Dhofar University
Question
Asked 2 August 2016
What is the critical difference between Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) and Carbon Sequestration?
If both are same, why we would use different words with same meaning?
Most recent answer
The following link is also very useful: https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2018/ee/c7ee02342a
Popular answers (1)
Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel University of Agriculture & Technology
@Rudiger The key difference between carbon capture and storage and carbon sequestration is that carbon capture and storage involve capturing, transporting, and storing carbon dioxide, while carbon sequestration only involves storing carbon dioxide for a longer period of time.
14 Recommendations
All Answers (26)
Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Guangzhou)
As I know, carbon capture is usually used as a term describing a technology used to capture carbon.
Carbon sequestration and storage are often used to describe carbon sequestered or accumulated by vegetation or sediment. But there is a little difference. When it concerns about the capacity of carbon sequestration, carbon sequestration rate is used. When it concerns about the amount of carbon stored in sediment, carbon store is used.
Please refer to a paper below regarding carbon sequestration and carbon storage.
Adame, M. F., Kauffman, J. B., Medina, I., Gamboa, J. N., Torres, O., Caamal, J. P., Reza, M., Herrera-Silveira, J. A. (2013). Carbon stocks of tropical coastal wetlands within the karstic landscape of the Mexican Caribbean. PLoS ONE, 8, e56569.
Alongi, D. M. (2009). The energetics of mangrove forests, Springer, New York.
1 Recommendation
Indian Agricultural Research Institute
Thank you Dr. Grote for your detailed answer regarding CCS and CS.
NGO, SECOT, Senior Volunteer consultants and mentors, Spain
CCS describes the complete process of carbon capture and carbon storage or sequestration. Sequestration is more general. It can mean simple storage of CO2, for example in exhausted reserves of gas, injection to enhance oil recovery, or dissolving it the in the ocean. But more recently it includes also the chemical fixation of CO2 to form carbonates.
Institute of Natural Sciences
The answer from Rüdiger Grote is very accurate. Some addition on why the two terms co-exist.
Therefore, just as a (partly historical) addition: CCS (resulting in geological storage) originally referred to Carbon Capture and Sequestration, in order to emphasize the long-term or near-permanent character.
In the EU, CCS was re-coined as Carbon Capture and (geological) Storage. This was mainly done by the PR people from the Zero Emission Platform, who liked the sound of Storage better than that of Sequestration. This change of terminology was adopted by the European Commission, more or less during the drafting of the CCS Directive, if I recall well.
In contradiction to its 'temporary' character, in the EU sequestration will commonly be used for all non-geological storage (biomass, soils, etc.).
Outside of the EU, sequestration remains to be used for geological storage (e.g. CSLF). I'm so used to seeing both terms, that I can't tell if this divide is still as sharp as it used to.
Dr. C. V. Raman University Vaishali Patna Bihar India
I am eagre to know, how this business of carbon capture and storage is going to help and safeguard our under ground natural resources , in particular the ground water, geological stregth and qualitative aspects of flow nets within under ground aquifers ...
Institute of Natural Sciences
Dear Dr. Gaur,
If you make this a starting question, I'll be happy to provide input. As background, at least in Europe there are several projects looking into co-use of the underground, including CGS and groundwater, considering both socio-economic, environmental and sustainability aspects.
NGO, SECOT, Senior Volunteer consultants and mentors, Spain
Dear Mr. Gaur,
Of course underground storage is not the best solution, in termes of sustainability. Better solutions are being investigated converting CO2 in useful products, such as for example in commercial plastics:
Or in ethanol:
1 Recommendation
University of Tehran
would u plz describe difference between "CO2 Recovery" and "Carbon capture & Storage"?
they do the same thing, I mean: CCS is established by three methods:
-pre-combustion capture
-post-combustion capture
-oxy-fuel combustion.
and "post-combustion method" uses a solvent for absorption, similar to described for CO2 recovery.
and still I don't Know the difference.
can you help me?
1 Recommendation
NGO, SECOT, Senior Volunteer consultants and mentors, Spain
"CO2 Recovery" and "CO2 Capture" is about the same. "CO2 Storage" comes after CO2 is captured. Storage means normally storage in underground reservoirs, and also to enhance oil recovery from oil wells.
CO2 can also be fixed after capturing. For instance injecting it in greenhouses to accelerate growth of plants. Or converting it into chemicals. See more: http://alchemy.cchem.berkeley.edu/static/pdf/innovativechemistry.pdf
1 Recommendation
NGO, SECOT, Senior Volunteer consultants and mentors, Spain
See also my recent article where converting CO2 by artificial photosynthesis is performed
Delft University of Technology
Hello,
I am making a research about my energy storage project for now. However, I am searching for methods of carbon capturing from flue gas. In the articles, I see carbon dioxide capturing methods (i.e. Post-Combustion) and carbon dioxide separation methods (i.e. Absorption). Are they different steps that one followed by other or are they the same ? I am confused by the descriptions a little bit.
Thank you.
Islamic Azad University, Tehran
carbon sequestration refers in UFORE to the removal of carbon (in the form of carbon dioxide) from the atmosphere through the process of photosynthesis.
carbon storage refers to the amount of carbon bound up in woody material above and below ground
Forest Research Institute, Kanpur
Sequestration done by plants as a natural physiological cheaper process whereas capture is a physico-chemical-mechanical costlier process, both leading to reduction in available Carbon di Oxide in the atmosphere. K P Dubey,
Email- kesheodubey@gmail com Regards.
1 Recommendation
Graphic Era University
(Carbon Capture and Storage) CCS principal goal is to prevent carbon dioxide from being released into the atmosphere by large and heavy enterprises in order to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Carbon dioxide is supposed to be stored in deep geological formations or in the form of mineral carbonates.
whereas,
Carbon sequestration is the act of absorbing and storing carbon dioxide over a lengthy period of time in order to prevent it from entering the atmosphere. This provides for the stability of carbon in both solid and dissolved forms, preventing an increase in atmospheric temperature. Sequestrations of carbon might be biological or geological.
The main point to be noticed is : CCS is the process of capturing emitted carbon dioxide, transporting it to a storage facility, and depositing it in a way that prevents it from entering the atmosphere.
1 Recommendation
Institute of Science Tokyo
According to the Wikipedia, the CCS includes three processes: 1) Capturing CO2 before entering into the atmosphere, 2) Transporting it to a designated place for storing, and 3) Storing CO2 process, which is called "Carbon Sequestration".
NSBM Green University
In order to do the sequestration process, we have to capture the carbon dioxide.
Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel University of Agriculture & Technology
@Rudiger The key difference between carbon capture and storage and carbon sequestration is that carbon capture and storage involve capturing, transporting, and storing carbon dioxide, while carbon sequestration only involves storing carbon dioxide for a longer period of time.
14 Recommendations
University of Calcutta
Sequestration is the rate of carbon storage; there is a time factor like age of trees etc. you can consult this report


Dhofar University
Dear G A Rajanna . See the following useful RG link:
Dhofar University
Kindly see also the following useful link: https://www.intechopen.com/chapters/66365
Dhofar University
Also check please the following useful link: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/applied-energy/article-selections/carbon-capture-and-storage-ccs
1 Recommendation
Dhofar University
The following link is also very useful: https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2018/ee/c7ee02342a
Similar questions and discussions
Recommendation Journal: Nano Research – Start Open Access in 2025
Haley Li
Dear Researchers,
I would like to bring your attention to Nano Research, a highly respected journal in the field of nanoscience and related disciplines. With an impact factor of 9.6 in 2023, this journal is known for publishing innovative and high-quality research that significantly contributes to the advancement of the field.
Here are some key details about Nano Research:
Ranked in the Q1 quartile for several SCIE categories:
Chemistry, Physical: Rank 30/178, Q1
Materials Science, Multidisciplinary: Rank 56/439, Q1
Nanoscience & Nanotechnology: Rank 24/141, Q1
Physics, Applied: Rank 18/179, Q1
Starting from Volume 18 (2025), Nano Research will transition to an Open Access model through the SciOpen platform. This shift will make all published articles freely accessible, thus enhancing their visibility and allowing for wider dissemination of cutting-edge research.
This journal could be an excellent platform for your own research, and I believe it offers great potential for staying updated with the latest developments in the nanoscience field.
For more information, check out these links:
Journal Homepage: https://www.sciopen.com/journal/1998-0124
Editorial Board: https://www.sciopen.com/journal/join_journal/editorial_board?id=1400285564990251009&issn=1998-0124
Editorial Office: https://www.sciopen.com/journal/join_journal/editorial_office?id=1400285564990251009&issn=1998-0124
I encourage you to explore the journal, consider submitting your work, or simply follow its developments if they align with your research interests. Let’s continue to support open access and the growth of our academic community.
Related Publications
RL has emerged as a transformative tool for enhancing CCS systems. It presents exciting opportunities to boost the efficiency and scalability of carbon sequestration efforts. This chapter delves into the integration of RL within CCS processes, focusing on optimizing key operations such as CO2 capture, injection, monitoring, and storage. Begin with...
The potential contamination of underground drinking water (UDW) caused by CO2 leakage is a critical decision input for risk assessment and management decision making. This paper presents an overview of the potential alterations to UDW quality caused by CO2 and the relevant quality guidelines on drinking water. Furthermore, a framework and numerical...
In the last few years there has been a surge in interest in the geologic sequestration of carbon dioxide (CO2), a process often referred to as carbon capture and storage, or sequestration (CCS), as a way to mitigate man-made CO2 emissions and thereby help address climate change concerns. The Energy Independence and Security Act contains measures to...