Discussion
Started 10 April 2020

What will be the World Sustainable Development policy after COVID 19 Pandemic?

Again, the economy has been the central part of the discussion regarding COVID 19, but we ignoring the Environment and human health once more. Reports and news suggest that air pollution has dramatically been reduced during lockdown due to COVID 19 worldwide.
What should Scholars think about the economy, environment, and humanity pragmatically? (English is not my native language, but hope you understand it)

Most recent answer

Luiz de Pinedo Quinto Junior
Instituto Federal Fluminense
I make my words the answer of Darlusz Prokopowicz. But exist Biggest problem. The Financial Capitalism in this moment passing a transformation in the growing Capitalist Funds. We pass in the Production Mode. Stiglitz , Nobel Econmist, and worked in FMI. The Neoliberalism in this moment stay in crisis, in this moment, are a New Teory Morden Coin. All the observation of Prokopowicz are correct, but are necessery to channel the Speculative Money to sustainable development goals. The case of Ambiental tragedy of Haiti are de biggst Problem, in this momento for Humanitarian soluctions. A Think for Real Change, are to Operate a International Program for a Sustainable Reconstion of Haiti. The foccus are the Regions in the world are in the deep crisis, and Make what the Marshall Plan make in the Europe and Japan after IIWW.
1 Recommendation

Popular replies (1)

Jaydip Datta
Independent Academician
7 Recommendations

All replies (95)

D A Gayan Nayanajith
University of Kelaniya
... sustainable development is considered a key concept and solution in creating a promising and prosperous future for human societies. Nevertheless, there are some predicted and unpredicted problems that epidemic diseases are real and complex problems. Hence, in this research work, a serious challenge in the sustainable development process was investigated using the classification of confirmed cases of COVID-19...
Pirouz, B., Shaffiee Haghshenas, S., Shaffiee Haghshenas, S., & Piro, P. (2020). Investigating a Serious Challenge in the Sustainable Development Process: Analysis of Confirmed cases of COVID-19 (New Type of Coronavirus) Through a Binary Classification Using Artificial Intelligence and Regression Analysis. Sustainability, 12(6), 2427.
3 Recommendations
D A Gayan Nayanajith
University of Kelaniya
… Most countries in Sub Saharan Africa continue to fall short of achieving the core capacities of IHR...
Paintsil, E. (2020). COVID-19 threatens health systems in sub-Saharan Africa: the eye of the crocodile. The Journal of Clinical Investigation.
4 Recommendations
My guess is that much like the climate change discussion and concerns, there will be a vocal minority of highly educated, but also highly opinionated individuals who deny climate change, may also push political views of development and sustainability further than would be supportable by facts and data. Unfortunately not all scholars agree or come to the same conclusion. One would hope that science and reason wins out. But unfortunately, we are human, and when leaders for example in the past told followers the earth is flat, the fake news was believed as fact. Eventually, this was challenged and overturned. But we still live in a world when powerful leaders can deny science if they so choose, and scholars and scientists are removed, defunded, or out-talked, and unfortunately sometimes worse. In this struggle between economy, greed and sustainable wage, food, Healthcare, etc., and the environment and health of the planet and conservation of our land and resources, who will win, who will loose? Maybe the virus, as bad as it is, will bring us back to realize we are all in this and stronger when we work together.
1 Recommendation
Muritala Olaniyi OKE
National Institute for Policy and Strategic Studies
I think in this COVID 19, Environment is gaining. So, after the pandemic, there is tendency for the world to take scientific forecasts/predictions seriously. Remember pandemic and it's solutions is science related. I think what environmental scientist, managers shld do is to let the scientific recommendations be more related to humans. How it could affect, implications on humans. With this incidence, human ll be more cautious to environmental hazards.
Thank you @ Gayan Nayanajith for your prompt contribution in the discussion. Of course, epidemic diseases are complex, and further research is needed. Again thank you for sharing insights.
Thanks @Jasim Hassen's for emphasizing on health research
Thank you @ William F. Hansen, very appreciated and logical insights you presented. It touched me- In this struggle between economy, greed and sustainable wage, food, Healthcare, etc., and the environment and health of the planet and conservation of our land and resources, who will win, who will loose? Maybe the virus, as bad as it is, will bring us back to realize we are all in this and stronger when we work together.
Later or sooner, leaders and decision-makers must come to the meeting point of economy, environment and health.
Very insightful view in the contemporary Pandemic issue, i would share-
In recorded history, the battle between humans and microbes has essentially been a fight between reason and superstition. For centuries, human societies felt powerless in the face of pandemics, so they resorted to religious rituals to placate some supposedly irate god. When science eventually triumphed over religion, one illusion was replaced by another. We convinced ourselves that we were the gods, capable of conquering nature and the microbial world.
Thanks @ Muritala Olaniyi OKE for sharing your optimistic view.
Dariusz Prokopowicz
Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University in Warsaw
Perhaps the global sustainable development policy will be strengthened. Occurring epidemics of this type remind us of how small he is against the forces and laws of nature. Perhaps the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus pandemic causing Covid-19 disease will also force a person to consider this issue. One of the consequences of a pandemic is that man remembers that he is only one of the millions of different life forms that have operated for millions of years on planet Earth in the balance of cooperating many species of life forms, including flora, fauna, fungi and microorganisms with natural ecosystems that have evolved over millions of years. Perhaps in the coming years man will apply the principles of sustainable, pro-ecological development to a greater extent. Maybe we don't know that yet. Everything will be explained in the future.
Greetings.
Dariusz Prokopowicz
2 Recommendations
Thank you @ Dariusz Prokopowicz for your optimistic insights. I fully agree with your argument as that sustainable, pro-ecological development should be considered along with economic development for future generation.
Folusho Olayemi Ilori
Achievers University
COVID-19 will also strengthen global economy strategies.
Exactly @ Folusho . Hope so, but question is that the world's powers will take lesson from the present epidemic crisis or not ???
Evens Emmanuel
Quisqueya University
The covid-19 challenges the whole world of how it works. It may be too early to assess its various effects on knowledge, the transmission of knowledge, the economy, the social, the environment, etc. However, it seems that it is today a critical condition for achieving the Sustainable Development Goals.
Muritala Olaniyi OKE
National Institute for Policy and Strategic Studies
I strongly believe Governments of African countries, shld by this pandemic and its preponderance, learn, appreciate and use their political insights and will to take necessary decision in relation to SDG GOALS. Records show that most of the timelines towards achieving the goals are not yet achieved. Disease, as an example of disasters, and its management and impact it could ve, have been exemplified as it is been experienced. During this time, East Africa is also experiencing locust insect attack, while Asia is experiencing flooding/earthquakes among others. Government must prioritize environment and give it enough provisions as expected, if we all want to live peacefully.
Thank you @ Evens Emmanuel for your valuable view.
1 Recommendation
Dear Muritala Olaniyi OKE
Your idea is appreciated.
Zagir Ataev
Dagestan State Pedagogical University
The model of sustainable business after the crisis will be based on proximity to the state.
First, the extraordinary situation is illustrated by the statement of the managing Director of the IMF, Kristalina Georgieva, that more than 80 developing countries have requested financial assistance from the Fund totaling $2.5 trillion.
Second, the fall in prices for most commodities (not just oil) is more than 30% on the CRB index, one of the key ones, and returns the markets to the price levels of 20 years ago. In fairness, it should be noted that world prices for some commodities (products, especially grain) have increased by 10-15% since the beginning of the crisis, but are now returning to their previous levels.
Third, the level of interest rates in the world returned to the bottom of 2008-2009, after all the major Central banks reduced their rates to minimum values.
Fourth, the G20 countries agreed to add more than $5 trillion in monetary and fiscal stimulus to the global economy at a "virtual" meeting on March 26.
How much can the growth rate decrease as a result of the crisis?
It is too early to make forecasts for the US and Europe, but for Southeast Asia, including China, the World Bank already has an estimate - from 5.8 to 2.1%, and in a negative scenario, even to minus 0.5%.
But the main question is not how much the economy of the world or a particular country will slow down. More important is how the economy will look after the epidemic, whether it will be able to return to its original form, even if it has lost a few percent of growth.
And there is no obvious answer.
Losses and opportunities
To understand this, you should make a list of the industries that have been most affected by the self-blocking:
foreign trade;
transport (air, auto)
tourism, hotels and restaurants;
offline services and entertainment (hairdressers, fitness, sports, theater, movies, etc.).
But there are also winners:
local e-commerce, especially food and ready meals;
online entertainment;
production and sale of medical products and goods;
medicine, first of all remote;
production and sale of products.
A significant part of the financial industry can also find positive sides in today's developments.
Special mention should be made of the oil industry, which by some monstrous coincidence went into a tailspin after the failed negotiations of the OPEC+ countries and in the same days when the explosive spread of COVID-19 in Europe and the United States began.
The drop in demand by almost 20% led to a severe crisis of overproduction, filling all possible storage facilities, and total chartering of all available tankers for oil storage. Extending this situation for three to six months will lead to the forced shutdown of a large number of wells, and not only in shale. But it also threatens to freeze investment in new projects with the suspension of current ones, which can create much bigger problems than a simple oversupply of oil. As a result, many small and medium-sized companies may not survive this crisis, but those who remain will be happy to share the clearing.
But will we return to the lifestyle we led before the crisis, or will we develop new habits and approaches to business that we formed while sitting at home?
Business transition to a distributed model
Rental of premises, payment for employees, organization of business processes around the "presence", as current experience shows, are associated with high risks. Not a hardware failure, not problems with contractors, not traditional financial difficulties, but a completely different risk turned out to be the key — the government's decision to stop business processes. And the country can be any, from centralized China to liberal Britain.
There is a high probability that after the release from quarantine, the largest companies and owners of small and medium-sized businesses will begin to prepare strategies for the transition to a distributed business model. To a model in which employees move to home offices as much as possible and communication is conducted not even via email or video chat, but using virtual substitutes for meetings, presentations, and presence. Of course, the workplace at home of such an employee must be significantly retrofitted. It is not for nothing that the sharply increased demand for modems and routers is being recorded now.
The state is the main partner and Advisor
Undoubtedly, the fight against coronavirus is a noble and very expensive task. But by solving it, the state simultaneously changes all the rules of the game in the economy. It turned out that in some situations, you can:
stop the day-to-day operation of business for very noble purposes;
restrict the freedom of movement of goods and people for the same reasons;
change the familiar tax system formed over the years;
leave virtually all economic activity in a state of uncertainty without any forecast of a return to normal life.
Therefore, the model of sustainable business after the crisis will be based on proximity to the state. We can assume that the largest company in Russia, along with Gazprom and Sberbank, will become a universal marketplace (conditional "public Services"), which will be able to concentrate most of the vital services and provide the population with the most urgent things in a timely manner — first services, and then goods.
Traditional budget fillers, energy companies may face serious financial problems due to reduced demand for energy, which may turn from situational and speculative to structural and permanent.
The transformation of the economy towards the long-awaited diversification has not yet gained the necessary speed, and money for budget incentives for structural adjustment may not be enough due to the crisis in the commodity market.
Competition could help improve the efficiency of the economy, but there are fewer and fewer people in the private sector who can compete. And after the epidemic, they will still need investment to move their business to a post-crisis model.
The conclusion is that the state economy will only expand its position, and in these conditions, issues of employment, minimum guaranteed income, and the creation of a unified state it infrastructure will come to the fore. To solve such problems, we need a stable budget and its stable filling at the expense of tax revenues.
The new distributed business model, combined with continued robotization, may lead to increased unemployment. As a result, the demand for social security will increase, and economic relations will become less capitalistic and more socialist.
When the money runs out
In such circumstances, the growth rate of the economy and issues of growth/decline will take a back seat. The focus will remain on stability, primarily in meeting the basic needs of the population. And the main question will be how a particular state can provide an acceptable existence for the majority of the population, and not relying on private business as the main resource.
And here, for many countries, the problem of a very large public debt is not yet relevant for Russia, and filling the budget revenues for the next two or three years may be unsolvable.
If disasters like the COVID-19 outbreak start to recur and the state continues to fight them with similar methods, where can we get so much money? And if you sell government bonds to your own and other Central banks to get them, how long can this continue?
Finally, we must remember that the main government debt is not bonds, but money — dollars, euros, and yen. And if trust is lost in them, it will not be possible to extinguish the next crisis.
1 Recommendation
Thanks @Zagir Ataev for your depth analysis, and valuable insights.
M Aktaruzzaman Zaman Hasan
Asian Institute of Technology
In my opinion, world order in terms of economy will be changed. People will more emphasis on climate and medical related issues
1 Recommendation
Rachan Karmakar
Graphic Era University
I don't think is requirement of any new sustainable development policy. All those policies which are there, should be followed strictly. Then something fruitful can happen.
1 Recommendation
Thanks @ Rachan Karmakar for your important view, it will be noted down. ,
Thank you M Aktaruzzaman Zaman Hasan for your view
Joan Nyika
Technical University of Kenya
To answer the question, the world's sustainable development policy's after Corona should focus on the following:
1. Economically, developed economies should invest in accurate early warning assessment using accurately acquired data. Furthermore, they should empower developing nations towards better preparedness to handle disasters through adequate funding, reducing existent poverty gap and building knowledge and infrastructural capacity.
2. Environmentally, our food consumption habits should be reviewed to verify the safety of food prior to consumption and based on its source. Habits that enhance human-animal or human-human contact unless mandatory should be avoided. Environmental friendly production habits such as reduced motor vehicle use, virtualization of some office activities and reduced human aggregation should be adopted to prevent pollution.
3. Socially, we need to educate communities to be disciplined enough to follow WASH practices.
1 Recommendation
Luiz de Pinedo Quinto Junior
Instituto Federal Fluminense
Human History are the answer that question, why? When occur tne Colera epidemic in 1820 in Europe. Many engeneering change de way to look de Development, and think the growing the city in other way. The beginning sustanaybility. All the times in the history whem occur a Crises, the Humanity change the way. The air accidenties have a very inteligenty thinking, when occur a different or a new type, is necessary to think whats a new prevent solution. The history of humanity passing in theis moment for change many positions.
1 Recommendation
Abhijit Mitra
University of Calcutta
Kindly have a look-we can interact
1 Recommendation
Fred Amonya
University of Birmingham
First, look at the tension between issues and organisations. Covid is striking the organisational layout of the world. The reassembling of the organisations will determine which issues come top. After the health challenge, the states will be bearing enormous debt. And fiscal stress will influence the networking of the leading economies. Therefore, it maybe early to assess individual sustainability issues post-Covid. That said, Covid is reminding the world we are one dynamical system. So, ultimately we should expect sustainability as a whole to receive more attention.
2 Recommendations
Dear Abhijit Mitra , Nice to see your abstract and findings. It is good for the world. But, main question is how to make it sustainable. I think we cannot forget economy and human life. The balance between economy, and environment is a crucial question in the wake of sustainable development.
Yasser A. Jabbar
Al-Furat Al-Awsat Technical University
Good Q Dear Deepak Chaudhary
I don't want to have a negative opinion. But I think nothing will change because major countries consider fossil fuels is cheaper than other sources of fuel. Therefore, whenever the oil is implemented, the sustainable policy will be directed towards clean sources, including renewable energy.
1 Recommendation
Dariusz Prokopowicz
Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University in Warsaw
If the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus pandemic causing Covid-19 disease causes a change in people's thinking of recognizing the high level of importance of sustainable development, pro-ecological reforms and a return to balance in nature, it may be that national environmental policies and World Sustainable Development Policy can also increase its importance and scale of future development.
Regards,
Dariusz Prokopowicz
1 Recommendation
In my opinion the policy of quarantine moved the world to more sustainable, bet future WSDP again moved it to other direction and try to compensate the losses during the quarantine as still all governments are thinking about GDP growth.
1 Recommendation
Naseer K. Kasim
Ministry of Electricity/Training and Energy Research Office
Treatment the current economical crises.
1 Recommendation
Thanks for your valuable views: Naseer K. Kasim ; Hassan Izzeddin Sarsak
I agree with pro-ecological reforms to balance the nature as a national environmental policy as sustainable development policy with Dariusz and Engr.
Zagir Ataev
Dagestan State Pedagogical University
Like the first human spaceflight, the collapse of the Soviet Union, and the fall of the Berlin wall, the COVID-19 coronavirus pandemic is a major event whose consequences we cannot imagine even today. There are a number of possible futures, all of which depend on how governments and society respond to the coronavirus. There are four possible futures:
1. Creating a strong national capitalism,
2. Falling into barbarism and anarchy
3. Radical state socialism
4. Transformation into a society based on mutual assistance.
Zagir Ataev , Thans for your insights. This historical perspective may suggest such political or geopolitical changes. The chances of barbarism and anarchy may have fewer chances due to information technology. Others may be debatable.
Okechukwu Dominic Nwankwo
Chukwuemeka Odumegwu Ojukwu University, Igbariam, Anambra State, Nigeria
After the COVID-19 (Chinese virus) pandemic, Psychology will be the invisible paradigm or influencer of the world diplomatic relations. Many families and nations will be drastically and negatively affected. Many nations, particularly serious-minded nations of the developed and emerging economies will distrust China, and try to recoup what they have lost from China. A ground plan, based on conspiracy theory, will be made never to trust China again, prevent China from surprising the world again with their maximum wickedness, as well as finally tame China. China will try to anchor and hold tenaciously on African nations with the enslaving loans they are giving to Africa. This will be an added great burdens on Africa, which will ground any remaining (if any at all) Africa's development aspirations. This will impoverish Africa further into poverty den. Basically, BIAFRA INDEPENDENCE will be one of the very few development options open to African.
1 Recommendation
Dear Okechukwu Dominic Nwankwo ,
You are focusing on Psychology or mental matters that is important as a part of sustainable development. Directly or indirectly, this refers to the public health and ultimately human. Nice insights, Thank you.
Dariusz Prokopowicz
Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University in Warsaw
In my opinion, the development of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic (causing Covid-19) disease will affect the change in human thinking about the importance of ecology, sustainable development of civilization, including the need to develop civilization according to the concept of circular economy and green economy. Therefore, the significance of World Sustainable Development Policy may increase.
Greetings,
Dariusz Prokopowicz
4 Recommendations
Once more thanks Dariusz Prokopowicz for your insights
1 Recommendation
Rachan Karmakar
Graphic Era University
There should be only one policy. Be good human being. Live to fulfill your need , not your greed. All the problems will be solved then.
2 Recommendations
Thank You Rachan Karmakar for your contribution
1 Recommendation
Greetings, Respected Dariusz Prokopowicz,
But SARS-CoV-2 did spread less than COVID-19. COVID-19 covered the entire world.
1 Recommendation
Kabita Maharjan
Tribhuvan University
The policy should be for life existence.
3 Recommendations
Of Course Kabita Maharjan Madam, Thanks for your contribution
Thank You @ Yasser A. Jebbar for your contribution.
Thank you @ D A Gayan Nayanajith for your valuable contribution and insights
Naseer K. Kasim
Ministry of Electricity/Training and Energy Research Office
Mitigation of the environmental impact firstly
2 Recommendations
Jaydip Datta
Independent Academician
7 Recommendations
Thank you @ Naseer K. Kasim , i agree with you.
Thanks Jaydip Datta for your insights
Rachan Karmakar
Graphic Era University
Sustainable policies which are there may remain same. We just need to follow that. We do not do that. That causes harm to us. We should abide by the existing sustainable development policies. Otherwise a time will come when no development will be permitted by the environment which is being done by the same at this moment of pandemic. Let's become good human beings.
1 Recommendation
Thank you @ Rachan Karmakar for your valuable suggestion.
Thank You @ Jaroslav Dvorak for your insights
Tnak you Dear Yasser A. Jebbar for your contribution.
Thanks @ Fred Amonya for your valuable contribution.
Saswatik Tripathy
Foundation for Ecological Security
First of all the goal of zero hunger will become impossible after this. Then the high mortality. So the medical research part should be taken into account. After that sustainable village models should be promoted. Every country should be self-sufficient for basic need.
1 Recommendation
Thank you Saswatik Tripathi for your valuable view.
Arvydas Guogis
Mykolas Romeris University
More accentuation to social and environmental aspects.
1 Recommendation
Thank you Arvydas Guogis for your view.
Rabin Thapa
Ministry of Agriculture and Livestock Development Nepal
The five pillars of SDG focusing on people (Goals 1-6), planet (Goals 12, 13, 14, 15), prosperity (Goals 7-11), peace (Goal 16) and partnerships (Goal 17) all will be seriously hampered. SDG will be affected to its core. It already had difficulty with implications mostly focusing on marginalized people and area. In a broad sense, attainment of SDG will be delayed.
Hence the policy should be to focus on marginalised ones and attainment of stipulated goals at correct time.
Further points can be found in:
3 Recommendations
Thank You Rabin, your view is that the existing SDGs are enough after COVID-19.
2 Recommendations
Thank you Sovit Bhai your valuable opinion
Rachan Karmakar
Graphic Era University
In my view at this point, socio and economic are the terms which should be treated separately although they are very much interdependent. Degradation of economic condition is taking place now but the social value has started depleting long back. Our greed is the backbone of that. Let us try to be better human beings. Everything else will be resolved with time.
2 Recommendations
Dear Rachan Karmakar, I would appreciate your contribution, it is useful and Thank you.
1 Recommendation
Having already a global public policy for sustainable development - the SDGs, the United Nations Agenda 2030, it is necessary to assess the impact of Covid-19 in each of the 17 objectives and in each of its 169 goals. This work has to be done at a domestic and local level so that you can then get a sense of the global impact of this pandemic crisis. In the socio-economic dimension, it seems peaceful to me to say that Covid-19 has aggravated the problems of structural social inequalities and, therefore, of social justice. But it seems to me that the big problem, until then semi-hidden, is how we leave the older generations to their fate. In fact, I think that this is a civilizing moment in which we reveal very little maturity by the way we forget our old people. Since sustainable development emphasizes an intergenerational concern linked to the future, it may be necessary to reformulate the concept, as young people, but also governments, have shown little solidarity with older generations.
2 Recommendations
Thank You Dear Hermann Gruenwald for useful opinion.
It is true and fully agreed with you. Thank you Dear Ricardo Dias for sharing valuable idea.
M Aktaruzzaman Zaman Hasan
Asian Institute of Technology
Yes , its true but there should be synergy between air pollution and Economy
1 Recommendation
Harasit Kumar Paul
Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University
Please have a look at the attached document:
1 Recommendation
Dariusz Prokopowicz
Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University in Warsaw
After the global financial crisis of 2008, many researchers and scientists forecasted an increase in the importance and scale of the pro-ecological transformation of the traditional economy of surplus to a sustainable economy of moderation based on the concept of green economy and circular economy. However, as part of the anti-crisis, interventionist programs supporting the activities of economic entities from the funds of the state finance system in order to reduce the scale of the economic downturn and reduce the scale of unemployment growth during the economic crisis in 2020 caused by the development of the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus pandemic (causing the Covid-19 disease), the decision makers considered it a priority developing state intervention in the conditions of classic solutions known from socio-economic policy programs implemented during previous global and regional financial, economic and debt crises of state finances. The suggestions of researchers and scientists pointing to the need to increase the scale and expenditures on the processes of systemic pro-ecological transformation of the economy in order to reduce the scale of greenhouse gas emissions, slow down the global warming process and reduce non-recyclable waste generated, etc., and protect the biodiversity of natural ecosystems have been forgotten. Therefore, the interventionist, anti-crisis programs supporting the economic activity of economic entities applied in individual countries, referred to as the so-called Unfortunately, the Anti-Crisis Shields to a small extent implement the principles set out in the World Sustainable Development Policy.
Best regards,
Dariusz Prokopowicz
4 Recommendations
M Aktaruzzaman Zaman Hasan
Asian Institute of Technology
We should give SDG and emphasis on circular economy and more on
1 Recommendation
Thank You, Dear M Aktaruzzaman Zaman Hasan for your fruitful answer.
1 Recommendation
'Sustainability and Development after COVID-19' is a really good insight. Thank you Dear Harasit Kumar Paul for you valuable sharing.
Dear Dariusz Prokopowicz, Thank You Sir for your insightful view.
Emmanuel V Murray
Caspian Impact Investment Adviser Ltd
Will require a complete overhaul..
1 Recommendation
Gurudutta Japee
Gujarat University
Emotional Well being and agnotology should be part of new policy
2 Recommendations
Dear Emmanuel V Murray, Thank you for your reply. All sectors need to reform.
Dear Gurudutta Japee, Many thanks for your contribition.
Radha Gautam
S B GARDA COLLEGE NAVSARI VNSGU SURAT
Covid has alarmed us to take utmost care in medical research bcs one lapse can affect the whole world. Environmental Precarity is the utmost urgency we all must address at priority.
1 Recommendation
Rachan Karmakar
Graphic Era University
Yes, we need better medical facilities and that is why more effective research should take place. At the same time we must become good human beings and follow all the normal protocols set for humanity.
2 Recommendations
Isaias Peraza
Arizona State University
I think it will interesting to couple the existing climate models with the current epidemiological models that help us understand the emergence of the COVID-19 pandemic and try to find a correlation between climate change and the next possible pandemic emergence. Maybe like this, we can actually measure the potential danger of climate change with something more palpable in our daily lives.
2 Recommendations
Thank you Dear Isaias peraza for you reply.
1 Recommendation
Dear @Rachan Karmakar , thanks for your opinion.
1 Recommendation
Dariusz Prokopowicz
Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University in Warsaw
Much data indicates that the SARS-CoV-2 (Covid-19) coronavirus pandemic may cause an increase in the general social awareness of the pro-environmental society and an increase in systemic pressure from public institutions activating economic entities to increase the scale of implementation of the sustainable development goals.
Regards,
Dariusz Prokopowicz
4 Recommendations
Thank You, Dariusz for your enthusiastic opinion
2 Recommendations
Dariusz Prokopowicz
Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University in Warsaw
Dear Deepak Chaudhary,
Yes, my view of this issue is optimistic. I hope that the SARS-CoV-2 (Covid-19) coronavirus pandemic will result in a significant increase in the general social awareness of the pro-environmental. And the increase in this awareness should increase the scale of implementation of the sustainable development goals in companies, enterprises and public institutions. It is necessary to develop a pro-environmental policy by central public institutions, which set specific standards and calendars for a gradual increase in the scale of the implementation of sustainable development goals and thus also the progressive process of ecological transformation of the economy towards a sustainable, green circular economy. Yes, I am optimistic about this. I hope it will happen that the Coronavirus pandemic will accelerate the processes of ecological transformation of the economy.
Best regards, Have a nice day, Stay healthy!
Dariusz Prokopowicz
4 Recommendations
Luiz de Pinedo Quinto Junior
Instituto Federal Fluminense
I make my words the answer of Darlusz Prokopowicz. But exist Biggest problem. The Financial Capitalism in this moment passing a transformation in the growing Capitalist Funds. We pass in the Production Mode. Stiglitz , Nobel Econmist, and worked in FMI. The Neoliberalism in this moment stay in crisis, in this moment, are a New Teory Morden Coin. All the observation of Prokopowicz are correct, but are necessery to channel the Speculative Money to sustainable development goals. The case of Ambiental tragedy of Haiti are de biggst Problem, in this momento for Humanitarian soluctions. A Think for Real Change, are to Operate a International Program for a Sustainable Reconstion of Haiti. The foccus are the Regions in the world are in the deep crisis, and Make what the Marshall Plan make in the Europe and Japan after IIWW.
1 Recommendation

Similar questions and discussions

Has the SARS-CoV-2 (Covid-19) coronavirus pandemic potentially increased to accelerate pro-climate transformation processes in the economy?
Discussion
5 replies
  • Dariusz ProkopowiczDariusz Prokopowicz
Did the SARS-CoV-2 (Covid-19) coronavirus pandemic potentially increase opportunities to accelerate processes of pro-climate and pro-environmental transformation of the economy, but unfortunately these opportunities were not taken advantage of?
During the 1st wave of the SARS-CoV-2 (Covid-19) coronavirus pandemic in March 2020, the stock markets crashed. Energy and industrial commodities fell sharply on the commodity exchanges. A stock market crash also occurred on the stock markets. The main factor in the panic on the capital markets was the declaration of a global coronavirus epidemic, or pandemic state, by the World Health Organisation on 8 March 2020. This new term 'pandemic' itself created fear and uncertainty in the context of financial markets and economic processes. During the SARS-CoV-2 (Covid-19) coronavirus pandemic, there were also disruptions to international supply and supply logistics chains, government imposed quarantines and lockdowns imposed on selected sectors of the economy which increased the scale of the 2020 recession. As a result of these mainly interventionist actions by central institutions, a deep economic crisis emerged in 2020, the economy declined in many sectors of the economy, and economic process activity declined. The result of the decline in economic activity was a decrease in demand for raw materials, including energy raw materials. Due to the increase in remote working by employees of many companies from home, the use of cars, especially combustion cars, decreased. As a result, air quality and the state of the environment noticeably improved in 2020. In addition, opportunities have arisen to accelerate pro-climate transformation processes in the economy. Unfortunately, in many countries these opportunities have not been seized. For example, in the country where I operate during the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus pandemic (Covid-19), the government used printed money to provide financial public assistance to companies and enterprises operating in a wide variety of industries and sectors, not just those in lockdowns, on a historically record scale. Many companies and enterprises that were in good financial standing also benefited from these programmes of non-refundable financial subsidies, employee wage subsidies, tax relief, deferrals of contributions to the social security system and so on. The scale of the granted non-refundable public aid realised on the basis of printed money introduced extra-budgetarily by government funds created especially for this purpose was so large that inflation began to rise in Poland almost from the beginning of 2021. Citizens invested the extra, free money in shares and flats, which caused an increase in the prices of these assets. On the other hand, opportunities to accelerate the processes of pro-climate transformation of the economy were missed by the government. Subsidies for the development of renewable energy sources were not increased and were even reduced on some issues. Since April 2022, the government has reduced subsidies and worsened the economic conditions for the installation of photovoltaic panels by citizens on the roofs of their houses. There is a lack of subsidies for insulating the facades of buildings and single-family houses, installing photovoltaics, installing heat pumps and other renewable energy solutions. Poland has still not met the European Union guidelines for receiving EU subsidies to finance projects that could be implemented under the National Reconstruction Programme. As a result, the development of renewable and emission-free energy sources has slowed down instead of accelerating as it could have done during the pandemic. Unfortunately, still the process of pro-environmental and pro-climate transformation of the energy sector is progressing much slower than it could if the issue of green transformation of the economy was not ignored in the political and business spheres in Poland. The result of these omissions, neglect and ignorance is the current low level of energy independence and security in Poland in the context of the currently developing energy crisis. The result of this neglect is also the poor air quality in Poland. Poland has one of the worst air quality in the world. Poland is one of the 3 countries in Europe with the highest mortality rate caused by poor air quality polluted with various toxins resulting mainly from the dominant dirty energy industry based on burning fossil fuels. In addition, even more negative consequences of these omissions, negligence and ignorance appear in the future, when the process of global warming will significantly accelerate in the next decades and lead to a worsening of the climate crisis and to a climate catastrophe, which may already occur at the end of this 21st century.
The potential for accelerating the processes of pro-climate transformation of the economy that occurred during the SARS-CoV-2 (Covid-19) coronavirus pandemic was described in my publications, which I posted on my profile of this Research Gate portal after publication:
What does it look like in your country?
Did the SARS-CoV-2 (Covid-19) coronavirus pandemic potentially increase opportunities to accelerate processes of pro-climate and pro-environmental transformation of the economy, but unfortunately these opportunities were not used?
Please respond,
I invite you all to discuss,
Thank you very much,
Warm regards,
Dariusz Prokopowicz
During the Covid-19 pandemic, was there an opportunity to accelerate the processes of green transformation of the economy?
Discussion
2 replies
  • Dariusz ProkopowiczDariusz Prokopowicz
During the Covid-19 pandemic, was there an opportunity to accelerate the processes of green transformation of the economy, and was this opportunity unfortunately not taken advantage of in some countries?
During the Covid-19 pandemic, due to the decline in the economic activity of companies and enterprises in many sectors of the economy, there were opportunities to accelerate the processes of green transformation of the economy, to implement the principles of sustainable economic development, to direct the development of the economy towards the green circular economy model, to achieve the goals of sustainable development, to increase the scale of pro-environmental policies, pro-environmental, pro-climate policy and thus reduce greenhouse gas emissions, reduce the level of environmental pollution, and in the situation of continuation of these processes in the coming years, it is also to increase the scale of the possibility of implementing the scenario of slowing down the progressive process of global warming, to give humanity more time to prepare for the possible subsequent negative effects of progressive climate change, the developing climate crisis. Some countries have taken advantage of these opportunities, but unfortunately only in some countries.
These issues are presented in the article:
The Impact of the SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) Coronavirus Pandemic on Ecological Security and the Development of International Environmental Policy
In view of the above, I address the following question to the esteemed community of scientists and researchers:
During the Covid-19 pandemic, was there an opportunity to accelerate the processes of green transformation of the economy, and was this opportunity unfortunately missed in some countries?
During the Covid-19 pandemic, was there an opportunity to accelerate the processes of green transformation of the economy?
What do you think about this topic?
What is your opinion on this issue?
Please answer,
I invite everyone to join the discussion,
Thank you very much,
Best wishes,
Dariusz Prokopowicz
The above text is entirely my own work written by me on the basis of my research.
In writing this text I did not use other sources or automatic text generation systems.
Copyright by Dariusz Prokopowicz
How can the state activate entrepreneurship to get out of the economic crisis faster after the SARS-CoV-2 Coronavirus pandemic? What economic policy?
Discussion
53 replies
  • Dariusz ProkopowiczDariusz Prokopowicz
Can the non-fulfillment of election promises by winning political options be considered antisocial activity?
Discussion
1 reply
  • Dariusz ProkopowiczDariusz Prokopowicz
Can the non-implementation of electoral promises on the issues of sustainable economic development, green transformation of the economy, increasing pro-climate and pro-environmental policy measures by the political options winning the elections be considered as antisocial activities and not in compliance with basic human rights and the Constitution?
In recent years, more and more different political options during election campaigns before parliamentary and other political elections have added to their election slogans the issues of sustainable economic development, green transformation of the economy, increasing pro-climate and pro-environmental policy measures, including a significant increase in the development of renewable energy sources, decarbonization of industry, development of sustainable organic agriculture, sustainable energy-efficient construction, electromobility, recycling, development of sustainable tourism, development of urban agglomerations in accordance with the concept of green smart city, significant increase in the scale of reclamation of natural environments in areas degraded by industrial development, increase in the scale of protection of biodiverse natural ecosystems, natural forest ecosystems, increase in the scale of reforestation and other aspects of a sustainable green circular economy, and after winning the elections, they only slightly implement their election promises to citizens, or do not implement these promises at all. Since the scale of this phenomenon is growing so the importance of the discussions held in the issues of not fulfilling election promises on the issues of sustainable economic development, green transformation of the economy, increasing pro-climate and pro-environmental policy measures by the political options winning the elections is also increasing. When this kind of situation is repeated repeatedly in a certain country then citizens begin to consider the possibility of recognizing this kind of unreliable political activity as antisocial and perhaps also not in accordance with basic human rights and the Constitution.
I am conducting research on this issue. I have included the conclusions of my research in the following article:
I invite you to discuss this important topic for the future of the planet's biosphere and climate.
In view of the above, I address the following question to the esteemed community of scientists and researchers:
Can the non-implementation of election promises on the issues of sustainable economic development, green transformation of the economy, increasing pro-climate and pro-environmental policy measures by the political options winning the elections be considered as antisocial activities and not in compliance with basic human rights and the Constitution?
Can the non-fulfillment of election promises by election-winning political options be considered antisocial activity?
What do you think about this topic?
What is your opinion on this issue?
Please answer,
I invite everyone to join the discussion,
Thank you very much,
Best regards,
Dariusz Prokopowicz
The above text is entirely my own work written by me on the basis of my research.
In writing this text, I did not use other sources or automatic text generation systems.
Copyright by Dariusz Prokopowicz
Environmental policy and high prices of ecological products.
Discussion
22 replies
  • Dariusz ProkopowiczDariusz Prokopowicz
Research question for discussion: What should be done as part of the pro-environmental policy to significantly accelerate the process of falling prices of ecological products as well as pro-environmental raw materials and prefabricated products?
Unfortunately, more and more research results confirm that the process of global warming is accelerating and that the development of civilization in the last 2 centuries is responsible for these unfavorable climate changes. On August 9, 2021, on the basis of the analysis of 14,000 scientific papers, the sixth IPCC Report "Climate Change 2021: the Physical Science Basis" was published, i.e. a report summarizing the current and predicted climate changes prepared by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change operating at the United Nations. This is another Report on the issues of climate change, the progressing global warming process, the adverse effects of this process, civilization greenhouse gas emissions responsible for the ongoing climate change, predictive modeling of future climate changes and the impact of these changes on the biosphere and human civilization. The above-mentioned IPCC Report shows that without a rapid reduction in greenhouse gas emissions in the next 20 years, the accelerated process of global warming will continue. In such a situation, the temperature will increase by 1.5 degrees Celsius by around 2040, not 2050 as previously thought - compared to the state at the beginning of the first industrial revolution. As a result of this acceleration of the global warming process, in 2-3 decades the feedback will be activated and the processes of global warming will be accelerated. An additional negative effect will be the entry of the accelerating process of global warming into the phase of irreversibility of this process. In order to slow down the progressing global warming process and the growing risk of a climate catastrophe threatening humanity, which may occur in the next several dozen years, it is necessary to quickly reduce greenhouse gas emissions to the point of complete reduction and capture excess CO2 from the atmosphere. According to the mathematical forecasting models for long-term forecasting of climate change, this plan should be implemented within the next dozen or so years. If this plan to quickly implement the pro-environmental transformation of the economy is not implemented, then in the coming years, climate warming will further limit food production, the frequency and scale of droughts and forest fires will increase, soil sterilization in arable lands will increase, and the scale of the migration crisis will increase, the process of extinction of flora and fauna species will accelerate, which will mean the continuation of the rapid decline in the biodiversity of natural ecosystems, etc. Therefore, humanity has little time to counteract the climate catastrophe, save the biosphere, climate and itself. Due to the growing risk of a global climate crisis occurring in the next several dozen years, it is necessary to quickly reduce greenhouse gas emissions. It is necessary to eliminate the key factor of the growing risk of the emergence of a global climate crisis, which is the civilization emission of greenhouse gases causing the accelerating process of global warming. We already know what to do in this matter. The main determinants of the implementation of the greenhouse gas emission reduction plan include the pro-environmental transformation of the energy sector through the development of renewable energy sources, the development of electromobility based on, inter alia, on hydrogen power, afforestation of civilization degraded areas and reconstruction of devastated forest complexes, pro-environmental transformation of agriculture through the development of sustainable ecological agriculture, etc., and other pro-environmental measures to achieve the goals of sustainable development and to carry out a pro-environmental transformation of a classic growth, brown economy of excess to a sustainable, green, zero-emission economy of growth zero and closed circuit. The process of pro-environmental transformation of the economy could take place much faster if the prices of ecological products were much lower than at present. If the process of pro-environmental transformation of the economy is to be efficiently carried out within the currently dominant economic systems based on the social market economy model, it is necessary to drop the prices of ecological products faster, i.e. such as electric and / or hydrogen-powered cars and other types of motor vehicles powered by hydrogen, photovoltaic panels, energy storage batteries, agricultural products produced as part of sustainable organic farming, home installations of renewable energy sources, devices for capturing CO2 from gaseous waste emissions installed in enterprises, etc. Currently, for example, electric or hydrogen-powered cars, home installations of photovoltaic panels, etc. are unattainable for a citizen with an average income level. In connection with the above, what processes should be started, the implementation of which sustainable development goals should be scaled up as part of pro-environmental state intervention in order to significantly accelerate the process of falling prices of ecological products as well as pro-environmental raw materials and prefabricated products? What should be done as part of the pro-environmental policy so that in the next years there is an increase in production and a significant decrease in the prices of organic products and raw materials? What legislative changes should politicians implement to meet citizens' expectations regarding the urgent implementation of the pro-environmental transformation of the economy, including accelerating the process of falling prices of organic products and raw materials?
I invite you to the discussion,
Thank you very much,
Researchers and scientists interested in the issues of this discussion are invited to scientific cooperation on this issue important for the future development of civilization. The issues of solving global problems related to climate change, the ongoing process of global warming, and the increasing scale of environmental pollution have often been recognized as priorities in the 21st century. I conduct research on the key determinants of the pro-environmental transformation of the economy. The results of my research on significant issues of the pro-environmental transformation of the economy, the implementation of sustainable development goals, conditions for the development of a green circular economy, etc., are described in the following publications:
I invite all those who study this subject to research cooperation.
Best regards,
Dariusz Prokopowicz

Related Publications

Article
Full-text available
The pandemic is unavoidable; in addition to increased morbidity and mortality, they profoundly affect people and economies at every level. The negative effects of pandemics are more severe in marginalized populations such as older adults who have higher risks of acquiring infection, more disease-related complications, and increased risks of death....
Got a technical question?
Get high-quality answers from experts.