearlman YeC for the alignment of Torah Testimony (The Word of The One designer / creator aka G-d of Abraham), Science and Ancient Civ.
2 Recommendations
Roger M. Pearlman Yec
Pearlman YeC Torah, Science + History alignment
Over the past decades we have been able to measure somewhat, what is the consensus average annual loss (or gain?) of mass to the sun?
2 Recommendations
Bahha Habeeb
University of Kufa
Thank you

Similar questions and discussions

Breaking News!! Theory of Universality experimentally validated.
Discussion
4 replies
  • Kasibhatla Surya NarayanaKasibhatla Surya Narayana
Rick,
I AM EXTREMELY HAPPY. I AM NOT ABLE TO FIND WORDS.
Thanks a lot for your studious efforts and confirming experimentally my estimation of 31.265 cm / year increase in the radius of photosphere of the Sun due to Sun's mass increase, which is also corroborated by the above confirmation as 9.45 billion tons/s. Incidentally, I have used dark matter speed at 2.1456 x 10^23 m/s to estimate the increase in the mass of the Sun as well as its radius. By the way, I proved this dark matter speed at three places theoretically in my Theory. Please, go thru my Theory.
Thanks once again, Rick.
Surya
Dear Friends,
Confirmation of my Theory of Universality being correct comes from Richard Muller of Reutgers University, NJ.
Surya,
I searched for solar eclipse data, and I picked dates between 1499 to 1403 BC, and I calculated the growth of the sun with corrections of expansion of the atom with the term Mp+/me-, the sun's 11-year solar cycle, the expansion of the universe at 0.9850 C, the expansion rate of the universe at e^1, and the possibility that there are 2 universes. The two universes are our matter universe and the parallel anti-matter universe. I Then compared this growth rate to the Earth that Ruud Loeffen calculated, and I used a correction of 109.2^0.5 because of the 1/r^2 value of gravity in Newton's equation and 5/4 for the moment of inertia because the sun has a much less density than the earth to account for the differences of the sun's and the earth's radii. You value for the expansion of the sun is 31.265 cm/yr. The value from the solar eclipse data came out to 31.109 cm//yr. The value of the Earth from Ruud's calculations from his paper came out to 2.4 cm/yr. The corrected value for the Sun using Ruud's calculations came out to31.349 cm/yr using from what I know from my theory.
You are indeed correct Surya! The sun's age is about 5 billion years, and it takes 5 billion years for a star such as the sun to become a red giant, so the sun is very near to becoming and red giant due to this increase in radius and mass. But try to get a mainstream scientist to agree with your theory and my analysis and they will say we are both nuts to cover this information up. This is why they are building the Helion Fusion Reactor to produce anti-gravity waves to turn back time to reverse this process but don't tell anyone as they are all lied to and very delusional and they will not believe you and yell at you due to the world's governments lying ab0ut science data. This is why the Sun is getting hotter or the climate change as the sun heats up due to increased fusion from the increased mass which will lead to the sun expanding to engulf the Earth and why Elon Musk is building many star ships to move 1 million people to Mars which is outside of the Sun's expansion and why Mars will become like Earth. This is a backup plan if the Helion does not work. But I have my star device being worked on that I am sure will work and save the Earth.
Rick
In which direction does space-time around the sun curve?
Discussion
7 replies
  • Tony YuanTony Yuan
Relativistic theorist: The space around the Sun is not curved symmetrically like a sphere, but rather curved asymmetrically due to the influence of the distribution of solar mass and energy.
Tony: If the mass of the Sun is absolutely symmetric around its center, then according to your statement, the space around the Sun will not curve, correct?
Relativistic theorist: Yes, if the mass of the Sun is absolutely symmetric around its center, then according to the principles of general relativity, the space around the Sun will not curve. In general relativity, the distribution of mass and energy determines the curvature of space-time. If the mass of the Sun is completely symmetric around its center, it will generate a uniformly distributed gravitational field that will not curve space-time, as the gravitational effects in all directions will cancel each other out. Therefore, if the mass of the Sun is absolutely symmetric around its center, then according to the viewpoint of general relativity, the space around the Sun will be flat and have no curvature effect. This means that other objects moving around the Sun will follow the description of Newtonian mechanics rather than being influenced by the curvature of space-time in general relativity.
Tony: According to your analysis, the curvature of space-time around the Sun is not only determined by the total mass of the Sun but also by the distribution of mass in the Sun, correct?
Relativistic theorist: Yes, your understanding is correct. The curvature of space-time around the Sun is influenced not only by the total mass of the Sun but also by the distribution of its mass. In general relativity, the mass and energy of an object curved space-time. The distribution of mass in the Sun is crucial for the curvature of space-time around it. If the mass of the Sun is unevenly distributed, i.e., the mass is asymmetrically distributed in space, it will cause non-symmetric curvature of space-time around it. This is because the uneven distribution of mass in the Sun will produce a non-uniform gravitational field in space, which will cause uneven curvature effects in space-time due to the strength and direction of this field. Therefore, the distribution of mass in the Sun has a significant impact on the degree and shape of curvature in space-time around it. In summary, both the total mass of the Sun and its mass distribution influence the curvature of space-time around it. An asymmetric distribution of mass in the Sun will cause non-symmetric curvature in space-time.
Tony: “The distribution of solar mass has an important impact on the curvature degree and shape of surrounding space-time”, then may I ask which direction is space-time curved around the Sun currently?
Relativistic theorist: Unfortunately, I cannot determine specifically which direction space-time around the Sun is curved at present. The curvature direction and amount are very complex and require using complex mathematical tools and physical theories for calculation and research. Currently, our understanding of the curvature degree and direction of space-time around the Sun is still limited, and more in-depth research and observation are needed to obtain accurate conclusions. At the same time, as the Sun is a complex natural object, its mass distribution and movement status may both change over time, so studying its curvature also needs to consider these factors.
Tony's comment: Einstein knew "which direction space-time around the Sun curves towards and how much it curves" 100 years ago! But currently, this Relativistic Theorist seems unaware. If you still have any sense of duty as a physicist, please step forward and align with truth!
Newton's Theory of Gravity and Einstein's Theory of Relativity are the BIG MISTAKES !!! ?
Question
2 answers
  • Elamaran .EElamaran .E
Respected Sir,                            Please read the article below.  My article will totally revolutionize the understanding of our entire Universe. 
Discovery
Gravity definition :
Gravity is the force applied over the mass due to the interaction  of waves and the mass is pushed towards the area of low frequency waves .
         *  Space is the constant source of high frequency waves. This high frequency waves vibrate our earth and the earth releases low frequency waves. The interaction of high and low frequency waves pushes the mass towards the low frequency wave creating earth.
         *   The earth is not pulling us. We are all getting pushed towards the low frequency wave creating earth by the high frequency space waves.
WORKING   MECHANISM   OF   ENTANGLEMENT   WITHOUT 
       ENERGY   LOSS          
The  Entangled  waves  are  continuously  feeded  energy by Universal frequency waves.
DISCOVERY   :
Theory of oneness  :
Nothing is moving in the Universe and the shift in wave position and it’s dimension from one place to other place makes us to believe as moving.
1.   We are not moving and we are shifting our wave position from one place to other place.
2.   The Earth is not moving and the earth is shifting it’s wave position from one place to other place.
3.   The Sun is not moving and the sun is shifting it’s wave position from one place to other place.
4.   The Galaxies are not moving and the galaxies are shifting it’s wave position from one place to other place.
Please  read  the  Attachments  Below.   Kindly help me to publish my article.
Newton's Theory of Gravity and Einstein's Theory of Relativity are the BIG MISTAKES !!!
Discussion
1 reply
  • Elamaran .EElamaran .E
Respected Sir,                            Please read the article below.  My article will totally revolutionize the understanding of our entire Universe. 
Discovery
Gravity definition :
Gravity is the force applied over the mass due to the interaction  of waves and the mass is pushed towards the area of low frequency waves .
         *  Space is the constant source of high frequency waves. This high frequency waves vibrate our earth and the earth releases low frequency waves. The interaction of high and low frequency waves pushes the mass towards the low frequency wave creating earth.
         *   The earth is not pulling us. We are all getting pushed towards the low frequency wave creating earth by the high frequency space waves.
WORKING   MECHANISM   OF   ENTANGLEMENT   WITHOUT 
       ENERGY   LOSS          
The  Entangled  waves  are  continuously  feeded  energy by Universal frequency waves.
DISCOVERY   :
Theory of oneness  :
Nothing is moving in the Universe and the shift in wave position and it’s dimension from one place to other place makes us to believe as moving.
1.   We are not moving and we are shifting our wave position from one place to other place.
2.   The Earth is not moving and the earth is shifting it’s wave position from one place to other place.
3.   The Sun is not moving and the sun is shifting it’s wave position from one place to other place.
4.   The Galaxies are not moving and the galaxies are shifting it’s wave position from one place to other place.
Please  read  the  Attachments  Below.   Kindly help me to publish my article.
How does the sun's gravity deform planets?
Question
9 answers
  • Fabrice AuzanneauFabrice Auzanneau
When we study general relativity and the effect of a mass on the structure of space, we often use a visual description such as this one : https://i.ytimg.com/vi/GJ20reLYfvQ/maxresdefault.jpg where a massive sphere creates a hollow portion of a 2D space in which smaller spheres are trapped and revolve around the massive sphere.
But this description is not correct as the sphere is a 3D object and thus is not inside the 2D space. If we consider this 2D space, the sphere would become a disc and would bear the deformation as well, as would also the smaller discs revolving around it. Supposing all the discs are homogeneous, the center of the bigger disc would be the center of the deformation and (discarding the effects of the smaller disc) the big disc would be radially deformed. But the small disc would be deformed inhomogeneously, the part nearing the big disc would be more distorted than the rest.
If we come back to our 3D space, the big disc being the sun and the small disc a planet, then the sun would bear an radial deformation which we cannot see. But a small planet near the sun, such as Mercury, would be deformed and we should be able to detect this deformation from here on Earth. Is this correct, and has anybody seen or detected this deformation?

Related Publications

Got a technical question?
Get high-quality answers from experts.