Question
Asked 25 June 2014

What is the best tool for system dynamics modeling?

I'm currently using PowerSim and would be interested if there are some alternatives.

Most recent answer

Leonard Malczynski
Mindseye Computing LLC
Free webinar using Powersim Studio to introduce System Dynamics. https://systemdynamics.org/introduction-to-system-dynamics-modeling/

Popular answers (1)

Leonard Malczynski
Mindseye Computing LLC
There is an SD tools page I maintain for the SD Society at: tools.systemdynamics.org
The other more important concern is what you plan to do in SD. CLDs? Small models? Large models? Hybrid models? Knowing that will help you to pick the tool within your budget.
11 Recommendations

All Answers (80)

Alexander Schneider
Technical University of Munich
Hi Tobias,
recently I've used MapSys to create some CLDs and SFDs. It is very intuitive, allows you to manipulate the diagrams to optimize their look so that the results look pretty. It also provides simulation features which I haven't tried yet.
Alternative tools are for example:
1 Recommendation
Kim Warren
London Business School
Simpler online tools are now available, see for example Insightmaker http://insightmaker.com/ and Sysdea https://sysdea.com/ (I must declare an interest in the latter, so offer no judgement on any tool)
2 Recommendations
Isaac Camilo Gonzalez Romero
Comillas Pontifical University
Hi tobias. I believe that PowerSim is a powerful tool for system dynamics modelling, even though it is strict with units consistency you have important functionalities such as risk and optimization analysis. Vensim is also a good tool, for sensitivity analysis, you can create parallel models to run differente scenarios.
So despite the fact that powersim is one of the best system dynamics software you may also try with vensim.
I hope this would help you.
1 Recommendation
Pratigyna Rajkrishna
Colorado State University
Hello Tobias,
I agree with Kim about Insightmaker, it's a really good learning tool if you are new to system dynamics modeling.
I would also recommend TRUE, it has a good set of tutorials and is a freeware. I used it for my thesis, the learning curve is slightly steep, but I'm in love with the interface and how the output interactive model looks like.
Hope this helps.
1 Recommendation
Klaus Vogstad
Markedslabben AS
What about Dynaplan Smia ? The founder of PowerSim moved on and formed another company several years ago. He is now developing Dynaplan Smia, see www.dynaplan.com
1 Recommendation
Leonard Malczynski
Mindseye Computing LLC
There is an SD tools page I maintain for the SD Society at: tools.systemdynamics.org
The other more important concern is what you plan to do in SD. CLDs? Small models? Large models? Hybrid models? Knowing that will help you to pick the tool within your budget.
11 Recommendations
V. B. Sondur
Maratha Mandal Engineering College
I have been using SYMBOLS software using bondgraphs and am quite happy with it.
Steve Schneider
University of Arizona Global Campus
The recently published interactive eBook "Beyond Connecting the Dots" is an excellent source on simulation and modeling. Just put the title in Google and it will come up.
1 Recommendation
Pierre-Alexandre Château
National Sun Yat-sen University
I agree with Alexander that Vensim is great. You can also give Goldsim a try (http://www.goldsim.com).
Klaus Vogstad
Markedslabben AS
Anyone have experience with simantics ?  It's closer to more programming language capabilities, while maintaining the graphical modelling language of system dynamics tools www.simantics.org 
Farzin Piltan
University of Ulsan
Hi Tobias
I think MATLAB/SIMULINK is also very good to implement system dynamic modeling using Lagrangian formulation or the other type of modeling.  Based on this software you can system identification based on intelligent method and implement it based on this software
Jose Fiestas
National University of Engineering
Hello  Tobias,
  • Ithink/Stella
  • Consideo
  • Simile (works on linux also)
  • Vensim
John Hamer Powell
University of Exeter
I work exclusively in qualitative SD modelling and use Vensim. It's free for educational use.
1 Recommendation
Tobias Riasanow
Technical University of Munich
Currently I'm trying to develop a System Dynamics Model of the risk factors in IT projects to develop a holistic risk management approach. 
Yes the basis for me is always a causal loop model of the factors derived from literature (case studies, etc.).
Thanks for the very helpful comments, I definitely will try some of the alternatives to see the differences to PowerSim :)
John Hamer Powell
University of Exeter
Tobias, I am just finishing a paper for EJOR on that very subject of holistic risk management using QPID under Vensim. I add the human agents outside of Vensim. If you would like to msg me I'll show you the draft before it's sent out. It's a series of four papers dealing with, respectively, the need to include dynamic behaviours, the need to include human agency, the knowledge  aspect, and lastly the issues of plural ontologies in risk identification. Mostly I'm concerned with CHASs (critical human activity systems) like epidemic control,, safety critical systems and such
Vensim is good because clearly you're not going to use a quantitative approach or numerical simulation, ,and  Vensim is particularly good for structural analysis (although others work, also).
1 Recommendation
Pierre Kunsch
Vrije Universiteit Brussel
I use Vensim PLE (freeware) with my students; it is downloadable from the Ventana Systems site www.vensim.com. This educational version is sufficient in the classroom:  it shares many features with Vensim Professional or Vensim DSS.  Nevertheless subscripts (vector representation of variables) are not available in Vensim PLE while they are many times necessary in larger models.  
Veerendra K Rai
International School of Business and Media (ISB&M)
We are using VENSIM DSS. It i the best tool we have come across for SD modeling. It has features such as "Arrays" which helps in dis-aggregation and takeing the model towards closer to Agent based modeling if neceesary. It has built-in optimizer which is quite powerful and useful of course.
Leonard Malczynski
Mindseye Computing LLC
Vensim DSS is indeed a great tool. Some of the other leading tools have arrays, optimization, sampling, etc. In addition some permit thousands of elements per array and get much closer to ABM than Vensim DSS. If you are making a first time purchase decision you would be remiss not to look at iThink by isee systems and Studio by Powersim AS.
You may want to look at "CONSIDEO MODLER". 
Leonard Malczynski
Mindseye Computing LLC
I realize that this is an old question but two more opinions:
Dynamics before detail - always!
Dynamics, then detail, then interface - always!
Using interface elements to help debug a model is a good idea. Each tool is different and has various advantages. Interfaces can take up the majority of the time spent modeling.
Be wise, plan ahead, sketch layouts.
A rule that I use is this:
Total model variables = exogenous variables + endogenous variables (the real SD) + variables that enable a nice interface + test variables.
You decide which of them to show to your customer/client/user/advisor/etc. Therefore Application = Model + Interface
2 Recommendations
Milad Mousavian H.
University of Melbourne
Hi there,
Vensim is one of the most user-friendly options you have.
the PLE version is free while the DSS version is not, although it has been recently cracked!
Best.
1 Recommendation
Leonard Malczynski
Mindseye Computing LLC
I realize that we are all expressing our opinions. No one can make an objective recommendation without experience with all the modeling tools. No one has done a thorough comparison. Each tool has features that are common to the system dynamics methodology and each tool has features that set it apart from the others.
Please be aware of 'success to the successful', switching costs, your objectives with respect to tool features (units, layout, naming, functions, interface capability, discrete event capability, links to other methods and tools, ...), your familiarity with the system dynamics methodology, and more.
Finally, know the problem domain and the usefulness of both the methodology, system dynamics, and the tool to your current and future problem solving tasks.
I have used the three leading tools and have an opinion too. I will not state it here. Contact me if you want that opinion.
Joska Kulcsar
Kerry Ingredients GmbH
Hello Leonhard,
why not using one of our tools to exactly figuring this out?
What are the most important priorities/goals for a system dynamic tool?
1. easy to understand and present
2. supports interconnected thinking
3. consens solution orientated
.....
.....
Leonard Malczynski
Mindseye Computing LLC
Joska,
I have been thinking about your suggestion for a month.
I am making an exhaustive features list.
Thanks,
Len
Miloš Jovičić
University of Kragujevac
I think that Sysdea is extremely practical and agile (for agile modeling approach).
I can recommend Sysdea for practical business modeling. If you are new to system dynamics it is probably the best tool to actually figure out how system dynamics functions. If you are doing real world staff you will have all the applications that you need.
Leonard Malczynski
Mindseye Computing LLC
As a service to the community there are about 100 models in Powersim Studio format for free at my company's website.
Many can be viewed with the free Powersim Studio Express.
Edgar Duarte-Forero
Universidad Libre
In my opinion Vensim (https://vensim.com/) is the best tool. There's a new version named Ventity (https://vensim.com/vensim-software/#ventity-bundle), which brings you more flexibility for analysis. By the way, if you are just beginning in the field, InsightMaker could be really helpful: https://insightmaker.com/
In my paper about SD and transport, we describe how to apply this tool to fleet management:
Leonard Malczynski
Mindseye Computing LLC
De gustibus non disputandem est
About matters of taste there is no point in arguing.
De veritate disputandum est
About matters of truth, dispute is fruitful.
Tool opinions are taste.
Model quality is truth.
How can we help those looking for a system dynamics tool to choose?
No single person has used all the available tools to model the same problem. It seems that the situation that each tool user is in has a big influence on their decision; e.g. student, professional, funds available, time available to learn, user community, sample models, tutorials, size of problem, tool flexibility, ... etc. There is no objectively developed list of these attributes. In this forum perhaps cost is the first criteria.
Hopefully we all have the same goal, quality modeling. Then we might ask how does a tool help me to achieve quality models? I do not believe we can answer that in this forum.
So, download what you can for free. Find model repositories, find tutorials, find user communities, find mentors. Expect to invest some time. Good luck!
Fabián P Cuenca Mayorga
Universidad Tecnica de Machala
For agroecosystems and environmental systems modelling, I would suggest STELLA or BERKELEY MADONNA.
2 Recommendations
I have used Vensim for my causal loop. You may want to try that.
Leonard Malczynski
Mindseye Computing LLC
Attached is a 2015 comparison. Please remember that we are in 2019, much has changed with all the software evaluated.
Aleksandar P. Medarevic
The independent researcher
Could you please recommend some R package in addition?
Leonard Malczynski
Mindseye Computing LLC
Jim Duggan has done work with SD and R. Please search for his work. Since R is not an icon based language it has not been used much.
Sajeep Sankalpa
Rubber Research Institute of Sri Lanka
What is best for Agricultural System modelling ?
I don't think the content matters much. Most of the distinctions among the software packages are related to handling of data, calibration and interface features. So the key questions will be things like, who is your audience, how and when will the model be used, how much data, etc.?
1 Recommendation
Dénes Csala
Lancaster University
I believe the best start is InsightMaker or Loopy. For modelling itself, Vensim still the best, maybe AnyLogic.
I like the Loopy visuals, but I think you have to be a little cautious with it: https://metasd.com/2017/03/loopy/
Sara Dehghani
University of Tehran
Hi. I read the answers. does anybody know which of the system dynamics software could have linked by PYTHON or R?
This is possible by several avenues. Vensim has a .dll that can be run from a variety of languages and applications. Vensim .mdl format can also be imported to PySD and c via SDeverywhere. I believe PySD can also do XMILE now. You can also run dynamic models directly in R - Jim Duggan is the expert on this. However, I think R is a good environment for exercising and estimating models, but a lousy one for developing them.
1 Recommendation
Sara Dehghani
University of Tehran
@Thomas Fiddaman appreciate for your information
Leonard Malczynski
Mindseye Computing LLC
The Powersim Studio line also has dll capability with C++. The SDK integrates simulations in custom-designed software applications using C++, VB, ASP, HTML, etc.
I agree with Thomas Fiddaman, without an icon based interface for building models you are operating as if in the 1970s.
Elie Azar
Carleton University
I would recommend Anylogic:
(1) it handles SD as well as Agent-Based Modeling (ABM) and Discrete Event (DE) simulation in case you want to eventually develop hybrid models.
(2) it has a nice graphical interface for visualization.
(3) it has a free Personal Learning Edition (PLE) that is quite decent.
Leonard Malczynski
Mindseye Computing LLC
The AnyLogic web site says: AnyLogic is the only tool that allows the combination of system dynamics model components with those developed using agent based and discrete event methods."
I know that Studio has discrete event capability and I believe that Stella Architect and Vensim also have some discrete capability. I have also seen an ABM model in Studio.
1 Recommendation
Ventity also has significant ABM and discrete capability, and the architecture works very naturally with ad hoc data.
Elie Azar
Carleton University
Leonard Malczynski , I did not mean to say that Anylogic is the only one. I'm just speaking out of my personal experience with the software, which I used a lot for my research. I don't know (nor plan on defending) what they mention on their website :)
Leonard Malczynski
Mindseye Computing LLC
Elie Azar , thanks. I just want to let folks know that they should look at the entire market. I believe that over the years we have found up to 16 different 'SD' modeling tools out there. It is sometimes quite difficult to match one's needs to the software features. Then of course there are budgets, learning curves, switching costs, operating systems, etc.
Elie Azar
Carleton University
Leonard Malczynski, totally agree.
Masni Dyta Anggriani
University of Indonesia
I am using powersim studio software, but actually there is no best tool, every tool has it’s weakness and strength. You can also use Vensim, which is free download.
1 Recommendation
Ventity is also free for academic use. https://ventity.biz/
Jose Gonzalez de Durana
University of the Basque Country (Spain)
In my opinion it is Anylogic because not only includes System Dynamics but also Discrete Event and Agent Based methods, which can be combined in agents, even agents inside other agents.
1 Recommendation
Parnia Shafinejad
Italian National Research Council
for modeling the economic assessment of new Circular Business Models with SD, is it essential to know the programming languages to run the SD model or with existing tools we can develop the interconnections and variables without needs of programming?
1 Recommendation
Leonard Malczynski
Mindseye Computing LLC
The majority of system dynamics models use basic algebra in their equations. Basically, + - * / and maybe ^. Most have many functions (100+) to do things from SQRT to matrix inversion to random distributions to array manipulation to lookups to selection criteria to If/Then/Else etc. If the economic assessment model is expecting more that that some tools can call external routines and/or permit the embedding of non-SD algorithms in an SD model. If you have a good idea of what you want to accomplish you can check the tool against your requirements at a vendor's website. If that doesn't work there are typically user groups for the more commonly used tools (Powersim Studio, Ventana Vensim, iseesystems Stella, Anylogic Anylogic, etc). User group members always provide help. Some tools also have SDK (software development kit) that permit a conversation between the SD tool and other tools (that is a rich area for discussion). I know a PhD candiate in economics that used results from I/O, econometrics, and GIS and embedded those equations/results into an SD model to look at the over time effects of renewable energy policy. I have also seen I/O calculations, Great Circle Distance calculations, links to Google Earth, discrete event, and some ABM embedded in an SD model.
Jose Gonzalez de Durana
University of the Basque Country (Spain)
Are you really interested in how, that is, what mathematical methods does the software tool that performs the simulation use? If your answer is yes then I think you should use AnyLogic. If your answer is no, then you can use PowerSim or any other tool that does everything for you; the problem with this is that you will never know what it is really doing, which is especially evident when unexpected errors appear.
Parnia Shafinejad
Italian National Research Council
Actually what we are developing is based on the economic assessment for EVs remanufacturing and recycling with considering different variables and actors, what we need is to analyze the profitability of the Business Model we have designed for remanufacturing and recycling the EVs across 10 years. Based on the Cost benefit analysis (CBA) that we have performed for these operations we would like to economically assess the operations for each involved actors along the value chain (Dismantlers, remanufacturers with the robotized operation, recyclers and collecting centers). There are different scenarios analyzed for these BMs which each has different impacts and accordingly different costs and revenues, which is the point of analysis for our study.
Leonard Malczynski
Mindseye Computing LLC
I was on a team that looked at the future of the 'drive train' for vehicles. We used SD. Here is a reference Parametric analysis of technology and policy trade offs for conventional and electric light-duty vehicles, Energy Policy, Volume 46, July 2012, Pages 473-488. Also try the SD Bibliography at https://sds.memberclicks.net/bibliography
Jose Gonzalez de Durana
University of the Basque Country (Spain)
Parnia Shafinejad , I guess that each of your recycling and remanufacturing operations could be decomposed into a sequence of discret event operations, described in terms of entities, products, parts, queues, processes delays, resourced, services, etc.
If this is the case then your system could be modeled using some of classical discrete event tools (Gpss, Simscript, Arena...) or, much better, using the AnyLogic Process Modeling Library.
Please email me at jmgdurana@gmail.com if you like a more detailed answer.
I think you'd have to know more about the problem statement before choosing a discrete event simulation. If the questions are strategic and span several levels of the value chain, a DES is likely to emphasize a lot of detail that obstructs experimentation with alternative structures.
1 Recommendation
Jose Gonzalez de Durana
University of the Basque Country (Spain)
Tobias Riasanow Yes, of course. We would need a more detailed description of the problem, that's why I put, "I guess" in my answer and offered her a further contact. Still I think that if we want to make a cost benefit analysis, some processes description even if it is "roughly" we should do, because if not, what are we going to count?
Jose Gonzalez de Durana
University of the Basque Country (Spain)
Parnia Shafinejad , I am sorry to say the information I told you before maybe is not very updated to your problem, as Tobias Riasanow suggested --thanks Tobias-- since the issues of supply chain, circular economy, etc. are unfamiliar to me, as the only that I can help is based on my past experience in teaching automatic control and manufacturing systems topics. Still, I have been looking at the internet and I have found some information that could perhaps help you:
Derek Woodgate
University of Agder
Vensim or Matlab
1 Recommendation
FC Prinsloo
University of Nevada, Reno
Anylogic is a good option, but you can also write a custom model in Python object orientated language.
FC Prinsloo
University of Nevada, Reno
Anylogic is a good option, but you can also write a custom model in Python object orientated language.
FC Prinsloo
University of Nevada, Reno
Anylogic is a good option, but you can also write a custom model in Python object orientated language.
FC Prinsloo
University of Nevada, Reno
Anylogic is a good option, but you can also write a custom model in Python object orientated language.
FC Prinsloo
University of Nevada, Reno
Anylogic is a good option, but you can also write a custom model in Python object orientated language.
John ONYEKACHI Onyeagoziri
University of Pretoria
I use VENSIM. I recently heard about the Enroad but not too sure how it works. I will be starting the class soon to learn how the Enroad works.
Ariya Elbegjargal
Mongolian University of Science and Technology
anylogic is short time but vensim long time than good
Ariya Elbegjargal
Mongolian University of Science and Technology
vensimDSS is long time most good
Leonard Malczynski
Mindseye Computing LLC
Powersim Studio (www.powersim.com) has a completely free version, no time limit. Look for Studio Express.
Masni Dyta Anggriani
University of Indonesia
Powersim studio
Leonard Malczynski
Mindseye Computing LLC
Free webinar using Powersim Studio to introduce System Dynamics. https://systemdynamics.org/introduction-to-system-dynamics-modeling/

Similar questions and discussions

Call for Book Chapters - Springer-Palgrave Macmillan
Discussion
8 replies
  • Dean LangeveldtDean Langeveldt
I am excited to share with you an opportunity to contribute to an upcoming book titled "Philosophically (Re)Imagining Educational Leadership in the Age of Connectivity and 4IR: Shaping the Future of Education in a Hyperconnected World", to be published by Springer-Palgrave Macmillan. This book, edited by Prof. Doniwen Pietersen, Dr. Dean Langeveldt, and Dr. Elson Davison Khambule, aims to explore the intersection of educational leadership and advanced technologies within the context of the Fourth Industrial Revolution (4IR).
The book seeks to provide a comprehensive philosophical exploration of transformative leadership practices in education, addressing the ethical, innovative, and humanistic challenges posed by 4IR technologies. We welcome chapters on a variety of themes, including but not limited to:
  • The Mindful Leader: Philosophy and Purpose in the Age of AI and Education
  • Leading with Integrity: Navigating Ethical Dilemmas in a 4IR-Driven World
  • Wisdom and Innovation: Philosophical Insights for Leading in the 4IR Classroom
  • Ethics in the Cloud: The Role of Leadership and Morality in Digital Education
  • The Post-Human Educator: Philosophical Leadership in a World of AI and Automation
  • Future-Ready Leadership: Bridging Traditional Values with 4IR Realities
  • Empathy in Algorithms: Cultivating Compassionate Leadership in Tech-Driven Education
  • The Digital Socrates: Leading with Inquiry and Insight in a 4IR Context
  • Humanity at the Helm: Ethical Leadership and Technology in Education
  • Equity in Action: Bridging the Digital Divide in Education Leadership
  • Leadership in Context: Addressing 4IR Challenges in Under-Resourced Schools
  • Bridging Being and Bytes: Philosophical Foundations for Leaders in 4IR Education
We encourage contributions that are either conceptual or empirical in nature. Theoretical explorations, philosophical reflections, and literature reviews are welcome alongside research-based chapters featuring empirical data, case studies, or practical applications.
Submission Guidelines:
  • Abstract and Affiliation: A concise summary of the chapter (250-300 words), including your affiliation and the key theme or chapter focus.
  • Chapters: Contributions should be between 5,000 and 7,000 words, including references. Shorter contributions (3,000-5,000 words) focusing on specific themes or practical insights are also welcome.
  • Formatting: APA 7th edition guidelines must be followed.
Important Dates:
  • Abstract Submission Deadline: 15 January 2025
  • Chapter Submission to Editors: 15 May 2025
  • Editors’ Feedback to Authors: 15 July 2025
  • Corrected Chapters to Editors: 15 September 2025
  • Submission to Publisher: 15 October 2025
We look forward to your valuable contributions to this significant academic endeavor.
Best regards,
February 2025-Call for Chapters on Academic Integrity - Open Access Book (FREE to authors)
Discussion
8 replies
  • Alexander AmigudAlexander Amigud
Dear colleagues,
I am delighted to invite you to contribute a chapter to an upcoming edited volume titled Advanced Topics in Academic Integrity: A Temporal, Technological, Social, and Pedagogical Perspective
This will be an open access book to be published by an independent publisher in Canada. There are NO publishing fees. It is FREE to authors. Ebooks will be made available FREE on Kindle, while physical books (softcover) will be sold at cost to cover production and shipping expenses.
Abstract
Academic integrity lies at the core of the educational system, defining standards and safeguarding the credibility of academic work, ensuring competence in education, and preserving the value of institutional credentials. This topical collection examines academic integrity from four overlapping perspectives of temporal evolution, technological impact, social and cultural influences, and pedagogical approaches. In this book, the notion of integrity is posited as more than just the quality of being honest or the ability to enforce policy; instead, it is presented as an interplay between the individual, group, institution, and society. Before offering solutions, one must examine the influence of cultural norms and expectations, economic pressures, technological advancements, and pedagogical approaches—each of which shapes perceptions of fairness, influences behaviors, and either advances or creates barriers to meeting the needs of students and institutions. By uncovering the rich tapestry of these relationships this book aims to provide a nuance understanding of academic integrity issues by drawing from data-driven research and experiential narratives of educators and students.
The book is organized into four sections, drawing from a multitude of academic and professional domains, to provide an advanced understanding of academic integrity issues. All methods and schools of thought are welcome.
[A] Academic Integrity Through a Temporal Lens [B] Academic Integrity Through a Technology Lens [C] Academic Integrity Through a Social Lens [D] Academic Integrity Through a Pedagogical Lens
Topics may include, but are not limited to:
1. Evolution of Definitions, Cheating Strategies, and Response Strategies
2. Technology in Society and the Classroom
3. The “Netflixification” of Education
4. Generative AI and Machine-Aided Plagiarism
5. Social Factors Influencing Integrity
6. Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion
7. Assessment and Evaluation
8. Traditional, Hybrid, and Fully Online Delivery Modes
9. Phenomenological Perspectives (educators’ or student’s lived experiences)
All methods and schools of thought are welcome. The abstract should be up to 500 words, and the full paper should not exceed 12,000 words. All submissions should follow APA style.
Important Dates
Abstract submission deadline: Ongoing
Full chapter submission deadline: September 1, 2025
Peer-review results returned: TBA
Final chapter submission deadline: TBA
Editor
International Business University, Toronto, Canada
Call for Book Chapters without Publishing Fee
Discussion
10 replies
  • Onur GülerOnur Güler
CALL FOR CHAPTER PROPOSALS
Proposal Submission Deadline: December 22, 2024
We are pleased to invite you to contribute a chapter to the upcoming book titled Innovative Materials for Next-Generation Defense Applications: Cost, Performance, and Mass Production. This book will explore the latest advancements in materials science, specifically focusing on materials designed to meet the demands of modern defense applications. Topics will cover high-performance materials such as advanced composites, high-strength alloys, ceramics, and innovative protective coatings, among others.
Key Details:
Chapter Proposal Submission: Please submit a chapter proposal (1,000 to 2,000 words) that clearly explains the mission, objectives, and concerns of your proposed chapter by December 22, 2024.
Notification of Proposal Status: Authors will be notified by December 29, 2024, about the status of their proposals and will receive detailed chapter guidelines.
Full Chapter Submission: Full chapters (minimum 10,000 words, including references and related readings) are expected to be submitted by February 23, 2025. All contributors must consult the manuscript submission guidelines before submitting their full chapters. These can be found here: Submission Guidelines.
Peer Review Process: All submitted chapters will undergo a double-anonymized peer review process. Contributors may also be requested to serve as reviewers for this project.
Important Notes:
There are no submission or acceptance fees for manuscripts submitted to this publication.
Chapters will cover a wide array of topics in materials science, including but not limited to:
Advanced Composites and High-Strength Alloys for Defense
Protective Coatings and Surface Durability in Defense Applications
High-Entropy Alloys and Thermal Stability in Extreme Environments
Nanotechnology and Smart Materials for Defense Innovation
We welcome contributions from researchers, academics, and industry professionals with expertise in materials science, defense engineering, and related fields. This book aims to bridge the gap between cutting-edge research and real-world defense applications.
For further information and to submit your chapter proposal, please visit the call for chapters page on the eEditorial Discovery® online submission manager linked below:
Important Dates
December 22, 2024 : Proposal Submission Deadline
January 5, 2025 : Notification of Acceptance
February 23, 2025 : Full Chapter Submission
March 30, 2025 : Review Results Returned
April 27, 2025 : Final Acceptance Notification
May 4, 2025 : Final Chapter Submission
Editorial Advisory Board Members:
Onur GÜLER (onurguler@ktu.edu.tr, Karadeniz Technical University, Turkey)
Müslim ÇELEBİ (muslimcelebi@ktu.edu.tr, Karadeniz Technical University, Turkey)
Abdullah Hasan KARABACAK (hasankarabacak@ktu.edu.tr, Karadeniz Technical University, Turkey)

Related Publications

Article
A sector or subsystem approach to the formulation of system dynamics models is described. The approach concentrates on the development of the T'orrester flow or schematic diagram, and incorporates the concept of an interaction matrix to assist in the formulation of such models. The interaction matrix, together with an explicit sequence of steps for...
Article
The changing structure of organization and the increasing diversity of business have forced organizations to have abilities to coordinate dispersed business activities. They have required cooperation and coordination among the functional units in the organization which should involve group decision-making processes. Although many group decision-mak...
Article
Full-text available
This paper describes the outcome of a research project undertaken for the government of the State of Sarawak in E. Malaysia. A system dynamics model was constructed so as to inform the State's future economic and social planning to 2020. Positive engagement with State government officials at the highest levels was a feature of the successful comple...
Got a technical question?
Get high-quality answers from experts.