What is a revolutionary phenotype and how do we avoid one?

Suppose that in January 1996, 1000 adult residents of a community accepted an invitation to be examined for hypothyroidism at a local clinic. Eight persons were found to have the disease, it was newly discovered in 3, and 5 were already under treatment. The same group was examined again in January 1998. Six new cases of hypothyroidism were discovered; of these, two had developed symptoms several months before and had been diagnosed and treated by their personal physicians. It was learned that of the 8 hypothyroid persons discovered at the 1996 examination, one had discontinued medication and died of heart disease in 1997. Otherwise, all persons examined in 1996 came to the second examination.

Using the above information, respond to the following questions – don’t forget to use the formulas already provided in this chapter:

I would greatly appreciate your assistance in verifying my calculations and providing any insights you may have.

epidemiologia de onicomicosis en pacientes con diabetes tipo 2.

In the identified case of familial desminopathy (T341P DES mutation in heterozygous state), the son has bradycardia, but the father did not have bradycardia. How can this fact be explained?

in the descriptive table, how would you interpret the p-values of the descriptives of your sample?

For instance, if there was a p < .001 between three levels of poverty, how would this be interpreted if the outcome was hypertension. There were significant differences in hypertension among the three levels of poverty?

I would greatly appreciate if you could give a better example so I can understand the idea of p-values in table 1.

I am wondering which term is more appropriate for use in titles when discussing a group within a larger category: 'among' or 'in'?

For example:

'Prevalence of sleep disorders among children with autism'

'Prevalence of sleep disorders in children with autism'

Could you explain the difference between using 'among' and 'in' in such contexts and advise which option is more suitable for title usage?

Bonjour à tous,

Je travaille actuellement sur un protocole d’étude pour une recherche primaire rétrospective sur le cancer pendant la grossesse. L’objectif est d’analyser la prévalence, les caractéristiques des patientes et l’impact sur les nouveau-nés.

J’élabore en ce moment une fiche d’exploitation exhaustive et je cherche des conseils sur les variables essentielles à inclure. Avez-vous des recommandations basées sur des études similaires ? Si vous avez un exemple de fiche d’exploitation ou des articles qui pourraient m’aider, je serais ravie d’en discuter.

Merci pour votre aide et votre expertise

#cancer #pregnancy #epidemiology #clinicalresearch #publichealth