Question
Asked 6 January 2025
Paolo Miguel Bulan
Paolo Miguel Bulan

What is a good reference on qualitative content analysis for beginners?

I am looking for a reference on how to conduct qualitative content analysis. It's preferable that it should be beginner friendly and the steps can be generalizable to other contexts (i.e. analysis for scoping reviews etc.).
Content Analysis

All Answers (2)

David L Morgan
Portland State University
Basic Content Analysis by Weber is a good place to start.
Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology by Krippendorff will take you further.
Cite
Qayssar Jabbar Gatea
Mustansiriyah University
For a beginner-friendly reference on qualitative content analysis, I recommend Krippendorff's Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. This book is comprehensive yet accessible, offering clear explanations of the foundational concepts and steps involved in qualitative content analysis. It also provides practical examples that can be generalized to various contexts, including scoping reviews. Another excellent resource is Schreier’s Qualitative Content Analysis in Practice, which focuses on step-by-step guidance for conducting content analysis, making it ideal for beginners. Both references should help you build a strong foundation and apply the method effectively across different research contexts.
Cite

Top contributors to discussions in this field

David L Morgan
David L Morgan
Nick J Fox
Nick J Fox
Nidhal Kamel Taha El-Omari
Nidhal Kamel Taha El-Omari
Pichakoon Auttawechasakoon
Pichakoon Auttawechasakoon
Doug Traylor
Doug Traylor

Similar questions and discussions

How to convert quantitative data into qualitative data?
Question
15 answers
  • Asked 19 February 2025
  • Alwielland Q. BelloAlwielland Q. Bello
How to convert quantitative data into qualitative data?
How can i do sampling, if my study involves multiple stakeholders?
Question
6 answers
  • Asked 6 January 2025
  • Rajeemol T RRajeemol T R
I am doing educational research (mixed methodology), which involves responses from multiple stakeholders. Quantitative phase has 2 types of respondents and qualitative has 3 types. How can i do the sampling for the entire study?
Can individuals who informed/help develop research questions take part in the actual study
Discussion
2 replies
  • Asked 20 February 2025
  • Jesse KarpathiosJesse Karpathios
Hello,
I am doing a qualitative study and want to have some of the community inform my research questions. Can those participants who help develop inform the question also take part in the interviews - I am struggling to get participants but still wish to do this and I thought it would sit nicely along the concept of Participatory Research Action
When can we say that the sample size is small? Or large?
Discussion
9 replies
  • Asked 9 February 2025
  • Ammar Kuti NasserAmmar Kuti Nasser
What is the appropriate standard for this? Note that there is a difference in studies.
Is this form of collaboration acceptable?
Question
3 answers
  • Asked 8 February 2025
  • Lalithambigai RajagopalLalithambigai Rajagopal
I completed a qualitative PhD by thesis in 2021 in Australia. My thesis was published on the university's site. In addition, I published a meta-synthesis. Overall technically two online. There are three chapter results in my thesis each addressing an objective. Unfortunately I am unable to turn each of the chapter findings into individual articles.
Now, my question is since my thesis is available online, can I take one of the three chapter results and collaborate with another researcher from another country who has published similar result in the form of a journal article?
My aim is to compare and contrast the findings between two different countries, and turn this into new article. Is that possible to do this way?
Do I have to seek permission from my former university regarding this?
And who will be the authors be?
One of the statistical methods is (z test).
Discussion
6 replies
  • Asked 7 February 2025
  • Ammar Kuti NasserAmmar Kuti Nasser
Is there a test for the difference between the means of two samples using this test in the SPSS program?
How to Find Research Gaps and Use Them to Develop Relevant Research Topics
Discussion
10 replies
  • Asked 14 January 2025
  • Hamza Kweyu OmullahHamza Kweyu Omullah
In the world of academic research, finding a meaningful and relevant research topic is often considered one of the most challenging steps. However, rather than starting with a broad topic or a specific subject of interest, experienced researchers and scholars often recommend focusing on research gaps. These gaps are areas in existing literature where there is a lack of sufficient knowledge, unexplored issues, or areas that need further investigation. Identifying these gaps is crucial for developing innovative, impactful, and original research topics.
In this article, we will explore the concept of research gaps, how to identify them, and how to use these gaps to generate a relevant and valuable research topic. This guide is designed to be educational and informative for graduate students, postdoctoral researchers, professors, educators, scholars, and research consultants.
Understanding Research Gaps
A research gap refers to an area where existing research has either not been fully explored or where new research could contribute significantly to the field. Identifying these gaps is critical, as they offer opportunities for new discoveries, innovations, and contributions to the academic community.
Research gaps can manifest in several ways, such as:
  • Unanswered questions: Questions that remain unresolved or inadequately addressed in the existing literature.
  • Under-researched areas: Topics that have been explored but lack sufficient depth or breadth.
  • Contradictory findings: Areas where studies have produced conflicting results or conclusions.
  • Methodological limitations: Gaps related to the research methods, tools, or approaches that have been used in existing studies.
  • Emerging trends: New technologies, concepts, or societal issues that have not yet been fully explored in academic research.
Why Focusing on Research Gaps Is Essential
1. Originality: Research gaps offer a unique opportunity to contribute something new and original to the field. By addressing these gaps, you ensure your research adds value and provides novel insights.
2. Relevance: Research gaps are often aligned with current issues, trends, or technological advancements, ensuring that your research is timely and relevant to ongoing academic and societal discussions.
3. Impact: Research that addresses an existing gap is more likely to have a substantial impact on the field, as it addresses an unsolved problem or a critical question.
4. Academic Recognition: Researchers who successfully address gaps in existing knowledge often gain recognition for their work, which can lead to further opportunities for collaboration, publication, and funding.
How to Find Research Gaps
1. Review the Existing Literature
The first step in identifying research gaps is conducting a thorough review of the existing literature in your field. This involves reading a wide range of scholarly articles, journals, conference proceedings, books, and other credible sources. Here's how to approach it:
  • Conduct a comprehensive literature search: Use academic databases like Google Scholar, JSTOR, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science to find relevant articles and papers in your area of interest. Start by identifying key papers and seminal works in the field.
  • Analyze existing studies: As you read through the literature, pay attention to the study objectives, methodologies, findings, and conclusions. Look for areas where the studies have limitations or where they explicitly mention areas that require further research.
  • Look for patterns and trends: Identify recurring themes, unanswered questions, or frequently cited studies. This can help you pinpoint areas that are ripe for further investigation.
  • Identify contradictions or inconsistencies: If multiple studies have conflicting results, this could signal a research gap. Investigating why these contradictions exist could lead to valuable insights.
2. Consult Recent Review Articles and Meta-Analyses
Review articles and meta-analyses are especially valuable when searching for research gaps. These types of articles summarize and synthesize existing research in a given field, often highlighting areas that require further study. Look for sections within these articles where the authors note gaps or propose future research directions.
3. Analyze Methodological Limitations
Another way to find research gaps is by examining the methodologies used in previous studies. Are there common limitations in the approaches used? For example:
  • Sample size issues: Many studies may have small sample sizes, limiting their generalizability.
  • Outdated methods: Some research might use older techniques or technologies that could be replaced by more advanced methods.
  • Geographical or demographic limitations: Research may focus on specific regions or populations, leaving out other areas that may be equally important.
By recognizing these limitations, you can identify opportunities to conduct studies using better methodologies, larger sample sizes, or more diverse populations.
4. Look for Emerging Topics
Emerging trends in technology, society, and policy often create new areas for research. For example, the rise of artificial intelligence, blockchain technology, sustainable development, or pandemic preparedness might introduce new research questions or gaps in the literature. Stay updated on current developments in your field by following conferences, news articles, blogs, and industry reports.
5. Ask for Feedback from Experts
Engage with professors, advisors, colleagues, or fellow researchers. Discussing existing research with others can help you uncover overlooked gaps. Academic networking groups, seminars, and research-focused forums are good places to exchange ideas and gain insights into areas that need more investigation.
6. Use Research Gap Databases and Tools
There are some tools and resources that can help you systematically identify research gaps:
  • ResearchGate: A social networking site for researchers, where you can see discussions, unanswered questions, and gaps in current research.
  • Google Scholar Alerts: Set up alerts for keywords related to your research area to stay updated on the latest publications and developments.
  • AI-based tools: Tools like Connected Papers, Scite, and Semantic Scholar use artificial intelligence to identify research trends and gaps based on citation networks and keyword analysis.
How to Use Research Gaps to Develop a Research Topic
Once you've identified a research gap, it's time to use that gap to develop your research topic. Here's a step-by-step guide to help you turn research gaps into meaningful, feasible topics:
1. Refine the Research Question
A research question should be clear, focused, and researchable. Once you've identified a gap, try to formulate a question that addresses it directly. For example:
  • Research Gap: A lack of research on the impact of AI in small businesses.
  • Research Question: "How can artificial intelligence enhance operational efficiency in small businesses?"
2. Narrow the Scope
Research gaps can be broad, so it's important to narrow your focus. Consider the following factors:
  • Feasibility: Do you have the resources, time, and expertise to address this gap?
  • Specificity: Make sure your research question is specific enough to be manageable.
  • Relevance: Ensure the topic is aligned with current academic or societal needs.
3. Define the Methodology
Once you've identified the gap and refined the question, decide on the research methodology that will best address the issue. Will your research involve qualitative, quantitative, or mixed methods? Your methodology should be tailored to the nature of the gap.
4. Evaluate the Contribution
Consider how your research will contribute to the field. Will it:
  • Fill the identified gap in knowledge.
  • Challenge existing assumptions or theories?
  • Offer practical applications or solutions?
5. Align with Current Trends
Ensure that your research topic is aligned with current trends and developments in your field. This will ensure that your research is timely and relevant.
Conclusion
Identifying research gaps is a critical step in the academic research process. By focusing on gaps rather than simply looking for topics, you can ensure that your research is original, impactful, and aligned with the needs of the academic community. Whether you’re a graduate student, postdoc, researcher, professor, or research consultant, this approach will help you develop relevant, innovative, and valuable research topics that contribute to the ongoing conversation in your field.
If you're struggling to find a research gap or need assistance in refining your research questions, Hamza Omullah’s consultancy services can help guide you through this process. Contact us for personalized support in identifying research gaps, developing topics, and crafting high-quality research proposals.
#ResearchConsultant #WritingSupport #AcademicWriting #ResearchHelp #ContentCreation #ProfessionalWriting #ThesisWriting #DissertationHelp #AcademicSuccess #ClientSuccess #hamnicwriting #hamnicsolutions #AI
Doing a before and after study on emotional wellbeing, should I convert the ordinal data to scale or use the Wilcoxon Signed-Rank Test for analysis?
Question
15 answers
  • Asked 17 December 2024
  • Majid SamiminejadMajid Samiminejad
Hello everyone,
I am conducting a study on the emotional well-being of students before and after participating in a bibliotherapy intervention. The study is based on a hypothesis, and I plan to collect data using the Barbara Fredrickson Positive and Negative Emotions Questionnaire. Each question in this questionnaire offers five response options based on a Likert scale: very much, a lot, medium, little, and not at all.
Given that the collected data will be ordinal in nature, I would like to ask for your advice on the best approach for analysis. Should I convert the responses to scale data, or would it be more appropriate to use tests designed for ordinal data, such as the Wilcoxon Signed-Rank Test?
I would appreciate any guidance or insights you may have on this topic. Thank you in advance for your help!
Would it make sense in a PhD study to analyze the same data set of semi structured interviews in two different ways to see the difference in results?
Question
10 answers
  • Asked 26 October 2024
  • Lesley GarciaLesley Garcia
Method 1. Analysis of semi structured interviews using Reflexive thematic analysis. (Supervisors advice)
Method 2. Analysis of the same interviews through a critical realist lens. (My preference). Doing both is my compromise.

Related Publications

Theoretische und methodische Grundlagen
Chapter
Full-text available
  • Apr 2014
Zeitgleich mit der Einführung und Nutzung neuer Medien für die Kommunikation von Institutionen oder Privatpersonen stellt sich die Frage nach den Möglichkeiten, diese kommunikativen Aktivitäten zu analysieren, zu evaluieren und ihren Wertschöpfungsbeitrag zu ermitteln. Dabei kommen zwei unterschiedliche Strategien zur Anwendung: Zum einen wird vers...
View
View
Gêneros Digitais: escolha discentes - opções docentes
Chapter
Full-text available
  • Jun 2017
O trabalho apresenta os resultados do estudo de caso comparativo cujo objetivo foi analisar as conexões existentes entre os gêneros virtuais selecionados por docentes de língua portuguesa dos anos iniciais do ensino fundamental para práticas de ensino; os utilizados por seus alunos para fins de aprendizagem dessa área de conhecimento e os utilizado...
View
Got a technical question?
Get high-quality answers from experts.
Ask a question