Question
Asked 31st Aug, 2016

What is the Tajima's D and Fu and Li's D and F statistics biological significance?

I am analyzing a set of 203 intra-population sequences of a gene using DnaSP and getting the Tajima's D and Fu and Li's D and F statistic values in negative with P values being significant P< 0.02. Can any one help me in interpreting the biological significance of this? 

Most recent answer

6th Sep, 2016
Ferruccio Maltagliati
Università di Pisa
Results from these statistics should be interpreted with great care. Depending on the genetic marker(s) employed, the target species, the sampling design, etc., interpretations may be not univocal. I would recommend you to study a little bit the theoratical bases of each statistics and read good articles with their applications, instead to search for shortcuts in RG. Good luck.
4 Recommendations

Popular answers (1)

6th Sep, 2016
Ferruccio Maltagliati
Università di Pisa
Results from these statistics should be interpreted with great care. Depending on the genetic marker(s) employed, the target species, the sampling design, etc., interpretations may be not univocal. I would recommend you to study a little bit the theoratical bases of each statistics and read good articles with their applications, instead to search for shortcuts in RG. Good luck.
4 Recommendations

All Answers (4)

1st Sep, 2016
Deepak Pakalapati
Novartis
Negative Tajima's D signifies an excess of low frequency polymorphisms.
Arur is right.
It will tend to be negative under selective sweeps (and population growth) and positive under balancing selection (or population structure with sampling from many populations)
Fu &Li D 's negative value indicates an excess of singletons
Pls refer to Pg 54 of this DNASP doc :  http://www.ub.edu/dnasp/DnaSPHelp.pdf
Significant departure of these tests has been explained mainly to be due to an excess of new mutations as results of evolutionary forces, such as selective sweeps or population growth. Processes that produce an excess of old mutations also render significant but positive departures.
4 Recommendations
5th Sep, 2016
Max R. Bangs
Azenta Life Sciences
Hello Amit,
There was a similar question with several answers that may be helpful.
Also below is a link from University of Connecticut that has a good explanation of these statistics.
But the simple answer as everyone has mentioned is that there is a population expansion.
Best Regards
3 Recommendations
6th Sep, 2016
Ferruccio Maltagliati
Università di Pisa
Results from these statistics should be interpreted with great care. Depending on the genetic marker(s) employed, the target species, the sampling design, etc., interpretations may be not univocal. I would recommend you to study a little bit the theoratical bases of each statistics and read good articles with their applications, instead to search for shortcuts in RG. Good luck.
4 Recommendations

Similar questions and discussions

What is the relevant time scale to interpret Tajima's D?
Question
4 answers
  • Rodolfo JafféRodolfo Jaffé
The values of Tajima's D are interpreted as follows:
Tajima's D=0: Population evolving as per mutation-drift equilibrium.
Tajima's D<0: Recent selective sweep or population expansion after a recent bottleneck.
Tajima's D>0: Balancing selection or sudden population contraction.
I would like to ask about the relevant time scale to interpret Tajima's D. Perhaps someone could suggest publications mentioning time or number of generations when interpreting Tajima's D?
Tanks!

Related Publications

Article
Diese Arbeit untersucht die Stabilität asexueller (nicht rekombinierender) Genome mit mehreren Methoden. Die Auswirkung der beobachteten, hohen Mutationsraten auf die langfristige Stabilität von Mitochondrien wurde mit theoretischen Überlegungen zu Mullerís Ratsche untersucht. Weil analytische Näherungen für die Berechnung der Geschwindigkeit der R...
Conference Paper
Given a set of species and their similarity data, an important problem in evolutionary biology is how to reconstruct a phylogeny (also called evolutionary tree) so that species are close in the phylogeny if and only if they have high similarity. Assume that the similarity data are represented as a graph G = (V, E) where each vertex represents a spe...
Got a technical question?
Get high-quality answers from experts.