Mustansiriyah Unversity-Cooege of Basic Education
Discussion
Started 14 January 2020
Was U.S.-Soviet cooperation during the Cold War a conspiracy of silence?
An article by Irek Sabitov, a Russian journalist, and myself will appear in the Winter 2020 edition of the U.S. Navy War College Review. Our article concerns the April 1969 North Korean downing of a U.S. Navy EC-121 spy plane in the Sea of Japan.
It’s a well-known Cold War story, but seen from both the U.S. and Soviet sides... with a twist.
On April 15, 1969, the U.S. and Soviet Union took part in a rare, 4-day, joint search-and-rescue (SAR) operation to locate and retrieve the bodies off a U.S. Navy EC-121 spy plane that was shot out of the sky by North Korean fighters.
And yet, despite the fact that three Soviet destroyers took part in this SAR operation, and a Soviet sailor (who we interviewed) said he personally placed human remains into plastic bags and then transferred those body parts to a U.S. ship (USS Turner), the Russians were never given credit for recovering of the dead airmen’s remains and their transfer to U.S. custody.
The draft of a speech to be given by President Nixon five days after the shootdown failed to mention the Russians.
Following the incident, the U.S. Navy handed out photos of the recovered wreckage and coffins of the two EC-121 crewmen’s bodies pulled from the sea. But again, none of the photos’ captions mentioned the Russians.
The photo of a Soviet destroyer (taken by a U.S. Air Force Reserve aircraft) appeared on the front page of the New York Times on April 17, 1969. There was mention of how the destroyer’s whaleboat was to pick up “debris,” but nothing about human remains.
After the recovery effort had ended, a newly-declassified top-secret DIA (Defense Intelligence Agency) memorandum described the SAR operation. But, once again, there was no mention of the Russians.
Had the President of the United States and the U.S. Navy deliberately kept the Soviet role in this episode of Cold War history from the American public?
Bill Streifer
bill.streifer@gmail.com
Editorial Board, Journal of Oriental Studies (Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow)
Editorial Board, Journal "Vostok”
Most recent answer
سيدي العزيز بيل
لو لم تكن مؤامره لانتهت الحرب بينهما ولم تستمر لأكثر من سنتان على الأكثر ولكنهم عملوا على تقسيم العالم بينهما ليسيطروا عليه
All replies (4)
Mustansiriyah Unversity-Cooege of Basic Education
نعم كان مؤامرة بين البلدين ليستنزفوا طاقات الدول الاخرى وخاصة تلك الدول التابعة لهم ليقوموا بببيع الاسلحة والمعدات لهم حتة لاتتوقف مصانع اسلحتهم
Mustansiriyah Unversity-Cooege of Basic Education
نعم كان مؤامرة بين البلدين ليستنزفوا طاقات الدول الاخرى وخاصة تلك الدول التابعة لهم ليقوموا بببيع الاسلحة والمعدات لهم حتة لاتتوقف مصانع اسلحتهم
Hussein Karim at the College of Basic Education agrees: "Yes, it was a conspiracy between the two countries to deplete the energies of other countries, especially those of their own, to sell weapons and equipment to them even as their weapons factories do not stop."
Similar questions and discussions
Kaplan-Meier survival graph explanation?
I used kmplot.com to analyze the overall survival rate of the gene I'm interested in. When I analyzed gene A only, the P value was ns. When I analyzed gene B only, the P value was significant, with the higher expression group being the better outcome. But I used the ratio of 2 genes expression A/B, I got the following results (attached photo) which show the lower expression group is the better outcome. How can I interpret this graph?
Related Publications
This volume brings together two classic works on the culture of the Russian people which have been long out of print. Gorer's Great Russian Culture and Mead's Soviet Attitudes towards Authority: An Interdisciplinary Approach to Problems of Soviet Character were among the first attempts by anthropologists to analyze Russian society. They were influe...
