Question
Asked 19 May 2013
What is a "randomized double blind crossover"?
What is a "randomized double blind crossover"?
Most recent answer

Please see an example of study using this design.
2 Recommendations
Popular answers (1)
Medical College of Wisconsin
Randomized: means the researcher does not assign how the subject will be treated. The treatment will be decided by either pre-arranged code in a opaque envelop or container.
Double blind: means researcher, the treatment handler, and even the patient does not know what kind of treatment is provided except the one who provide the treatment (such as pharmacist who is not one of the researcher that provided drug without any information that the doctor or nurse will know)
Crossover: means the treatment will be switched to the other treatment arm after a pre-determined period.
Correct me if I am wrong.
5 Recommendations
All Answers (7)
Medical College of Wisconsin
Randomized: means the researcher does not assign how the subject will be treated. The treatment will be decided by either pre-arranged code in a opaque envelop or container.
Double blind: means researcher, the treatment handler, and even the patient does not know what kind of treatment is provided except the one who provide the treatment (such as pharmacist who is not one of the researcher that provided drug without any information that the doctor or nurse will know)
Crossover: means the treatment will be switched to the other treatment arm after a pre-determined period.
Correct me if I am wrong.
5 Recommendations
Loyola University Medical Center
Randomized means the subjects are randomly assigned to different arms of the study which receive different treatment. As Ru-Jeng wrote the treatment will be decided by either pre-arranged code in an envelop. Double-blind means neither the physician nor the patients knows whether an active drug is given or an inactive placebo is given (pharmacist may know what is given, since pharmacist is not participating in the study). Cross-over design is the one in which patients receive 2 different treatments. When the randomized trial is a repeated measures design, the same measures are collected multiple times for each patient.
A crossover clinical trial is a repeated measures design in which each patient is randomly assigned to a sequence of treatments, including at least 2 treatments of which one is the standard treatment or placebo. A crossover design has two advantages over a crossover longitudinal study. Firstly, the influence of confounding variables is minimized since each patient serves his or her own control. Secondly, all crossover designs have 'balance' that means all subjects should receive the same number of treatments and that all subjects participate for the same number of periods. Interestingly, in most crossover clinical trials each patient receives all treatments.
1 Recommendation
Cardiff University
Cardiff University provide an e-Learning stand alone Masters level module on Research, Statistics and Evidence Based Practice, which is appropriate for different healthcare professionals working in any clinical areas. This might be something you're interested in developing further.
2 Recommendations
University of Nottingham Medical School
The downsize with this design is the presence of a carry-over effect.
Regarding the reply of Ru-Jeng Teng and Omer Iqbal ; both are OK; but missed the concern raised by Tim Constantin.
So if I may add, that in any crossover study design we have a wash out period.
In case both active drugs tested, have different wash out period; then we use logically the longest wash out period.
In case we use placebo; the wash out period will be more simply determined.
Similar questions and discussions
Call for Chapters A Comprehensive Guide for Novice Researchers in Clinical Trials
Miltiadis D. Lytras
Call for Chapters
A Comprehensive Guide for Novice Researchers in Clinical Trials
Elsevier, Academic Press Imprint
Series: Next Generation Technology Driven Personalized Medicine and Smart Healthcare
For more information on the series, visit Next Generation Technology Driven Personalized Medicine.
Call for Chapters
Introduction to the Theme
The landscape of clinical trials is evolving rapidly, with increasing emphasis on personalized medicine, innovative methodologies, and technology-driven approaches. This book, A Comprehensive Guide for Novice Researchers in Clinical Trials, aims to provide an accessible, in-depth foundation for early-stage researchers and professionals in the field. Topics include research methods, trial design, ethics, data management, and regulatory insights specific to Saudi Arabia. The objective is to create a resource that bridges theoretical foundations with practical applications in clinical trials, addressing the needs of today’s healthcare researchers.
Objectives of the Book
This book is designed to:
- Equip novice researchers with a comprehensive understanding of clinical trial methodologies and requirements.
- Introduce essential aspects of clinical research, from trial design to data management, while highlighting ethics and regulatory practices.
- Serve as a Scopus-indexed reference that leverages Elsevier’s ELSA platform, making it accessible to a broad academic and professional audience.
Table of Indicative Chapters
- Introduction to Health Research Methods
- History of Clinical Trials
- Clinical Trial Designs
- Clinical Trial Essentials
- Ethics and Good Clinical Practice in Clinical Trials
- Trial Protocol Development
- Clinical Research Site Operation
- Clinical Data Management
- Clinical Trial Monitoring
- Principles of Statistics in Clinical Trials
- Reporting Clinical Trials
- Essentials of Project Management
- Regulatory Affairs of Clinical Trials in Saudi Arabia
- Training Programs and Job Opportunities in the Clinical Trial Industry
Important Guidelines for Contributors
- Submission Platform: Contributions will be managed through Elsevier’s ELSA platform.
- Proposal Submission: A chapter proposal (300-500 words) is required for initial review. Detailed guidelines for authors, a sample chapter, and sample chapter abstract are attached for reference.
- Manuscript Preparation: Use MS Word with consistent formatting (bold, font size) for different heading levels. Each chapter should contain an abstract (100-150 words) and 5-10 keywords. Refer to the Elsevier Manuscript Preparation Guidelines for specific formatting instructions.
- Artwork and Figures: Figures and tables should be submitted separately, with high-resolution images in JPG or TIFF format as per the provided guidelines.
- Permissions: Contributors are responsible for obtaining permissions for any third-party material. An artwork list detailing all figures and tables with appropriate permissions is required upon manuscript submission.
- Language and Style: Both British and US English are acceptable; however, authors must remain consistent within their chapters.
- Reference Style: Use either the Harvard (Name-Date) or Vancouver (Numbered) style, as outlined in the guidelines.
Timeline
- Submission of Chapter Proposals (300-500 words): December 5, 2024
- Acceptance of Book Chapter Proposals: December 10, 2024
- Full Chapters Due: February 15, 2025
- Reviews to Authors: March 5, 2025
- Final Chapters to ELSA: April 1, 2025
- Publication: Quarter 4, 2025
Editorial and Contact Information
Editors
- Dr. Basim Alsaywid Saudi National Institute of Health, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia Email: balsaywid@snih.gov.sa
- Dr. Miltiadis D. Lytras Saudi National Institute of Health, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia Email: miltiadis.lytras@gmail.com
Managing Editor
- Dimitrios Lytras, MD Student School of Medicine, National Kapodistrian University of Athens Email: dimitrios.lytras.md@gmail.com
For further information, please refer to the attached author guidelines, sample chapters, and sample abstract. We look forward to receiving your proposals and contributions to this impactful project.
Call for Expert Participation: Seeking PhD-Level Clinical Research Specialists for a Study on Linguistic Comparability in Clinical Trials
Ludovic Leleu
Hello ResearchGate community,
I’m pleased to announce that the SCALab Laboratory at the University of Lille is launching a study to understand how experts evaluate the linguistic comparability of items used in quality assessments of clinical trials.
We are currently seeking expert participants who meet the following criteria:
- A background in clinical research methodology
- Native proficiency in English
- Possession of a doctorate (PhD)
The study requires completing a brief evaluation document (PDF), which should take approximately 30 minutes. Once you express your interest, you will receive a detailed information letter via email followed by the evaluation document upon confirmation of your participation.
Your expertise and insights are invaluable to advancing our research. If you are interested in contributing, please contact me at: ludovic.leleu.etu@univ-lille.fr
Alternatively, feel free to send a direct message here on ResearchGate.
If you support public research, please consider sharing this announcement within your networks.